SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

98%

GPU

76%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

97,453 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D paired with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is an unusual laptop combination: a flagship-class mobile processor sitting in the top tier of all CPUs measured in this database, attached to an end-of-life professional mobile graphics solution that sits near the bottom of the GPU rankings. The CPU posts an average benchmark score of 97453 and lands in the 96th percentile versus all CPUs; the GPU manages an average of 1285 and sits in the 7th percentile versus all GPUs. The combined build percentile of 52 reflects that tension — raw processing muscle on one side, a weak graphics layer on the other. Note that no measured FPS data exists in this database for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly measured.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D is a Fire Range processor built on AMD's Zen 5 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process. It uses AMD Socket FL1, carries a TDP of 55 W, and supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which matters for workstation deployments where data integrity is a requirement rather than a luxury. PCIe connectivity is generous for a mobile part: 28 lanes of Gen 5 from the CPU alone, enough to feed a fast NVMe storage array and a discrete GPU without the lane sharing that plagues lesser mobile platforms.

The processor is multiplier unlocked, so headroom exists within the platform's thermal envelope for tuning. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a fallback display path if the discrete Quadro fails or is retired.

Here is the awkward part: the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is an MXM-module part that is officially end-of-life, succeeded by Ampere-based mobile professional GPUs. Its bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which cannot exploit the CPU's Gen 5 lanes. Because this is a laptop-class build, the practical upgrade path is not component swapping but platform replacement — moving to a newer machine where the CPU's Gen 5 capability is matched by a contemporary GPU. In this pairing, the graphics subsystem is the clear candidate for the next upgrade.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured data, gaming performance will be constrained almost entirely by the GPU. A 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1285 places the Quadro in the 7th percentile of all GPUs, comparable to a GeForce GT 610 or a Radeon R9 380 per the nearest-rivals list. Esports titles at reduced settings are plausible; high-refresh AAA gaming is not realistic.

Streaming: The CPU side is superb — 32 threads, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 38161.5, and a PassMark multithread score of 62674 mean encoding and compositing load will barely register. The GPU, however, will struggle to render the game being streamed. The data suggests a CPU that could stream anything and a GPU that can hardly run anything demanding.

Video editing: Timeline scrubbing, proxies, and CPU-based encodes will be fast given the 16 cores and high single-thread score. The 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM is the limiting factor for GPU-accelerated effects and heavier timelines. This is workable for lightweight professional editing, not for high-resolution finishing work.

3D rendering: The split is stark. CPU rendering will rival desktop workstation parts — the CPU's average score sits within 1.1 percent of the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX. GPU rendering via the 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores is possible but slow given the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 figure.

Software development: Compilation benefits directly from 32 threads and the 128 MB of L3 cache; the PassMark multithread and integer-math scores support fast builds, container workloads, and parallel test suites. This is one of the strongest scenarios for the build.

Student and office work: Massively overprovisioned on CPU. Single-thread scores of 332 in R15 and 2159.5 in R23 mean instant responsiveness for documents, browsing, and web apps. The integrated Radeon 610M would handle these tasks equally well, which frames the Quadro's limited value here.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark sheet is extensive. In Cinebench R15 it scores 6042.5 multi-core and 332 single-core; in R23 those figures rise to 38161.5 and 2159.5 respectively. PassMark results include 62674 multithread, 4511 single-thread, 222503 integer math, 144122 floating point math, 785811 data compression, 39446 encryption, 62813 extended instructions, 83497 string sorting, 4687 physics, and 525 for finding prime numbers. The average score of 97453 puts the CPU in the 96th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

The nearest-rivals data is revealing. The Threadripper PRO 5965WX averages 98504, just 1.1 percent above this mobile chip; the Ryzen 9 PRO 9945 sits 1.4 percent below at 96083; EPYC 4565P and EPYC 9175F are 1.8 and 1.9 percent below respectively. A mobile processor trading blows with workstation and server-class silicon is exceptional, and it means sustained multi-threaded throughput is essentially desktop-workstation grade.

The GPU tells the opposite story. Its only recorded benchmark is a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1285, averaging to 1285 and the 7th percentile of all GPUs. Rivals include the GeForce GT 610 at 1281 (0.3 percent behind), the Radeon R9 380 at 1293 (0.6 percent ahead), and the GT 520 and NVS 4200M at 1267 (1.4 percent behind). The combined build percentile of 52 is the arithmetic casualty of pairing a 96th-percentile CPU with a 7th-percentile GPU: the average lands mid-pack even though no workload actually experiences mid-pack behavior.

Who Should Build It

Strictly on the measured data, the sensible owner of this configuration is someone whose work is CPU-bound and GPU-light. Software developers top the list: the 32-thread, 128 MB-L3 processor delivers workstation-class compile and test throughput, and a code editor needs almost nothing from the GPU. Data professionals doing compression and encryption work benefit directly — 785811 and 39446 in those PassMark subtests — as do students and small-business workstation users running office suites, statistical tools, and light content tasks.

Content creators working with CPU-rendered output or modest-resolution video will find the processor side exceptional, though the 6 GB VRAM ceiling limits GPU-accelerated pipelines. Gamers are the poorest fit. Even at lower resolutions where the CPU's strong single-thread results could otherwise push high frame rates, the GPU's 7th-percentile standing caps everything; no resolution choice rescues a graphics layer scoring alongside the GeForce GT 610.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9955HX3D combines 16 cores and 32 threads with a 2.50 GHz base clock and a 5.40 GHz boost clock on the Zen 5 architecture. Cache is the headline: 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, plus a 128 MB slab of L3 cache — the 3D-stacked cache approach that gives this chip its suffix. That cache pool is why the CPU rivals Threadripper-class parts despite its 55 W TDP: large working sets stay on-die instead of hitting main memory.

The transistor count of 16,630 million across a dual-die layout of 2x 70.6 mm² on TSMC's 4 nm node explains the efficiency. Real-world translation: the R23 multi-core score of 38161.5 indicates throughput for rendering, compiling, and simulation that was until recently desktop-HEDT territory. Single-core scores of 332 (R15) and 2159.5 (R23), plus a PassMark single-thread figure of 4511, mean lightly threaded applications — most everyday software — remain snappy. The 96th percentile placement confirms this is a top-tier processor by database-wide comparison, not merely a strong mobile part.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis here is unambiguous. In any workload with a meaningful graphics component, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is the limiter: a 7th-percentile GPU behind a 96th-percentile CPU is a gap of 89 percentile points. In gaming terms, estimated from the benchmark scores since no measured FPS data exists for this pairing, frame rates will be pinned to whatever the 1285 Steel Nomad score can deliver regardless of resolution or settings — the CPU could feed a far faster card many times over.

In GPU compute, the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 rate and 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth cap throughput while 32 threads idle. The situation inverts for CPU-bound work: compilation, compression, encryption, physics, and CPU rendering are effectively unbounded by anything else in the system. The dual-channel DDR5 subsystem at 89.6 GB/s is adequate for the CPU's needs and would not be the first constraint in either direction. The build's overall balance verdict: treat this as a compute machine with display capability, not a balanced laptop.

GPU Analysis

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a Turing-generation professional part built on the TU106 chip, fabricated on TSMC's 12 nm process with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. It runs at a 945 MHz base and 1380 MHz boost clock, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 6 GB of GDDR6 sits on a 192-bit bus delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Hardware resources include 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 30 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores, yielding a pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s, 5.299 TFLOPS FP32, and 10.60 TFLOPS FP16. API support extends to DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

What the benchmark score means: a 1285 Steel Nomad result and the 7th percentile position indicate rendering performance comparable to entry-level and legacy cards, per the rival list. The RT and tensor hardware enables ray-traced and AI-accelerated features functionally, but at this throughput they are better suited to professional viewport work and inference-assisted application features than to real-time rendering of demanding scenes. The 80 W TDP and MXM form factor reinforce its identity as an embedded professional module, now end-of-life with Ampere-based parts as its successor line.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, and the component pairing is generational mismatch incarnate: a 2025-released, active-production flagship mobile CPU bolted to a 2019-released, end-of-life professional GPU. The tier picture from percentiles is straightforward — the CPU sits at 96 versus all CPUs, the GPU at 7 versus all GPUs, and the combined build at 52. That combined figure should not be read as "average laptop"; it is the average of two extremes. In practice the build behaves as a high-end mobile workstation for compute workloads with a legacy-class graphics layer, and any evaluation should weight the CPU heavily for productivity use and the GPU heavily for anything visual.

FAQ

Q: Is this build good for gaming?

A: No. The GPU sits in the 7th percentile of all GPUs with a Steel Nomad score of 1285, comparable to the GeForce GT 610 and Radeon R9 380. No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, but estimates from these scores indicate only lightweight or older titles are viable.

Q: How strong is the CPU compared to rivals?

A: Very strong. Its average score of 97453 is within 1.1 percent of the Threadripper PRO 5965WX, 1.4 percent above the Ryzen 9 PRO 9945, and roughly 2 percent above two EPYC parts, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: How much memory and VRAM does the build have support for?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC support; the GPU provides 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, though the 55 W TDP of the mobile platform defines the realistic tuning envelope.

Q: Is the GPU still supported?

A: No. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is listed as end-of-life, with Ampere-based mobile professional GPUs as its successor line.

Q: Is this build suitable for software development?

A: Yes — it is one of the best-fit scenarios. With 16 cores, 32 threads, 128 MB of L3 cache, a PassMark multithread score of 62674, and single-thread strength, compilation and parallel workloads are workstation-grade.

Q: Does ray tracing work on this GPU?

A: Functionally, yes — it has 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores plus DirectX 12 Ultimate support. But with a 7th-percentile standing and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32, ray-traced rendering performance is limited.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists in this database for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so the figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not recorded results. The estimating basis is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1285, its 7th-percentile position, and its nearest rivals — the GeForce GT 610 (1281), Radeon R9 380 (1293), GT 520, and NVS 4200M (both 1267).

From that basis, expectations are modest across the board. Modern AAA titles at high settings, even at lower resolutions, are likely to produce unplayable or marginal frame rates given the GPU's standing alongside entry-level legacy cards. Older or lightweight titles, esports-class games at reduced settings, and emulated or indie workloads are the realistic playable envelope. Critically, changing resolution will not shift the balance: the CPU's 96th-percentile single-thread and multi-thread results mean the processor has enormous headroom the GPU cannot use, so frame rates will scale with graphics settings down but cannot climb to the levels the Ryzen 9 9955HX3D could support with a stronger graphics partner. For gaming specifically, the data identifies the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile as the defining — and limiting — component of this build.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds