SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

89 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
80%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score
Top 20% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation form a laptop platform with a pronounced performance split: the CPU sits at the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 21st percentile among all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 59 reflects that pairing's divergent strengths. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data — so all gaming performance discussion is framed as estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not from direct testing.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX has 16 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX has an average benchmark score of 91,199. It is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Xeon 654 (90,717) and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (90,541), but 2.8% behind both the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (93,785) and the Intel Xeon 6520P (93,786).

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX scores 2,174 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: What is the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score and its percentile?

A: The RTX 5000 Mobile scores 3,596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 21st percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support and bus width?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC capability.

Q: What is the process node and foundry for each component?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the GPU uses TSMC's 5 nm process.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU's 96th percentile and its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,174 indicate strong per-thread performance, which is beneficial for frame pacing in games that rely on a few threads. The GPU, however, sits at the 21st percentile overall, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,596. That is only 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (3,594) and 0.9% behind the GTX 1050 (3,629). These close rival scores suggest the GPU is not a high-end gaming part.

Given the CPU's strength and the GPU's moderate standing, gaming estimates point to a pairing that is more comfortable at 1080p and 1440p with high settings, rather than at 4K with extreme presets. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for modern textures, but the compute throughput — 41.15 TFLOPS FP32 — is low relative to top-tier desktop GPUs. The CPU's 32 threads can handle streaming, but the GPU's rendering capability will be the limiting factor in demanding titles. In CPU-light games, the CPU will sit idle while the GPU carries the load; in CPU-heavy simulators, the CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and 32 threads will help maintain frame rates, but the GPU's 21st percentile will cap the overall FPS. Thus, gaming performance is expected to be moderate, with the CPU far ahead of what the GPU can utilise at high resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-core score (2,174 in R23 single-core) and high boost clock (5.40 GHz) are well suited to high-refresh 1080p gaming, but the GPU's 21st percentile means the system cannot consistently drive high frame rates at 1440p or 4K. The 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are ample, but the raw compute is limited.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU with a multithread score of 56,171 in Passmark and 37,159 in Cinebench R23 provides ample headroom for software encoding and background tasks. The GPU's tensor cores (304) could accelerate AI-based encoding features, but the CPU alone can handle most streaming workloads.

Video editing: The CPU's 32 threads and high single-core performance (2,174 R23 single-core) make it excellent for timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth support large preview buffers, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,596 suggests that GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will be slower than with a higher-percentile GPU.

3D rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the Ryzen 9 9955HX is a top-tier part (96th percentile, 91,199 average score). GPU rendering, however, is limited by the RTX 5000's 21st percentile and its FP32 throughput of 41.15 TFLOPS. The 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI denoising, but the overall GPU performance will be the bottleneck.

Software development: The 16 cores, 32 threads, and a single-thread Passmark score of 4,393 are excellent for compilation and code execution. The dual-channel DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth supports heavy virtual machines, and the 4 nm process node keeps power consumption at 55 W TDP, making the laptop suitable for long coding sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU's 96th percentile and 32 threads are overkill for typical productivity tasks, but the Radeon 610M integrated graphics provide a fallback for light display tasks. The laptop's class (laptop) and the CPU's 55 W TDP indicate good portability, though the discrete GPU adds 120 W TDP, affecting battery life.

Who Should Build It

This laptop is best suited for users who prioritise CPU compute over GPU raw graphics. Content creators and developers who work with multithreaded applications — such as 3D rendering, video encoding, or heavy compilation — will benefit from the CPU's 96th percentile and 32 threads. The 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth allow for large assets in creative software, but the GPU's 21st percentile means it is not a workstation-class graphics solution. Students in engineering or data science fields will appreciate the CPU's throughput and the ECC memory support, but they should be aware that the GPU is not geared toward high-end gaming or GPU compute tasks. Small business workstations that need reliable multi-core performance for simulation, financial analysis, or software development would find the CPU excellent, but they should pair it with a different GPU if they require more than basic graphics acceleration. The laptop form factor (buildClass = laptop) means it is a mobile workstation, but the 55 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP suggest a large chassis and substantial cooling.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a stark imbalance: the CPU is at the 96th percentile, the GPU at the 21st percentile. This 75-point gap indicates that the CPU can feed far more work than the GPU can execute. In gaming workloads, the GPU is the bottleneck — its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,596 is within 1% of the GT 545 (3,594) and 1.5% of the HD 6770 (3,649). That places the GPU in the lower quartile, and even the strongest CPU cannot overcome that limit. In CPU-bound tasks — like the Passmark multithread score of 56,171 or Cinebench R23 multi-core of 37,159 — the CPU is the primary driver, and the GPU is irrelevant. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are not the bottleneck in most workloads; the compute throughput (41.15 TFLOPS) is. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface is sufficient for the GPU, while the CPU supports PCIe Gen5 with 28 lanes, which is overkill for this GPU.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is based on the AD103 chip, fabricated on a 5nm process by TSMC. It has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, 112 ROPs, 76 RT cores, and 304 tensor cores. The base clock is 1,425 MHz and the boost clock is 2,115 MHz. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) on a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s and texture rate is 643.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 and FP16 performance are both 41.15 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3,596, placing it at the 21st percentile. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545, scores 3,594 (0.1% lower), while the GT 735M scores 3,616 (0.6% higher), the GTX 1050 scores 3,629 (0.9% higher), and the AMD Radeon HD 6770 scores 3,649 (1.5% higher). The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is generous, but its raw compute is modest. For rendering, the 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores support ray tracing and AI workloads, but the low percentile means that the GPU will not excel in heavy GPU compute tasks. The 120 W TDP is moderate for a laptop GPU, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is compatible with modern systems.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multi-core 5,905, single-core 336; Cinebench R23 multi-core 37,159, single-core 2,174; Passmark data compression 731,998; data encryption 37,330; extended instructions 57,946; find prime numbers 287; floating point math 136,682; integer math 212,598; multithread 56,171; physics 2,720; random string sorting 77,890; single thread 4,393. The CPU's average benchmark score is 91,199, and its percentile is 96. The GPU's only benchmark is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 3,596, and its percentile is 21. The combined percentile is 59. This combined figure reflects a system where the CPU is a top-tier part, but the GPU is a low-mid-tier part, resulting in an overall balanced system that is far stronger in CPU-bound tasks than in GPU-bound tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop (buildClass laptop) pairing an AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX CPU with an NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is a 16-core/32-thread Zen 5 part with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, a 55 W TDP, and a 96th percentile ranking. The GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 16 GB GDDR6, a 120 W TDP, and a 21st percentile ranking. The combined percentile of 59 indicates that the system is not a high-end gaming machine, but it is a very capable CPU-centric workstation. The CPU's 96th percentile and the GPU's 21st percentile create a lopsided profile: users who need CPU processing will find this laptop outstanding, but those expecting GPU strength will be disappointed.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (codename Fire Range) using TSMC's 4nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and it includes ECC support. The CPU has a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 lanes (CPU only). It features an integrated Radeon 610M GPU. The TDP is 55 W. The CPU's benchmark results are outstanding: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 places it in the 96th percentile. Its single-core score of 2,174 is also strong, as is its Passmark multithread of 56,171. The nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon 654 (0.5% slower), the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (0.7% slower), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (2.8% faster). The high multi-core throughput makes it ideal for rendering, compilation, and other parallel workloads. The 55 W TDP is low for the performance, indicating high efficiency. The 4nm process and 16,630 million transistors on a dual-die design (2x 70.6 mm²) contribute to this efficiency.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket. Memory is DDR5 dual-channel, and the platform supports ECC. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes; the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The system is a laptop, so the upgrade path is limited to components that are socket-compatible and power-constrained. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 120 W; there is no suggested PSU for the laptop. A sensible next upgrade would be a more capable GPU, but the laptop's form factor and the GPU's 120 W TDP limit the options. The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 120 W TDP suggest that the laptop has a substantial power delivery system, but without a PSU rating, no further detail is available. The CPU is unlocked (multiplier unlocked), but in a laptop, overclocking is typically limited by thermal and power limits. The next upgrade path would be to increase RAM capacity or to swap the GPU to a higher-percentile model, but that is not possible in a laptop without a new motherboard. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes are ahead of the GPU's Gen 4 interface, so there is no bottleneck there. The platform is current (active production) for both CPU and GPU, but the GPU's 21st percentile suggests that a future GPU upgrade would be the most meaningful improvement.