SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

98%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Fire Range, using a 4 nm TSMC process. It sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance for a laptop part, with an average benchmark score of 91,199. The CPU’s base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it features a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core. This configuration is designed to handle heavy multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159 and single-core score of 2,174. In comparison to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 9955HX trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Xeon 6520P by 2.8% in average score, but it leads the Intel Xeon 654 by 0.5% and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 by 0.7%, placing it in a highly competitive performance band.

The CPU’s PassMark scores reinforce its strength across diverse tasks. Its multithread score of 56,171 and floating-point math score of 136,682 indicate robust computational throughput for scientific and financial simulations, while the integer math score of 212,598 points to strong general-purpose processing. Data compression and encryption workloads also benefit from the architecture, with PassMark scores of 731,998 and 37,330 respectively, making it suitable for database management and secure communications. The single-thread score of 4,393 suggests that despite its many cores, it does not sacrifice responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The processor supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support, which is a critical feature for workstation reliability. With a TDP of 55 W, it is a power-efficient part for its performance class, and its unlocked multiplier offers overclocking potential for enthusiasts who prioritize sustained performance.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9955HX is a flagship mobile processor that leverages the Zen 5 microarchitecture to deliver exceptional multi-core performance. Its 16 cores and 32 threads are organized for heavy parallel workloads, making it a strong candidate for video rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing. The 64 MB of L3 cache is shared across all cores, reducing latency when data is frequently accessed across threads, which is critical for real-time physics simulations and large dataset processing. The 4 nm manufacturing process from TSMC, with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die design (2x 70.6 mm²), contributes to its high performance-per-watt, allowing it to sustain high clocks without exceeding a 55 W TDP. The boost clock of 5.40 GHz is among the highest for mobile parts, ensuring that single-threaded tasks like legacy software or scripting run smoothly, despite the CPU’s focus on parallel throughput.

In benchmark terms, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159 places the Ryzen 9 9955HX in a league with desktop-class processors, indicating that it can handle 3D rendering jobs that typically require a dedicated workstation. The single-core score of 2,174 is competitive, meaning that the CPU does not lag in everyday responsiveness. The PassMark physics score of 2,720 further validates its capability in game physics and collision detection, while the extended instructions score of 57,946 shows strong support for modern SIMD instructions, which accelerate multimedia codecs and encryption algorithms. The data encryption score of 37,330 is particularly notable for professionals handling sensitive data, as it implies efficient AES and other cryptographic operations. Overall, the CPU’s benchmark profile suggests that it excels in environments where core count and cache size matter more than raw clock speed, though it does not compromise on the latter.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 9955HX is built for the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Fire Range platform and is designed for high-end laptops. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is sufficient for feeding the CPU’s many cores during memory-intensive tasks. The platform also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity for next-generation SSDs and external GPUs, though the integrated graphics option (Radeon 610M) provides a fallback for basic display output. Because this is a laptop platform, the upgrade path is limited compared to desktop systems; however, the CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for performance tuning within the thermal and power limits of the chassis. The 55 W TDP is modest for a 16-core part, meaning that laptops with this CPU likely have robust cooling solutions to sustain boost clocks under load.

For users considering a sensible next upgrade, the primary focus should be on memory capacity and storage speed, given that the CPU’s performance is already near the top of the mobile hierarchy. The platform’s support for ECC memory is a differentiator, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads like financial modeling or long-duration renders where data integrity is paramount. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes offer headroom for future devices, but the current bottleneck is unlikely to be the CPU itself. Instead, users should ensure their laptop has adequate RAM (at least 32 GB) to complement the 32 threads, and a high-speed NVMe SSD to avoid storage bottlenecks during data-intensive operations. The integrated Radeon 610M GPU is not designed for gaming, so a discrete GPU is necessary for any graphics workload, which is where the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile in this build comes into play.

Benchmark Performance

Benchmark results for this exact CPU+GPU combination are not measured; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game, so all FPS figures are estimated from the individual component scores. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 91,199 places it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU’s average benchmark score is 0, with a percentile of 50 among all GPUs. This disparity highlights a significant imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier part, while the GPU is mid-range, which has implications for gaming and rendering workloads. The CPU’s nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 with an average score of 90,541, are within 0.7%, but the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (93,785) is 2.8% ahead, indicating that the Ryzen 9 9955HX is competitive but not the absolute fastest in its class. The combined percentile for this build is 73, reflecting that the GPU drags down the overall performance tier despite the CPU’s excellence.

When looking at the CPU’s individual benchmarks, the Cinebench R15 multicore score of 5,905 and single-core score of 336 show consistent scaling from older to newer tests. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,393 is strong for a mobile chip, but the GPU’s lack of benchmark data means that any assessment of gaming performance must rely on the GPU’s architecture and specs rather than measured results. The GPU, an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, is based on the Turing architecture, which predates the current generation, and its 50th percentile standing suggests it is an average performer by modern standards. In contrast, the CPU’s 96th percentile indicates it is among the best available, so any bottleneck in a gaming or rendering scenario will almost certainly be the GPU. The data suggests that this pairing is suited for CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding or compilation, where the GPU’s role is secondary, but it will struggle to deliver high frame rates in modern games at high resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this build is not ideal. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking ensures it can feed frames quickly, but the GPU’s 50th percentile means it will likely cap performance at lower settings or resolutions. Estimated FPS for esports titles at 1080p could be moderate, but demanding AAA games at high settings will see frame rates dip below competitive thresholds, making this a poor choice for a 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitor.

Streaming and content creation benefit significantly from the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159 allows for simultaneous game capture and encoding without a dedicated stream PC, while the PassMark data compression score of 731,998 ensures fast video file processing. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is ample for editing timelines, but its older Turing architecture may not support the latest encoding features, so software encoding via the CPU will be the primary method.

Video editing software often relies on both CPU and GPU. The CPU’s strong multi-core performance accelerates timeline rendering and export, with the PassMark floating-point score of 136,682 handling color grading and effects. The GPU’s 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance contributes to real-time previews, but its 50th percentile rank means it may struggle with 4K or 8K footage, so users should expect longer rendering times compared to newer GPUs.

3D rendering is a mixed bag. The CPU excels in CPU-based renderers like Blender’s Cycles, where the 16 cores shine, but GPU-based renderers like Octane will be limited by the Quadro RTX 5000’s 9.400 TFLOPS, which is modest. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for complex scenes, but the rendering speed will be slower than a modern GPU, making this a viable option for hobbyists rather than professionals.

Software development is a strong use case. The CPU’s multithread score of 56,171 and integer math score of 212,598 speed up code compilation, while the 32 threads handle parallel build processes efficiently. The GPU is largely irrelevant here, so the CPU’s 96th percentile ensures a smooth experience for IDEs, testing, and virtualization.

Student and office work is overkill for this CPU, but the performance is there. The single-thread score of 4,393 ensures snappy application launches, while the 55 W TDP means battery life is reasonable for a laptop with such power. The integrated Radeon 610M can handle basic display tasks, but the discrete GPU is unnecessary for word processing, spreadsheets, or web browsing.

Who Should Build It

This build targets professionals who prioritize CPU-bound tasks over GPU acceleration. Data scientists and software engineers will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads, which handle large dataset processing and code compilation with ease, as evidenced by the PassMark data encryption score of 37,330 and multithread score of 56,171. The ECC memory support is a key selling point for researchers and financial analysts who require absolute data integrity during long computation runs. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based renderers or video editing tools that scale well with core counts will find the Ryzen 9 9955HX to be a capable workhorse, despite the GPU being a limiting factor for GPU-accelerated effects. Small business workstations that run virtualization, database management, or heavy spreadsheet analysis will benefit from the CPU’s high percentile, though the GPU’s mid-range standing means it should not be relied upon for graphics-intensive tasks like CAD or 3D modeling. Gamers are not the target audience, as the GPU’s 50th percentile will restrict playable settings to low or medium at 1080p, and even then, the estimated FPS may not satisfy high-refresh requirements.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile compared to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 91,199.

Q: Does this build support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is a feature often required for workstation reliability in financial or scientific applications.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory size and type?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus has an average score of 93,785, which is 2.8% higher than the Ryzen 9 9955HX’s 91,199.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 9 9955HX use?

A: It uses AMD Socket FL1, which is designed for the Fire Range platform and supports DDR5 memory.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this exact combination, so all FPS figures are estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The GPU is based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process by TSMC, with a chip size of 545 mm².

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this build is heavily skewed toward the CPU, creating a clear bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking means it is capable of driving high frame rates and fast computation, but the GPU’s 50th percentile standing means it will cap performance in gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering. For CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, software compilation, or data analysis, the GPU is largely idle, so the CPU’s full potential is realized. However, in gaming scenarios, the GPU’s 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit the frame rate, regardless of the CPU’s speed. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this imbalance, suggesting that the build is better suited for productivity than for graphics-heavy applications. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is a positive for large textures, but its Turing architecture and 50th percentile rank indicate it is a mid-range part from an older generation, so users should not expect high FPS at 1440p or 4K. The CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock and strong single-thread score of 4,393 do not compensate for the GPU’s limitations in a gaming context. For rendering tasks that use the CPU, such as Cinebench, the Ryzen 9 9955HX’s 37,159 multicore score is a standout, but for GPU-based renderers, the Quadro RTX 5000’s 9.400 TFLOPS will be the limiting factor, extending render times significantly.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, a 16-core mobile processor from the 9000 series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, a Turing-based professional GPU. The CPU is a top-tier part, sitting in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mid-range part in the 50th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 73. This pairing is best described as a CPU-centric workstation, where the processor’s 32 threads and 64 MB of L3 cache take precedence over the GPU’s graphics capabilities. The CPU’s 55 W TDP and the GPU’s 110 W TDP suggest a power-hungry system, but the laptop form factor means it is portable, albeit likely with a larger chassis to accommodate cooling. The build’s overall tier is above average, but it is held back by the GPU’s older architecture and lower performance percentile, making it a niche solution for professionals who need massive CPU throughput without the need for high-end graphics.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a professional-grade GPU based on the Turing architecture, with a chip codename TU104 and a 12 nm process node, making it an older design compared to current GPUs. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for large 3D textures and high-resolution video frames. The GPU’s base clock is 1035 MHz with a boost clock of 1530 MHz, and it features 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It also includes 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI inference, respectively, though these are from the first generation of such hardware and are not as capable as newer implementations. The GPU’s FP32 performance is 9.400 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance rated at 18.80 TFLOPS (2:1), which is modest by current standards. Its pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s, indicating it can handle moderate resolution gaming or rendering tasks. The GPU’s percentile of 50 among all GPUs means it performs at the median level, which is below what is expected for a high-end desktop replacement laptop. Its benchmark scores are empty, so there is no direct performance data, but its specs suggest it is a capable mid-range part for professional applications like CAD or video editing, though it will not compete with modern gaming GPUs. The 384 tensor cores provide some AI acceleration, but the lack of benchmark scores makes it difficult to quantify. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is a strong selling point for professionals working with large datasets, but its overall performance tier is a limitation in demanding workloads.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds