SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

FAQ

Q: What CPU and GPU are paired in this build?

A: This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, a Turing-architecture GPU with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX uses the Zen 5 architecture (codename Fire Range) and is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, containing 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with a combined die size of 2x 70.6 mm².

Q: What are the core and clock specifications of this CPU?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory and PCIe capabilities does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. It provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, and it includes an integrated Radeon 610M GPU.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and a total bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Q: Does this GPU support ray tracing and AI acceleration?

A: Yes, the GPU includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 APIs.

Q: What are the CPU's benchmark percentile positions?

A: The CPU sits in the 96th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The combined build percentile is 73.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for this pairing presents a stark contrast between the two primary components. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX delivers an average benchmark score of 91,199, placing it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs — a dominant position that puts it among the top tier of processors available. The GPU, however, the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, has an average benchmark score of zero due to missing benchmark rows, placing it in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, which is a middling position relative to the broader graphics landscape.

The CPU's benchmark results are comprehensive and reveal a multi-threaded powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 37,159 in multi-core and 2,174 in single-core. The single-core result is respectable, but the multi-core figure is exceptional, indicating that the processor scales remarkably well across its 16 cores and 32 threads. In Cinebench R15, the scores are 5,905 multi-core and 336 single-core, following the same pattern of strong parallel performance.

PassMark results further reinforce this profile. The multithread score is 56,171, while the single-thread score is 4,393. Integer math scores 212,598, floating-point math scores 136,682, and extended instructions score 57,946. Data encryption scores 37,330, data compression scores 731,998, and random string sorting scores 77,890. Physics scores 2,720, and finding prime numbers scores 287. These figures collectively show a processor that excels in compute-heavy, parallel workloads across a wide range of instruction types.

The nearest rivals provide context for the CPU's performance. The Intel Xeon 654 has an average score of 90,717, which is just 0.5% lower than the Ryzen 9 9955HX. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 90,541, a 0.7% deficit. On the other side, the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 93,785, which is 2.8% higher, and the Intel Xeon 6520P also scores 93,786, also 2.8% higher. The Ryzen 9 9955HX thus sits in a tight competitive band, essentially trading blows with enterprise Xeon parts and a high-end Core Ultra chip.

The combined picture is one of imbalance. The CPU is a top-tier performer that can handle the most demanding computational tasks, while the GPU is a mid-range professional part that will likely cap performance in graphics-intensive scenarios. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this gap — a strong processor pulling up a mediocre graphics adapter.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Fire Range. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with 16,630 million transistors spread across a dual-chiplet design with a combined die size of 2x 70.6 mm². This is a mobile processor with a TDP of 55 watts, using the AMD Socket FL1, and it has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The clock speeds are notable for a mobile part: a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This high boost clock, combined with the high core count, positions the chip favorably for both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a large 64 MB of shared L3 cache, which helps feed the cores in data-heavy applications.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU is particularly strong in multi-threaded scenarios. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 reflects its scalability, and the PassMark multithread score of 56,171 confirms this. For real-world workloads, this means the processor can handle video rendering, code compilation, scientific simulations, and data processing with substantial headroom. The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 2,174 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,393 are also solid, ensuring responsive performance in everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

The CPU's memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with ECC, which is a boon for workstation and server-class applications where data integrity is paramount. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is sufficient to feed the cores, though it is not the fastest available. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 28 lanes from the CPU enables high-speed connectivity for NVMe storage and external GPUs.

In terms of rival comparisons, the Ryzen 9 9955HX is essentially neck-and-neck with the Intel Xeon 654 (0.5% faster) and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (0.7% faster), while being slightly behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Xeon 6520P by 2.8%. This places it in the upper echelon of processors, competitive with enterprise-grade silicon, despite being a mobile part. The 96th percentile ranking reinforces that this CPU is among the best available, making it an excellent foundation for a high-performance laptop.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows available for this exact CPU and GPU combination — the data pack contains no measuredFps entries. Therefore, all frame rate discussions here are qualitative estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct testing.

The CPU's exceptional multi-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159, suggests that it will not be a bottleneck in gaming scenarios, even in CPU-intensive titles that can utilize many threads. The single-core performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2,174 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,393, is also adequate for games that rely on fewer, faster cores.

The GPU, however, is the limiting factor. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a Turing-generation part with 1,920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its compute power is rated at 5.299 TFLOPS for FP32, which is modest by modern standards. Given that the GPU sits in the 50th percentile of all GPUs, it is an average performer, likely suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles, but it may struggle with 1440p or 4K resolution, especially at ultra settings.

For esports titles and older games, the GPU's performance should be sufficient to drive high frame rates at 1080p. For modern AAA games, users should expect to lower settings to achieve smooth gameplay. The 6 GB VRAM capacity may also become a limitation in newer titles that require more than 6 GB at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs. The GPU does support DirectX 12 Ultimate, which enables hardware ray tracing, but the 30 RT cores on a mid-range Turing part will likely produce playable but not exceptional ray-traced performance.

In summary, this pairing is not ideal for high-end gaming. The CPU is overkill for most gaming workloads, while the GPU is merely average. Gamers targeting 1080p with moderate settings will find it adequate, but those seeking high-refresh-rate or high-resolution experiences will be disappointed.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need exceptional CPU horsepower but have modest GPU requirements. The 16-core Ryzen 9 9955HX, with its 96th percentile ranking, is a computing powerhouse that excels in multi-threaded workloads.

Content creators and media professionals will benefit significantly. Video editors using software that leverages multi-core CPUs will see fast render times, and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 indicates strong performance in tasks like 3D rendering and batch processing. Data scientists and researchers running simulations or processing large datasets will also find the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 212,598 and floating-point math score of 136,682 to be highly capable.

Software developers and engineers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU's throughput. The high core count and boost clock of 5.40 GHz mean that parallel build systems will see substantial speedups. Students in STEM fields who run computational workloads but play only occasional games will find this a balanced machine for their academic needs.

Small business workstations that handle database operations, financial modeling, or engineering simulations will benefit from the CPU's ECC memory support, which can prevent data corruption in long-running processes. The GPU, while not powerful, is a professional Quadro part that supports certified drivers for CAD and DCC applications, making it suitable for light 3D modeling and design work.

The target user is not a hardcore gamer. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and modest 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 compute make it unsuitable for high-end gaming. Instead, this build is for professionals who need a mobile workstation with top-tier CPU performance and acceptable graphics for professional applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is based on the Turing architecture, using the TU106 chip manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process node. It contains 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die, with a transistor density of 24.3 million per mm². This is a professional mobile GPU, now end-of-life, that was released in 2019.

The memory subsystem consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. This is a moderate amount of memory and bandwidth, sufficient for 1080p professional workloads but potentially limiting for large datasets or high-resolution textures.

The GPU has 1,920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It includes 30 RT cores for ray tracing and 240 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The base clock is 945 MHz, with a boost clock of 1380 MHz. Its pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 5.299 TFLOPS for FP32 and 10.60 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio).

Given the lack of GPU benchmark scores, the percentile ranking of 50 places it exactly in the middle of all GPUs. This suggests it is an average performer, suitable for mainstream workloads but not for high-end rendering or gaming. For rendering tasks, the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 compute is modest; users should expect reasonable performance in entry-level 3D modeling and CAD, but not in complex ray-traced renders or heavy simulation.

The RT cores and tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI features, but their performance will be limited by the overall compute power. The 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for the GPU's compute capabilities, but it is not a high-bandwidth design.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. Its power consumption is rated at 80 W TDP, and it uses an MXM module form factor with no power connectors, relying on the system's power delivery. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support, but this is not a significant bottleneck for this GPU class.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear bottleneck in this system: the GPU is the limiting factor for graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has substantial headroom. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking, with an average benchmark score of 91,199, vastly outperforms the GPU's 50th percentile ranking. This imbalance means that in any workload that stresses the GPU, the CPU will likely remain underutilized.

For gaming, the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 6 GB VRAM will cap performance well before the CPU's capabilities are taxed. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 is more than sufficient to feed the GPU in most games, so the frame rate will be determined by the GPU's rendering speed, not by CPU bottlenecking. In CPU-bound scenarios, such as simulation-heavy games or esports titles at low resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4,393) will keep frame rates high, but the GPU may still limit maximum FPS.

For professional workloads, the balance depends on the application. CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, data compression (PassMark score of 731,998), and scientific computing will run exceptionally well, with the GPU playing a minimal role. GPU-accelerated tasks like 3D rendering, machine learning inference, or CAD will be constrained by the GPU's compute power and memory bandwidth.

The FPS scaling evidence, while estimated due to lack of measured data, suggests that users will see better performance at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU is less stressed. At 1080p with medium settings, the GPU can likely hold its own, but at 1440p or 4K, the frame rate will drop significantly due to VRAM and compute limitations.

In summary, this is a CPU-heavy system. Users should be aware that the GPU will bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks, and upgrading the GPU (if possible in a laptop) would yield the most significant performance gains for such workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is based on AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to this mobile platform. This socket supports the Ryzen 9 9955HX, and it is unlikely that users can upgrade the CPU in a laptop due to soldered or proprietary mounting. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC, so upgrading to higher-capacity or faster DDR5 modules is possible, limited only by the laptop's memory slots.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, which is forward-looking and supports the fastest NVMe SSDs currently available. The GPU, however, uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is an older interface. This means that storage devices can run at Gen 5 speeds, but the GPU is limited to Gen 3, potentially reducing data transfer rates between the GPU and CPU in some scenarios.

The GPU has a TDP of 80 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 55 W, for a combined thermal load of 135 W, not accounting for other components. The suggested PSU is null in the data pack, meaning no specific power supply recommendation is provided. However, given that the TDPs are relatively low for a laptop, the system likely includes a power adapter in the 180-240 W range. Users should ensure the laptop's cooling solution can handle the combined thermal output.

A sensible next upgrade would be to increase system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is shared across cores. Upgrading to faster NVMe Gen 5 storage would also improve load times and data-intensive workloads. The GPU is end-of-life and cannot be upgraded in a laptop, so users seeking better graphics performance would need to consider an external GPU enclosure, provided the laptop supports it via PCIe Gen 5.

The platform's support for ECC memory is a key feature for reliability in workstation use, and users should prioritize ECC DIMMs if data integrity is critical. Overall, the upgrade path is limited by the laptop form factor, but memory and storage upgrades are feasible.

Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, a top-tier 16-core mobile CPU, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, a mid-range professional GPU. It is a laptop-class build, as indicated by the build class designation. The CPU is a 9000-series processor from AMD's Zen 5 Fire Range generation, manufactured on a 4 nm process, and it ranks in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. The GPU is a Turing-architecture part from NVIDIA's Quadro line, ranking in the 50th percentile of all GPUs.

The combined percentile of the build is 73, indicating that the overall system is better than most, driven primarily by the exceptional CPU performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 91,199 puts it in the same league as enterprise Xeon processors and high-end Core Ultra chips, as evidenced by its nearest rivals. The GPU, with no benchmark scores available, is an average performer that will handle professional graphics tasks but is not suited for high-end gaming or rendering.

This is a workstation-oriented laptop for users who prioritize computational throughput over graphics performance. It is ideal for developers, researchers, and content creators who need a powerful CPU for multi-threaded workloads and require professional GPU drivers for CAD or DCC applications. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, but the GPU's mid-range specs suggest it is not a gaming machine.

In summary, this build is a CPU-centric mobile workstation with a capable but not exceptional GPU. It excels in compute-intensive tasks and offers a strong platform for professional work, but it is not balanced for graphics-heavy applications. Users seeking a gaming laptop or a GPU-focused workstation should look elsewhere.