SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
76%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score
Top 24% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines one of the most powerful mobile CPUs available with a GPU that is decidedly entry-level by modern standards. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, while the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a Turing-era professional GPU with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. The benchmark data shows a stark performance divide between these two components: the CPU sits at the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes at the 7th percentile among all GPUs. This is a configuration that will excel in processor-intensive tasks but will struggle with modern graphics workloads. The following analysis is based entirely on the provided benchmark scores, percentile rankings, and hardware specifications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a viable high-refresh gaming platform. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile scores at the 7th percentile among all GPUs, with its nearest rivals being the GeForce GT 610 and GT 520 — parts that are over a decade old and never intended for gaming. The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are far below what modern titles require for high frame rates. While the CPU's 96th percentile ranking would not bottleneck the GPU, the GPU itself will be the limiting factor, preventing the system from reaching high refresh rates even at lower resolutions.

Streaming: The CPU provides exceptional headroom for streaming workloads. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37159 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 56171, the Ryzen 9 9955HX can handle game capture, encoding, and broadcasting simultaneously without breaking a sweat. The 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores on the GPU could assist with AI-based encoding features, but the GPU's overall low performance means it will likely struggle with the rendering portion of the stream. The CPU's 64 MB of shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth are ample for streaming software and overlays.

Video editing: Multi-core performance is outstanding for video editing workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37159 places this CPU in the top 4% of all processors, which translates to fast rendering times for 4K footage and complex timelines. The Passmark data compression score of 731998 indicates rapid handling of codec operations. However, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 7th percentile GPU score will limit GPU-accelerated effects, real-time previews, and export speeds in modern editors that rely heavily on CUDA acceleration. The 6 GB VRAM is also restrictive for high-resolution video editing with multiple layers.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be exceptional. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5905 and the Passmark floating-point math score of 136682 demonstrate strong computational throughput for ray tracing and physics simulations. The 16 cores and 32 threads are ideal for multi-threaded render engines. GPU-based rendering, however, will be severely hampered. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 30 RT cores are insufficient for modern GPU renderers, and the 7th percentile ranking confirms it is far below the performance level needed for professional 3D work.

Software development: The CPU's single-thread performance is strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2174 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4393. This supports fast compilation of single-threaded build steps and responsive IDE interactions. The Passmark integer math score of 212598 and extended instructions score of 57946 indicate strong performance for code compilation and cryptographic operations. The 32 threads will handle parallel builds efficiently. The GPU's low score is irrelevant for most development tasks, though it may struggle with GPU debugging or compute workloads.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for typical student and office tasks. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking means it will breeze through document editing, spreadsheet calculations, and web browsing with essentially zero lag. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is disabled. However, the power consumption implications of a 55 W TDP CPU and 80 W TDP GPU make this an inefficient choice for battery-conscious users, and the performance benefits over a mid-range processor will be imperceptible for these workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers exceptional benchmark results across all tested metrics. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 9 9955HX scores 37159 in multi-core and 2174 in single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 5905 multi-core and 336 single-core. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 56171, single-thread score of 4393, floating-point math of 136682, integer math of 212598, and data encryption of 37330. These results place the CPU at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 91199. The nearest rival is the Intel Xeon 654, which scores 90717 with a deltaPct of 0.5% — essentially a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is also close at 90541 with a 0.7% deltaPct.

The GPU presents a completely different picture. The only benchmark score available is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile scores 1285. This places it at the 7th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1285. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (1281, 0.3% deltaPct), the AMD Radeon R9 380 (1293, -0.6% deltaPct), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 (1267, 1.4% deltaPct). These are all legacy or ultra-low-end components, confirming the GPU's position as an entry-level part.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU is in the top 4% of all processors, while the GPU is in the bottom 7% of all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 52 reflects this median position, but it obscures the massive gap between the two components. The system's overall benchmark performance will be dramatically limited by the GPU in any graphics-related task, while CPU-bound workloads will perform at a near-flagship level.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU limits every graphics-related workload. The 7th percentile GPU score versus the 96th percentile CPU score creates a situation where the processor is effectively idle while waiting for the graphics card to complete its work. In gaming, the GPU's 1285 Steel Nomad score and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap frame rates far below what the CPU can feed. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37159 is more than sufficient to drive any modern GPU, so there is no scenario where the CPU becomes the limiting factor in a graphics-bound task.

The CPU limits workloads that are inherently single-threaded or require very high clock speeds. With a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz, the Ryzen 9 9955HX has strong single-thread performance, but the Passmark single-thread score of 4393 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2174 are not class-leading. Certain legacy applications, poorly optimized games, or latency-sensitive workloads may show CPU limitations, but these are edge cases given the 96th percentile overall CPU ranking.

For compute workloads that use both CPU and GPU, the imbalance is stark. The CPU's 136682 floating-point math score and 56171 multi-thread score provide massive compute headroom, while the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS is a fraction of what modern workstation GPUs offer. The FPS scaling in gaming will be entirely dictated by the GPU; the CPU will not contribute to higher frame rates beyond a certain point, and that point is very low due to the GPU's weak performance.

Who Should Build It

This configuration suits users who need extreme multi-core CPU performance and only occasional, light GPU acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads, with the Passmark integer math score of 212598 indicating strong compile throughput. Students in computer science or engineering fields who run heavy simulations or parallel computations will find the CPU's 96th percentile ranking and 37159 Cinebench R23 score more than adequate.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based rendering — such as certain 3D animation packages or audio processing — will see excellent performance. The Passmark floating-point math score of 136682 and data compression score of 731998 support these workflows. However, video editors who rely on GPU acceleration will be severely disappointed by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 7th percentile performance.

Small business workstations handling database operations, financial modeling, or scientific computing will benefit from the CPU's 731998 data compression score and 37330 data encryption score. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations. Gamers should avoid this configuration entirely; the GPU's 1285 Steel Nomad score and 7th percentile ranking mean even esports titles will struggle to maintain playable frame rates at medium settings.

FAQ

Q: Is this system good for modern gaming?

A: No. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile scores at the 7th percentile among all GPUs, with its nearest rivals being the GeForce GT 610 and GT 520. The 1285 Steel Nomad DX12 score indicates the GPU is far below the level required for modern gaming, regardless of the CPU's 96th percentile performance.

Q: Can the CPU handle heavy multi-threaded workloads?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 9 9955HX scores 37159 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 56171 in Passmark multi-thread, placing it at the 96th percentile among all CPUs. It has 16 cores and 32 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX has an average benchmark score of 91199. The Intel Xeon 654 scores 90717, which is 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 90541, which is 0.7% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 93785, which is 2.8% higher.

Q: What is the GPU's performance level relative to other GPUs?

A: The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is at the 7th percentile among all GPUs. Its Steel Nomad score of 1285 is essentially tied with the GeForce GT 610 (1281, 0.3% deltaPct) and slightly below the Radeon R9 380 (1293, -0.6% deltaPct).

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX supports ECC memory. It also supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the processor's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Fire Range, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 16,630 million transistors across a die size of 2x 70.6 mm².

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile has a production status of "End-of-life." It was released on 2019-05-26 and uses the Turing architecture on a 12 nm process.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the benchmark scores and must be treated as approximations. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1285 places it at the 7th percentile, which indicates it will deliver very low frame rates in any modern 3D game.

At 1080p with ultra settings, expect single-digit to low-20s frame rates in AAA titles released after 2020. The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB GDDR6 memory are insufficient for modern game engines. Esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs may reach playable frame rates at low settings, but the GPU's nearest rival being the GT 610 confirms its performance class. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be unusable for gaming, with even the lightest titles struggling to maintain presentation-quality frame rates.

The CPU can easily handle any game's physics, AI, and draw call processing, but this does not help when the GPU is the bottleneck. The 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores on the GPU are too weak for ray tracing or DLSS to be practical in modern games. The 192-bit memory bus and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are also limiting factors for texture-heavy scenes.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for future high-end GPUs. The motherboard's memory controller supports ECC memory, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for most workloads.

The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16 and is an MXM module. This limits upgrade options to other MXM modules, which are increasingly rare. The GPU has no power connectors and a 80 W TDP, suggesting it draws power directly from the MXM slot. The CPU has a 55 W TDP, and the system's total power draw is low enough that no PSU upgrade is needed, though the suggestedPsu field is null. The GPU is end-of-life, so finding a compatible replacement may be difficult.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile with a more modern MXM GPU, though availability is a concern. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking means it will not need upgrading for years. The 64 MB L3 cache and 32 threads ensure the platform remains relevant for CPU-bound tasks. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future peripherals and storage devices will be compatible.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing a 16-core, 32-thread AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX processor with an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile GPU. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor at the 96th percentile, while the GPU is an entry-level part at the 7th percentile. The combined percentile is 52, reflecting the median position of the overall system. This is a workstation-oriented configuration where the CPU is the primary compute engine and the GPU is an afterthought.

The build class is laptop, meaning the components are designed for mobile use with power and thermal constraints. The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 80 W TDP indicate a total system draw that is manageable for a large laptop chassis. The processor is part of the 9000 series with the Fire Range codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process. The GPU is a Turing-era professional part from 2019 that is now end-of-life.

The overall tier is defined by the CPU's 96th percentile ranking, making this a high-end processor platform with a severely underpowered graphics solution. The system is best suited for CPU-intensive professional workloads where GPU acceleration is not a priority. The imbalance between the two components is the defining characteristic of this build.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Fire Range. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. The processor is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 16,630 million transistors across a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark results confirm the CPU's high-end positioning. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37159 and single-core score of 2174 indicate strong performance in both parallel and single-threaded workloads. The Passmark multi-thread score of 56171 and single-thread score of 4393 corroborate this. The Passmark integer math score of 212598 and floating-point math score of 136682 demonstrate robust compute capability for number-crunching applications.

The 96th percentile ranking places this CPU among the top 4% of all processors. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 654, is only 0.5% behind with an average score of 90717, indicating that the Ryzen 9 9955HX is at the performance frontier. The 0.7% lead over the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and the 2.8% deficit to the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus show a tightly contested high-end field. The processor supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and ECC, making it suitable for professional and server-like workloads in a mobile form factor.