SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

18,159 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile presents a striking asymmetry in raw capability. The CPU sits at the 96th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 62nd percentile among all graphics cards. This 34-point gap in percentile positioning is the single most important structural fact about this build: the processor is a top-tier part, and the graphics solution is a mid-range mobile component.

Benchmark data reinforces this imbalance. The CPU's average benchmark score is 91,199, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 and a single-core score of 2,174. The GPU's average benchmark score is 18,159, with a PassMark G3D score of 13,230 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,821. In raw compute terms, the CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 56,171 dwarfs the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 5,718 by nearly an order of magnitude. This is not a balanced pairing; it is a configuration where the CPU is the dominant partner in almost every workload category.

For gaming, the bottleneck is unambiguous. The GPU will limit frame rates in graphically intensive titles. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 4,393 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,174 indicate it can feed frames far faster than the RTX 3060 Mobile can render them. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 10.94 TFLOPS and texture rate of 171.0 GTexel/s define the practical ceiling for pixel pushing. In CPU-light games at lower resolutions, the GPU saturates first. In CPU-heavy simulations or strategy titles, the processor's 16 cores and 32 threads provide headroom that the GPU cannot match.

The opposite bottleneck appears in non-graphics workloads. The CPU's PassMark data encryption score of 37,330 and data compression score of 731,998 show a processor that excels at serialized and parallel computation. The GPU's compute score of 5,718 in PassMark indicates it is not a primary compute accelerator. For tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific calculations, the CPU is the workhorse, and the GPU contributes only where its specific features—RT cores and tensor cores—come into play.

The memory subsystem further clarifies the balance. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 336.0 GB/s. The GPU's memory bandwidth is nearly four times the CPU's system bandwidth, which means the graphics card is not starved for data in its own domain. However, the 6 GB VRAM capacity is a hard constraint for modern textures and high-resolution assets, potentially causing the GPU to become the bottleneck earlier than its compute scores suggest.

# Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 9955HX delivers elite-level CPU performance. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 places it in the top tier of mobile processors. The single-core score of 2,174 indicates strong per-thread performance, essential for older games and lightly threaded applications. The PassMark multi-thread score of 56,171 and single-thread score of 4,393 confirm consistent performance across different benchmark methodologies. The CPU's average benchmark score of 91,199 places it at the 96th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals provide context for this score. The Intel Xeon 654 scores 90,717, a delta of 0.5%—essentially a tie. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 90,541, 0.7% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 93,785, which is 2.8% ahead of the 9955HX, and the Intel Xeon 6520P matches that at 93,786, also 2.8% ahead. The data shows the 9955HX sits in a tight cluster of high-end processors, trading blows with workstation-class Xeons and the latest desktop-class Ultra parts.

The GPU's benchmark results are more modest. Its PassMark G3D score of 13,230 and average benchmark score of 18,159 place it at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,821 reflects modern DirectX 12 rendering performance. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 79,483 and 80,344, respectively, show consistent compute performance across APIs. The nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 at 18,189 (0.2% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER at 18,093 (0.4% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 460 at 18,373 (1.2% ahead), and the Intel Arc A770M at 18,383 (1.2% ahead). The RTX 3060 Mobile is effectively performance-matched with a last-generation desktop card and a current mobile competitor.

The combined percentile for this build is 79, reflecting the wide gap between CPU and GPU tiers. The CPU carries the system's overall standing; the GPU pulls it down. For a user who prioritizes processor-heavy workloads, this is an excellent combination. For a user who prioritizes gaming or GPU compute, the pairing is lopsided.

# FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9955HX compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon 654?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: 91,199 for the Ryzen and 90,717 for the Xeon, a delta of 0.5%. In practical terms, they are performance peers, with the Ryzen offering a negligible edge.

Q: What is the GPU's tier relative to all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile sits at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 18,159 places it in the mid-range segment, comparable to the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER.

Q: Can the CPU bottleneck the GPU in gaming?

A: No. The CPU's single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,174, PassMark single-thread score of 4,393) is far higher than what the GPU can utilize. The GPU is the limiting factor in gaming workloads.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. The GPU uses its own 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 336.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No. The production status is listed as "End-of-life," with a release date of 2021-01-11. The CPU is listed as "Active" with a release date of 2025-01-05.

Q: How does the GPU perform in DirectX 12 compared to older APIs?

A: The PassMark DirectX 12 score is 58, while DirectX 11 scores 110 and DirectX 9 scores 146. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,821 provides a modern benchmark reference, but the PassMark numbers suggest the GPU is relatively weaker in the latest API.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 79, which sits between the CPU's 96th percentile and the GPU's 62nd percentile, reflecting the dominance of the processor in the overall score.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RTX 3060 Mobile will cap frame rates in most titles. With 6 GB VRAM and an FP32 throughput of 10.94 TFLOPS, the GPU supports 1080p high-refresh gaming in esports titles, but the CPU's single-thread strength ensures it will not be the limiting factor. Expect the GPU to be the ceiling in graphically intensive games.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. The PassMark data encryption score of 37,330 and data compression score of 731,998 indicate strong throughput for real-time encoding. The GPU's NVENC capabilities are not directly benchmarked, but the CPU can handle software encoding without impacting game performance.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 and PassMark multi-thread score of 56,171 make this CPU a strong editor for 4K timelines and effects. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM will limit complex GPU-accelerated effects, but the CPU can compensate in many tasks. The PassMark floating point math score of 136,682 supports heavy filter and color work.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will excel. The 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5,905, position this for demanding render workloads. GPU-accelerated rendering will be constrained by the 10.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB VRAM, which limits scene complexity.

Software Development: Compilation and build tasks benefit from the 32 threads and high single-thread score of 4,393. The PassMark integer math score of 212,598 indicates strong performance for code compilation. The GPU is sufficient for basic UI rendering and testing, but not for GPU compute development.

Student and Office Work: This is overpowered for typical office tasks. The CPU's single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness, while the GPU is more than capable for spreadsheets, presentations, and web browsing. The 55W TDP for the CPU and 80W for the GPU suggest manageable power for a laptop.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Fire Range. It belongs to the 9000 series and is manufactured on a 4nm process at TSMC, with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die design totaling 140.8 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 5.40 GHz. This is a mobile part on AMD Socket FL1, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. This large L3 cache benefits workloads with high data locality, such as database queries and scientific simulations. The memory controller supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported, making this viable for workstation use.

Benchmark data illustrates the CPU's strengths. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 is elite for a mobile processor, and the single-core score of 2,174 shows strong per-thread performance. The PassMark suite breaks down performance by workload: integer math at 212,598, floating point math at 136,682, and extended instructions at 57,946. Data encryption at 37,330 and data compression at 731,998 show strong throughput for these specific tasks. The find prime numbers score of 287 is comparatively low, indicating that this workload does not scale well with the architecture.

The average benchmark score of 91,199 places the 9955HX at the 96th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include workstation Xeons and desktop-class Core Ultra parts, with deltas ranging from 0.5% to 2.8%. The CPU's performance is competitive with, and in some cases superior to, processors in higher power envelopes.

The integrated Radeon 610M GPU provides basic display output and video decoding, but it is not a gaming or compute solution. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 28 lanes ensures high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and external devices.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is based on the GA106 chip, using the Ampere architecture on an 8nm Samsung process. It contains 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. The GPU has 3,840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads.

Clock speeds are 900 MHz base and 1,425 MHz boost. Memory is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), delivering 336.0 GB/s bandwidth. The pixel rate is 68.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 171.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 10.94 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), indicating no half-rate advantage for FP16 workloads.

The GPU's API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The power draw is 80W TDP, with no external power connectors, suggesting a mobile design. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16.

Benchmark results show a mid-range performer. The PassMark G3D score of 13,230 and average benchmark score of 18,159 place it at the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,821 is the most modern benchmark, representing DX12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 79,483 and 80,344 show consistent compute across APIs. The PassMark DirectX scores are unusual: DirectX 11 at 110, DirectX 10 at 90, and DirectX 12 at 58, suggesting the GPU is relatively stronger in older APIs, though the 3DMark Steel Nomad result provides a more modern reference.

The nearest rivals show tight competition: the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 is 0.2% ahead, the RTX 2060 SUPER is 0.4% behind, and both the Radeon RX 460 and Intel Arc A770M are 1.2% ahead. This places the RTX 3060 Mobile in a cluster of last-generation desktop cards and current mobile parts. The production status is "End-of-life," indicating this is a mature product.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Fire Range generation. The motherboard must support DDR5 dual-channel memory, and the memory controller supports ECC. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, enabling fast NVMe storage and external GPU connectivity if the laptop chassis allows.

The GPU is a mobile part with no upgrade path in the traditional sense; it is soldered or integrated into the laptop. The 80W TDP for the GPU and 55W TDP for the CPU suggest a combined thermal and power budget that is modest for high-end components. The suggested PSU field is null, indicating that power supply headroom is not specified for this mobile configuration.

For a sensible next upgrade, the CPU's socket and platform support future Zen 5-based processors in the same generation, assuming the laptop BIOS and cooling can handle them. The GPU cannot be upgraded in a laptop, so the only path to better graphics is a new system. The PCIe Gen 5 interface on the CPU ensures that a future eGPU solution would have bandwidth headroom, but the laptop's power delivery and thermal design would be the limiting factors.

The CPU's 55W TDP is low for a 16-core part, suggesting a power-efficient design that leaves thermal headroom. The GPU's 80W TDP is typical for a mid-range mobile card. The combined 135W TDP is manageable for a laptop power brick, but the actual system power draw would depend on the rest of the platform.

# Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining a top-tier mobile CPU with a mid-range mobile GPU. The build class is explicitly "laptop," meaning all components are designed for portable use. The combined percentile of 79 reflects the CPU's dominance: the processor is at the 96th percentile, while the GPU is at the 62nd percentile.

The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is a recent 2025 release (2025-01-05) with an active production status, while the GPU is a 2021 release (2021-01-11) that is end-of-life. This creates a generational mismatch: the CPU is current-generation hardware, while the GPU is two generations old. The CPU's Zen 5 architecture and 4nm process are state-of-the-art; the GPU's Ampere architecture and 8nm process are dated.

The overall tier of this build is high for CPU-bound workloads and mid-range for GPU-bound workloads. The CPU outperforms most desktop processors, while the GPU competes with last-generation desktop cards. This is a workstation-class processor paired with a mainstream graphics solution, making it suited for productivity and development rather than high-end gaming.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need extreme CPU performance in a portable form factor. The Ryzen 9 9955HX's 16 cores and 32 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159, make it ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running simulations, and analysts processing large datasets. The PassMark integer math score of 212,598 and floating point math score of 136,682 support these workloads.

Content creators working with video will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded performance for rendering and encoding. The PassMark data compression score of 731,998 indicates fast archive handling, and the encryption score of 37,330 supports secure workflows. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM is a limitation for heavy GPU effects, but the CPU can handle most tasks.

Gamers at 1080p will find the RTX 3060 Mobile adequate for medium-to-high settings in most titles. The CPU ensures no frame drops due to processor limitations, but the GPU's 62nd percentile standing means high-refresh 1080p is only achievable in esports titles. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Students and office workers are over-served by this hardware. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,393 ensures responsive applications, but the cost and power of a 16-core processor are unnecessary for basic tasks. Small business workstations handling data analysis or light server duties would benefit from the CPU's ECC memory support and multi-threaded performance.

# Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. All frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 13,230 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,821 indicate mid-range gaming performance. At 1080p with ultra settings, the RTX 3060 Mobile should achieve playable frame rates in most titles, but the 6 GB VRAM will cause texture streaming issues in VRAM-heavy games. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 2,174) ensures consistent frame pacing.

For esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, the CPU's high single-thread score and the GPU's 10.94 TFLOPS should support high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 144 FPS in less demanding games. For AAA titles, expect 60 FPS at 1080p medium-to-high settings, with ultra settings requiring compromises.

At 1440p, the GPU's 336.0 GB/s bandwidth and 6 GB VRAM become limiting. Frame rates will drop to 30-60 FPS in demanding titles, and texture quality will need to be reduced. At 4K, the RTX 3060 Mobile is not viable for modern games, with performance likely below 30 FPS in most AAA titles.

The 30 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the 10.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests that enabling ray tracing will halve or worse the frame rates. DLSS is supported via the 120 tensor cores, which can recover some performance, but the 6 GB VRAM limits the resolution at which DLSS is effective.

In summary, this is a 1080p gaming machine. The CPU guarantees no bottleneck, but the GPU caps the experience at medium-to-high settings in modern titles. For higher resolutions or maxed settings, a more powerful GPU would be required.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds