SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 880M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

85%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 880M

8,436 Benchmark Score

Top 15% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX paired with the Radeon 880M is a lopsided laptop combination in the most literal sense: a 96th-percentile desktop-class CPU bolted to a 43rd-percentile integrated GPU. The data shows a machine built for compute-heavy work that happens to game, not the reverse. One important caveat applies throughout: the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than directly recorded.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. Estimated from the GPU's scores — a PassMark G3D result of 7615 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 535 — the Radeon 880M lands in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs, essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (deltaPct 0.1) and NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (deltaPct -0.3). That is entry-level graphics territory. Esports titles and older games at reduced settings are the realistic target; demanding modern AAA games at high settings are not. High-refresh play is plausible only in lighter engines.

Streaming. The 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 CPU is more than capable of encoding while gaming — the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37159 confirms heavy parallel throughput — but the 880M's limited graphics headroom means the GPU, not the CPU, caps the playable frame rate during a stream. Single PC streaming works; the bottleneck sits entirely on the graphics side.

Video editing. This is where the pairing makes sense. The Ryzen 9 9955HX posts a PassMark multithread score of 56171 and 96th-percentile standing overall, with 89.6 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth feeding timeline scrubbing and multi-stream edits. Timeline responsiveness is excellent; final GPU-accelerated exports depend on the 880M, where the Geekbench OpenCL score of 31285 and Vulkan score of 40006 indicate modest but usable compute acceleration.

3D rendering. CPU-based rendering is a strength: the Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5905 and R23 multi-core score of 37159 place the CPU ahead of the Intel Xeon 654 (deltaPct 0.5) and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (deltaPct 0.7) in aggregate terms. GPU-path rendering is weak by comparison — the 880M's 12 ray-tracing cores and 4.454 TFLOPS FP32 throughput are integrated-class figures, and the PassMark GPU Compute score of 3719 confirms it.

Software development. A PassMark single-thread score of 4393 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2174 mean snappy IDEs, fast compiles of single files, and responsive scripting. When the build fans out across threads, the 32-thread count and the 16.66-billion-transistor Fire Range design take over. This is a compile machine first.

Student and office work. Overkill in the best way. Documents, browsing, video calls, and spreadsheets barely register against a 96th-percentile CPU. The integrated GPU adds efficiency — a 15 W IGP with no power connectors — which suits a laptop that must last through a full day of mixed coursework.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark sheet is uniformly strong. Cinebench R23 returns 37159 multi-core and 2174 single-core; Cinebench R15 returns 5905 multi-core and 336 single-core. PassMark multithread sits at 56171, single-thread at 4393, with component scores of 731998 in data compression, 37330 in encryption, 57946 in extended instructions, 136682 in floating point math, 212598 in integer math, and 77890 in string sorting. The CPU's average benchmark score is 91199 against a percentileVsAllCpus of 96 — top-tier, and the aggregate is within half a percent of the Intel Xeon 654 (90717) and 0.7% of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (90541), while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (93785) and Intel Xeon 6520P (93786) by 2.8%.

The GPU's numbers tell a different story. The Radeon 880M averages 8436 across its benchmarks and sits in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs. Its rivals are all legacy parts: the GTX 675MX at 8427 (deltaPct 0.1), the MX330 at 8458 (deltaPct -0.3), the Radeon HD 8870M at 8462 (deltaPct -0.3), and the R9 M375X at 8325 (deltaPct 1.3). Individual results: PassMark G3D of 7615, G2D of 969, GPU Compute of 3719, Geekbench OpenCL of 31285, Geekbench Vulkan of 40006, and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 of 535.

The combined percentile for the pairing is 70 — a number that quantifies the imbalance. The CPU drags the average up; the GPU drags it down. Users buying this combination get workstation-grade processing attached to mainstream-legacy-grade graphics.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 9955HX uses AMD Socket FL1, a mobile-oriented platform, so the practical "upgrade path" is a platform swap rather than a chip swap. Memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported — a genuine differentiator for workstation-adjacent use in a laptop chassis. PCIe is generous: Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes, enough for a fast NVMe drive plus a discrete GPU in systems that wire the lanes out.

Power draw is modest for the class. The CPU's TDP is 55 W and the integrated GPU's is 15 W, and since the 880M requires no power connectors, total platform demand stays low. A sensible next upgrade is a discrete GPU in a laptop that exposes the PCIe lanes externally, or a next-generation platform revision — the CPU itself is multiplier unlocked, though tuning headroom in a mobile chassis is constrained by cooling rather than silicon.

One quirk worth noting: the CPU's own listed integrated graphics is the Radeon 610M, meaning the 880M in this pairing is a system-level configuration rather than the 9955HX's native IGP. Buyers should verify which graphics appear in a given chassis.

Balance and Bottleneck

The imbalance is stark and quantifiable. The CPU occupies the 96th percentile; the GPU the 43rd. That gap of over fifty percentile points means the Radeon 880M bottlenelocks every graphics-bound workload, while no realistic software task bottlenecks the Ryzen 9 9955HX.

Evidence from the scores: the GPU's PassMark G3D of 7615 sits alongside rivals from a much older GPU generation, while the CPU's multithread score of 56171 outruns workstation Xeons. In gaming, the CPU's PassMark physics score of 2720 shows enormous simulation headroom that the 880M cannot convert into frames. In rendering, CPU-based paths fly while GPU-accelerated paths crawl — the GPU Compute score of 3719 versus the CPU's multithread 56171 is roughly a fifteen-fold difference in the PassMark framework.

Since no measuredFps data exists for this exact pairing, the estimate is directional: expect the 880M to define the ceiling in every 3D workload, regardless of how light or heavy the CPU-side load is. The 70th combined percentile confirms a build whose graphics are the limiting factor in roughly all interactive scenarios.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination good for gaming?

A: Not as a primary gaming machine. The Radeon 880M sits in the 43rd GPU percentile, statistically tied with the GTX 675MX and MX330. Lighter and older titles are fine; demanding AAA games at high settings are beyond it.

Q: Is this combination good for video editing?

A: Yes, primarily on CPU merit. The 37159 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth make timeline work fast; GPU-accelerated effects are limited by the 880M's 4.454 TFLOPS FP32 figure.

Q: Can it handle software development and compilation?

A: Comfortably. A 4393 single-thread PassMark score covers interactive work, and 16 cores / 32 threads handle large parallel builds. Encryption and compression-heavy tooling benefit from scores of 37330 and 731998 respectively.

Q: Are measured frame rates available for this pairing?

A: No. The dataset contains no measuredFps entries for this CPU and GPU combination; all frame-rate expectations here are estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: How much power does the combination draw?

A: The CPU is rated at 55 W TDP and the integrated GPU at 15 W, with no external power connectors on the GPU. This is an efficient pairing for a laptop.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The Ryzen 9 9955HX supports ECC on its dual-channel DDR5 interface — relevant for data-integrity-sensitive workstation use.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its 91199 average score sits 0.5% above the Intel Xeon 654, 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, and 2.8% below the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Xeon 6520P.

Who Should Build It

Esports and competitive gamers at low settings: the 880M's standing against the MX330 and GTX 675MX defines realistic expectations — older or lighter engines, reduced settings, modest resolutions.

Content creators doing CPU-heavy work: video editors who lean on CPU encoding, 3D artists using CPU renderers, and anyone whose pipeline is thread-bound. The 96th CPU percentile and workstation-Xeon-rivaling scores make this a portable render box.

Software developers: large codebases, containerized builds, and virtualized environments all benefit from 32 threads. The integer math score of 212598 supports compiled-language workloads directly.

Students and small business workstations: the ECC support and low power draw make this suitable for mobile workstations in finance, engineering, and data-sensitive fields where integrity matters more than graphics muscle.

Who should not: anyone buying primarily for AAA gaming or GPU rendering. The 43rd GPU percentile is the wrong tool for that job.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon 880M is a Strix Point integrated GPU on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process with 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die (a density of 145.9M per mm²). It carries 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 16 render outputs, and 12 ray-tracing cores. Clocks run from a 400 MHz base to a 2900 MHz boost. Memory is system-shared, drawn from the platform's dual-channel DDR5, so its effective bandwidth depends entirely on the host configuration.

Peak theoretical output: 4.454 TFLOPS FP32 (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio), 46.40 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 139.2 GTexel/s texture rate. The API stack is modern — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, OpenGL 4.6 — and the bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8.

What the benchmarks mean for rendering: the Steel Nomad score of 535 and GPU Compute score of 3719 place real-time and offline GPU rendering firmly in entry-level territory. The 12 RT cores help ray-traced effects run at all, but not quickly. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 40006 versus OpenCL's 31285 suggests the driver's Vulkan path is the stronger compute route for applications that support it. For serious GPU rendering work, this is a preview device, not a production one.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class pairing — buildClass confirms it — combining AMD's Zen 5 flagship-tier mobile CPU with a mid-pack integrated GPU. The Ryzen 9 9955HX, codenamed Fire Range, launched January 2025 with 16 cores, 32 threads, a 2.50 GHz base and 5.40 GHz boost, 64 MB of shared L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes. The Radeon 880M arrived earlier, in July 2024.

By percentile, the picture is unambiguous: 96th for the CPU, 43rd for the GPU, 70th combined. This is a top-tier mobile compute platform with mainstream integrated graphics. The class verdict is portable workstation, not gaming laptop.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9955HX is a Fire Range implementation of AMD's Zen 5 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm node, with 16,630 million transistors across a 2x 70.6 mm² die configuration. Per-core cache allocation is 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, with 64 MB of shared L3 — a cache hierarchy built for sustained multi-threaded throughput. Base clock is 2.50 GHz with boosts to 5.40 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked.

The benchmark scores translate directly to real workloads. Single-thread results — 2174 in Cinebench R23, 336 in R15, 4393 in PassMark — mean fast application launch, responsive UI, and quick lightly-threaded tasks. Multi-thread results — 37159 in R23, 5905 in R15, 56171 in PassMark — mean heavy parallel workloads complete at workstation pace. The floating point score of 136682 and extended instructions score of 57946 indicate strong SIMD and vector throughput for scientific and media workloads.

Positioning: with an average score of 91199, the 9955HX trades blows with the Intel Xeon 654 and Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and concedes only 2.8% to the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Xeon 6520P. For a mobile-segment processor to sit in the 96th percentile of all CPUs is the headline fact of this pairing — the silicon is rarely the limit; everything around it is.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 880M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

AMD Radeon 880M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds