SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX and AMD Radeon 860M represent a high-performance laptop pairing, combining a flagship 16-core CPU with a capable integrated GPU. The combined benchmark percentile of 84 places this build in the upper tier of available hardware, though the pairing is defined by a stark contrast: the CPU is a top-tier powerhouse while the GPU, while competent for an iGPU, anchors the system's gaming and graphics capabilities. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided data, with all gaming performance figures presented as estimates due to the absence of measured FPS data.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX ranks in the 96th percentile, indicating it outperforms 96% of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Radeon 860M's average benchmark score compare to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550?

A: The Radeon 860M has an average score of 26401, which is effectively identical to the MX550's 26421, showing a negligible 0.1% difference.

Q: What is the architectural generation of the Ryzen 9 9955HX?

A: The CPU is based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed "Fire Range," and is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Ryzen 9 9955HX?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the Radeon 860M's boost clock speed?

A: The GPU has a boost clock of 3000 MHz.

Q: Does the Radeon 860M have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the GPU uses "System Shared" memory, meaning its VRAM size, type, and bus width are all dependent on the system's main memory.

Q: What is the total L3 cache available to the Ryzen 9 9955HX?

A: The CPU has a shared L3 cache of 64 MB.

Benchmark Performance

The data reveals a dual-core identity for this laptop build. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is an exceptional processor, evidenced by its 96th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 91199. In multi-core workloads, it achieves a Cinebench R23 score of 37159, placing it in a class typically occupied by desktop-class chips. Its single-core performance is equally robust, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2174 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4393, indicating excellent responsiveness for everyday tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

This CPU performance is closely matched with its nearest rivals. The Ryzen 9 9955HX's average score is a mere 0.5% higher than the Intel Xeon 654 and 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392. The data shows a more significant gap when compared to the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Xeon 6520P, which hold an average score advantage of 2.8% over the Ryzen chip. This places the 9955HX in a highly competitive position, leading its immediate rivals by a small margin but trailing the top contenders by a few percentage points.

On the graphics side, the AMD Radeon 860M presents a different story. Its average benchmark score of 26401 places it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable for an integrated solution but far from the performance tier of the CPU. The Geekbench scores of 22759 (OpenCL) and 30043 (Vulkan) demonstrate its capability for general-purpose compute and graphics tasks. The combined picture is one of a system with immense processing power that is balanced by a more modest, though competent, graphics component.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance profile of this pairing creates a clear bottleneck scenario. The CPU's 96th percentile performance is not matched by the GPU's 72nd percentile standing. In CPU-bound workloads, such as multi-threaded rendering, data compression, and software compilation, the Ryzen 9 9955HX will operate at its full potential, delivering scores like 731998 in Passmark data compression and 37159 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The GPU will not impede these tasks.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads like modern 3D gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Radeon 860M becomes the limiting factor. The system's overall 84th percentile, which sits between the CPU and GPU scores, reflects this imbalance. While the CPU can execute game logic and physics calculations with ease, the GPU will struggle to render frames at high detail settings, capping the achievable frame rates. The CPU is effectively waiting on the GPU to finish its work in these scenarios, meaning that the Radeon 860M is the definitive performance bottleneck for graphics-intensive applications.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at users who require exceptional multi-core processing power but do not prioritize high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. The 96th percentile CPU makes it an ideal platform for content creators who work with video editing, 3D modeling, and software development, where the 16 cores and 32 threads will dramatically reduce render and compile times. The high single-core score of 2174 in Cinebench R23 also ensures that less parallelized tasks, such as UI interactions and script execution, remain fluid.

For developers, the Ryzen 9 9955HX is a powerful workstation. The Passmark data encryption score of 37330 and extended instructions score of 57946 indicate strong performance for security-related and complex computational tasks. The system is also suitable for students and small business workstations that run demanding productivity suites, simulations, or data analysis software. However, it is not the primary choice for gamers seeking high frame rates in modern titles, as the Radeon 860M's performance is not in the same league as the CPU.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The GPU is equipped with 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. It also includes 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU's memory configuration is entirely "System Shared," meaning its 15W TDP and performance are directly tied to the system's DDR5 RAM. The bandwidth is "System Dependent," but the CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth serves as the ceiling. The GPU's compute capabilities are quantified by its FP32 and FP16 performance, both rated at 3.072 TFLOPS. With a pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s, the 860M is a capable iGPU for light gaming and content consumption. Its benchmark scores, which put it on par with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 and RTX 5060 in the database, suggest it is a viable option for esports titles and older games, but it will not handle high-fidelity AAA titles at high settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not the intended use case. The Radeon 860M's estimated performance, while adequate for esports at 1080p, will not sustain high frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU's power is largely irrelevant here, as the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads are excellent for encoding a stream using x264 software encoding. The high multi-core score of 37159 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the game and the encoding process can run concurrently without significant frame drops, despite the GPU's limitations in the gaming portion.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario. The 9955HX's multi-core might dramatically accelerates video export and rendering, with Passmark's floating-point math score of 136682 indicating strong performance for effects processing. The iGPU can handle the display and basic timeline scrubbing, but final renders are CPU-driven.

3D Rendering: The CPU is the star here, with Cinebench R23 multicore scores of 37159 making it a formidable rendering engine. The Radeon 860M's 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance can support GPU rendering in some engines, but it will be much slower than the CPU for most renderers.

Software Development: The Ryzen 9 9955HX is ideal for compiling large codebases. The high Passmark integer math score of 212598 and multithread score of 56171 indicate that parallel compilation tasks will be completed with speed. The 64 MB of L3 cache also helps with large project data sets.

Student and Office Work: This is a scenario where the system is overqualified. The CPU's single-core performance ensures a snappy, responsive system for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The Radeon 860M is more than sufficient for driving multiple displays and handling 2D graphics, making this an expensive but highly capable workstation for academic or office use.

Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following figures are estimates based on the GPU's benchmark scores and are not actual measured results.

Based on the Radeon 860M's average benchmark score of 26401 and its 72nd percentile ranking, gaming performance is expected to be in the entry-level discrete GPU tier. The GPU's performance relative to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (a 0.1% difference) suggests it can handle esports titles at 1080p with medium to high settings. For more demanding AAA games, the expectation is that users will need to reduce settings to low or medium and potentially target 30-60 FPS at 1080p. The 8 ray tracing cores are present, but the 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 power is insufficient for ray-traced gaming at playable frame rates in most modern titles. Therefore, all gaming frame rate discussions should be viewed as estimates, with the understanding that the CPU will not be the limiting factor at any resolution.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX processor with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated graphics. The pairing represents a high-performance computing platform with a moderate graphics capability. The combined percentile of 84 places it in the upper tier of all systems in the database, but this is primarily driven by the CPU's exceptional performance. The system is best described as a powerful workstation that can handle light to moderate gaming, rather than a dedicated gaming machine. The core design philosophy is to maximize multi-threaded processing power within a mobile platform.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed "Fire Range." It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a transistor count of 16,630 million across two 70.6 mm² dies. The CPU has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55W. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

The benchmark data shows a processor that excels in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37159 and the Passmark multithread score of 56171 underscore its dominance in heavily parallelized workloads. The single-core performance is equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 score of 2174 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4393, indicating excellent performance in legacy and lightly-threaded applications. The CPU's 96th percentile ranking confirms its position as one of the fastest mobile processors available, and its nearest rival comparisons show it is either slightly ahead or marginally behind the top competitors, confirming its status as a flagship part. The 64 MB of L3 cache is substantial and helps to reduce memory latency, further boosting performance in data-intensive tasks.