SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 8060S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8060S

55,757 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Fire Range, and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. This is the flagship of AMD's 9000 series for laptops, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The chip carries a 55 W TDP, which is notable for a 16-core part, indicating that AMD has tuned this for high-performance laptops where thermal headroom is at a premium. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, offering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for the CPU alone.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 pool is critical for workloads that exhibit data locality across cores, and it helps mitigate the latency penalties of the dual-chiplet design (with a die size of 2x 70.6 mm²). The CPU integrates a Radeon 610M graphics unit, so the system can run without a discrete GPU when needed, though this pairing includes a powerful Radeon 8060S.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 96th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 91,199. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 37,159, which is exceptionally high for a mobile processor—this is a chip that can handle heavy multi-threaded rendering tasks without breaking a sweat. The single-core score of 2,174 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-thread performance, which matters for everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 5,905 and single-core is 336, confirming the same pattern: this is a top-tier mobile CPU in both metrics.

PassMark results further illustrate the CPU's character. The multithread score is 56,171, which is in the range of desktop workstation chips. Integer math posts 212,598, floating point math 136,682, and extended instructions 57,946. Data compression scores 731,998, which is a massive number and suggests excellent throughput for archiving and file management tasks. Data encryption at 37,330 indicates strong cryptographic performance, while random string sorting at 77,890 shows solid memory subsystem efficiency. Physics simulation scores 2,720, and finding prime numbers scores 287—these are more specialized tests but still reflect the CPU's overall compute capability.

The nearest rivals provide context. The Intel Xeon 654 scores 90,717 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 90,541 (0.7% lower). The Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus scores 93,785 (2.8% higher), and the Intel Xeon 6520P also scores 93,786 (2.8% higher). So the 9955HX sits in a tight cluster, slightly behind those two Intel parts but ahead of the others. This is a competitive position, but not an outright win—the difference is small enough that real-world performance will depend heavily on cooling and power delivery in the specific laptop chassis.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX and AMD Radeon 8060S. There are no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. Therefore, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not from direct frame rate measurements.

That said, the benchmark data allows for informed expectations. The GPU, a Radeon 8060S based on the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 55,757. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,162, which is a modern DirectX 12 test that stresses raw rasterization. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 84,626, and Vulkan is 80,483. These numbers suggest a GPU that can handle modern AAA titles at high settings, but the lack of measured FPS means we must temper expectations.

For 1080p ultra settings, the combination of a 96th-percentile CPU and an 87th-percentile GPU should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though the exact numbers will vary. The CPU's 16 cores and 5.40 GHz boost clock will prevent bottlenecks in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU's 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance should push high frame rates in less demanding games. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor, but the Radeon 8060S is still positioned near the desktop Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (which scores 55,698, just 0.1% lower), so expect similar performance to that card. At 4K, this laptop GPU will struggle with ultra settings in demanding titles, as it is not in the same class as the RTX 5080 (which scores 56,083, only 0.6% higher) despite the close benchmark scores.

The CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s are adequate for gaming, but the GPU's memory is system shared, meaning bandwidth is system dependent. This could be a bottleneck in some scenarios, particularly at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth becomes critical. Overall, expect a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming machine, with 4K gaming being possible only at lower settings or in less demanding titles.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmarks is of a high-end laptop platform. The CPU's average benchmark score of 91,199 places it in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU's average score of 55,757 places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The combined percentile for this pairing is 92, indicating that this is a top-tier laptop configuration overall.

Looking at the CPU's benchmark distribution, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159 is the standout figure—this is a score that rivals many desktop processors from a generation ago. The single-core score of 2,174 is also strong, indicating that the Zen 5 architecture has excellent instruction-level parallelism and branch prediction. The PassMark multithread score of 56,171 reinforces the multicore strength, while the single-thread score of 4,393 shows that even lightly-threaded applications will run well.

The GPU's benchmarks are more modest but still respectable. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162 is the key modern gaming metric, and it aligns with the GPU's nearest rivals: the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698 (0.1% lower), the RTX 5080 scores 56,083 (0.6% higher), the Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54,828 (1.7% lower), and the RTX 4080 scores 54,247 (2.8% lower). This is a tight cluster, meaning the Radeon 8060S is essentially at parity with these desktop cards in raw compute terms, but remember that the laptop's power and thermal constraints will affect sustained performance.

The combination of a 96th-percentile CPU with an 87th-percentile GPU is typical of a balanced laptop build—the CPU is slightly stronger than the GPU, which is fine for productivity tasks but means the GPU will be the primary limiter in gaming at higher resolutions. The CPU's 96th percentile suggests it can handle any workload you throw at it, while the GPU's 87th percentile means it is above average but not at the very top of the mobile GPU hierarchy.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: What is the GPU's position relative to desktop graphics cards?

A: The Radeon 8060S has an average benchmark score of 55,757, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, 0.6% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, 1.7% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X, and 2.8% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080.

Q: Does this laptop support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and it uses dual-channel DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and how many RT cores does it have?

A: The GPU is based on RDNA 3.5 architecture (Strix Halo) and has 40 RT cores, along with 2,560 shading units and 64 ROPs.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX scores 91,199 on average, which is 2.8% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus's score of 93,785.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The Radeon 8060S delivers 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 also at 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8060S is a mobile integrated GPU built on the Strix Halo chip, using the RDNA 3.5 architecture and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and has a die size of 308 mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with a 55 W TDP that matches the CPU's TDP—this is a tightly integrated solution designed for thin and light high-performance laptops.

The GPU has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It features 40 RT cores for ray tracing, though it has no dedicated tensor cores—AMD relies on shader-based AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 185.6 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 464.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 14.85 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1), which is notable for a mobile part. The memory is system shared, meaning the GPU uses the CPU's DDR5 memory rather than dedicated VRAM; the bus width and bandwidth are system dependent, which is a potential limitation for memory-intensive workloads.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is fully compatible with modern game APIs and feature sets. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, which provides ample bandwidth for communicating with the CPU. The display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning the laptop manufacturer determines the physical ports.

Benchmark results show the GPU in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 55,757. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162 is the key gaming metric, and it places the 8060S in the same performance tier as the desktop Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and RTX 4080, which is impressive for an integrated solution. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 84,626 and Vulkan score of 80,483 indicate strong compute performance for tasks like rendering and machine learning inference.

For rendering workloads, the 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for real-time 3D rendering in applications like Blender or Unreal Engine, though the system-shared memory will limit texture sizes and scene complexity. The 40 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, but the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated tasks like DLSS (which requires NVIDIA hardware) are not available; instead, AMD's FSR upscaling can be used, which is shader-based. Overall, this is a capable GPU for 1080p and 1440p gaming and light to moderate content creation, but it is not a replacement for a high-end discrete GPU.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination is aimed at users who need a single laptop that can handle both demanding productivity workloads and modern gaming. The 96th-percentile CPU with 16 cores and 32 threads makes it ideal for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation—tasks that benefit from high multicore throughput. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159 and PassMark multithread score of 56,171 are evidence that this CPU can handle heavy parallel workloads without slowdown.

For gamers, the 87th-percentile GPU with 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming at high to ultra settings. The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot give exact numbers, but based on the GPU's benchmark scores, it should deliver smooth frame rates in most titles at those resolutions. Gamers who prioritize high refresh rates at 1080p will find this platform capable, though those seeking 4K gaming will need to lower settings or look at a more powerful discrete GPU.

Software developers will appreciate the 16 cores and 32 threads for parallel builds and the 64 MB of L3 cache for frequently accessed data. The ECC memory support is a bonus for those running long compute jobs. Students and small business workstations will find the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 score of 2,174) more than adequate for office applications, while the GPU provides acceleration for tasks like photo editing or CAD.

The target user is someone who wants a premium laptop that does not compromise on CPU performance and can still play modern games. This is not a budget build—the hardware is positioned at the high end of the mobile market, and the 92nd combined percentile reflects that. Users who need a workstation-class CPU in a laptop form factor with gaming capability are the ideal audience.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the combination of a 96th-percentile CPU and 87th-percentile GPU should deliver high frame rates in esports titles and many AAA games. The CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock and 64 MB L3 cache prevent bottlenecks, while the GPU's 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance pushes frames. For 1440p high-refresh gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but performance should still be playable in most titles. Expect smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, though 4K high-refresh is out of reach.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU has ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159 and PassMark multithread score of 56,171 suggest that x264 encoding at high quality settings will not impact gaming performance significantly. The GPU can handle the rendering side, and the system-shared memory provides enough bandwidth for both tasks, though the exact quality settings will depend on the streaming software and game.

Video editing: The CPU's multicore strength is a major asset for video editing. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159 and PassMark data compression score of 731,998 indicate fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing in applications like DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro. The GPU's 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading, while the 40 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing for 3D elements. The system-shared memory is a limitation for large 4K projects with many layers.

3D rendering: The CPU is the star here, with 16 cores and 32 threads delivering the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159. This is a laptop that can render complex scenes in Blender or Maya without taking all day. The GPU's 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provides real-time viewport feedback, and the 40 RT cores accelerate ray-traced previews. However, the system-shared memory means texture memory is limited to the laptop's total RAM, so extremely large scenes may require optimization.

Software development: The 16 cores and 32 threads make this an excellent laptop for compiling large codebases. The PassMark integer math score of 212,598 and extended instructions score of 57,946 indicate strong compute throughput for build processes. The 64 MB L3 cache speeds up repeated access to hot code paths, and the 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures quick single-threaded compilation steps. Developers who run multiple VMs or containers will appreciate the 32 threads.

Student and office work: For everyday tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the CPU's single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,174) is more than sufficient. The GPU provides hardware acceleration for PowerPoint transitions and video playback. The 55 W TDP means this is a laptop that can run all day on battery for light work, though heavy loads will drain it faster. This is overkill for basic office work, but it ensures the laptop will not feel slow for years to come.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (build class is "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX CPU with the AMD Radeon 8060S GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 (Fire Range) processor on TSMC's 4 nm process, and the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 (Strix Halo) integrated solution on the same process node. The combined percentile is 92, placing this in the top tier of laptop configurations.

The CPU's 96th percentile ranking means it is among the fastest mobile processors available, while the GPU's 87th percentile ranking puts it above the average but not at the very top of the mobile GPU hierarchy. This is a balanced high-end platform, though the GPU is the weaker link relative to the CPU. The launch MSRP is not available, so no pricing information is provided.

The build is designed for users who need maximum CPU performance in a laptop, with gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks as secondary but still important requirements. The 55 W TDP for both components suggests this is a well-integrated design that can fit in a reasonably portable chassis, though the performance levels indicate it is not a thin-and-light ultrabook. This is a desktop replacement class laptop for power users.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU that is significantly stronger than the GPU in relative terms. The CPU sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. This asymmetry means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in any workload; instead, the GPU will bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks.

For gaming, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The CPU's 16 cores and 5.40 GHz boost clock can feed the GPU with frames faster than the GPU can render them in most scenarios. The GPU's 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at higher resolutions or with demanding settings, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The lack of measured FPS data means we cannot quantify this precisely, but the benchmark scores support this conclusion.

For productivity workloads, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU plays a supporting role. In tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU's multicore performance (Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159) will be the primary driver, and the GPU will only matter for specific acceleration features. The system-shared memory is a potential bottleneck for GPU-intensive tasks, as the bandwidth is system dependent and shared with the CPU.

The combined percentile of 92 indicates that this pairing is well-matched overall, but the CPU's higher percentile means it has more headroom for future software that leverages more threads. The GPU's 87th percentile means it is above average but not future-proof for the most demanding games at high resolutions. In practical terms, the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming at 1080p or 1440p, but the GPU will limit performance in CPU-light tasks like gaming at 4K or heavy ray tracing. For mixed workloads, this is a balanced system, but pure gamers may find the GPU to be the weak link, while pure productivity users will find the CPU to be overkill for most tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 8060S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

AMD Radeon 8060S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds