SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

98%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 8050S — Laptop Benchmark Analysis

This pairing combines AMD's flagship mobile 16-core Zen 5 processor with a RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU built on the Strix Halo die, targeting high-end laptops where CPU throughput and GPU capability must coexist within a 55 W TDP envelope. The data shows a 96th-percentile CPU and an 89th-percentile GPU, placing this build in the 93rd percentile overall among all laptop configurations. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data — so all frame-rate discussion that follows is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on Zen 5 architecture with the Fire Range codename. It operates on a 4 nm TSMC process node with 16,630 million transistors spread across a 2x 70.6 mm² die configuration. The base clock sits at 2.50 GHz, boosting to 5.40 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that is remarkably modest for a 16-core part — this is a mobile chip designed to deliver desktop-class throughput within laptop thermal constraints.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool is critical for workloads that repeatedly access the same data sets, such as database queries or compiled code execution, where the CPU can avoid slower memory lookups. The memory subsystem supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC memory support, which matters for workstation-class reliability in scientific computing or financial modeling.

Benchmark results confirm the processor's positioning. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 37,159 and single-core score of 2,174 indicate strong scaling across all 16 cores. The R15 multicore result of 5,905 and single-core of 336 follow the same pattern. PassMark data compression scores 731,998, encryption 37,330, and extended instructions 57,946 — the compression figure is particularly telling, as it suggests heavy multi-threaded throughput that benefits from the 32 threads. Floating-point math at 136,682 and integer math at 212,598 show balanced arithmetic capability, while the multithread score of 56,171 and physics score of 2,720 reinforce the CPU's dominance in parallel workloads.

The CPU's 96th-percentile ranking versus all CPUs is backed by its nearest rivals. The Intel Xeon 654 averages 90,717 (0.5% slower), the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 averages 90,541 (0.7% slower), while the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Xeon 6520P both average 93,785 and 93,786 respectively (2.8% faster). This places the 9955HX in a tight cluster where it slightly edges out two competitors and trails two others by a narrow margin — the differences are within a few percentage points, meaning real-world application performance will hinge on specific workload optimizations rather than raw architectural superiority.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 91,199, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 96. This means it outperforms 96% of all tested processors in the database, placing it firmly in enthusiast and workstation territory. The GPU's average benchmark score is 62,108, with a percentile versus all GPUs of 89. The combined build percentile is 93, reflecting that both components are above-average performers but the GPU lags the CPU's relative standing.

Looking at the GPU benchmarks specifically, the Radeon 8050S scores 65,818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58,398 in Geekbench Vulkan. The OpenCL score is notably higher, suggesting compute-oriented workloads (which often favor OpenCL) will extract more performance than gaming-oriented Vulkan tasks. The delta between the two — roughly 11% — indicates the GPU's compute shader throughput is stronger than its graphics pipeline efficiency.

The CPU's nearest rival comparisons show a 0.5% advantage over the Intel Xeon 654 and a 0.7% advantage over the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392. The two Intel parts that beat it — the Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Xeon 6520P — do so by 2.8%, which is within the margin of benchmark variance for most applications. For the GPU, the Radeon 8050S is 0.3% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, 2.5% slower than the Radeon Pro Vega 56, 2.6% slower than the Radeon RX 7600M, and 2.7% slower than the Radeon RX 9060 XT LP. This places the GPU in a competitive mid-range bracket where it trades blows with dedicated mobile GPUs from a generation or two ago.

The combined picture is a laptop that excels at CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and scientific computing, while delivering respectable but not class-leading GPU performance. The 96th-percentile CPU paired with an 89th-percentile GPU means the processor is the star of the show, and the GPU is competent enough to handle modern games at reasonable settings without being the bottleneck in most productivity scenarios.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU based on the Strix Halo chip, using RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process. The die size is 308 mm², which is substantial for an iGPU, reflecting the large number of functional units packed into the chip. It has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 32 ray tracing cores. There are no tensor cores listed, meaning AI acceleration relies on the standard RDNA 3.5 compute units rather than dedicated tensor hardware.

Clock speeds are a base of 1295 MHz and a boost of 2800 MHz. The pixel rate is 179.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 358.4 GTexel/s, yielding a fill rate that can handle modern resolutions at moderate settings. FP32 performance is 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 11.47 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no half-precision boost — this is relevant for workloads that use FP16 for machine learning inference, as they will not see a throughput advantage over FP32.

Memory is entirely system-shared, with the size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared" and bandwidth as "System Dependent." This is a critical limitation: the GPU has no dedicated VRAM, so it must compete with the CPU for the same DDR5 memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. In gaming, this means texture loading and frame buffer access share the same bus as CPU cache misses, potentially causing stutter in memory-intensive scenes. The 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, but without dedicated VRAM, ray-traced workloads at high resolutions will be constrained by memory bandwidth rather than compute throughput.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 and Vulkan score of 58,398 indicate strong compute capability for an iGPU. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, scores 61,896 (0.3% slower), while the Radeon RX 7600M scores 63,775 (2.6% faster). This positions the 8050S as roughly equivalent to a mid-range dedicated mobile GPU from the previous generation, which is impressive for an integrated solution but still below what a high-end discrete GPU would deliver. The 89th-percentile ranking versus all GPUs confirms it sits above the majority of laptop graphics solutions, including most older integrated graphics and entry-level discrete parts.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear asymmetry: the CPU is a top-4% performer while the GPU is top-11%. This means the CPU will frequently outpace the GPU in workloads that heavily utilize both components, such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. In gaming, the GPU is almost certainly the bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the CPU's 16 cores and 5.40 GHz boost clock are more than sufficient to feed frames to a GPU of this class. The GPU's system-shared memory further compounds this, as the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth must be split between CPU and GPU operations.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or spreadsheet analysis, the CPU will dominate and the GPU will sit largely idle. The PassMark multithread score of 56,171 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159 indicate that workloads scaling across 32 threads will see near-linear improvements, and the GPU's involvement will be minimal. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or gaming, the CPU has enough headroom that it will rarely be the limiting factor — the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS and shared memory will dictate performance.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the percentile gap. A 96th-percentile CPU paired with an 89th-percentile GPU typically means the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 1440p and above, while at 1080p the CPU may still have enough single-thread headroom (2,174 in Cinebench R23 single-core) to keep frame times consistent. The 32 RT cores suggest ray tracing is possible, but the shared memory bandwidth will likely force lower ray-traced settings compared to a discrete GPU with dedicated VRAM.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than observed gameplay. The GPU's Geekbench Vulkan score of 58,398 and the CPU's strong single-thread performance of 2,174 in Cinebench R23 single-core suggest the pair can handle modern titles at 1080p with medium to high settings, and possibly 1440p at reduced quality settings.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, which are CPU-bound and light on GPU load, the 9955HX's single-core strength should push frame rates well into triple digits at 1080p. For AAA single-player games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS and shared memory will likely cap performance at 60 FPS on medium settings at 1080p, with ray tracing requiring significant compromises due to the 32 RT cores operating under memory bandwidth constraints. At 1440p, expect 40-50 FPS on medium settings in demanding titles, and older or less demanding games should run comfortably at 60+ FPS.

The CPU's 731,998 PassMark data compression score and 212,598 integer math score indicate that game logic, physics calculations, and AI pathfinding will not bottleneck the GPU. The 2720 PassMark physics score further supports this, suggesting the CPU can handle complex physics simulations without dropping frame rates. Overall, this is a laptop that can game, but it is not a dedicated gaming machine — the GPU will limit maximum settings and resolutions.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need heavy CPU compute in a portable form factor. The 96th-percentile CPU with 16 cores and 32 threads makes it ideal for content creators running video editing software like Adobe Premiere or DaVinci Resolve, where the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 37,159 translates to fast export times. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 212,598 PassMark integer math score and 731,998 data compression score, which speed up build processes and version control operations.

Students and researchers in engineering, physics, or data science fields will find the ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR5 sufficient for simulation workloads, while the 89th-percentile GPU handles visualization and light rendering tasks. Small business workstations running database applications or financial models will leverage the CPU's 56,171 PassMark multithread score for concurrent query processing. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings will find the GPU adequate, but those seeking high-refresh 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere.

The 55 W TDP for both CPU and GPU means this build is suitable for laptops that prioritize battery life and thermals over raw GPU performance. The integrated nature of the GPU eliminates the need for discrete graphics, reducing weight and power draw, which appeals to professionals who travel frequently and need all-day battery life without sacrificing compute capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-core score of 2,174 in Cinebench R23 should drive 100+ FPS in esports titles, while the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS handles 60-90 FPS in AAA games at medium settings. The shared memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s may cause occasional frame hitches in texture-heavy scenes.

Streaming: The 32 threads and 37,159 Cinebench R23 multicore score can handle game capture and encoding simultaneously without noticeable CPU impact. The GPU's 65,818 OpenCL score supports hardware encoding offload, though the integrated nature means no dedicated encoder chip.

Video editing: The 731,998 PassMark data compression score accelerates codec operations, and the 136,682 floating-point math score handles color grading and effects. The GPU's 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate speeds up preview rendering, while the 64 MB L3 cache keeps timeline scrubbing responsive.

3D rendering: The CPU's 56,171 PassMark multithread score dominates CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles, while the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS can accelerate GPU-based render engines. The 32 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, though shared memory limits scene complexity.

Software development: The 212,598 integer math score and 57,946 extended instructions score speed up compilation, and the 16 cores allow parallel builds. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces link-time overhead for large projects.

Student and office work: The 4,393 PassMark single-thread score ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsers and office suites, while the 55 W TDP extends battery life for all-day note-taking and research. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics (listed as the CPU's iGPU) handles basic display output, with the 8050S available for heavier tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on Zen 5 architecture with a 4 nm process node.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 64 MB of shared L3 cache, plus 1 MB of L2 per core and 80 KB of L1 per core.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the AMD Radeon 8050S uses system-shared memory, with bandwidth dependent on the system's DDR5 configuration (89.6 GB/s for this build).

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing capability?

A: The Radeon 8050S has 32 ray tracing cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), but performance is limited by shared memory bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Xeon 654?

A: The 9955HX scores 91,199 on average, which is 0.5% higher than the Xeon 654's 90,717.

Q: What is the combined build percentile?

A: The combined percentile is 93, meaning this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 93% of all laptop configurations in the database.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing manual overclocking, though the 55 W TDP may limit headroom in laptops.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Fire Range mobile platform. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes. The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, and the system's power connectors are listed as "None" because the GPU is integrated — the suggested PSU is null, meaning power delivery is handled by the laptop's internal design rather than a separate graphics card power connection.

The 55 W TDP for both CPU and GPU indicates a power-efficient platform, but it also means upgrades are limited to what the laptop motherboard supports. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the GPU shares this memory — more RAM directly benefits both CPU and GPU performance. Storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also leverage the CPU's 28 PCIe lanes, reducing load times in games and speeding up file transfers for content creation.

The socket FL1 is unlikely to support future CPU generations, so a CPU upgrade would require a new laptop. The GPU, being integrated, cannot be upgraded independently. Users seeking more GPU performance would need to look at a different laptop with a discrete GPU, while those needing more CPU throughput would wait for the next architecture revision. The platform's strength is its efficiency — 55 W for both components means the laptop can run cool and quiet while delivering top-4% CPU performance.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The CPU is a 16-core Zen 5 part with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, 64 MB of L3 cache, and a 96th-percentile ranking among all CPUs. The GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with 2,048 shading units, 32 RT cores, and an 89th-percentile ranking among all GPUs. The combined percentile of 93 places this build in the top 7% of laptop configurations, making it a high-end mobile workstation with gaming capability.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 91,199 places it just above the Intel Xeon 654 and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Xeon 6520P by 2.8%. The GPU's average score of 62,108 puts it in a tight race with the Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% faster than the 8050S) and the Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% faster). This is a laptop designed for users who prioritize CPU compute above all else, with GPU performance that is respectable but secondary. It is not a dedicated gaming machine, nor is it a workstation-class GPU solution — it is a balanced, power-efficient mobile platform for professionals who need serious multi-threaded performance on the go.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds