SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines a 16-core Zen 5 flagship mobile processor with an integrated Radeon 780M GPU, creating an unusual configuration where the CPU’s immense compute capability far outpaces the graphics solution. The benchmark data reveals a system built for productivity and multitasking rather than high-end gaming, with the CPU ranking in the 96th percentile while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this imbalance, placing the overall package firmly in the upper-midrange tier of laptop configurations.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, delivering a pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s. The GPU’s FP32 performance stands at 8.909 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance matching at 8.909 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. The memory configuration is entirely system-dependent, with the GPU sharing main system memory for both capacity and bandwidth, meaning the effective memory bus width and bandwidth vary based on the installed DDR5 RAM and the platform’s dual-channel configuration.

The GPU features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation pipelines, along with 12 dedicated ray tracing cores. While the RT core count suggests some hardware support for ray-traced workloads, the integrated nature and shared memory bandwidth limit the practical impact of this feature. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, indicating full modern API compatibility for both gaming and compute applications. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for an integrated part but does limit bandwidth compared to discrete solutions.

Benchmark results for the 780M show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 18602, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 33683. The average benchmark score of 17588 places this GPU in the 61st percentile among all GPUs, indicating it performs better than the median but falls well short of dedicated graphics solutions. The nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 560 with an average score of 17551 and a delta of 0.2%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with 17639 and a delta of -0.3%, and the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with 17666 and a delta of -0.4%. The RTX 4060 comparison is particularly notable, as the delta of -0.3% suggests the integrated 780M achieves nearly identical average benchmark scores to a modern discrete laptop GPU, though the RTX 4060 would excel in sustained workloads and dedicated VRAM scenarios that the shared-memory 780M cannot replicate.

For rendering and compute tasks, the 780M’s scores indicate it can handle light 3D workloads and hardware-accelerated video encoding, but the system-dependent memory bandwidth becomes a bottleneck for texture-heavy applications. The 12 RT cores provide nominal ray tracing support, yet the 480 Steel Nomad score suggests that ray-traced gaming at playable frame rates is unrealistic beyond minimal settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2174 in Cinebench R23 and 4393 in Passmark single-thread tests provide ample processing power for game logic and physics, but the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking limits practical frame rates. The 780M’s performance aligns closely with entry-level discrete GPUs from past generations, meaning 1080p gaming at medium settings is feasible, but high-refresh 144Hz displays will remain underutilized in demanding titles. Games that rely more on CPU performance, such as strategy titles or esports shooters at lower graphical presets, will benefit more from this configuration.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide exceptional headroom for simultaneous gameplay, encoding, and streaming software. The 37159 multi-core score in Cinebench R23 indicates that x264 encoding on the CPU is a viable option without significant frame loss. The 780M’s support for modern DirectX 12 Ultimate features ensures compatibility with GPU-accelerated encoding APIs, though the shared memory architecture means encoding tasks will compete with the game for bandwidth.

Video editing: The Passmark data compression score of 731998 and integer math score of 212598 demonstrate the CPU’s capability in handling codecs and effects processing. The 780M provides hardware acceleration for decode and encode operations, but the system-dependent memory bandwidth limits the speed of multi-stream 4K editing timelines. Export times will be dominated by the CPU’s multi-threaded performance, which is exceptional, while preview rendering in the timeline will see moderate GPU acceleration.

3D rendering: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37159 places this CPU in the 96th percentile, making it a rendering powerhouse for CPU-based render engines like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The 780M can contribute to GPU-accelerated rendering through OpenCL and Vulkan APIs, with the Geekbench OpenCL score of 18602 indicating usable compute performance, but the shared memory and integrated nature mean GPU rendering will be significantly slower than any discrete solution.

Software development: The Passmark multi-thread score of 56171 and floating-point math score of 136682 indicate strong performance for code compilation, unit testing, and parallel build processes. The 32 threads allow for fast incremental builds, while the single-thread score of 4393 ensures responsive IDE performance and quick startup times for development tools. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking means developers working with large codebases will notice substantial improvements over mainstream processors.

Student and office work: The combination of strong single-thread performance and 32 threads handles typical office workloads with ease, while the 780M provides adequate GPU acceleration for presentation software, spreadsheet rendering, and basic photo editing. The Passmark extended instructions score of 57946 supports fast processing of encryption and compression tasks common in document management. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking ensures this configuration will not bottleneck any standard productivity application.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data paints a clear picture of a CPU-bound system where the processor’s capabilities vastly exceed the GPU’s. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 61st percentile creates a 35-percentage-point gap that defines the system’s character. For multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and scientific computing, the CPU dominates the performance profile, and the GPU plays a minimal supporting role. The 37159 Cinebench R23 multi-core score indicates that the processor can sustain heavy compute loads, while the 780M’s 480 Steel Nomad score suggests it would bottleneck any graphics-intensive task.

In gaming scenarios, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the GPU. The CPU’s single-thread performance is more than sufficient to feed the 780M, meaning frame rates will be dictated by the integrated graphics’ capabilities. The GPU’s nearest rival delta of -0.3% versus the RTX 4060 is misleading in gaming contexts, as the shared memory bandwidth becomes a limiting factor that the benchmark averages do not capture. For FPS scaling, the data implies that lowering resolution or graphical settings will yield diminishing returns once the GPU’s compute and fillrate limits are reached, because the system-dependent memory bandwidth cannot be improved without changing the entire platform.

The Passmark physics score of 2720 and find prime numbers score of 287 indicate strong CPU-side physics calculation capability, which helps in games with complex simulation systems, but the GPU’s 32 ROPs limit pixel throughput. The 92.80 GPixel/s pixel rate is adequate for 1080p at moderate settings but will struggle with high-resolution textures and anti-aliasing. The balance between CPU and GPU favors productivity workloads where the processor can operate independently of graphics performance, making this an unconventional pairing that excels in compute-heavy tasks while remaining modest in visual performance.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads in a laptop form factor. Content creators working with 3D rendering, video encoding, and complex data processing will find the 16-core processor exceptional, as the 37159 Cinebench R23 multi-core score places it among the top 4% of all CPUs. Software developers compiling large projects will benefit from the 32 threads and 56171 Passmark multi-thread score, while the single-thread score of 4393 ensures responsive tooling. Students and professionals in STEM fields running simulations, statistical analysis, or machine learning preprocessing will see substantial gains from the CPU’s 96th percentile ranking.

Gamers seeking a laptop for 1080p esports titles or older games will find the 780M adequate, as its 61st percentile ranking and close alignment with the RTX 4060 in average benchmark scores suggest playable frame rates at medium settings. However, gamers expecting modern AAA titles at high settings will be disappointed, as the integrated GPU’s shared memory and limited ROP count create a hard ceiling. Small business workstations running database management, virtualization, or financial modeling will leverage the CPU’s multi-threaded performance and the Passmark data encryption score of 37330 for secure transactions. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute tasks, making this a viable option for scientific computing or server-like workloads in a portable form factor.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Fire Range. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die design of 2x 70.6 mm². The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial on-die storage for frequently accessed data. The processor supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, along with ECC memory support for error correction in critical workloads.

The CPU’s benchmark scores are exceptional across the board. Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 37159, while single-core hits 2174, and Cinebench R15 scores 5905 multi-core and 336 single-core. Passmark results show a multi-thread score of 56171, single-thread score of 4393, integer math at 212598, floating-point math at 136682, and extended instructions at 57946. The data compression score of 731998 and data encryption score of 37330 highlight the CPU’s capability in data-intensive applications. The average benchmark score of 91199 places this processor in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon 654 at 90717 (0.5% delta), AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 at 90541 (0.7% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus at 93785 (-2.8% delta).

The 5.40 GHz boost clock is among the highest for mobile processors, and the 55 W TDP suggests excellent power efficiency for the performance level. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 lanes provides ample bandwidth for high-speed storage and external GPUs. The processor includes an integrated Radeon 610M GPU as a fallback graphics solution, though the primary pairing uses the discrete-class 780M. The unlocked multiplier offers overclocking potential in supported laptops, and the 2025 release date makes this a current-generation part. The architecture’s 4 nm process allows for the high core count and clock speeds while maintaining a mobile-friendly power envelope.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9955HX compare to its nearest rivals in overall performance?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score of 91199 places it 0.5% ahead of the Intel Xeon 654 and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392, while sitting 2.8% behind both the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Xeon 6520P. The 96th percentile ranking confirms it is among the top processors available.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance tier based on benchmark data?

A: The Radeon 780M has an average benchmark score of 17588, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. It performs nearly identically to the AMD Radeon Pro 560 with a 0.2% delta and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with a -0.3% delta, though its shared memory configuration may limit real-world gaming performance.

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: The Radeon 780M includes 12 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, indicating hardware-level ray tracing capability. However, the 480 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 suggests that ray-traced workloads will be limited by the integrated GPU’s overall compute performance.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The GPU’s memory bandwidth is system-dependent, meaning it relies on the same DDR5 memory as the CPU.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded versus multi-threaded tasks?

A: The Cinebench R23 scores show 2174 in single-core and 37159 in multi-core, representing a 17x scaling factor across the 16 cores and 32 threads. The Passmark single-thread score of 4393 indicates strong per-core performance for everyday applications.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 79, which reflects the significant gap between the CPU’s 96th percentile and the GPU’s 61st percentile. This indicates a system optimized for compute-heavy workloads rather than balanced gaming performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Radeon 780M uses system shared memory for both capacity and bandwidth, meaning there is no dedicated VRAM. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as system-dependent, so performance scales with the installed DDR5 configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 9955HX delivers an average benchmark score of 91199, ranking in the 96th percentile of all CPUs. This places it slightly ahead of the Intel Xeon 654 by 0.5% and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 by 0.7%, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Xeon 6520P by 2.8% each. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37159 and single-core score of 2174 demonstrate balanced performance across both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. Passmark results reinforce this with a multi-thread score of 56171 and single-thread score of 4393, along with strong auxiliary scores in integer math (212598), floating-point math (136682), and extended instructions (57946).

The Radeon 780M GPU achieves an average benchmark score of 17588, ranking in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 is modest, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 18602 and Vulkan score of 33683 show better compute performance. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 560 with a 0.2% positive delta, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with a -0.3% delta, and the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with a -0.4% delta, indicating the 780M sits in the same performance class as these older and newer discrete options.

The combined percentile of 79 reflects the overall system tier, but the disparity between CPU and GPU performance is stark. The passmark data compression score of 731998 and data encryption score of 37330 on the CPU side complement the GPU’s 18602 OpenCL score, creating a system where compute tasks that leverage the CPU will vastly outperform any GPU-accelerated equivalent. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking makes this one of the fastest mobile processors available, while the GPU’s 61st percentile positions it as an entry-level graphics solution. The benchmark picture is clear: this is a CPU-first system where the GPU serves as a functional but not performance-leading component.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 9955HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Fire Range platform and limits CPU upgrades to other FL1-compatible processors. The system supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is determined by the installed RAM configuration. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for NVMe storage and potential external GPU enclosures, though the laptop form factor may restrict expansion options.

The GPU’s TDP is 15 W and it requires no power connectors, operating entirely from the motherboard’s power delivery. The CPU’s TDP of 55 W indicates a moderate power envelope for a 16-core processor, and the absence of a suggested PSU value reflects the integrated nature of the GPU. The 780M’s memory bandwidth is system-dependent, meaning upgrading to faster DDR5 memory would directly improve GPU performance, as the GPU has no dedicated VRAM. The PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface for the GPU is adequate for an integrated part, but any external GPU connection would leverage the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes for higher throughput.

A sensible next upgrade path involves increasing system memory to maximize both CPU bandwidth and GPU performance, since the shared memory architecture benefits from higher-speed DDR5 modules. The ECC memory support allows for error-corrected configurations suited to long-running compute tasks. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support future-proofs the system for next-generation storage devices. Given the CPU’s 96th percentile ranking, upgrades to other components would have diminishing returns; the primary limitation is the integrated GPU, which cannot be upgraded in a laptop form factor without an external enclosure.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX with the AMD Radeon 780M in a laptop configuration, creating a system that prioritizes CPU compute power over graphics performance. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking result in a combined percentile of 79, placing this system in the upper-midrange tier of all benchmarked configurations. The processor is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 5 part with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.0 integrated solution with 768 shading units and 12 ray tracing cores.

The system’s class is laptop, indicating a mobile form factor where the 55 W CPU TDP and 15 W GPU TDP contribute to a reasonable thermal profile. The integrated nature of the GPU means the entire graphics subsystem shares system memory, which simplifies the build but limits graphics performance compared to discrete solutions. The CPU’s 37159 Cinebench R23 multi-core score makes this one of the most capable mobile processors for productivity, while the GPU’s 480 Steel Nomad score keeps gaming expectations modest. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level GPU, targeting users who need maximum processing power in a portable package.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 17588 and 61st percentile ranking, combined with its close alignment to the RTX 4060 in average scores, suggest that 1080p gaming at medium to high settings is achievable in less demanding titles. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4393 ensures that game logic and physics will not bottleneck the GPU, meaning frame rates will be GPU-limited in most scenarios.

The 780M’s 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 92.80 GPixel/s pixel rate indicate capability for 1080p gaming at 30-60 FPS in esports titles and older games, with more demanding AAA games requiring reduced settings. The 12 RT cores provide nominal ray tracing support, but the 480 Steel Nomad score suggests ray-traced games will run at very low frame rates even at minimal settings. The system-dependent memory bandwidth becomes a critical factor, as the GPU’s performance will vary based on the installed DDR5 speed and configuration. For high-refresh gaming, the GPU will limit performance to well below 144 FPS in most titles, making this system better suited for 60 Hz displays and less demanding games. The CPU’s 96th percentile ranking ensures that any frame rate limitations come from the GPU, not the processor, and users can expect consistent performance without CPU-induced stuttering.