SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX + AMD Radeon 760M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
98%
VS
GPU
83%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX

91,199 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 760M

6,019 Benchmark Score
Top 17% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of an AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX with an AMD Radeon 760M presents one of the most extreme CPU-to-GPU imbalances in the mobile market. The CPU sits at the 96th percentile among all processors, while the integrated GPU languishes at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. This is not a balanced configuration; it is a processor-first design where the graphics solution is fundamentally the limiting factor for any visually intensive workload.

Examining the compute deltas reveals the scale of this disparity. The Ryzen 9 9955HX produces a PassMark multi-thread score of 56,171, while the Radeon 760M delivers a PassMark G3D score of 5,310. Even in pure compute tasks, the GPU's PassMark GPU compute score of 2,840 is dwarfed by the CPU's integer math score of 212,598. When the CPU is performing floating-point math at 136,682 and the GPU is managing only 5.323 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, the conclusion is inescapable: the CPU will be idle waiting on the GPU in any graphics-bound scenario.

The bottleneck analysis shows that the GPU constrains gaming and 3D rendering workloads almost exclusively. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,393 and multi-thread score of 56,171 indicate it can handle any game logic, physics simulation, or AI processing the GPU can feed it. Conversely, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 suggests it will struggle to maintain playable framerates at modern resolutions, leaving the CPU's substantial capabilities untapped in gaming contexts.

For productivity tasks, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU—which is excellent news for this pairing. Data compression scores of 731,998 and encryption scores of 37,330 demonstrate that the CPU can crush throughput-oriented workloads without GPU involvement. The GPU's role in such scenarios is minimal, making the imbalance irrelevant for CPU-bound professional work. The data indicates that this build is a workstation disguised as a laptop, with the GPU serving primarily as a display output rather than a compute accelerator.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Radeon 760M's PassMark G3D score of 5,310 places it at the 35th percentile among all GPUs, which signals entry-level integrated graphics performance.

Based on the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400, this iGPU is suitable for 1080p gaming at low-to-medium settings in esports titles. The GPU's pixel rate of 41.58 GPixel/s and texture rate of 83.17 GTexel/s provide enough throughput for games like League of Legends or Counter-Strike 2 at modest framerates. However, the DirectX 12 PassMark score of 25 and DirectX 11 score of 52 indicate that modern AAA titles will require significant settings reductions to approach playability.

At 1440p or 4K resolutions, the 760M's capabilities diminish rapidly. The system-shared memory architecture means bandwidth is system dependent, and with the CPU demanding 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth for its own operations, the GPU will compete for the same pool. The estimated gaming experience at higher resolutions is poor, with frame rates likely falling below 30 FPS in most modern titles. Users should consider the Radeon 760M as a solution for 1080p esports and older titles, not for high-fidelity gaming. The CPU's 96th percentile gaming potential is entirely wasted in this configuration, as the GPU cannot translate that processing power into frames.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Fire Range codename. It operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts to 5.40 GHz, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with 16,630 million transistors spread across two 70.6 mm² dies. The 55 W TDP classification is notably efficient for a 16-core mobile part, suggesting the Fire Range design prioritizes power efficiency alongside raw throughput.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. This large L3 pool benefits workloads that exhibit data locality, such as database operations and scientific computing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159 places this chip in elite territory, while the single-core score of 2,174 demonstrates strong per-thread performance that rivals desktop parts. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,393 corroborates this, indicating responsive application performance in lightly threaded tasks.

The processor supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, plus ECC memory support—a feature that appeals to workstation users who require data integrity. PCIe Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes provides ample connectivity for NVMe storage and external GPUs. The multiplier is unlocked, enabling enthusiast overclocking despite the mobile form factor. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics is present but overshadowed by the discrete-level 760M in this pairing.

Benchmark results show the 9955HX at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 91,199. It edges past the Intel Xeon 654 by 0.5% and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 by 0.7%, while trailing the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus by 2.8% and the Intel Xeon 6520P by 2.8%. These deltas illustrate that the 9955HX competes directly with enterprise-class server processors, not just mobile parts.

# Who Should Build It

The target user for this configuration is a professional who requires maximum CPU throughput in a laptop form factor but has minimal graphics demands. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 32 threads and 56,171 PassMark multi-thread score, while the 731,998 data compression score accelerates version control and build artifact handling. Students in computational fields—engineering, data science, or finance—will find the CPU's floating-point performance (136,682) and encryption throughput (37,330) valuable for simulations and secure communications.

Small business workstations handling database management, virtualization, or financial modeling will see exceptional responsiveness from the 16-core design. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running server-like workloads. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering—such as software like Blender's Cycles CPU engine or Premiere Pro's software encoding—will appreciate the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 37,159, though they must accept that GPU-accelerated effects will be slow.

This is not a build for gamers at 1440p or 4K, nor is it suitable for 3D artists relying on GPU rendering. The Radeon 760M's 35th percentile ranking limits it to 1080p esports and light photo editing. The ideal buyer is someone who prioritizes compile times, data processing, and multitasking above all else, and who needs a discrete GPU only for basic display output and occasional light graphics work.

# Benchmark Performance

The combined picture shows a system at the 66th percentile overall, dragged down by the GPU's weak showing despite the CPU's stellar performance. The CPU's average benchmark score of 91,199 places it at the 96th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 6,019 places it at the 35th percentile. This 61-percentile gap between components is among the largest observed in mobile configurations.

The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5,905 and single-core score of 336 reinforce its position as a top-tier mobile processor. In PassMark tests, the CPU achieves 212,598 in integer math, 136,682 in floating-point math, and 57,946 in extended instructions. These scores indicate balanced performance across different instruction types, making the chip versatile for mixed workloads. The data compression score of 731,998 is particularly impressive, suggesting excellent performance in archiving and file transfer tasks.

The GPU's benchmark results tell a different story. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 is low, and the PassMark DirectX 11 score of 52 and DirectX 12 score of 25 indicate limited modern API support. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 20,255 and Vulkan score of 30,336 show some compute capability, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 2,840 is modest. The G2D score of 890 confirms that 2D desktop acceleration is adequate for office work but nothing more.

The nearest rivals for the CPU include the Intel Xeon 654 (0.5% faster), AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 (0.7% faster), Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (2.8% slower), and Intel Xeon 6520P (2.8% slower). The GPU's nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6400 (0.3% faster), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (0.3% faster), NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (0.4% faster), and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 (0.5% slower). These comparisons show the CPU punching at server-class level while the GPU trades blows with decade-old discrete parts.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Fire Range mobile platform. This socket supports the 9000 series processors, and the 9955HX is the flagship 16-core part in this lineup. Memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and ECC capability, providing a modern memory subsystem. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 CPU lanes offers high bandwidth for storage and expansion, though the laptop form factor limits physical expansion options.

The Radeon 760M is an integrated GPU on the Phoenix chip, sharing the system's DDR5 memory. Because the GPU's memory is system shared, its bandwidth is system dependent—in this case, tied to the CPU's 89.6 GB/s dual-channel memory bandwidth. This shared architecture means the GPU cannot be upgraded independently; any graphics improvement requires a different platform or an external GPU solution via the PCIe interface.

The CPU's 55 W TDP and the GPU's 15 W TDP combine for a modest total power envelope, leaving headroom for the rest of the system. The suggested PSU is null in the FACT PACK, which is expected for a laptop where the power supply is integrated into the chassis. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be adding an external GPU via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which would dramatically improve graphics performance while retaining the powerful CPU. Alternatively, upgrading the DDR5 memory capacity could benefit both CPU and GPU, as the iGPU relies on system memory for its frame buffer.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The estimated FPS at 1080p in esports titles is playable, but the GPU's 35th percentile ranking means high-refresh monitors (144Hz+) will rarely be saturated. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 400 suggests that even at low settings, modern titles will struggle to exceed 60 FPS consistently.

Streaming: The CPU's 32 threads can handle x264 encoding at high quality while gaming, but the GPU's weak rendering performance means the game itself may not run smoothly. The 5,323 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is insufficient for GPU-accelerated encoding alongside gaming, so CPU-based streaming is the viable path—a workload the 9955HX handles with ease.

Video editing: CPU-based editing workflows will be fast, with the 37,159 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerating timeline operations and exports. However, GPU-accelerated effects, color grading, and rendering will be slow due to the 760M's limited compute. The 731,998 data compression score helps with project file management and archive tasks.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in Blender or similar software will be excellent, leveraging 16 cores and 32 threads. GPU rendering is not viable given the 760M's modest performance. The 136,682 floating-point math score indicates strong numerical throughput for simulation-heavy scenes.

Software development: Compilation times will be short with 32 threads, and the 212,598 integer math score accelerates code processing. The 57,946 extended instructions score benefits vectorized code paths. The 4,393 single-thread score keeps IDE interactions responsive.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for document processing and web browsing, but the 890 G2D score ensures smooth 2D desktop performance. The CPU's encryption score of 37,330 provides fast secure communications and VPN throughput. The 55 W TDP means long battery life potential for all-day campus use.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, a 16-core Zen 5 mobile flagship, with the AMD Radeon 760M, an RDNA 3.0 integrated GPU. The build class is laptop, confirming this is a mobile configuration. The combined percentile of 66 places it in the upper-middle range of all systems, though this ranking is heavily skewed by the CPU's dominance.

The Ryzen 9 9955HX represents the pinnacle of AMD's Fire Range mobile lineup, with a 96th percentile CPU ranking that puts it among the fastest processors available—mobile or desktop. In contrast, the Radeon 760M is an entry-level integrated solution at the 35th percentile, comparable to discrete GPUs from several generations ago. This pairing creates a laptop that excels at CPU-intensive professional work while offering only basic gaming capability.

The overall tier of this build is "workstation-class CPU with entry-level graphics." It is a specialized tool for users who need maximum processing power in a portable form factor and are willing to accept limited GPU performance. The 66th percentile combined ranking understates the CPU's excellence while overstating the GPU's capability, reflecting the inherent challenge of summarizing such an imbalanced configuration in a single metric.

# FAQ

Q: Is this configuration suitable for modern AAA gaming at high settings?

A: No. The Radeon 760M scores 400 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and 25 in PassMark DirectX 12, indicating it cannot handle modern AAA titles at high settings. Estimated performance is limited to 1080p low-to-medium settings in less demanding games.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9955HX compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The 9955HX has an average benchmark score of 91,199, which is 0.5% behind the Intel Xeon 654 and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392. It is 2.8% ahead of both the Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus and Intel Xeon 6520P.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. The GPU uses system-shared memory, so its bandwidth is dependent on the system's memory configuration.

Q: Can the Radeon 760M be upgraded?

A: The Radeon 760M is an integrated GPU on the Phoenix chip, so it cannot be upgraded independently. An external GPU connected via the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes with 28 lanes would be the only path to improved graphics performance.

Q: What is the CPU's process technology and transistor count?

A: The Ryzen 9 9955HX is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with 16,630 million transistors across two 70.6 mm² dies. The GPU is also on TSMC 4 nm with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The CPU scores 2,174 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4,393 in PassMark single-thread. These results indicate strong per-thread performance for responsive applications, though the 96th percentile ranking is driven primarily by its exceptional multi-threaded capabilities.

Q: What is the combined system percentile and why is it lower than the CPU's percentile?

A: The combined percentile is 66, which is lower than the CPU's 96th percentile because the GPU's 35th percentile ranking drags down the overall score. The system's average benchmark performance is constrained by the graphics solution.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on the Phoenix chip using TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units, along with 8 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 800 MHz and boosts to 2599 MHz, delivering a pixel rate of 41.58 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 83.17 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 5.323 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio).

Memory is system shared, with no dedicated VRAM. The bus width and bandwidth are system dependent, tied to the CPU's dual-channel DDR5 configuration. This shared memory architecture means the GPU competes with the CPU for bandwidth, which is a significant limitation given the CPU's own 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth requirement. The GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8, and display outputs are motherboard dependent.

The benchmark results place this GPU at the 35th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 6,019. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6400, which is 0.3% faster, and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000, which is 0.5% faster. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 400 is low, and PassMark DirectX scores range from 19 (DX10) to 65 (DX9), indicating that the GPU is best suited for older or less demanding titles. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 20,255 and Vulkan score of 30,336 show some compute capability, but the PassMark GPU compute score of 2,840 is modest.

For rendering workloads, the 8 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but the low 5.323 TFLOPS throughput limits practical ray tracing performance. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support ensures compatibility with modern games, but the hardware cannot deliver playable performance at high settings. The TDP of 15 W is efficient for an integrated solution, and the lack of power connectors reflects its IGP classification. This GPU is a capable display adapter and light gaming solution, but it is the clear bottleneck in this otherwise high-performance build.