SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X + AMD Radeon RX 6700

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X

74,640 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6700

30,433 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and AMD Radeon RX 6700 pairing represents a distinct desktop configuration where a top-tier enthusiast processor is matched with a mid-range graphics card. This combination yields a system whose character is defined entirely by the massive disparity in capability between its two primary components. The data indicates a machine that excels at processor-bound productivity tasks while simultaneously being constrained in graphics-intensive workloads, making it a peculiar but purpose-driven build.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die design with a total die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The CPU features a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 170 W. It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and includes ECC memory support. The processor is unlocked, allowing for multiplier adjustments, and provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance. The CPU scores 40,924 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 6,335 in Cinebench R15 multi-core, illustrating its capacity for heavily threaded workloads. In Geekbench, it achieves a multi-core score of 25,616 and a single-core score of 3,029. The 3DMark tests show a scaling pattern from 1,293 in single-thread to 16,780 in max-threads, with 16,263 in the 16-thread test, indicating near-linear scaling across its 16 cores. PassMark results further substantiate this, with a multi-thread score of 66,030, an integer math score of 242,097, and a floating-point math score of 159,063.

The processor sits in the 94th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 74,640. Its nearest rivals are closely matched, including the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 (deltaPct of -0.2), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 (deltaPct of 0.2), the AMD EPYC 4545P (deltaPct of -1), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (deltaPct of -1.1). These negligible deltas indicate that the 9950X is squarely in the top tier of available processors, trading blows with enterprise and high-end workstation chips. For real workloads, this means the CPU will not be the limiting factor in any task; it handles data compression at 896,544 in PassMark, data encryption at 44,366, and extended instructions at 71,564. The single-thread performance, with a PassMark score of 4,737 and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,293, ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and strong performance in lightly-threaded applications.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 is a RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU, using the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC with 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die. It has 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines, with 36 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1941 MHz, a game clock of 2174 MHz, and a boost clock of 2450 MHz. Memory consists of 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s. The card has a TDP of 175 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. It is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, with display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

Performance metrics place this GPU in the 75th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30,433. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 70HX (deltaPct of -0.1), the NVIDIA Tesla M60 (deltaPct of -0.2), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (deltaPct of 1.1), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (deltaPct of 1.6). The small deltas here suggest the RX 6700 is in a competitive mid-range segment, slightly outperforming the RTX 3070 Ti in the aggregate benchmark score. Specific test results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,014, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 97,841, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 83,974, and a Geekbench Metal score of 122,223. PassMark results show a G3D score of 18,931 and a GPU compute score of 8,240.

The GPU achieves 11.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 22.58 TFLOPS of FP16 performance, with pixel rate of 156.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 352.8 GTexel/s. The 36 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for DirectX Raytracing, though the RX 6000 series is not the strongest implementation of RT. The 10 GB VRAM capacity and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the card will be the primary constraint in rendering and high-resolution textures. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern game APIs, and the Vulkan 1.4 support allows for efficient multi-threaded CPU utilization.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between the processor and graphics card in this pairing. The CPU’s 94th percentile rank and average score of 74,640 contrast sharply with the GPU’s 75th percentile rank and average score of 30,433. This disparity means the GPU will be the bottleneck in almost any graphics-bound scenario, such as gaming or 3D rendering. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to complete its work, or more precisely, the frame rate will be dictated by the GPU’s rendering speed, not the CPU’s processing power.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, data analysis, or heavy multitasking, the GPU becomes irrelevant, and the system will perform at a level consistent with a top-tier workstation. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 16,263 suggests the CPU can feed data to the GPU faster than the GPU can consume it, but this does not translate to higher frame rates in games. The PassMark physics score of 3,279 indicates strong game physics processing, but again, the final frame presentation is the GPU’s job.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, the percentile gap of 19 points (94th vs. 75th) is the clearest indicator of where the bottleneck lies. The GPU’s average score of 30,433 is less than half of the CPU’s average score of 74,640, further quantifying the imbalance. In gaming, the RX 6700 will be the limiting factor, and the Ryzen 9 9950X’s potential will be largely unrealized. In productivity tasks that do not rely on the GPU, the system will perform exactly as the CPU’s benchmark scores indicate—at the top of the heap.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The RX 6700’s 75th percentile rank and 10 GB VRAM make it suitable for 1080p high-refresh gaming. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,543 and single-thread score of 1,293 ensure that frame pacing and minimum frame rates will be stable, but the GPU will cap maximum FPS. Frame rates will be dictated by the GPU’s 11.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is mid-range. Expect smooth gameplay at 1080p with high settings, but the CPU will not push frame rates higher than the GPU can render.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU with a 3DMark max-thread score of 16,780 is exceptionally well-suited for streaming. The CPU can handle game capture, encoding, and broadcast simultaneously without impacting performance. The GPU’s 75th percentile rank is sufficient for the game rendering itself, but the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess ensures no dropped frames during the encoding process. The PassMark multi-thread score of 66,030 supports this, indicating ample headroom for concurrent workloads.

Video Editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. Video editing software scales well with multi-core CPUs, and the 9950X’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,924 will handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export rendering with ease. The GPU’s 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth can accelerate effects and color grading in GPU-accelerated editors. The PassMark data encryption score of 44,366 also suggests fast disk encryption for large media files. The GPU will be the weaker link in heavy effect stacks, but the CPU dominates the core editing workloads.

3D Rendering: The CPU is a champion here, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 25,616 and a PassMark floating-point math score of 159,063. CPU-based rendering will be exceptionally fast. However, GPU-based rendering engines will be limited by the RX 6700’s 11.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 10 GB VRAM. Large scenes may exceed the VRAM capacity, forcing lower resolution textures. The 36 ray tracing cores provide some acceleration, but this is not a high-end GPU rendering solution.

Software Development: The Ryzen 9 9950X is ideal for development. Compilation times will be minimal, with the PassMark integer math score of 242,097 and multi-thread score of 66,030 indicating rapid code compilation. The 64 MB of L3 cache and 16 cores allow for massive parallel builds. The GPU’s performance is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this pairing highly effective for developers who also play games occasionally.

Student and Office Work: This is overkill for typical student tasks. The CPU’s single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4,737) ensures fast application launches, but the 16 cores are unused in standard office applications. The GPU’s 75th percentile rank is more than enough for office productivity, video conferencing, and web browsing. The system will be power-hungry, with a CPU TDP of 170 W and GPU TDP of 175 W, but performance will never be a concern.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X achieves an average benchmark score of 74,640, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. This is a top-tier score, with nearest rivals within 1.1% in either direction. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 scores 74,761 (-0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 74,496 (+0.2% delta), the AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75,373 (-1% delta), and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75,488 (-1.1% delta). This places the 9950X in a dead heat with these high-end chips, confirming its flagship status.

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 achieves an average benchmark score of 30,433, placing it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA CMP 70HX at 30,476 (-0.1% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla M60 at 30,490 (-0.2% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30,095 (+1.1% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti at 29,945 (+1.6% delta). This shows the RX 6700 is slightly ahead of the RTX 3070 Ti in the aggregate score, but the differences are marginal, placing it in a competitive mid-range tier.

The combined percentile for this pairing is 85, reflecting the average of the CPU’s high rank and the GPU’s lower rank. The CPU’s specific scores include a 3DMark 16-thread score of 16,263, a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,924, and a Geekbench multi-core score of 25,616. The GPU’s specific scores include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,014 and a PassMark G3D score of 18,931. The combined picture is a system that is 94th percentile on the CPU side and 75th percentile on the GPU side, creating a lopsided profile where the CPU’s capabilities far outstrip the GPU’s.

Gaming Performance

The data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination. Therefore, all FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the component benchmark scores, not measured results. The RX 6700’s 75th percentile rank and 11.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggest it is a capable 1080p gaming card. The 10 GB VRAM is adequate for modern titles at 1080p with high textures, but may be strained at 1440p with ultra settings in VRAM-hungry games.

The CPU’s gaming-relevant scores, such as the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,543 and single-thread score of 1,293, indicate it will not bottleneck the GPU at 1080p. The PassMark physics score of 3,279 supports this, showing strong game physics processing. However, the GPU will be the limiting factor in all gaming scenarios. In CPU-light games like esports titles, the CPU’s high single-thread performance will allow the GPU to run at its maximum potential. In CPU-heavy games like strategy titles or simulations, the CPU will excel, but the GPU will still cap the maximum frame rate.

For 1080p gaming, estimated frame rates would be high, with the GPU able to push well over 60 FPS in most titles at high settings, given its 75th percentile rank. At 1440p, the 10 GB VRAM and 320.0 GB/s bandwidth may limit texture quality, and frame rates would drop. At 4K, the GPU would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles. These are estimates, and actual performance varies by game, but the GPU’s benchmark scores anchor its capability in the mid-range segment.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who need extreme CPU performance but have modest graphics requirements. The target user is a professional who runs CPU-intensive workloads—such as software compilation, data analysis, video encoding, or complex simulations—and also plays games at 1080p or 1440p with medium to high settings. The Ryzen 9 9950X’s 94th percentile rank and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 40,924 make it a workstation-class CPU, while the RX 6700’s 75th percentile rank is adequate for mainstream gaming.

Content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes on the CPU will benefit most, as the GPU’s role is secondary in these tasks. Developers will see massive compilation speedups from the 16 cores and 32 threads. Students in engineering or computer science programs will have more than enough power for any coursework. Small business workstations running database queries or financial modeling will be exceptionally fast on the CPU side. Gamers who prioritize frame rates at 1080p and do not require ultra settings at 4K will find the GPU sufficient, but they are not getting a balanced gaming system.

The system is not ideal for users who want a balanced gaming PC, as the GPU is clearly the weaker component. It is also not ideal for GPU-based rendering or machine learning workloads, where the 10 GB VRAM and 11.29 TFLOPS will be limiting. The build is a CPU-centric powerhouse with a capable but modest GPU bolted on for standard graphics tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, a flagship 16-core processor, with the AMD Radeon RX 6700, a mid-range RDNA 2 GPU. The CPU is a 9000-series Granite Ridge part on the AM5 socket, representing the top of AMD’s consumer line. The GPU is an RX 6000-series Navi 22 part, representing a mainstream gaming card. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 85, is high, driven almost entirely by the CPU’s 94th percentile rank. The GPU’s 75th percentile rank pulls the combined score down from what a top-tier gaming system would achieve.

The CPU’s 16 cores, 32 threads, and 5.70 GHz boost clock make it a productivity monster, while the GPU’s 2,304 shading units and 10 GB GDDR6 make it a solid 1080p gaming card. The system’s class is desktop, and it is intended for stationary use with the CPU’s 170 W TDP and the GPU’s 175 W TDP requiring adequate cooling and a 450 W power supply. This is not a balanced build; it is a workstation CPU with a gaming GPU bolted on, resulting in a system that is far more capable at compute tasks than at graphics tasks.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile against all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X is in the 94th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 74,640.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6700 has an average benchmark score of 30,433, which is 1.6% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti's score of 29,945.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 9 9950X and RX 6700 pairing is 85.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 9950X supports ECC memory, and it uses a dual-channel DDR5 memory bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the memory capacity and bandwidth of the RX 6700?

A: The RX 6700 has 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 320.0 GB/s.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this specific build?

A: No, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussions are estimates based on the component benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Ryzen 9 9950X scores 40,924 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, indicating exceptional performance in heavily threaded workloads.