SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a desktop configuration that combines a high-end 12-core Zen 5 processor with a professional-grade Ada Lovelace GPU. The data shows a combined percentile of 71, placing this pairing above the majority of systems, but the absence of any measured FPS rows for this exact combination means all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The CPU is the clear performance anchor, holding a 91st percentile rank among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile, creating a notable imbalance where the processor vastly outclasses the graphics card in relative standing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. It operates with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W. The chip features a substantial cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a large 128 MB L3 cache, which is characteristic of the X3D series and beneficial for latency-sensitive workloads. Memory support includes DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The processor uses AMD Socket AM5 and offers PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well from single-threaded to multi-threaded tasks. The 3DMark suite reveals a score of 1269 in single-thread, rising to 2512 in 2-thread, 4885 in 4-thread, 9002 in 8-thread, and peaking at 13795 in max-thread tests. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-threading efficiency, with the 8-thread score representing over 70% of the max-thread result. Cinebench scores reinforce this: R15 multicore hits 4811, R20 multicore reaches 20049, and R23 multicore achieves 47737, while single-core scores are 679, 2830, and 6739 across the same three versions. The R23 multicore score of 47737 places this CPU in the upper tier for content creation, while the single-core score of 6739 ensures snappy responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications.

Geekbench results show a multicore score of 22884 and a single-core score of 3041, confirming competitive performance across both metrics. PassMark tests provide further granularity: multithread score is 56154, single-thread is 4646, integer math is 179727, floating-point math is 119622, extended instructions is 55426, data compression is 685074, data encryption is 33282, physics is 5340, and random string sorting is 71864. The find prime numbers score of 544 is notably lower, but this is an isolated test. The average benchmark score is 54762, and the CPU holds a percentile rank of 91 among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 91% of processors in the database.

Compared to nearest rivals, the 9900X3D sits within a tight competitive band. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF by 0.6% in average score (55093 vs 54762), leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K by 1.3% (54053 vs 54762), leads the Intel Xeon 6505P by 2% (53701 vs 54762), and leads the Intel Core i7-14700F by 2.1% (53620 vs 54762). These deltas are small, indicating that while the 9900X3D is not the outright leader in this group, it is within striking distance of the top rival and clearly ahead of the others. For real workloads, the 128 MB L3 cache and high boost clock make this processor exceptionally well-suited for gaming, where cache-sensitive algorithms benefit, while the 12-core/24-thread configuration handles multi-threaded rendering and compilation tasks with ease.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores define the system’s overall performance ceiling. The 3DMark max-thread score of 13795 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 are the most representative figures for all-core workloads, indicating strong performance in video rendering, 3D modeling, and software compilation. The single-thread scores, including Geekbench single-core of 3041 and 3DMark single-thread of 1269, show that the processor also excels in tasks that rely on a single core, such as legacy applications or certain game engines. The PassMark multithread score of 56154 and integer math score of 179727 further confirm the CPU’s capability in parallel processing scenarios.

The GPU, however, presents a starkly different picture. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has no benchmark scores listed in the data, and its average benchmark score is 0, with a percentile rank of exactly 50 among all GPUs. This means the graphics card sits at the median of the GPU distribution, neither exceptional nor weak, but it is far below the CPU’s 91st percentile. The combined percentile of 71 reflects this gap, pulling the overall system rating down from what the CPU alone would suggest. The lack of GPU benchmarks means the data cannot quantify the GPU’s absolute performance, but its specifications (detailed in the GPU Analysis section) suggest it is capable for professional workloads, though not for high-end gaming at high settings.

The combined picture is one of imbalance: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is mid-pack. This configuration would excel in CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, data analysis, or multi-threaded rendering, but it would struggle to keep up in GPU-intensive scenarios like high-resolution gaming or GPU-based rendering. The data indicates that the CPU is the system’s primary strength, and any performance bottleneck in graphics-heavy workloads will originate from the GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor in graphics-bound workloads. The CPU’s percentile rank of 91 versus the GPU’s percentile rank of 50 creates a significant disparity, with the processor outperforming the graphics card by 41 percentile points. In gaming scenarios, this means the GPU will likely saturate before the CPU reaches its full potential, especially at higher resolutions where pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth become critical. However, in CPU-bound tasks like physics simulation (PassMark physics score of 5340) or data compression (685074), the GPU is irrelevant, and the CPU’s high scores will shine.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent due to no measured FPS data, but the benchmark scores allow for an estimated bottleneck analysis. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 12490 and max-thread score of 13795 indicate strong multi-core throughput, which is beneficial for maintaining high frame rates in modern games that use multiple threads. The GPU’s specifications, including a 256-bit memory bus and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the FP32 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS is modest compared to top-tier gaming GPUs. Therefore, in games that are GPU-bound, the RTX 5000 Embedded will likely limit frame rates, while in CPU-bound titles, the 9900X3D will provide ample headroom.

The combined percentile of 71 suggests that the system as a whole is above average, but the wide gap between components means that upgrading the GPU would yield substantial gains in graphics performance, while upgrading the CPU would offer minimal benefits for gaming. For professional workloads that rely on the CPU, such as compilation or data processing, the bottleneck is effectively nonexistent, as the CPU’s performance is more than sufficient. The data supports a verdict that this is a CPU-first system, with the GPU serving as a secondary component that is adequate but not outstanding.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is best suited for users whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive and who require occasional GPU acceleration. The 91st percentile CPU makes it ideal for software developers who compile large codebases, as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 and Geekbench multicore score of 22884 indicate rapid compilation times. Data scientists and analysts working with large datasets will benefit from the PassMark data compression score of 685074 and floating-point math score of 119622, which accelerate data processing and numerical computations. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the processor’s multi-threaded performance sufficient for simulations and parallel computing projects, while the 128 MB L3 cache aids in repeated data access patterns.

For content creators who rely on CPU-based rendering, such as those using Blender or traditional 3D applications, the 12 cores and 24 threads provide solid performance, though the GPU’s 50th percentile means GPU-accelerated rendering will be slower than with a higher-end graphics card. Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or server-side applications will benefit from the CPU’s robust multi-threaded scores, and the ECC memory support (noted in the specifications) adds reliability for mission-critical tasks. Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolutions will find the CPU capable of high frame rates in most titles, but the GPU’s mid-pack performance may require lower settings to achieve smooth gameplay. At 4K, the GPU will likely become the primary bottleneck, making this configuration less suitable for high-end gaming.

The GPU’s professional nature, with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, makes it suitable for moderate GPU-accelerated workloads like video transcoding or light 3D rendering, but users who require top-tier graphics performance should look elsewhere. Overall, this build targets users who prioritize processor performance over graphics, such as developers, researchers, and professionals running CPU-bound applications.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is based on the AD103 chip using the Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node with 45,900 million transistors and a die size of 379 mm². It operates with a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1680 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The compute configuration includes 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation units. For ray tracing and AI acceleration, it features 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores.

The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s, indicating solid fill rates for a mid-range GPU. The FP32 performance is 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is modest compared to higher-end Ada Lovelace variants. The TDP is 120 W, and the card uses no power connectors, drawing power from the system bus. It interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x16 and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, indicating this is an embedded or mobile-oriented GPU.

With no benchmark scores and a 50th percentile rank, the GPU’s performance is unquantified in the data, but its specifications suggest it is designed for professional or embedded use rather than high-end gaming. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for large textures or compute workloads, and the 576.0 GB/s bandwidth supports memory-intensive tasks. The RT cores enable ray tracing, but the relatively low FP32 throughput means rendering performance will be below that of gaming-focused GPUs with higher TFLOPS. For rendering workloads, this GPU can handle moderate tasks, but users expecting high frame rates or fast render times will be disappointed. The lack of power connectors and 120 W TDP indicate it is efficient, but this comes at the cost of raw performance.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, not empirical data. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 6739 in Cinebench R23 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1269 suggest it can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, especially at lower resolutions. The GPU’s 50th percentile rank and FP32 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS indicate it is capable of 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, but at 1440p, frame rates will drop, and at 4K, the GPU will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles.

Based on the CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 9002, games that utilize multiple cores will see strong performance, but the GPU will likely bottleneck in most modern titles. For esports games like Counter-Strike or Valorant, which are CPU-intensive, the 9900X3D could achieve very high frame rates at 1080p, potentially exceeding 200 FPS, but this is an estimate. For AAA titles at 1440p, expect frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range on medium settings, again an estimate. At 4K, the GPU’s memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s will be insufficient for high-detail textures, leading to sub-60 FPS performance. The data cannot provide exact figures, so these expectations should be treated as rough estimates based on the GPU’s mid-pack ranking and the CPU’s top-tier status.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance supports high frame rates in CPU-bound titles at 1080p, but the GPU’s 50th percentile will limit overall FPS, making 144Hz gaming possible only in less demanding games. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2512 indicates strong dual-core performance for older game engines.

Streaming: The 12-core/24-thread CPU can handle game encoding and streaming simultaneously, with the PassMark multithread score of 56154 providing ample headroom. The GPU can assist with NVENC, but no specific encoding numbers are available; the CPU will likely handle the load without significant frame drops.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 accelerates timeline rendering and export in CPU-based workflows. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM supports effects processing, but its modest FP32 throughput means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than with a higher-tier card.

3D rendering: CPU rendering in Blender or similar will benefit from the 9900X3D’s 128 MB L3 cache and 12 cores, with R20 multicore score of 20049 indicating solid performance. GPU rendering will be limited by the RTX 5000’s 32.69 TFLOPS, which is below workstation-grade GPUs.

Software development: Compilation tasks will be fast, with Geekbench multicore of 22884 and PassMark integer math of 179727 ensuring quick build times. The 128 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, improving performance in large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 4646 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness, while the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth handles multitasking. The GPU is more than sufficient for productivity applications, and the 120 W TDP keeps power consumption manageable.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path for the CPU. The 9900X3D is part of the Ryzen 9000 series, and users can potentially upgrade to higher-tier processors within the same socket, though the data does not specify which models. The motherboard supports DDR5 memory, and the dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is current. PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU allows for fast NVMe SSDs and future GPUs, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The CPU’s TDP of 120 W is moderate, and the GPU also has a TDP of 120 W, with no suggested PSU listed, but the system’s total power draw is estimated to be around 240 W plus other components, so a quality 650W PSU would be a safe choice, though this is a qualitative estimate.

The memory support for DDR5 with ECC is a feature for workstations, and the 128 MB L3 cache is a unique advantage for gaming. A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, as the CPU has significant headroom and would not bottleneck a higher-tier graphics card. The data shows the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, so replacing it with a GPU in the 80th percentile or higher would dramatically improve gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU itself is unlikely to need upgrading for several years, given its 91st percentile rank. The platform’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future GPUs will have adequate bandwidth, and the AM5 socket is expected to support future Ryzen generations, though this is not explicitly stated in the data.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile rank among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D holds a percentile rank of 91 among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 91% of processors in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF?

A: The 9900X3D has an average benchmark score of 54762, which is 0.6% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF’s average score of 55093, indicating the rival is marginally faster.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, using 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 9900X3D supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation applications requiring data integrity.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 71, indicating the system as a whole performs better than 71% of configurations in the database.

Q: Are there measured FPS figures for this exact combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU-GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s L3 cache size?

A: The processor features a 128 MB L3 cache, which is large and beneficial for gaming and cache-sensitive workloads, along with 1 MB of L2 cache per core.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds