SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

17,789 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

This pairing combines AMD's top-tier 12-core Zen 5 desktop processor with NVIDIA's professional Turing-based Quadro RTX 4000 GPU, creating a desktop workstation configuration that leans heavily on CPU throughput. The processor sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU rests at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, giving the combined system a 76th percentile overall ranking. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, using the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It launches with a 4.40 GHz base clock and boosts up to 5.50 GHz, operating within a 120 W TDP envelope. The chip carries 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die layout with 2x 70.6 mm² die sizes. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 128 MB of L3 cache, which is critical for the 3D V-Cache performance characteristics that this processor family is known for.

Benchmark results show exceptional scaling across thread counts. The 3DMark suite reveals a single-thread score of 1269, which climbs to 2512 at 2 threads, 4885 at 4 threads, 9002 at 8 threads, and peaks at 13795 at 16 threads, with max-thread performance reaching 12490. This scaling pattern demonstrates strong efficiency up to 8 threads, with diminishing but still solid returns beyond that point. Cinebench R23 scores of 6739 single-core and 47737 multi-core place this processor firmly in high-performance desktop territory, while Geekbench scores of 3041 single-core and 22884 multi-core corroborate the strong showing.

The PassMark suite provides deeper insight into workload-specific capabilities. Integer math scores hit 179727, floating-point math reaches 119622, and extended instructions (SIMD) achieve 55426. Data compression performance is particularly strong at 685074, while data encryption processes at 33282. The processor handles random string sorting at 71864 and finds prime numbers at a rate of 544. Multithreaded PassMark performance sits at 56154, with physics calculations at 5340. Single-thread PassMark performance is 4646, giving the chip an average benchmark score of 54762.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 9900X3D is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093 on average, a mere 0.6% difference. It leads the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K by 1.3%, the Intel Xeon 6505P by 2%, and the Intel Core i7-14700F by 2.1%. These small deltas indicate that the 9900X3D sits at the top of its immediate competitive bracket, though not by a commanding margin. For real-world workloads, this means the CPU will handle heavily threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with ease, while single-threaded applications receive near-class-leading responsiveness.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all gaming figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of each component. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 6739 in Cinebench R23 and 4646 in PassMark single-thread suggests excellent frame pacing in CPU-bound scenarios, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 indicate modest rasterization capability relative to modern gaming cards.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this pairing would likely see the GPU become the limiting factor in most titles. The Quadro RTX 4000's 7.119 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 416.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth place it in the range of mid-tier gaming graphics cards from its era. The CPU would have ample headroom at this resolution, potentially delivering high frame rates in esports and lighter titles, but AAA games with demanding graphics would see performance constrained by the GPU. The RTX 4000's 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides sufficient capacity for 1080p ultra textures, though some modern titles may approach the limit.

At 1440p, the GPU bottleneck becomes more pronounced. The estimated frame rates would drop by roughly 20-30% compared to 1080p across most titles, given that the GPU's pixel rate of 98.88 GPixel/s and texture rate of 222.5 GTexel/s are moderate by current standards. The CPU's performance headroom remains untapped at this resolution, as the GPU's rendering throughput sets the ceiling. For competitive shooters and less demanding games, 1440p high-refresh gaming might still be achievable, but ultra settings at 1440p would likely yield playable-but-not-high-refresh results.

At 4K resolution, the system would struggle with ultra settings in graphically intensive titles. The GPU's memory bandwidth and compute throughput are insufficient for sustained 60 FPS in most modern AAA games at 4K ultra. The CPU's immense L3 cache and high boost clock would not compensate for the GPU's limitations at this resolution. However, for older titles, indie games, or games with scalable settings, 4K at medium or high settings could remain viable. The data clearly indicates this is not a 4K ultra gaming system, but rather a workstation that can handle moderate gaming on the side.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 54762 places it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, indicating top-tier processor performance. Its nearest competitor, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, scores 55093, essentially identical. The gap widens slightly against the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K at 54053 (1.3% behind), the Intel Xeon 6505P at 53701 (2% behind), and the Intel Core i7-14700F at 53620 (2.1% behind). This positioning confirms the 9900X3D is a flagship-class desktop processor, competitive with the best Intel has to offer in this segment.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 17789 places it at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, a mid-tier position. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17666 (0.7% difference), followed by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 at 17639 (0.9% difference), the AMD Radeon 780M at 17588 (1.1% difference), and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17551 (1.4% difference). This is notable: the Quadro RTX 4000 essentially matches the GeForce RTX 4060 in average benchmark score, despite being from an older architecture and designed for professional workloads rather than gaming.

The combined picture shows a significant imbalance. The CPU outperforms 91% of all processors, while the GPU outperforms only 61% of all graphics cards. This creates a system where the processor is capable of far more than the GPU can feed or render. In GPU-bound workloads, the CPU would sit idle waiting for the GPU to complete its tasks. In CPU-bound workloads, the GPU would finish its portion quickly and wait for the processor. The combined percentile of 76 reflects this imbalance — the system is better than average overall, but its performance ceiling is dictated almost entirely by the GPU's capabilities.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (6739 in Cinebench R23) and high boost clock of 5.50 GHz would allow the GPU to reach its maximum frame output in most titles. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 suggests it can handle 1080p high-refresh in esports and lighter titles, but AAA games at ultra settings would likely cap below 144 Hz. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p, but not future-proof for heavy texture packs.

Streaming: The 12-core CPU with 24 threads provides ample encoding headroom. The PassMark multithread score of 56154 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47737 indicate that software x264 encoding would have minimal impact on gaming performance, as the processor has enough cores to handle both simultaneously. The GPU's lack of dedicated NVENC from the Turing generation is present (36 RT cores, 288 tensor cores), though its compute score of 6176 in PassMark GPU compute is modest for hardware encoding tasks.

Video editing: The CPU excels in this workload. Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 20049 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22884 indicate strong performance in timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 compute would accelerate effects and transitions, though its 8 GB VRAM may limit working with large 4K timelines or complex compositions. Data compression score of 685074 suggests fast file I/O for media assets.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would be excellent, with Cinebench R23 multi-core of 47737 placing it among the fastest desktop processors. GPU-based rendering with CUDA or OptiX would benefit from the 2304 shading units and 288 tensor cores, but the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest compared to modern render-focused GPUs. The 36 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, though performance would be limited by the GPU's overall compute capacity.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the high multi-threaded performance. PassMark integer math score of 179727 and extended instructions score of 55426 indicate strong performance for code compilation, especially with SIMD-optimized builds. The 128 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases that exceed typical cache sizes. Single-thread performance of 4646 in PassMark single-thread ensures responsive IDE and editor interaction.

Student and office work: This system is dramatically overprovisioned for typical office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM and professional drivers provide stable multi-monitor support with 3x DisplayPort 1.4a and 1x USB Type-C outputs. The 120 W CPU TDP and 160 W GPU TDP keep power consumption reasonable for a workstation, though the overall system would still require a 450 W PSU as suggested.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors across a 545 mm² die. It operates with a base clock of 1005 MHz and boosts to 1545 MHz, with memory running at 1625 MHz (13 Gbps effective). The card features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 416.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its 160 W TDP requires a single 8-pin power connector and fits in a single-slot form factor measuring 241 mm in length.

Compute resources include 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The card also contains 36 RT cores for hardware ray tracing and 288 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads. Pixel rate reaches 98.88 GPixel/s, texture rate hits 222.5 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 7.119 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 14.24 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs.

Benchmark results show moderate performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1873 indicates DirectX 12 gaming capability at entry-level to mid-range levels. Geekbench OpenCL score of 74540 and Vulkan score of 78844 suggest reasonable compute performance for professional applications. PassMark results show G3D score of 15117 (the primary gaming metric), G2D score of 846 (2D desktop performance), and GPU compute score of 6176. DirectX-specific PassMark scores are 108 for DX10, 128 for DX11, 52 for DX12, and 205 for DX9, which are relatively low figures for a professional card.

The GPU's 61st percentile ranking and its near-tie with the GeForce RTX 4060 (0.9% difference) in average benchmark score is surprising given the architectural differences. The Quadro RTX 4000's strength lies in driver certification and stability for professional applications rather than raw gaming performance. Its 8 GB VRAM, while matching consumer cards, is configured for workstation workloads like CAD, scientific visualization, and AI inference, where the 288 tensor cores provide acceleration for neural network operations.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture with a 4.40 GHz base clock and 5.50 GHz boost clock.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF?

A: The 9900X3D scores 54762 on average, which is 0.6% lower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF's score of 55093, making them effectively tied in performance.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 416.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 1625 MHz memory clock.

Q: Does the GPU support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Quadro RTX 4000 includes 36 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, along with 288 tensor cores for AI workloads.

Q: What is the combined system percentile ranking?

A: The CPU-GPU combination achieves a 76th percentile overall ranking, with the CPU at 91st percentile and GPU at 61st percentile among their respective categories.

Q: What power supply is recommended for this build?

A: The suggested PSU is 450 W, based on the CPU's 120 W TDP and GPU's 160 W TDP requirements.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No, the data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this CPU-GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on component benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a clear CPU-favored imbalance. The processor operates at the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs. This 30-percentage-point gap means the CPU is capable of far more work than the GPU can keep pace with in graphics-intensive scenarios. In gaming, the GPU would be the bottleneck at virtually all resolutions above 1080p, as its 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 416.0 GB/s bandwidth are substantially below what the CPU can feed.

Evidence from the benchmark scores supports this conclusion. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 47737 represents top-tier rendering performance, while the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 15117 is mid-range. In a balanced system, these scores would be closer in relative percentile. The GPU's nearest rival being the GeForce RTX 4060 (0.9% difference) confirms its mid-range positioning, while the CPU's rivals are all high-end desktop processors. This suggests the GPU would limit frame rates in games, while the CPU would limit performance in compute-heavy workloads only if the GPU were significantly faster.

For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering in CPU-based engines, or software compilation, the GPU is not a limiting factor. The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads would operate at full capacity. However, for GPU-accelerated rendering or gaming, the Quadro RTX 4000's compute and memory bandwidth would cap performance well below what the CPU could theoretically support. The 8 GB VRAM also acts as a bottleneck for large textures or datasets, regardless of the CPU's capabilities.

The practical implication is that this system excels at CPU-intensive professional workloads but underperforms in GPU-intensive tasks relative to its processor's potential. Upgrading the GPU would yield significant performance gains in graphics workloads without requiring a CPU change. Conversely, the CPU has substantial headroom for future GPU upgrades, meaning the system can be balanced over time with a single component swap.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining AMD's Ryzen 9 9900X3D processor with NVIDIA's Quadro RTX 4000 workstation GPU. The CPU is a flagship Zen 5 part with 12 cores, 24 threads, and a 5.50 GHz boost clock, released in January 2025 with a launch MSRP of $599. The GPU is an end-of-life Turing workstation card from November 2018, originally launched at 899 USD. The pairing represents a significant generational mismatch, with the CPU being current-generation hardware and the GPU being several generations old.

The system's combined percentile of 76 places it in the upper quartile of all desktop configurations. This ranking is driven almost entirely by the CPU's exceptional performance, as the GPU's 61st percentile is below average for a system at this tier. The CPU's 91st percentile means it outperforms 91% of all processors, while the GPU's 61st percentile means it outperforms only 61% of all graphics cards. This is a workstation-oriented build where CPU compute takes priority over gaming graphics performance.

The overall tier of this system is "high-end CPU with mid-range GPU." It would be classified as a professional workstation for tasks like software development, scientific computing, or CPU-based rendering, rather than a gaming rig. The GPU provides adequate acceleration for professional applications that benefit from CUDA or tensor cores, but its gaming performance is comparable to a mid-range consumer card. The 76th percentile overall reflects a system that is better than three-quarters of all desktop configurations, though not by virtue of balanced components.

Who Should Build It

This system targets professionals and power users whose workloads are CPU-bound. Software developers would benefit from the 12-core, 24-thread processor with 179727 PassMark integer math score and 55426 extended instructions score, which accelerate compilation and code analysis. The 128 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases and virtual machines. Video editors working with CPU-based codecs would see strong export performance from the 47737 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while the GPU's 8 GB VRAM provides adequate acceleration for effects and color grading.

3D artists using CPU-based renderers would find this system well-suited, as rendering performance scales with core count. The 20049 Cinebench R20 multi-core score and 22884 Geekbench multi-core score indicate fast iteration times for complex scenes. The GPU's RT cores and tensor cores provide some acceleration for viewport rendering and AI denoising, though the 7.119 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest. Data scientists and AI researchers would benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 685074 and the GPU's 288 tensor cores for inference tasks.

Students in engineering or computer science programs would find this system overprovisioned for coursework but capable of handling any academic workload. The single-thread performance of 4646 in PassMark ensures responsive daily use, while the multi-thread capabilities handle parallel assignments. Small business workstations running databases, ERP systems, or financial modeling would benefit from the CPU's data encryption score of 33282 and random string sorting score of 71864. The 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs support multi-monitor productivity setups.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless they primarily play at 1080p with moderate settings. The GPU's 15117 PassMark G3D score and 1873 3DMark Steel Nomad score indicate entry-level to mid-range gaming performance. The CPU's gaming potential is wasted with this GPU, as the processor could easily drive a much faster graphics card. For users who need occasional gaming alongside professional work, this system will handle casual titles, but dedicated gaming builds would achieve better frame rates with a consumer GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory support. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 CPU lanes, offering ample bandwidth for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking within the 120 W TDP envelope. The integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 slots but limits bandwidth to older standards. The card's 160 W TDP and single 8-pin connector are modest, and the suggested PSU of 450 W provides substantial headroom for the entire system. The CPU's 120 W TDP combined with the GPU's 160 W TDP leaves room for additional components within the 450 W budget, though a higher-capacity PSU would be needed for future upgrades.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. The CPU's 91st percentile performance has significant headroom, and replacing the Quadro RTX 4000 with a modern GPU would immediately improve gaming frame rates and GPU-accelerated compute performance. The PCIe Gen 5 support on the AM5 platform ensures compatibility with current and future graphics cards. Memory capacity can also be expanded, as the dual-channel DDR5 interface supports high-capacity kits for memory-intensive workloads.

For users seeking balanced performance, upgrading the GPU to a card in the 90th percentile or higher would better match the CPU's capabilities. The 450 W PSU suggestion would need revision for more powerful GPUs, as modern high-end cards typically require 650-850 W. Alternatively, users could add a second Quadro RTX 4000 for SLI or compute scaling, though the end-of-life status of the card makes this less attractive. The platform itself — AM5 with DDR5 and PCIe Gen 5 — has a clear upgrade path for several generations of AMD processors, making this a future-proof foundation that only needs a GPU refresh to reach its full potential.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds