SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

54,209 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration built on AMD’s latest Zen 5 architecture and NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace GPU design. The CPU, a 12-core, 24-thread Granite Ridge part, combines a 4.40 GHz base clock with a 5.50 GHz boost clock, while the GPU packs 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus. This build sits in the 89th combined percentile across all systems, indicating a top-tier configuration for demanding workloads and high-resolution gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 5 architecture at TSMC’s 4 nm node. It operates within a 120 W TDP and supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, offering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The chip features a substantial 128 MB L3 cache, which is critical for gaming performance, alongside 80 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 cache per core. With PCIe Gen 5 support providing 24 CPU lanes, this processor is positioned for high-throughput storage and graphics connectivity.

Benchmark data places the 9900X3D in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54762. In multi-threaded workloads, the processor achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 and a Geekbench multicore score of 22884, demonstrating strong parallel processing capability. Single-thread performance is equally robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6739 and a Geekbench single-core score of 3041. The 3DMark results show a scaling pattern from 2512 with 2 threads to 13795 with max threads, indicating efficient utilization of all 24 threads.

The nearest rival comparisons show a tight competition at the top. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF scores 55093 on average, which is 0.6% higher than the 9900X3D, making the difference negligible in real-world terms. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K trails by 1.3%, while the Intel Xeon 6505P and Intel Core i7-14700F are 2% and 2.1% behind, respectively. This clustering suggests that the 9900X3D is competitive with, but not decisively ahead of, the latest mid-range Intel offerings in aggregate benchmarks.

For real workloads, the 128 MB L3 cache gives the 9900X3D a distinct advantage in cache-sensitive applications like gaming and data compression. The Passmark data compression score of 685074 highlights this strength, while the floating-point math score of 119622 and integer math score of 179727 indicate solid computational throughput for scientific and financial simulations. The 4 nm process node and 16,630 million transistors contribute to efficiency, though the 120 W TDP requires a capable cooling solution.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 6739 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU’s high frame rates combine to deliver exceptional performance. At 1080p, titles like Counter-Strike 2 reach 323 FPS and Valorant hits 582 FPS, easily saturating 240 Hz and 360 Hz displays. The 128 MB L3 cache minimizes latency, ensuring consistent frame pacing even in CPU-bound scenarios.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread configuration provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 20049 ensures that background encoding tasks will not starve the game of CPU resources. The GPU’s dedicated tensor cores can offload encoding work, though the CPU alone has sufficient throughput for x264 encoding at moderate presets.

Video editing: Multi-threaded performance is strong, with a Passmark multithread score of 56154 and a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4811. Timeline scrubbing and export tasks benefit from the 24 threads, while the 16 GB GPU memory handles large 4K and 8K project files without overflowing to system RAM. The Geekbench multicore score of 22884 supports smooth preview rendering in applications like Premiere Pro and DaVinci Resolve.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 47737 places it in the top tier for CPU-based rendering. For GPU-accelerated renderers, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 80 RT cores provide substantial compute power. The pair’s combined percentile of 89 indicates that this system can handle complex scenes with ray tracing and global illumination in Blender Cycles or V-Ray.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the high multi-threaded throughput, with a Passmark integer math score of 179727. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth accelerates large codebases, while the 128 MB L3 cache reduces access latency for frequently used libraries. The single-thread score of 4646 in Passmark ensures responsive IDE and terminal interactions.

Student and office work: While overkill for basic tasks, the system’s efficiency at lower thread counts is notable. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2512 and 4-thread score of 4885 show that the CPU remains responsive in lightly threaded applications. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback display output, and the DDR5 memory support ensures fast multitasking for research, document editing, and spreadsheets.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 54762 places it in the 91st percentile of all processors. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, scores 55093, a 0.6% difference that is virtually imperceptible. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is 1.3% slower, while the Intel Xeon 6505P and Intel Core i7-14700F trail by 2% and 2.1%, respectively. This places the 9900X3D in a competitive position, though not at the absolute top of the CPU hierarchy.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 54209 puts it in the 86th percentile of all graphics cards. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s closest rival is the standard RTX 4080, which scores 54247, a 0.1% difference that is effectively a tie. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% slower, while the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and Radeon 8060S are 2.7% and 2.8% slower, respectively. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6600 and Passmark G3D score of 34245 confirm its high-end positioning.

Combined, the CPU and GPU achieve a system-level percentile of 89. The pair ranks 210th out of 3732 pairs in terms of average FPS across games, with an average of 204.3 FPS. This places the configuration in the top 6% of all tested pairs, indicating excellent gaming performance. The data shows a balanced combination where neither component severely bottlenecks the other, though specific workload scaling varies as detailed in the bottleneck analysis.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets enthusiasts and professionals who require top-tier performance across both CPU and GPU-intensive tasks. Gamers playing at 2560x1440 will find the sweet spot, with titles like Call of Duty: Warzone hitting 161 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 reaching 214 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system still delivers playable frame rates in demanding titles, such as 74 FPS in Ark: Survival Ascended and 69 FPS in Control, though 1080p remains the domain of competitive esports players seeking maximum refresh rates.

Content creators working with 4K video or complex 3D scenes will benefit from the CPU’s 47737 Cinebench R23 multicore score and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM. The 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 compute capability accelerates rendering and AI-assisted editing tools. Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 24 threads and 179727 Passmark integer math score, which reduce build times significantly.

Students and small business workstations may find this configuration over-specified, but its efficiency at lower thread counts ensures it handles office productivity without excessive power draw. The 120 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP require a robust power supply and cooling, but the performance justifies the investment for users who demand zero compromises. The ECC memory support on the CPU side makes it suitable for workstation-class reliability in data-sensitive environments.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a well-balanced pairing, but bottleneck dynamics shift depending on resolution and workload. At 1920x1080, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (6739 Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures it can feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking means it becomes the limiting factor in lighter CPU-bound games. For example, Valorant at 1080p hits 582 FPS, suggesting the CPU is not the constraint, while the GPU’s frame rate ceiling caps performance.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440 and 3840x2160, the GPU becomes progressively more dominant in limiting frame rates. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows an average drop of roughly 30-40% across games, which is consistent with GPU-bound rendering. For instance, Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 95 FPS at 1080p to 71 FPS at 1440p, a 25% reduction that indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck.

The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 86th percentile suggests the CPU has slightly more headroom. In multi-threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU’s 24 threads can handle parallel tasks without bottlenecking the GPU’s compute capabilities. However, in games with high draw call counts or physics simulations, the CPU’s 128 MB L3 cache provides a buffer, but the 5.50 GHz boost clock may still hit limits in extreme scenarios. The pair’s rank of 210 out of 3732 pairs, with an average FPS of 204.3, indicates that this is a harmonious pairing for most gaming workloads.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data, collected from real-world testing, shows this system excels at high refresh rates. At 1920x1080, competitive titles dominate: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 714 FPS, Valorant reaches 582 FPS, and Tom Clancy’s Rainbow Six Siege achieves 384 FPS. Even demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended reach 167 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone hits 181 FPS, making 1080p gaming exceptionally smooth on high-refresh monitors.

At 2560x1440, the system remains highly capable. Counter-Strike 2 delivers 214 FPS, while Valorant maintains 552 FPS. Single-player titles see reduced but still excellent performance: Cyberpunk 2077 hits 71 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 reaches 65 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator achieves 94 FPS. This resolution offers the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate for most users.

At 3840x2160, the system transitions to a high-quality experience rather than a high-refresh one. Counter-Strike 2 drops to 120 FPS, while Valorant remains at 505 FPS due to its low graphical demands. AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (47 FPS) and Red Dead Redemption 2 (43 FPS) require settings adjustments to maintain 60 FPS, but less demanding games like Call of Duty: Warzone (136 FPS) and Ark: Survival Ascended (74 FPS) remain fully playable. The data shows a clear resolution scaling pattern where the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher pixel counts.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz with a boost clock of 2550 MHz, and its memory runs at 1438 MHz (23 Gbps effective).

The GPU’s compute specifications are substantial: 10240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It includes 80 RT cores for ray tracing and 320 tensor cores for AI acceleration. This hardware translates to 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an equal 52.22 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (1:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 285.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 816.0 GTexel/s, enabling high-resolution texture filtering and rasterization.

In benchmark tests, the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 6600 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 219065 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 260075 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark G3D score of 34245 and GPU compute score of 19822 further confirm its high-end status. The 86th percentile ranking places it just behind the RTX 4080 (0.1% faster) but ahead of the Radeon Pro W5700X by 1.1%. The 320 W TDP requires a 700 W power supply and a triple-slot cooler, with a 16-pin power connector.

For rendering workloads, the 16 GB VRAM and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth prevent memory overflow in complex scenes, while the 80 RT cores accelerate ray-traced effects. The tensor cores enable DLSS and AI-based denoising, which are critical for real-time ray tracing at high resolutions. The GPU’s performance in DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF is 0.6% faster in average benchmark score, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K is 1.3% slower. The Intel Xeon 6505P and Core i7-14700F are 2% and 2.1% slower, respectively.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What frame rate can I expect in Valorant at 1440p?

A: The measured FPS at 2560x1440 is 552 FPS, making it suitable for high-refresh displays.

Q: Is the GPU still in production?

A: No, the production status is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of January 30, 2024.

Q: What is the system’s overall performance percentile?

A: The combined system sits in the 89th percentile, with the CPU at 91st and GPU at 86th percentile.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU features 128 MB of L3 cache, which is a key factor in gaming performance.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, a 12-core Zen 5 desktop processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, an Ada Lovelace GPU. Both components are designed for desktop use, with the CPU featuring a 120 W TDP and the GPU a 320 W TDP. The configuration achieves an 89th combined percentile ranking, placing it in the upper echelon of all systems.

The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking and the GPU’s 86th percentile ranking indicate a slight CPU advantage in raw compute capability. However, the pair’s rank of 210 out of 3732 pairs in average FPS, with an average of 204.3 FPS, demonstrates that the combination excels in practical gaming scenarios. The system is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, with capable 4K performance in less demanding titles.

The RTX 4080 SUPER’s end-of-life status suggests this is a mature platform, but its 16 GB VRAM and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance remain competitive. The CPU’s 128 MB L3 cache and 24 threads provide a strong foundation for both gaming and productivity. Overall, this is a high-tier desktop build that balances CPU and GPU capabilities effectively, with the data showing no significant bottleneck in either direction.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds