SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

27,565 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 pairing represents a desktop build that couples a 12-core Zen 5 processor with a 24 GB Ampere flagship GPU. The CPU, released on 2025-01-05, sits in the 91st percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 54762, while the GPU, now end-of-life, holds the 73rd percentile with an average score of 27565. Together, this combination achieves an 82nd combined percentile, indicating a system that is strong across both compute and graphics workloads, though the GPU’s age relative to newer architectures is a factor in its overall standing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is built on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket for AMD’s 9000 series. The processor uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node. Memory support is limited to DDR5, running through a dual-channel memory bus with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which is a consideration for workstation builds requiring data integrity. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU itself, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for modern storage and expansion cards.

The RTX 3090, by contrast, uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. This means that while the CPU can supply Gen 5 lanes, the GPU will operate at Gen 4 speeds, which is not a bottleneck for the 3090’s bandwidth requirements. The platform’s PSU headroom is defined by the GPU’s suggested PSU of 750 W, which is the figure to plan around for the entire system. The CPU’s TDP is 120 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 350 W, so a 750 W power supply provides adequate capacity for both components under load, assuming no other high-draw peripherals. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the board should support that feature, though the 3D V-Cache design may have specific thermal considerations.

A sensible next upgrade on this platform would be to replace the GPU with a newer model that supports PCIe Gen 5, given that the CPU already provides those lanes. The RTX 3090 is end-of-life, so users looking to extend the system’s life could focus on the graphics card. Alternatively, adding more DDR5 memory or faster storage via the Gen 5 lanes would be straightforward, as the AM5 socket remains active for future CPU generations. The 750 W PSU headroom, however, may need revisiting if a more power-hungry GPU is installed, but for the current configuration, it is sufficient.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1269 and a passmark_single_thread score of 4646, supports high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios. The GPU’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 5118 indicates solid DirectX 12 performance, though the RTX 3090’s 73rd percentile suggests it may not reach the highest refresh rates at maximum settings in the most demanding titles. For 1080p and 1440p, the combination is likely capable of high refresh, but at 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a passmark_multithread score of 56154, provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The GPU’s tensor cores, 328 of them, support hardware-accelerated encoding, offloading work from the CPU. This setup can handle a game, a stream encoder, and background tasks without significant performance degradation, as the CPU’s multithreaded scores are strong.

Video editing: The CPU’s cinebench_r23_multicore score of 47737 and geekbench_multicore score of 22884 indicate strong performance in multi-threaded rendering tasks. The GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM and 936.2 GB/s of bandwidth are well-suited for handling large video files and effects, though the GPU’s age may limit support for the latest codecs. The combination is capable of 4K video editing with smooth timeline scrubbing and faster-than-real-time exports for many formats.

3D rendering: The CPU’s passmark_floating_point_math score of 119622 and integer_math score of 179727 show strong compute performance for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s fp32 performance of 35.58 TFLOPS and 10496 shading units make it a capable renderer for GPU-accelerated engines like Blender or Octane. The 24 GB VRAM is particularly valuable for complex scenes that exceed the memory capacity of smaller GPUs.

Software development: The CPU’s passmark_data_compression score of 685074 and data_encryption score of 33282 indicate strong performance in data-intensive tasks like compilation and encryption. The 12 cores and 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the single-thread score of 1269 in 3dmark ensures responsive compilers for less parallel workloads. The system is well-suited for development environments with multiple virtual machines or containers.

Student and office work: For typical productivity tasks, this system is overkill. The CPU’s single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches, and the GPU’s 3dmark_2_threads score of 2512 is irrelevant here, but the passmark_g2d score of 1063 indicates solid 2D performance. The power draw of 350 W for the GPU is excessive for office use, so this build is better reserved for users who also do creative or compute work on the side.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 54762, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, scores 55093, a delta of -0.6%, meaning the 9900X3D is essentially tied with that chip. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245K scores 54053, a 1.3% delta, and the Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701, a 2% delta. The CPU’s closest competition is thus the Core Ultra 5 series, with the 9900X3D holding a slight edge over the non-K variant. In multi-threaded tests, the CPU achieves a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 47737, and in single-core, it scores 6739 in cinebench_r23_singlecore. The passmark_multithread score is 56154, and the single-thread score is 4646.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 27565, placing it in the 73rd percentile. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, which scores 27435, a 0.5% delta, meaning the 3090 is slightly faster. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT scores 27425, a 0.5% delta, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 scores 27839, a -1% delta. The GPU’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score is 5118, and its passmark_g3d score is 26645. The passmark_gpu_compute score is 15356, indicating strong compute capability. The combined picture is a CPU that is near the top of its class, while the GPU is mid-pack among current offerings, with the CPU outperforming its rivals by a small margin and the GPU trailing its closest competitors by a similar small margin.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who need strong multi-threaded CPU performance for productivity and compute, paired with a GPU that has substantial VRAM for large datasets or high-resolution textures. Gamers at 1440p will likely see excellent frame rates, but at 4K, the GPU’s 73rd percentile may require lowering settings to achieve high refresh. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or data science will benefit from the CPU’s 12 cores and the GPU’s 24 GB of VRAM, which is rare among consumer cards. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s high passmark_multithread score of 56154. Students and small business workstations would find this system over-specified and power-hungry, given the GPU’s 350 W TDP, but for a professional workstation that also games, it is a balanced choice.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all FPS figures here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, and they should be treated as approximations rather than measured results. The CPU’s 3dmark_16_threads score of 12490 and the GPU’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 5118 provide a basis for estimating performance. In CPU-bound titles, the CPU’s high single-thread score of 1269 suggests it can drive high frame rates at 1080p. In GPU-bound scenarios, the RTX 3090’s 73rd percentile indicates it sits between modern mid-range and high-end GPUs, so at 4K ultra settings, frame rates in demanding games might hover around 60 FPS, while at 1440p, 100+ FPS is plausible in less demanding titles. These are estimates, and actual performance will vary by game and settings.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process. It packs 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The GPU has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1219 MHz, which translates to 19.5 Gbps effective. The base clock is 1395 MHz, with a boost clock of 1695 MHz. The GPU features 10496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 82 RT cores, and 328 tensor cores. Its pixel rate is 189.8 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 556.0 GTexel/s. The fp32 performance is 35.58 TFLOPS, with fp16 also at 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1).

The benchmark scores show a passmark_g3d score of 26645, which is close to its rivals, and a passmark_gpu_compute score of 15356, indicating solid compute throughput. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 5118 places it in a mid-tier position for modern DirectX 12 workloads. For rendering, the 24 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, allowing large scenes to fit entirely in memory without swapping. The RT cores and tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the 82 RT cores are fewer than newer generations, so ray-traced performance will be respectable but not leading-edge. The GPU’s bandwidth of 936.2 GB/s is exceptionally high, which helps in texture-heavy and compute-heavy workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU and GPU are relatively well-matched, but the data suggests the GPU is the more likely bottleneck in gaming scenarios. The CPU sits in the 91st percentile, while the GPU is in the 73rd, a gap that indicates the CPU has more headroom than the GPU. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation or data encryption, the CPU will be the limiting factor, but its high scores mean that is less likely in most gaming scenarios. The FPS scaling, estimated from the scores, would show diminishing gains as resolution increases, with the GPU’s 73rd percentile capping performance at 4K. Conversely, at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance can push frame rates higher, but the GPU may still be the constraint in graphically demanding titles. In compute-heavy tasks like 3D rendering, the balance depends on the software; CPU-based renderers will use the 9900X3D’s 12 cores effectively, while GPU-based renderers will leverage the 3090’s 35.58 TFLOPS and 24 GB VRAM. The 750 W suggested PSU indicates that neither component is excessively power-hungry relative to the other, so the system is not bottlenecked by power delivery.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM capacity and memory type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 has 24 GB of GDDR6X memory.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and does it support DDR5?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s suggested PSU wattage?

A: The RTX 3090 has a suggested PSU of 750 W.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 54762, which is 0.6% lower than the Core Ultra 5 245KF’s score of 55093.

Q: Is the RTX 3090 still in production?

A: No, the production status is end-of-life.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU and GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 82.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series, using the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process, with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chip design of 2x 70.6 mm². The base clock is 4.40 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.50 GHz. The TDP is 120 W. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of L3 cache. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and includes ECC support. Integrated graphics are present in the form of Radeon Graphics. The CPU is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and has a launch MSRP of $599.

Benchmark results show a strong single-thread performance, with a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1269 and a cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 6739. The multi-threaded scores are equally impressive, with a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 47737 and a geekbench_multicore score of 22884. The passmark suite highlights specific strengths: data compression scores 685074, data encryption scores 33282, extended instructions score 55426, floating point math scores 119622, and integer math scores 179727. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 54762, placing it in the 91st percentile. Compared to its nearest rivals, it is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093, and slightly ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K at 54053. For real workloads, this means the CPU excels at tasks that use many threads, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulations, while also delivering top-tier responsiveness in single-threaded applications like games and office software. The 128 MB L3 cache is particularly beneficial for gaming and data-heavy workloads, reducing memory latency.