SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D

54,762 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration that balances a modern 12-core processor with a previous-generation flagship GPU. This analysis examines the measured performance data to determine the strengths, limitations, and ideal use cases for this combination.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, containing 16,630 million transistors across a dual-die design measuring 2x 70.6 mm². The processor features a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, with a TDP of 120 W.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a large 128 MB of L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 via a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, with ECC support included. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor itself.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales strongly with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1269 in single-thread to 2512 with 2 threads, 4885 with 4 threads, 9002 with 8 threads, 12490 with 16 threads, and 13795 with max threads. This scaling pattern indicates excellent efficiency in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded scenarios.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture: R15 multicore scores 4811 and single-core 679; R20 multicore scores 20049 and single-core 2830; R23 multicore scores 47737 and single-core 6739. The multicore-to-singlecore ratios in these tests demonstrate that the processor extracts meaningful performance from additional threads, which is typical of a 12-core design with strong per-core efficiency.

Geekbench scores of 3041 single-core and 22884 multicore place the CPU in a strong position. PassMark results show particular strengths in integer math (179727), floating point math (119622), and data compression (685074). The multithread score of 56154 and single-thread score of 4646 both indicate balanced performance across workload types.

The CPU sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 54762 puts it in close competition with the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF, which scores 55093 (a delta of -0.6%), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K at 54053 (a delta of 1.3%). The Intel Xeon 6505P scores 53701 (2% behind), and the Intel Core i7-14700F scores 53620 (2.1% behind). This places the 9900X3D essentially at parity with or slightly ahead of these rivals in average performance, though the margin is narrow.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (6739 in Cinebench R23 single-core) combined with the RTX 3080 produces excellent frame rates in esports titles. Counter-Strike 2 reaches 243 FPS at 1080p, Valorant hits 557 FPS at 1080p, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 289 FPS at 1080p. These results support very high refresh rate monitors in competitive scenarios.

Streaming: With 12 cores and 24 threads, the processor can handle game encoding and streaming workloads simultaneously. The PassMark multithread score of 56154 and strong data encryption performance (33282) indicate sufficient headroom for real-time encoding tasks alongside gaming, though the GPU's lack of a dedicated encoder mentioned in this data would mean reliance on CPU or alternative methods.

Video editing: The multicore performance is substantial, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 47737 and Geekbench multicore at 22884. These scores suggest the CPU can handle video encoding, effects processing, and timeline rendering efficiently. The floating point math score of 119622 further supports graphics-intensive editing tasks.

3D rendering: The processor's 12 cores provide solid rendering performance, as evidenced by the max-thread 3DMark score of 13795 and Cinebench R20 multicore of 20049. The 24 threads allow for good parallelization in render engines that scale with thread count, though the 128 MB L3 cache helps with scene data access.

Software development: The combination of strong single-thread (4646 PassMark single-thread) and multithread (56154 PassMark multithread) scores supports compilation tasks, which often involve both sequential and parallel phases. The data compression score of 685074 indicates fast build artifact handling.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but the single-thread performance ensures snappy application responsiveness. The integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU handles all heavy lifting. Office suites, web browsing, and document work would run without any performance concerns.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a configuration where the CPU and GPU are relatively well matched, but the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and workload. At 1920x1080, the CPU's strong single-thread performance pushes frame rates very high in esports titles, with Valorant at 557 FPS and CS:GO at 537 FPS. In these cases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as seen in the frame rate drops at 2560x1440 and 3840x2160.

The average FPS across games is 156, placing this pair at rank 1040 out of 3732 pairs. This rank indicates that many other CPU+GPU combinations deliver higher average frame rates, but the 80th combined percentile shows this is still a strong configuration overall.

In more demanding titles, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth become the limiting factors. Cyberpunk 2077 drops from 72 FPS at 1080p to 54 FPS at 1440p and 35 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU's rendering limits at higher resolutions. Similarly, Red Dead Redemption 2 achieves only 65 FPS at 1080p, 49 FPS at 1440p, and 32 FPS at 4K.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking versus the GPU's 68th percentile suggests the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. In CPU-light, GPU-heavy scenarios like 4K gaming, the RTX 3080 will be the primary constraint. Conversely, in CPU-intensive tasks like data compression (685074 PassMark score), the processor demonstrates capabilities that far exceed what the GPU can contribute.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p: The measured frame rates show excellent performance at these resolutions for most titles. Esports games run at very high frame rates, and AAA games maintain playable levels, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 72 FPS at 1080p and 54 FPS at 1440p.

Content creators: The CPU's strong multicore performance (47737 Cinebench R23 multicore) combined with the GPU's compute capabilities (14397 PassMark GPU compute) supports video editing, 3D modeling, and rendering workflows. The 24 threads handle multitasking between creative applications.

Software developers: The balanced CPU performance supports compilation, testing, and running multiple virtual machines or containers. The 128 MB L3 cache helps with code and asset access patterns.

Students: While this is a high-end system, students in engineering, computer science, or digital arts programs would benefit from the CPU's compute capabilities and the GPU's rendering performance for coursework.

Small business workstations: The ECC memory support and 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes make this suitable for workstation tasks that require data integrity and high-bandwidth peripherals. The processor's 91st percentile ranking ensures it handles demanding business applications.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves a 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54762. Its closest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF at 55093 (-0.6% delta), Intel Core Ultra 5 245K at 54053 (1.3% delta), Intel Xeon 6505P at 53701 (2% delta), and Intel Core i7-14700F at 53620 (2.1% delta). These results show the 9900X3D is competitive with, but not dramatically ahead of, these mid-range Intel options.

The GPU scores a 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23172. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23249 (-0.3% delta), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23250 (-0.3% delta), AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23273 (-0.4% delta), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23276 (-0.4% delta). This places the RTX 3080 in a dense performance cluster where small differences separate competitors.

Combined, this build achieves an 80th percentile ranking, with an average FPS of 156 across all tested games. The pair ranks 1040 out of 3732 total pairs, indicating that while many combinations produce higher average frame rates, this setup remains above average in overall gaming performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is based on the GA102 chip using the Ampere architecture, manufactured on Samsung's 8 nm process. The die contains 28,300 million transistors across 628 mm², with a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1440 MHz and boosts to 1710 MHz, with memory running at 1188 MHz effective 19 Gbps.

Memory configuration includes 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus, delivering 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth is substantial for 1080p and 1440p gaming but can become a constraint at 4K with high-resolution textures.

The GPU contains 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operations units. It features 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads. The pixel rate is 164.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 465.1 GTexel/s, with FP32 and FP16 performance both at 29.77 TFLOPS.

Benchmark scores show the GPU's capabilities: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 scores 4407, Geekbench OpenCL scores 152423, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 33620. PassMark results include G3D at 25086, GPU compute at 14397, and DirectX 11 at 207. The DirectX 12 score of 100 is notably lower, suggesting this GPU may not excel in the most modern DX12 workloads compared to its other metrics.

The 68th percentile ranking indicates the RTX 3080 is above average but not in the top tier of GPUs. Its 10 GB VRAM, while sufficient for many games at 1080p and 1440p, may limit performance in VRAM-heavy titles at 4K, as evidenced by the significant frame rate drops at 3840x2160 resolution across multiple games.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile and how does it compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is at the 91st percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 54762 is 0.6% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 245KF (55093), 1.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245K (54053), 2% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6505P (53701), and 2.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700F (53620).

Q: What are the key memory specifications of this CPU?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation reliability.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 perform in compute benchmarks?

A: The GPU scores 152423 in Geekbench OpenCL and 14397 in PassMark GPU compute. It has 8704 shading units and 272 tensor cores, with FP32 performance of 29.77 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the combined performance ranking of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The pair achieves an 80th combined percentile, ranks 1040 out of 3732 pairs, and delivers an average FPS of 156 across all tested games.

Q: What PCIe generation does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor alone. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1188 MHz effective 19 Gbps.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-thread versus multithread workloads?

A: Single-thread performance is strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 6739 and PassMark single-thread at 4646. Multithread performance is also substantial, with Cinebench R23 multicore at 47737 and PassMark multithread at 56154.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU, released on 2025-01-05, is an active production part from the 9000 series, while the GPU, released on 2020-08-31, is end-of-life from the GeForce 30-series. The processor sits at the 91st percentile among CPUs, while the GPU is at the 68th percentile among GPUs, resulting in an 80th combined percentile.

The average benchmark scores show a CPU (54762) that outperforms its GPU (23172) relative to their respective competitor pools. This creates a configuration where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card, meaning CPU-bound scenarios will perform exceptionally well while GPU-bound scenarios may limit overall system potential.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU provide ample bandwidth for high-speed storage and expansion cards. The processor's TDP of 120 W is modest for a 12-core part, and the GPU's TDP of 320 W with a suggested 700 W PSU indicates the power supply requirements for this system.

For the GPU, the RTX 3080 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and requires a 700 W power supply according to the suggested PSU rating. The card is dual-slot, 285 mm long, 112 mm tall, and 40 mm wide, with a 1x 12-pin power connector. Its display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, since the CPU's 91st percentile ranking leaves significant headroom. The RTX 3080's 68th percentile and end-of-life status suggest that a newer, higher-tier GPU would better utilize the CPU's capabilities, particularly for 4K gaming where the current GPU shows limitations (e.g., Cyberpunk 2077 at 35 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 32 FPS at 3840x2160).

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data (dataIsMeasured: true) shows this build's gaming capabilities vary significantly by title and resolution. At 1920x1080, esports titles perform exceptionally well: Valorant hits 557 FPS, CS:GO reaches 537 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 achieves 243 FPS. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege runs at 289 FPS, and Roblox reaches 314 FPS.

AAA titles at 1080p show strong but less extreme results. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 72 FPS, Control at 101 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone at 181 FPS. Heavier titles like Red Dead Redemption 2 (65 FPS) and The Medium (51 FPS) remain playable but show the GPU's limits.

At 2560x1440, performance remains solid for most games. Valorant drops to 476 FPS, Counter-Strike 2 to 161 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone to 161 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 54 FPS, Control at 77 FPS, and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 49 FPS. The Medium drops to 43 FPS, approaching the edge of comfortable playability.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and bandwidth limitations become apparent. Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 35 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 32 FPS, and The Medium to 34 FPS. Even lighter titles see significant drops: Counter-Strike 2 to 90 FPS, Valorant to 380 FPS, and Roblox to 119 FPS. The most demanding titles at 4K will require reduced settings for smooth gameplay, while esports and lighter games remain playable.