SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

This desktop pairing combines AMD's 12-core Zen 5 flagship with NVIDIA's professional-grade Ada Lovelace mobile GPU, placing the combination at the 71st percentile of all tracked system pairings. The CPU alone sits at the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU lands at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards, indicating a heavily CPU-dominant configuration where the processor's capabilities far outstrip the graphics subsystem in raw benchmark terms.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a pronounced performance asymmetry between the two components. The Ryzen 9 9900X achieves an average benchmark score of 57,498, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation holds a 50th percentile position with an average benchmark score of zero, reflecting the absence of direct GPU benchmark entries in the dataset. This gap of 42 percentile points between CPU and GPU positions creates a clear bottleneck profile: the graphics card will constrain performance in GPU-bound scenarios, while the processor has substantial headroom in compute-heavy workloads.

The CPU's multi-threaded scaling demonstrates strong core utilization. The 3DMark results show a progression from 2,519 at 2 threads to 12,552 at 16 threads, reaching 13,929 at maximum threads, indicating that the 12-core/24-thread configuration scales effectively across workloads that can exploit parallelism. The single-thread score of 1,286 in 3DMark and 2,253 in Cinebench R23 single-core suggest that lightly-threaded applications will not starve the GPU, as the processor can feed frames quickly. However, the GPU's 50th percentile standing means that at high resolutions and maximum settings, the graphics card will become the limiting factor well before the CPU's processing capacity is exhausted.

The FPS scaling picture, while not directly measured for this pairing, can be inferred from the component balance. The CPU's 92nd percentile position suggests it can drive high frame rates at lower resolutions where graphics load is lighter, but the GPU's mid-pack percentile will cap frame rates at higher resolutions. The 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate memory resources, but the GPU's raw compute throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 is modest relative to the CPU's 32,172 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, reinforcing that GPU-bound bottlenecks will emerge in graphically intensive scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the most significant performance imbalance in this pairing?

A: The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, a 42-point gap that makes the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation the primary bottleneck in GPU-bound workloads, particularly at higher resolutions and maximum graphics settings.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 9900X scores 57,498 on average, which is 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 9015, 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313, 1.1% behind the Intel Core i9-14900, and 1.4% behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M, placing it in a tight competitive cluster at the high end.

Q: What memory technology does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for error-sensitive professional workloads.

Q: Does the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation have ray tracing capabilities?

A: Yes, it includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores based on the Ada Lovelace architecture, with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU's threading configuration?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X features 12 physical cores with 24 threads, using the Zen 5 architecture with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, built on TSMC's 4 nm process.

Q: How does single-threaded performance compare to multi-threaded performance?

A: The CPU achieves a single-thread score of 2,253 in Cinebench R23 and 3,010 in Geekbench, while multi-threaded scores reach 32,172 in Cinebench R23 and 22,174 in Geekbench, showing strong scaling across the 12-core design.

Q: Is the GPU's memory bandwidth sufficient for its compute capabilities?

A: The 16 GB GDDR6 memory operates across a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which pairs with the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput to provide balanced memory access for rendering and compute workloads.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 930 MHz with a boost clock of 1,680 MHz, and the memory clock runs at 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s, driven by 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units.

The memory subsystem provides 16 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity supports large texture sets and complex scenes typical of professional visualization workloads, while the bandwidth enables sustained throughput for compute-heavy shaders. The GPU includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated operations such as DLSS and denoising.

The FP32 compute throughput of 32.69 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicates the GPU can handle both single-precision and half-precision workloads at comparable rates. The 50th percentile standing among all GPUs reflects a mid-range position in the graphics landscape, suggesting the card delivers competent but not class-leading performance. The absence of benchmark scores for the GPU in this dataset means the 50th percentile is derived from its characteristics relative to other tracked graphics cards, and the 120 W TDP with no power connectors indicates an integrated form factor suitable for portable or embedded systems.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 16 GB VRAM, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 76 RT cores positions the GPU for moderate ray-traced scenes and professional 3D visualization, though the 32.69 TFLOPS compute ceiling will cap performance on extremely complex renders. The API support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures broad compatibility across modern graphics and compute frameworks.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU compute power in a desktop form factor while needing professional-grade GPU features. The Ryzen 9 9900X's 92nd percentile CPU standing makes the system well-suited for software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running multi-threaded simulations, and content creators handling video encoding or 3D rendering tasks that scale across the 12 cores and 24 threads.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p resolutions will benefit from the CPU's strong single-thread performance (2,253 in Cinebench R23 single-core) for high-refresh-rate gaming, though the GPU's 50th percentile position means 4K gaming at maximum settings will likely be constrained by the graphics card. The 16 GB VRAM supports high-resolution textures, but the GPU's mid-pack compute throughput may require reduced settings at higher resolutions to maintain smooth frame rates.

Students and small business workstations will find the system adequate for multi-tasking, office productivity, and light content creation, given the CPU's 22,174 Geekbench multi-core score and 54,643 Passmark multi-thread score. The ECC memory support adds reliability for data-sensitive workloads, while the integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU encounters issues. The 120 W TDP of both components keeps thermal requirements manageable for desktop builds, though the GPU's IGP slot width and portable-device-dependent display outputs suggest it may be intended for specialized chassis rather than standard desktop cases.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. The chip contains 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with each die measuring 70.6 mm². The base clock of 4.40 GHz boosts to 5.60 GHz, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking for additional performance headroom.

The cache hierarchy provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, supporting the processor's ability to keep frequently accessed data close to the execution units. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC capability, while the PCIe Gen 5 interface provides 24 lanes directly from the CPU for high-bandwidth peripherals such as NVMe storage and expansion cards.

Benchmark results demonstrate the processor's strengths across a range of workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22,174 highlight strong parallel performance, while the single-core scores of 2,253 (Cinebench R23) and 3,010 (Geekbench) indicate excellent per-thread performance. The 3DMark thread scaling from 2,519 at 2 threads to 13,929 at maximum threads shows efficient core utilization without significant scaling penalties.

Specialized workloads benefit from the CPU's instruction set capabilities. The Passmark data compression score of 683,579 and data encryption score of 33,421 demonstrate strong throughput for data-intensive operations. Extended instructions score 55,243, while floating-point math achieves 120,083 and integer math reaches 181,056, covering a broad spectrum of compute patterns. The CPU's average benchmark score of 57,498 places it at the 92nd percentile, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 9015 (-0.1%), AMD EPYC 7313 (+0.2%), Intel Core i9-14900 (-1.1%), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (-1.4%), showing it competes at the top tier of both server and desktop processors.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores. The CPU's 92nd percentile position and strong single-thread performance (3,010 Geekbench single-core) suggest it can sustain high frame rates in CPU-bound gaming scenarios, while the GPU's 50th percentile standing indicates it will be the limiting factor for graphical performance.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the CPU's robust single-thread capabilities should allow the GPU to operate near its full potential, with the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput providing playable frame rates in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures, but the mid-pack compute performance may require adjusting settings from ultra to high for demanding games. At 4K, the GPU's 50th percentile position suggests frame rates will drop substantially, likely requiring reduced settings or resolution scaling to maintain smooth gameplay.

The GPU's ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for titles that implement RT effects, though the 76 RT cores are modest compared to higher-tier Ada Lovelace offerings. Tensor cores enable DLSS upscaling, which can offset the GPU's compute limitations by rendering at lower internal resolutions and upscaling to display resolution. The 120 W TDP of both components suggests thermal headroom for sustained gaming sessions, though the GPU's embedded-class design may have different thermal characteristics than desktop graphics cards.

Benchmark Performance

The combined system sits at the 71st percentile among all tracked pairings, reflecting a configuration where the CPU's high performance compensates for the GPU's mid-range standing. The CPU's average benchmark score of 57,498 places it in the 92nd percentile of all processors, with a tightly grouped set of nearest rivals: the AMD EPYC 9015 at 57,555 (0.1% higher), AMD EPYC 7313 at 57,399 (0.2% lower), Intel Core i9-14900 at 58,115 (1.1% higher), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M at 58,323 (1.4% higher).

The CPU's individual benchmark results show consistent strong performance: 32,172 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 22,174 in Geekbench multi-core, 13,929 in 3DMark maximum threads, and 54,643 in Passmark multithread. Single-thread performance is equally impressive with 2,253 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 3,010 in Geekbench single-core, and 4,672 in Passmark single-thread. The Passmark specialty tests demonstrate breadth: 683,579 in data compression, 33,421 in data encryption, 55,243 in extended instructions, 120,083 in floating-point math, 181,056 in integer math, and 72,013 in random string sorting.

The GPU's benchmark data is absent, preventing direct score comparisons, but the 50th percentile standing and zero average benchmark score indicate the GPU has not been subjected to the same benchmark suite as the CPU. The combined percentile of 71 suggests that in systems where both components are exercised, the CPU will dominate performance metrics, while the GPU contributes moderate graphics capability. The overall picture is a system with exceptional processing power for CPU-intensive tasks, paired with competent but not exceptional graphics performance.

Build Overview

This desktop build combines AMD's Ryzen 9 9900X processor with NVIDIA's RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU, creating a system with a 71st combined percentile ranking. The CPU represents the top tier of desktop processors at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, making this a CPU-dominant configuration. The desktop class designation confirms this is intended as a stationary system, though the GPU's embedded form factor (IGP slot width, no power connectors, portable-device-dependent display outputs) suggests it may be designed for specialized or compact desktop chassis rather than traditional tower cases.

The overall tier from the percentiles positions this as an upper-mid-range system: strong CPU capabilities with mid-pack graphics. The 12-core Zen 5 processor with 24 threads and 5.60 GHz boost clock provides substantial compute headroom, while the 16 GB Ada Lovelace GPU offers professional-grade features such as ray tracing cores and tensor cores. This combination suits workloads where CPU performance is paramount—compilation, simulation, rendering—while graphics tasks are secondary or moderate in intensity.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's 92nd percentile and 2,253 Cinebench R23 single-core score support high frame rates in CPU-bound titles at 1080p, but the GPU's 50th percentile will cap performance in graphically demanding games, making this suitable for competitive titles rather than max-settings AAA experiences.

Streaming: The 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample capacity for concurrent game encoding and streaming workloads, with the CPU handling the encoding overhead while maintaining gameplay performance, though the GPU's mid-range standing limits the visual quality settings available for the game itself.

Video Editing: The CPU's 32,172 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 181,056 Passmark integer math accelerate timeline rendering and export encoding, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM supports large preview buffers and GPU-accelerated effects, making this a capable editing workstation for 1080p and 1440p projects.

3D Rendering: CPU-based rendering will excel given the 54,643 Passmark multithread score, while GPU-accelerated rendering benefits from 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 76 RT cores, though the GPU's 50th percentile position means complex scenes may render slower than with higher-tier graphics cards.

Software Development: The 22,174 Geekbench multi-core score accelerates code compilation across the 12 cores, and the 683,579 Passmark data compression score speeds up build artifact handling, making this an efficient development machine for large projects.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 4,672 Passmark single-thread score handles everyday productivity applications responsively, while the ECC memory support adds stability for long-running academic computations, and the 120 W TDP of both components keeps power draw manageable for shared workspaces.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Socket AM5 platform provides a clear upgrade path within the Ryzen 9000 series and future Zen-based processors, as the socket remains active with the 9900X's production status confirmed. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth allows memory capacity and speed upgrades, while the PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 CPU lanes supports high-bandwidth NVMe storage and future expansion cards.

The CPU's 120 W TDP keeps power requirements moderate, and the GPU's 120 W TDP with no power connectors suggests the system's total power draw is manageable for standard desktop power supplies, though no suggested PSU figure is provided in the data. The absence of a suggested PSU value means power supply selection must account for the 120 W CPU and 120 W GPU as the primary power consumers, with headroom for additional components.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, as the CPU's 92nd percentile leaves substantial headroom for a higher-performing graphics card. Replacing the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation with a GPU in a higher percentile bracket would balance the system's overall performance and raise the 71st combined percentile. The PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface on the GPU provides compatibility with newer graphics cards, and the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes ensure the processor will not bottleneck future GPU upgrades. The motherboard's AM5 socket also supports potential CPU upgrades within the same generation or future Zen architectures, though the 9900X's strong absolute performance means CPU upgrades would yield diminishing returns compared to GPU improvements.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds