SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080

54,247 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines AMD’s 12-core Zen 5 flagship mainstream processor with NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace-based RTX 4080, producing a desktop build that ranks in the 89th combined percentile against all CPU-GPU pairs in the database. The data shows a system engineered for high-refresh 1440p gaming and serious multi-threaded productivity, though its 4K performance and certain unoptimized titles reveal clear limits. Below is a detailed analysis based strictly on the measured benchmarks and specifications.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) using TSMC’s 4 nm process. Its base clock is 4.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, and it carries a 120 W TDP. The chip features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a rated bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor itself.

Benchmark results place this processor at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57498. Its nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 9015, which scores 57555 (a 0.1% difference), meaning the 9900X is statistically tied with that server chip. Against the Intel Core i9-14900, the 9900X trails by 1.1% (58115 vs 57498), while it leads the AMD EPYC 7313 by 0.2% (57399) and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by 1.4% (58323 vs 57498). These deltas are small, indicating the 9900X sits at the top of the desktop heap but does not dominate its closest competitors.

In multi-threaded workloads, the data shows a strong 3DMark max-thread score of 13929, which is 10.9% higher than the 16-thread score of 12552. This scaling suggests the 24 threads are effectively utilized beyond 16 threads, though the gain is modest. Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 32172, while single-core hits 2253. The single-thread 3DMark score of 1286 is competitive, and Geekbench single-core at 3010 confirms excellent per-thread performance. For real workloads, this means the CPU handles heavily threaded tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering with ease, while its strong single-core scores ensure snappy response in everyday applications and games that rely on a few fast cores.

The Passmark suite adds granularity: integer math scores 181056, floating-point math 120083, and extended instructions 55243. Data compression hits 683579, while encryption reaches 33421. These numbers indicate the 9900X excels at computational throughput, making it suitable for scientific computing, financial modeling, and any workload that uses AVX-512 or similar extended instruction sets. The physics score of 3381 in Passmark is relatively lower, suggesting that in purely physics-based simulations the CPU may not be the limiting factor, but rather the GPU or memory subsystem.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the measured FPS across the game list averages 202.6 FPS, with esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 hitting 325 FPS and Valorant reaching 586 FPS. This pairing is overkill for 1080p, delivering frame rates well beyond 144 Hz monitors in most titles. At 1440p, the average drops but remains high, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 162 FPS and Fortnite at 99 FPS, making this an excellent 1440p high-refresh setup.

Streaming: The 12-core/24-thread CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous game capture and encoding. The 3DMark max-thread score of 13929 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 32172 indicate that background encoding tasks will have minimal impact on game FPS, especially since games typically use fewer than 8 threads. The GPU’s tensor cores (304) also support hardware-accelerated encoding, offloading work from the CPU entirely.

Video editing: The Passmark data compression score of 683579 and floating-point math of 120083 suggest fast timeline scrubbing and effect rendering. Geekbench multicore at 22174 reinforces that 4K video exports will complete quickly. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth further accelerate GPU-accelerated effects and color grading.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multicore of 32172 places this CPU in the top percentile for CPU-based rendering. For GPU rendering, the RTX 4080’s 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 and 76 RT cores provide substantial compute. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6567 reflects strong rasterization, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739 indicates robust compute performance for render engines that offload to the GPU.

Software development: The Passmark multithread score of 54643 and integer math of 181056 show fast compilation times for large codebases. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with iterative builds. Single-thread performance (Geekbench 3010) ensures quick IDE responsiveness, while the 120 W TDP means sustained all-core loads are manageable with a capable air cooler.

Student and office work: This is massive overkill for document editing and web browsing. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2519 and single-thread of 1286 confirm that even light tasks are handled with negligible latency. However, the 120 W TDP and triple-slot GPU mean this is not an energy-sipping office machine; it is a workstation-grade tool for users who occasionally need heavy compute.

Balance and Bottleneck

The combined percentile of 89 places this system well above average, but the data reveals a CPU that slightly outpaces the GPU in some titles and falls behind in others. The CPU’s 92nd percentile versus the GPU’s 86th percentile suggests the processor has a slight edge, meaning in CPU-bound scenarios the RTX 4080 becomes the limiting factor. At 1080p, games like Counter-Strike 2 (325 FPS) and Valorant (586 FPS) are clearly CPU-limited, as the GPU could render more frames if the CPU allowed. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2519 and 4-thread of 4886 show that the CPU’s per-core strength is high, but not infinite.

Conversely, at 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. Red Dead Redemption 2 drops to 43 FPS at 3840x2160, and Cyberpunk 2077 hits 47 FPS, while the CPU utilization likely remains moderate. The GPU’s 86th percentile and 16 GB VRAM are sufficient for 4K, but the measured FPS indicates that the RTX 4080 cannot maintain 60 FPS in the most demanding titles at native 4K ultra settings. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is non-linear: for example, Ark: Survival Ascended goes from 47 FPS at 1080p to 16 FPS at 4K, a 66% drop, indicating that this game is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions.

The pairRankByFps of 229 out of 3732 pairs (top 6.1%) confirms that this combination is well-balanced overall, but the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution and title. In esports and older games, the CPU limits. In AAA 4K titles, the GPU limits. At 1440p, the system is closest to equilibrium, with most games showing strong scaling from 1080p without the sharp drop seen at 4K.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 9900X uses AMD Socket AM5, which is the current mainstream desktop platform. Memory support is DDR5 dual-channel, and the CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for a Gen 5 NVMe SSD or future GPUs. The socket is active, so a future upgrade to a newer Zen 5 or later CPU is possible without changing the motherboard. The 120 W TDP means a mid-range air cooler or 240mm-class liquid cooler is sufficient, based on the thermal envelope.

The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s Gen 5 lanes, so there is no bottleneck from the interface. The RTX 4080 has a 320 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 700 W, which is a reasonable requirement for a high-end desktop. The CPU’s 120 W plus GPU’s 320 W totals 440 W, leaving headroom for other components. A sensible next upgrade would be a larger GPU (e.g., a 50-series successor) when it becomes available, reusing the AM5 motherboard and DDR5 memory. The CPU’s 24 Gen 5 lanes also support adding a high-speed NVMe drive for video editing scratch space.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 57498, placing it at the 92nd percentile. Its highest individual scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 32172, Geekbench multicore at 22174, and Passmark multithread at 54643. The single-thread performance is equally strong, with Geekbench single-core at 3010 and Cinebench R23 single-core at 2253. The 3DMark suite shows scaling from 2519 (2-thread) to 13929 (max-thread), indicating good multi-threading efficiency.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 54247, at the 86th percentile. The most demanding test, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, scores 6567, which is a strong result for a high-end card. Geekbench Vulkan scores 263779, and OpenCL scores 214739, showing robust compute capability. Passmark G3D scores 34457, while GPU compute reaches 20671. The nearest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER with a score of 54209 (0.1% difference), meaning the non-SUPER is essentially identical in performance. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, which is 2.6% higher, though that card has a different feature set.

The combined picture is a system that sits at the 89th percentile, with the CPU slightly outperforming the GPU in relative terms. This is a high-end pairing that delivers top-tier results in both productivity and gaming, but not the absolute best in either category.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a chip of AD103 containing 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2205 MHz with a boost of 2505 MHz, and memory runs at 1400 MHz (22.4 Gbps effective). The GPU features 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores. Its pixel rate is 280.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 761.5 GTexel/s.

For FP32 compute, the card delivers 48.74 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The 76 RT cores accelerate ray tracing, while the 304 tensor cores handle DLSS and AI workloads. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for 4K textures, and the 716.8 GB/s bandwidth prevents memory starvation in most scenarios. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 214739 and Vulkan score of 263779 indicate strong compute performance for rendering and machine learning inference.

In gaming, the GPU’s 86th percentile means it is faster than the majority of GPUs but not at the very top. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6567 reflects good DX12 rasterization. The Passmark G3D of 34457 is consistent with a high-end card. For real workloads, this GPU handles 1440p ultra settings at high frame rates in most games, but 4K ultra requires DLSS or reduced settings to maintain 60 FPS in demanding titles. The 304 tensor cores make DLSS 3 frame generation effective, which can boost FPS significantly in supported games.

Gaming Performance

Data is measured, so the figures below are actual FPS at ultra settings. At 1080p, the system excels in esports: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 717 FPS, Valorant 586 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 325 FPS. Heavier titles still perform well, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 96 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 87 FPS. The average across all measured games at 1080p is 202.6 FPS, making this a top-tier 1080p setup.

At 1440p, the average drops but remains high. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 162 FPS, Fortnite at 99 FPS, and Cyberpunk 2077 at 71 FPS. The most demanding title, Ark: Survival Ascended, drops to 30 FPS, indicating that some games are too heavy even for this hardware. Microsoft Flight Simulator runs at 95 FPS, which is solid for a simulator.

At 4K, performance is mixed. Esports titles remain playable: Valorant at 507 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 292 FPS. However, AAA games struggle to maintain 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 hits 47 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 43 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended 16 FPS. The Medium runs at 45 FPS. These figures suggest that native 4K ultra is not consistently achievable, and DLSS would be necessary for smoother gameplay. The measured data confirms that this pairing is best suited for 1440p high-refresh gaming, with 4K possible in less demanding titles or with upscaling.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4080 have?

A: The GPU has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 716.8 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X is at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57498.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4080’s average score is 54247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER (54209) and 1.1% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54828).

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU-GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 89, placing it above the vast majority of all CPU-GPU pairings in the database.

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 9900X supports ECC memory, and it uses dual-channel DDR5.

Q: What is the GPU’s power requirement?

A: The RTX 4080 has a TDP of 320 W and a suggested PSU of 700 W.

Who Should Build It

This build targets gamers who want high-refresh 1440p performance without compromise. The measured 1440p FPS in games like Call of Duty: Warzone (162 FPS) and Fortnite (99 FPS) supports this. Content creators—video editors and 3D artists—will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore of 32172 and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM. Software developers compiling large projects will appreciate the Passmark integer math score of 181056. Students and office workers, however, are over-served by this hardware; the 120 W TDP and triple-slot GPU are unnecessary for document work. Small business workstations handling CAD or data analysis would find the combination of 24 threads and 16 GB VRAM useful. The system is less suitable for 4K gamers who demand native ultra settings, as the data shows 47 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077 at 4K.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. The CPU is a 12-core/24-thread Zen 5 processor on the AM5 platform, and the GPU is an Ada Lovelace chip with 16 GB VRAM. The system ranks at the 89th combined percentile, with the CPU at the 92nd and GPU at the 86th. It is a high-end configuration that excels at 1440p gaming and multi-threaded productivity, but it is not the absolute fastest in either category. The measured FPS average of 202.6 across games and the pair rank of 229 out of 3732 confirm that this is a top-tier pairing, ideal for enthusiasts who want a balanced, powerful desktop without reaching for the most expensive components.