SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 form a desktop pairing that sits in the 55th percentile overall among all combined CPU-GPU configurations. This is a system built around a flagship-class 12-core processor paired with an entry-level graphics card, so the performance ceiling in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads is sharply defined by the RTX 4010, while CPU-heavy tasks can run at a very high level. The data for this exact combination contains no measured FPS rows, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores of each component.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming — This is not a system for high-refresh gaming at demanding settings. The RTX 4010 sits in the 18th percentile among all GPUs and scores only 2893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which places it within 1% of the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB, RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, and RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB in that specific test. However, with only 4 GB of VRAM and a 64-bit memory bus, the card will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 1080p with modern titles, and the data suggests that competitive shooters at low settings are the realistic target rather than maxed-out AAA games.

Streaming — The CPU has ample headroom for software encoding and streaming workloads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32172 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 54643. The GPU's 24 tensor cores and 6 RT cores can handle NVENC-adjacent tasks, though the 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will limit the resolution and bitrate of any GPU-assisted encodes. The data indicates the CPU could handle the encode while the GPU renders, but the GPU's low percentile means the overall streaming experience will be constrained by graphics quality settings.

Video editing — Timeline editing and export tasks will benefit heavily from the Ryzen 9 9900X, which scores 22174 in Geekbench multi-core and 120083 in PassMark floating-point math. The RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 24 tensor cores can accelerate effects and AI-based tools, but the 4 GB VRAM is a hard ceiling for high-resolution previews or large composite stacks. Data shows the CPU is the star here, with the GPU contributing modest acceleration rather than defining performance.

3D rendering — For CPU-based rendering, this build is excellent, as the 9900X delivers a 3DMark max-threads score of 13929 and a PassMark integer math score of 181056. GPU rendering, however, is severely limited by the RTX 4010's 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 16 ROPs, which places it in the bottom fifth of all GPUs. The data suggests that render farms or hobbyists using CPU engines like Cinebench will see strong results, while GPU-accelerated engines like Blender Cycles will be slow.

Software development — Compilation and multi-threaded build tasks will fly on this CPU, given its 12 cores, 24 threads, and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5008. The PassMark data compression score of 683579 and data encryption score of 33421 indicate strong performance for code signing, packaging, and large repository operations. The GPU is largely irrelevant for most development tasks except for GPU compute debugging, where the 4 GB VRAM is a limiting factor.

Student and office work — This pairing is massively overqualified for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, with a PassMark single-thread score of 4672 and a Geekbench single-core score of 3010. The GPU's 18th percentile position is irrelevant for these tasks, and the 50 W TDP of the RTX 4010 means the system will run cool and quiet in a typical office environment. However, the CPU's 120 W TDP and desktop-class design make it a power-heavy choice for simple workloads that a cheaper processor would handle.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks for the Ryzen 9 9900X are consistently strong across the board. In 3DMark tests, it scores 1286 in single-thread, 2519 in 2-threads, 4886 in 4-threads, 9114 in 8-threads, 12552 in 16-threads, and 13929 in max-threads. The scaling from 4 to 8 to 16 threads shows a healthy progression, indicating efficient use of its 12 cores and 24 threads. In Cinebench, it posts a multi-core score of 32172 in R23 and 5008 in R15, with single-core scores of 2253 and 353 respectively. Geekbench results include 3010 single-core and 22174 multi-core. PassMark tests show strong scores in floating-point math (120083), integer math (181056), multi-thread (54643), and extended instructions (55243). The CPU's average benchmark score is 57498, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU benchmarks are far more modest. The only 3DMark score available is Steel Nomad DX12 at 2893, which gives the RTX 4010 an average benchmark score of 2893 and an 18th percentile ranking. This places it in the company of the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (deltaPct -0.5), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (deltaPct -0.6), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (deltaPct -0.7), and Quadro P600 (deltaPct -1). The deltaPct values show that the RTX 4010 is essentially tied with these cards in this single test, despite massive differences in memory capacity and bus width — the 4060 Ti models have far more VRAM, yet score nearly identically in Steel Nomad. The combined picture is of a CPU that outperforms 92% of all processors while a GPU that outperforms only 18% of all graphics cards, creating a 55th percentile overall system.

The central takeaway is a massive imbalance: the CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9015 (deltaPct -0.1), AMD EPYC 7313 (deltaPct 0.2), Intel Core i9-14900 (deltaPct -1.1), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (deltaPct -1.4), all of which are server or high-end desktop parts. Meanwhile, the GPU's nearest rivals are all low-end or previous-generation parts. The data clearly shows that the processor is a top-tier component while the graphics card is an entry-level one.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The build sits in the 55th percentile overall among all combined configurations, reflecting a high-tier CPU (92nd percentile) paired with a low-tier GPU (18th percentile).

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 9900X compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 57498, with its nearest rival being the AMD EPYC 9015 at 57555 (deltaPct -0.1), meaning the 9900X is essentially tied. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900 (58115, deltaPct -1.1) and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58323, deltaPct -1.4), but edges out the AMD EPYC 7313 (57399, deltaPct 0.2).

Q: What is the RTX 4010's score in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: It scores 2893, which places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This is within 1% of the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (2907), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (2910), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (2913), and Quadro P600 (2923).

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4010 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 9900X support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and it uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and architecture?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X uses AMD Socket AM5, is based on the Zen 5 architecture (codename Granite Ridge), and is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the data for this exact combination contains no measured FPS rows. All frame-rate figures in this analysis are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a classic bottleneck scenario where the GPU is the limiting factor in most gaming and graphics workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and strong multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32172, PassMark multi-thread of 54643) mean it can feed frames to any GPU without issue, but the RTX 4010's 18th percentile and 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance will cap frame rates far below what the CPU could support. In CPU-bound workloads like rendering, compilation, and data processing, the GPU's weakness is irrelevant — the system will perform at a top-8% level. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high settings, the system will perform at an 18th-percentile level, making the CPU's power largely untapped.

The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but clear: the RTX 4010 has a 64-bit memory bus and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth, which is far below what modern games require for high-resolution textures. The 4 GB VRAM will force texture quality down in many titles, and the 16 ROPs will limit pixel fill rate to 28.19 GPixel/s. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is actually comparable to the GPU's 96.00 GB/s, which is unusual — typically the GPU has far more bandwidth. This suggests that in memory-heavy workloads, the system will not show a clear CPU or GPU bottleneck but rather a shared memory-bandwidth limitation.

For productivity tasks, the CPU is the clear workhorse, and the GPU is nearly a placeholder. The PassMark data compression score of 683579 and floating-point math score of 120083 indicate that the CPU handles most compute tasks efficiently. The GPU's tensor cores (24) and RT cores (6) provide some acceleration for AI and ray tracing, but the low FP32 throughput means these features will be slow compared to any mid-range card. Overall, the balance is heavily skewed: the CPU is over-provisioned for the GPU, and any workload that relies on the GPU will be severely constrained.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is built on the GA107 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. It has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs, which explains its low pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s. The memory configuration is a major limitation: 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus yields 96.00 GB/s bandwidth, which is extremely narrow for a modern GPU. The boost clock is 1762 MHz, and the FP32 performance is 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 2.706 TFLOPS (1:1).

The GPU includes 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, providing ray tracing and AI acceleration, but the low shading unit count means these features have limited processing power behind them. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and it outputs via 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a. It has a 50 W TDP and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W — it is a single-slot card measuring 163 mm in length. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 places it in the 18th percentile, and its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its score. For rendering, the data shows that the GPU can handle light 1080p workloads, but the 4 GB VRAM and 64-bit bus will cause issues with large scenes or high-resolution textures. The Tensor cores can accelerate AI denoising, but the low FP32 throughput limits overall render performance.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p with low settings — This system can run esports titles and older games at playable frame rates, given the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1286 in 3DMark and 4672 in PassMark single-thread. However, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 18th percentile ranking mean that modern AAA games will require significant settings reductions.

Content creators focused on CPU rendering — Video editors and 3D artists who use CPU-based render engines will benefit from the 9900X's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32172 and Geekbench multi-core score of 22174. The GPU acceleration is a bonus, but the CPU does the heavy lifting.

Software developers — The 12-core processor with 24 threads and a PassMark integer math score of 181056 is ideal for compilation, testing, and running multiple virtual machines. The low-power GPU is sufficient for development tasks and keeps the system quiet.

Students and office workers — For general productivity, this is overkill, but the single-thread performance (3010 Geekbench single-core) ensures snappy application response. The GPU's 50 W TDP means low power draw during office tasks.

Small business workstations — The ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR5 make this suitable for data integrity-sensitive workloads like financial modeling or database work. The PassMark data encryption score of 33421 and data compression score of 683579 show strong performance for these tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the 9000 series, based on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge). It runs at a base clock of 4.40 GHz and boosts to 5.60 GHz, with a 120 W TDP. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design (2x 70.6 mm²). It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC memory support. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 is 1 MB per core, and L3 is 64 MB. It uses AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Benchmark results show the CPU is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 57498. The nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9015, scores 57555 (deltaPct -0.1), making them essentially identical in performance. The 9900X trails the Intel Core i9-14900 by 1.1% and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by 1.4%, but leads the AMD EPYC 7313 by 0.2%. The 3DMark scores show strong scaling from 2 threads (2519) to max threads (13929), indicating good multi-thread efficiency. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32172 and Geekbench multi-core of 22174 confirm strong all-core performance for rendering and compilation. PassMark tests show high scores in floating-point math (120083), integer math (181056), and multi-thread (54643), with a single-thread score of 4672 that ensures responsive single-threaded tasks. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier and integrated Radeon Graphics, providing a fallback display output.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs a top-tier AMD Ryzen 9 9900X processor with an entry-level NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 graphics card. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5 part on the AM5 socket, released in August 2024 with a launch MSRP of $499. The GPU is a 4 GB Ampere-based card from the GeForce 40-series, released in April 2024, with a 50 W TDP and no power connectors. The overall system sits in the 55th percentile of all combined CPU-GPU configurations, reflecting the enormous gap between the CPU's 92nd percentile and the GPU's 18th percentile. This is a workstation-class processor paired with a budget graphics card, making it suitable for CPU-intensive tasks but weak for gaming and GPU compute. The data shows that the CPU can outperform 92% of all processors, while the GPU only beats 18% of all graphics cards, so the system's tier is defined by its CPU strength and GPU limitation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so the following frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the individual benchmark scores. The RTX 4010's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 (18th percentile) and 4 GB VRAM on a 64-bit bus suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, most modern games will run at low to medium frame rates, likely below 60 FPS in demanding titles. The GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 16 ROPs will cap pixel throughput, and the 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will limit texture streaming. At 1440p or 4K, the system will struggle significantly, with the 4 GB VRAM causing texture pop-in and stuttering. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1286 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures that in CPU-bound scenarios at lower resolutions, frame rates will not be limited by the processor, but the GPU will still be the bottleneck. For esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant at low settings, the CPU can push high frame rates, but the GPU's low fill rate will cap performance. These figures are estimates since the data contains no measured FPS results for this pairing.