SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing represents a high-end desktop configuration that combines a 12-core Zen 5 processor with an Ampere-generation graphics card. The CPU, built on TSMC's 4 nm process, operates with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, featuring 24 threads and 64 MB of L3 cache. The GPU, using Samsung's 8 nm process, offers 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus with a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. This combination sits at the 80th percentile overall among all tested pairs, with the CPU at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs and the GPU at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. The measured data across 53 games at ultra settings provides a comprehensive picture of what this system can deliver, with an average FPS of 158.2 across all tested resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor from the 9000 series, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Granite Ridge codename. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, containing 16,630 million transistors across a die size of 2x 70.6 mm². The CPU features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a total of 64 MB of L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support.

Benchmark data shows the processor's threading scaling is substantial. The 3DMark scores progress from 1,286 in single-thread to 2,519 with 2 threads, 4,886 with 4 threads, 9,114 with 8 threads, 12,552 with 16 threads, and peak at 13,929 with max threads. This indicates strong scaling up to 8 threads, with diminishing returns beyond 16 threads, which is typical for a 12-core design. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 32,172 versus a single-core score of 2,253 shows the processor's ability to leverage all cores effectively for rendering workloads.

The Geekbench results reinforce this pattern, with a multicore score of 22,174 and single-core score of 3,010. The PassMark suite provides further insight into specialized workloads: integer math scores 181,056, floating-point math 120,083, and extended instructions 55,243. Data compression reaches 683,579, while data encryption hits 33,421. The random string sorting score of 72,013 and find prime numbers score of 436 round out the computational profile. The average benchmark score of 57,498 places it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD EPYC 9015 (57,555, -0.1% delta), AMD EPYC 7313 (57,399, +0.2%), Intel Core i9-14900 (58,115, -1.1%), and Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58,323, -1.4%). This positions the 9900X squarely in enterprise-class performance territory, matching server processors in multithreaded throughput.

For real workloads, the single-thread performance of 1,286 in 3DMark and 2,253 in Cinebench R23 indicates excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded applications, while the multicore scores show it can handle heavy parallel workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering. The 120W TDP is modest for this level of performance, though the package requires appropriate cooling for sustained loads.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The pairing delivers exceptional frame rates in competitive titles. Counter-Strike 2 runs at 245.6 FPS at 1080p, Valorant at 554.1 FPS at 1080p, and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive at 537 FPS at 1080p. Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege achieves 289 FPS at 1080p, making it suitable for 240Hz displays. Even at 1440p, Valorant maintains 473.6 FPS, and CS2 reaches 161 FPS, showing the CPU's strong single-thread performance is not a bottleneck in these scenarios.

Streaming: The 12-core/24-thread configuration provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 181.7 FPS at 1080p, leaving significant CPU capacity for software encoding while maintaining high frame rates. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs means it outperforms most processors in multithreaded tasks, making concurrent workloads feasible without substantial frame drops.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,172 indicates strong rendering performance for timeline previews and export tasks. The PassMark multithread score of 54,643 and floating-point math score of 120,083 support smooth playback and effects processing. The 4 nm process and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provide efficient data movement for large media files.

3D rendering: The multicore throughput shines here. Cinebench R15 multicore score of 5,008 and R23 score of 32,172 demonstrate that CPU-based rendering will complete quickly. The 3DMark max threads score of 13,929 shows consistent scaling across all 24 threads. The processor's 64 MB L3 cache helps with scene data that exceeds typical cache sizes.

Software development: Compilation tasks benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 181,056 and data compression score of 683,579 indicate strong performance in code compilation and packaging. The single-thread score of 4,672 in PassMark ensures responsive IDE interactions, while the multicore score handles parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: This configuration is overpowered for basic productivity, but the single-thread performance ensures snappy application launches. The 92nd percentile CPU ranking means it outperforms virtually all consumer processors in everyday tasks, though the power draw and platform cost are higher than necessary for such workloads. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback for basic display output, though the discrete GPU handles all graphics tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system demonstrates a clear CPU advantage over GPU in most scenarios. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. This imbalance means the CPU is rarely the limiting factor in gaming workloads, with the GPU typically determining frame rates. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 for the GPU shows its performance class, while the CPU's max threads score of 13,929 indicates it can feed even demanding workloads.

In gaming, the bottleneck shifts by resolution. At 1080p, the GPU becomes the primary constraint for most titles, as seen in Cyberpunk 2077 at 74.7 FPS versus Counter-Strike 2 at 245.6 FPS. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,286 in 3DMark is sufficient for even the most demanding game logic. At 1440p, the GPU load increases, with frame rates dropping across all titles, such as Red Dead Redemption 2 falling from 64.9 FPS at 1080p to 46.4 FPS at 1440p. At 4K, the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, with many titles dropping below 60 FPS, including Cyberpunk 2077 at 36.2 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended at 15 FPS.

The FPS scaling across resolutions reveals where each component limits. For CPU-bound titles like Valorant, the drop from 554.1 FPS at 1080p to 473.6 FPS at 1440p to 377.1 FPS at 4K shows the GPU gradually taking over as the constraint. For GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the drop from 74.7 to 55.1 to 36.2 FPS shows a steeper decline, indicating the GPU's 10 GB memory and compute capacity are the limiting factors. The pair rank of 992 out of 3,732 pairs, with an average FPS of 158.2, places this system in the upper quartile of all tested combinations.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh-rate competitive play at 1080p and 1440p. The measured FPS in esports titles exceeds 240 FPS at 1080p for Valorant (554.1), CS:GO (537), and CS2 (245.6), making it ideal for 240Hz monitors. At 1440p, these titles still maintain 473.6, 370, and 161 FPS respectively, supporting high-refresh 1440p displays. For AAA gaming, the system handles most titles at 60+ FPS at 1080p, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 74.7 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 64.9 FPS.

Content creators who need both strong single-thread and multithread performance will benefit from the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,172 handles video exports efficiently, while the single-core score of 2,253 ensures responsive editing interfaces. The GPU's 10 GB memory and 68 RT cores support GPU-accelerated rendering and ray tracing workloads, though the 68th percentile GPU ranking means it is not top-tier for compute-heavy tasks.

Software developers working on large codebases will appreciate the 12 cores and 24 threads for parallel compilation. The PassMark data compression score of 683,579 accelerates build packaging, while the integer math score of 181,056 handles complex algorithms. Students and small business workstations would be over-served by this hardware, as the performance far exceeds office productivity needs, but the CPU's single-thread performance ensures no lag in any application.

The desktop class (buildClass) indicates this is a stationary system, not a laptop. The combined percentile of 80 places it above 80% of all tested pairs, making it a high-end but not flagship configuration. Gamers at 4K should note that many titles fall below 60 FPS at that resolution, so 1440p is the practical ceiling for smooth gameplay.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 57,498 places it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 9015, scores 57,555, a difference of only -0.1%, effectively making them performance equals. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58,115, putting the 9900X 1.1% behind. The AMD EPYC 7313 at 57,399 is 0.2% behind the 9900X. This cluster of scores around 57,000-58,000 indicates the 9900X is in the top tier of available processors, competing with server-grade silicon.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 23,172 places it at the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are notably different: the NVIDIA P106-100 (23,249, -0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23,250, -0.3%), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23,273, -0.4%), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23,276, -0.4%). These rival scores are nearly identical, suggesting the RTX 3080 is in a crowded mid-range performance band, despite being a high-end card at launch. The 32 percentage point gap between CPU and GPU percentiles (92 vs 68) is significant, indicating the CPU substantially outperforms the GPU in relative terms.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407, Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423, and Vulkan score of 33,620 show the card's compute capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 25,086 and GPU compute score of 14,397 provide additional context. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is top-tier while the GPU is mid-to-high tier, resulting in an 80th percentile overall ranking. This means the system outperforms 80% of tested pairs but is not in the top 20%, primarily due to the GPU's relative position.

Gaming Performance

All figures below are measured at ultra settings across three resolutions, with dataIsMeasured set to true, meaning these are actual frame rates observed during testing.

1080p Ultra: The system excels in esports and older titles. Valorant leads at 554.1 FPS, followed by CS:GO at 537 FPS, CS2 at 245.6 FPS, and Minecraft at 240 FPS. Roblox achieves 315.4 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege reaches 289 FPS. Competitive shooters like Call of Duty: Warzone hit 181.7 FPS. Modern AAA titles run well: Cyberpunk 2077 at 74.7 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 64.9 FPS, and Assetto Corsa at 144 FPS. Heavier titles like Ark: Survival Ascended drop to 35.9 FPS, and The Medium runs at 51 FPS, indicating some games are too demanding for ultra settings.

1440p Ultra: Frame rates drop by roughly 30-40% from 1080p. Valorant still hits 473.6 FPS, CS:GO 370 FPS, and CS2 161 FPS. Warzone maintains 160 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege 190 FPS. Assetto Corsa runs at 101 FPS, and Control at 77 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 55.1 FPS, while Red Dead Redemption 2 falls to 46.4 FPS. Ark: Survival Ascended becomes nearly unplayable at 20.2 FPS. Most titles remain playable, but AAA games require settings adjustments to maintain 60+ FPS.

4K Ultra: This resolution stresses the GPU's 10 GB memory and 68th percentile performance. Valorant still delivers 377.1 FPS, and CS:GO 218 FPS. Warzone runs at 134.4 FPS, but most other titles struggle. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 36.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 32.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 15 FPS. The Medium runs at 34 FPS, and Control at 52 FPS. Many titles fall below 60 FPS, making 4K ultra impractical for smooth gameplay in demanding games. The average FPS across all games and resolutions is 158.2, but this is heavily skewed by esports titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, offering high-bandwidth connectivity for the latest storage and expansion cards. The platform's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is sufficient for the CPU's 12-core design, though future processors with more cores may benefit from faster memory. The socket is current-generation, with the CPU released on 2024-08-14, so the platform remains viable for future upgrades within the Zen 5 family.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is one generation behind the CPU's PCIe 5.0 support. This is not a bottleneck for the RTX 3080, as its bandwidth requirements are met by PCIe 4.0. The GPU's power requirements are substantial, with a 320W TDP and a suggested PSU of 700W. The 120W CPU TDP, combined with the GPU, means a 700W power supply provides adequate headroom for the entire system, including drives and peripherals. The GPU uses a 1x 12-pin power connector, which may require an adapter for some power supplies.

The most sensible next upgrade would be a newer-generation GPU, as the RTX 3080 at the 68th percentile is the limiting factor in this system. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it can support significantly faster graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. A GPU in the 90th percentile or higher would better match the CPU's capabilities, especially for 4K gaming where the current GPU struggles. The platform's DDR5 memory support and PCIe 5.0 lanes ensure that future components will be compatible, though the 12-pin power connector may need attention when upgrading to newer cards with different power requirements.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, a 12-core Zen 5 processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, an Ampere-generation GPU from the GeForce 30-series. The CPU was released on 2024-08-14 with a launch MSRP of $499, while the GPU was released on 2020-08-31 with a launch MSRP of 699 USD. The CPU is currently in active production, while the GPU is end-of-life, having been succeeded by the GeForce 40 series.

The system's overall tier is defined by its percentiles: the CPU at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, the GPU at the 68th percentile of all GPUs, and the combined pair at the 80th percentile of all tested pairs. This places the build in the upper performance bracket but not the absolute top tier. The pair ranks 992nd out of 3,732 tested pairs by average FPS, with an average of 158.2 FPS across all games and resolutions. The desktop class (buildClass) confirms this is a stationary system, not a portable one.

The combination is characterized by a significant CPU advantage over the GPU. The 12-core processor provides exceptional multithreaded performance for productivity tasks, while the RTX 3080 delivers solid but not class-leading gaming performance. The 10 GB GDDR6X memory and 68 RT cores support modern gaming features, but the GPU's 68th percentile ranking means it lags behind current high-end options. For users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads like rendering, compilation, and streaming, this build excels. For those who prioritize maximum gaming frame rates at 4K, the GPU would be the first component to upgrade.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X?

A: The CPU has 12 cores and 24 threads, built on the Zen 5 architecture with a base clock of 4.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The 9900X scores 57,498 on average, which is 0.1% behind the AMD EPYC 9015 (57,555), 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7313 (57,399), 1.1% behind the Intel Core i9-14900 (58,115), and 1.4% behind the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58,323).

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s and a boost clock of 1710 MHz.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming at ultra settings?

A: At 4K ultra, most demanding games run below 60 FPS. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 36.2 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 32.2 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 15 FPS. Esports titles like Valorant (377.1 FPS) and CS:GO (218 FPS) remain playable.

Q: What is the suggested power supply for this build?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 700W, which accommodates the 320W GPU TDP and 120W CPU TDP. The GPU uses a 1x 12-pin power connector.

Q: What memory type does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multithreaded benchmarks relative to its single-thread score?

A: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,172 is roughly 14.3 times the single-core score of 2,253, showing excellent scaling across its 12 cores. The 3DMark max threads score of 13,929 is 10.8 times the single-thread score of 1,286.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive

Valorant

Valorant

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds