SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + AMD Radeon RX 6600

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

57,498 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600

19,036 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing combines AMD’s top-tier 12-core Zen 5 desktop processor with an entry-level RDNA 2 graphics card. The result is a system with extreme compute headroom but a clear graphics bottleneck at higher resolutions. The data shows a 92nd percentile CPU paired with a 63rd percentile GPU, making the Ryzen 9 9900X the dominant component in virtually every workload. This analysis breaks down what that means for gaming, productivity, and platform longevity, using only the measured benchmark results and specifications provided.

Gaming Performance

The measured FPS data is based on ultra settings across a wide range of titles, and it clearly shows that the Radeon RX 6600 is the limiting factor. At 1920x1080, the system delivers playable frame rates in most esports and older titles, but demanding modern games struggle. For example, Counter-Strike 2 runs at 143.6 FPS, Valorant hits 326 FPS, and Call of Duty: Warzone reaches 182 FPS at 1080p. These are excellent results for competitive play.

However, the picture changes with more graphically intensive games. Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 42 FPS at 1080p, Red Dead Redemption 2 manages only 38.3 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended falls to a stuttery 18.6 FPS. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth of the RX 6600 are simply not enough for ultra settings in these titles. At 2560x1440, the situation worsens: Cyberpunk 2077 falls to 31 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 30.1 FPS, and Control to 45 FPS. The 3840x2160 results are mostly unplayable for modern AAA games, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 21 FPS and Ark: Survival Ascended at 5 FPS.

The system shines in lighter titles. Minecraft runs at 140 FPS at 1080p, Roblox at 184 FPS, and CS:GO at a massive 314 FPS. The average FPS across all tested games is 95.8, but this figure is heavily skewed by the strong performance in esports and indie games. For a balanced assessment, the data suggests that 1080p is the realistic target for this pairing, with 1440p viable only for less demanding games or when settings are lowered from ultra. The 4K numbers are mostly academic, serving to highlight the GPU’s limits rather than practical gaming scenarios.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are exceptional. The Ryzen 9 9900X scores 32,172 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2,253 in single-core, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 57,498, which puts it nearly level with the AMD EPYC 9015 (57,555, -0.1% delta) and AMD EPYC 7313 (57,399, +0.2% delta). It trails the Intel Core i9-14900 by 1.1% (58,115) and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M by 1.4% (58,323). This is a high-end desktop processor that trades blows with server-class silicon in multi-threaded work.

The GPU benchmarks tell a different story. The RX 6600 scores 15,096 in Passmark G3D and 6,554 in GPU Compute, placing it in the 63rd percentile. Its average score of 19,036 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19,030, 0% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile (19,049, -0.1% delta). It is 0.4% faster than the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18,954) but 0.3% slower than the NVIDIA Tesla K20m (19,089). These are mid-range results, appropriate for 1080p gaming but far from the CPU’s performance class.

The combined picture is one of massive imbalance. The CPU’s 92nd percentile score suggests a processor capable of handling the most demanding compute tasks, while the GPU’s 63rd percentile score limits the system to mainstream gaming. The combined percentile for this build is 78, reflecting the CPU’s dominance in the overall score. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level gaming GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is the strongest part of this build. The AMD Socket AM5 supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is forward-looking for future GPUs and NVMe storage. The 120W TDP of the CPU is modest for a 12-core part, and the GPU’s 132W TDP means the suggested 300W PSU is sufficient for the current configuration.

The upgrade path is straightforward. The RX 6600 is the clear bottleneck, so replacing it with a higher-tier GPU would unlock the CPU’s full gaming potential. The PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that a modern GPU will not be limited by the interface. The DDR5 memory support is also future-proof, as is the AM5 socket, which should support future Ryzen generations. For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests focusing on the GPU first, as the CPU has significant headroom in all gaming scenarios. The 8-pin power connector on the GPU and the 300W PSU recommendation leave room for a more power-hungry card, though a PSU upgrade would be necessary for anything beyond a mid-range replacement.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who need extreme CPU performance for productivity but only require mainstream gaming capability. Content creators working with video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,172 and Passmark multi-thread score of 54,643 indicate strong performance in heavily threaded workloads. Developers compiling large codebases or running virtual machines will also see significant benefits.

For gamers, this build is best suited to those playing at 1920x1080 with competitive or indie titles. The high frame rates in Valorant (326 FPS), CS:GO (314 FPS), and Warzone (182 FPS) make it ideal for esports. Students and small business users running office applications, web development, or data analysis will find the CPU’s single-thread score of 2,253 in Cinebench R23 more than adequate. The GPU can handle light 1080p gaming, but users who prioritize modern AAA games at high settings should look elsewhere. This is not a 4K gaming rig, nor is it intended for heavy GPU compute tasks like machine learning training.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It runs on the 4 nm TSMC process with 16,630 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design (2x 70.6 mm² die size). The base clock is 4.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory with ECC and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

The benchmark scores show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks. The Geekbench single-core score of 3,010 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,253 are top-tier results for desktop processors. The multi-threaded performance is equally impressive: Geekbench multi-core hits 22,174, and Passmark multi-thread reaches 54,643. The 3DMark scores scale well with thread count, from 2,519 with 2 threads to 13,929 with max threads, indicating good scaling across the 12 cores.

Real-world workloads will see strong performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Passmark floating-point math score of 120,083 and integer math score of 181,056 suggest excellent computational throughput. The data compression score of 683,579 and encryption score of 33,421 are particularly high, making this CPU well-suited for archive management and secure data handling. The extended instructions score of 55,243 indicates robust SIMD performance for scientific and engineering applications.

GPU Analysis

The Radeon RX 6600 is based on the Navi 23 chip using RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on the 7 nm TSMC process with 11,060 million transistors. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations pipelines. It includes 28 ray tracing cores, which is modest for modern standards. The base clock is 1626 MHz, with a game clock of 2044 MHz and a boost clock of 2491 MHz. The FP32 performance is 8.928 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1).

The benchmark results place this GPU firmly in the mid-range segment. The Passmark G3D score of 15,096 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,492 are consistent with a card designed for 1080p gaming. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 67,623 and OpenCL score of 28,850 show reasonable compute capability, but the 28 RT cores provide limited ray tracing performance. The 64 ROPs and 159.4 GPixel/s pixel rate are adequate for traditional rasterization but not for high-resolution rendering.

The 8 GB VRAM is a significant limitation for modern games at high textures. The data shows that this becomes a bottleneck in titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2, where frame rates drop below 45 FPS even at 1080p. For rendering tasks, the RX 6600 can handle light 3D work and video encoding, but the 6,554 Passmark GPU Compute score indicates it is not a primary choice for GPU-accelerated workloads. This is a card for esports and older AAA titles, not for 4K gaming or professional rendering.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78, reflecting the CPU’s high performance and the GPU’s mid-range position.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 9900X has an average benchmark score of 57,498, which is 0.1% below the AMD EPYC 9015 (57,555) and 0.2% above the AMD EPYC 7313 (57,399). It is 1.1% slower than the Intel Core i9-14900 (58,115) and 1.4% slower than the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (58,323).

Q: What is the average FPS across all tested games?

A: The pair ranks 2,978 out of 3,861 pairs, with an average FPS across all games of 95.8 at ultra settings.

Q: What memory type does this CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the suggested PSU for this GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RX 6600 is 300 W, given its 132 W TDP and 1x 8-pin power connector.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and PCIe support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X with the AMD Radeon RX 6600. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 9000 series with Zen 5 architecture, while the GPU is a mid-range RDNA 2.0 card from the Radeon RX 6000 series. The CPU is in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 63rd percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 78.

The class is standard desktop, with the CPU being a current production part and the GPU being end-of-life. The pairing creates a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance. The Ryzen 9 9900X is a top-tier productivity chip, while the RX 6600 is an entry-level gaming card. This is not a balanced gaming rig, but it is an exceptional workstation for users who occasionally game at 1080p. The overall tier is high-end CPU with mid-range GPU, making it a specialist tool for compute-heavy tasks rather than a general-purpose gaming machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU is the limiting factor in gaming workloads, while the CPU has massive headroom. The CPU’s 92nd percentile score versus the GPU’s 63rd percentile means that in any graphics-intensive task, the RX 6600 will be fully saturated while the 9900X sits idle. The FPS data confirms this. At 1080p, the system achieves 143.6 FPS in Counter-Strike 2 and 326 FPS in Valorant, but these are CPU-bound scenarios. In GPU-bound titles like Cyberpunk 2077 (42 FPS) or Red Dead Redemption 2 (38.3 FPS), the CPU’s performance is irrelevant.

The CPU is the limiting factor in productivity tasks. The 12 cores and 24 threads provide excellent multi-threaded performance, but the GPU’s compute capabilities (8.928 TFLOPS FP32) are insufficient for GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning. For gaming, the balance is clearly GPU-limited, as evidenced by the FPS scaling from 1080p to 1440p. For example, Call of Duty: Warzone drops from 182 FPS at 1080p to 162 FPS at 1440p, showing the GPU struggling with higher resolutions. The CPU has no such issues, as its benchmark scores remain constant regardless of GPU load.

The practical implication is that upgrading the GPU would provide the largest performance gain for gaming. The CPU will not need an upgrade for many years, given its 64 MB L3 cache and 5.60 GHz boost clock. The platform is ready for a more powerful GPU, with PCIe Gen 5 support and a 300W PSU recommendation that leaves some headroom. In summary, this is a highly unbalanced build that is ideal for CPU-intensive work but requires a GPU upgrade for serious gaming at higher resolutions.