SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

98%

GPU

76%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

106,413 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 5 architecture (Fire Range codename), fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. It is paired here with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, a Turing-architecture GPU with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. This combination represents a laptop build where an exceptionally powerful, high-end CPU is mated to a GPU that benchmark data places in the 7th percentile of all GPUs, creating a stark performance asymmetry that defines every workload outcome.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 9850HX is the dominant component in this pairing. With 12 cores and 24 threads running at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, the CPU delivers a Passmark multi-thread score of 51,722 and a single-thread score of 4,461. These figures place the processor in the 97th percentile of all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms 97% of processors in the benchmark database. The 55 W TDP is remarkably efficient for the performance level, enabled by the 4 nm TSMC process node and the Zen 5 architecture. The chip integrates 16,630 million transistors across two 70.6 mm² dies, with a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache.

For real workloads, the data shows exceptional capability in both threaded and single-threaded tasks. The single-thread score of 4,461 is critical for responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications, while the multi-thread score of 51,722 demonstrates serious parallel processing power. The floating-point math score of 115,062 and integer math score of 172,943 further confirm strong arithmetic throughput. The CPU's nearest rival, the Intel Xeon w7-3555, scores 106,192 on average, a mere 0.2% difference, while the Intel Xeon w7-2595X is 2.1% faster — placing the Ryzen 9 9850HX in elite server-class territory despite being a mobile part.

Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability, making it suitable for data-integrity-sensitive tasks. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, ensuring fast connectivity for storage and expansion. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics offer a basic display output, though the discrete GPU handles rendering. The Passmark data compression score of 662,381 and data encryption score of 32,139 indicate strong performance for archival and security workloads. In essence, the CPU analysis shows a processor that would not be out of place in a workstation, yet it is packaged for mobile use.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame-rate discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores. The data shows a clear bottleneck: the CPU sits in the 97th percentile while the GPU sits in the 7th percentile. For gaming, the GPU is the limiting factor in virtually every scenario, meaning the CPU's enormous headroom will rarely be utilized.

At 1080p resolution, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest playable frame rates in older or esports titles, but modern AAA games will struggle. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM is a constraint for high-texture settings. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 7th percentile ranking indicates that frame rates will drop significantly, likely falling below smooth-playable thresholds in demanding titles. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (0.3% slower) and the AMD Radeon R9 380 (0.6% faster), which contextualizes its performance class — these are entry-level or older mid-range parts.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,285 is the sole GPU benchmark available, and it reinforces the low-tier positioning. For high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, the CPU can push frames in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU will cap output well below what the CPU can feed. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics are not a gaming solution, so the discrete GPU is the only option. Given the 7th percentile GPU score, users should expect 1080p gaming at medium-to-low settings in modern titles, with esports games like CS:GO or Valorant potentially achieving higher frame rates due to lighter GPU demands. Frame rates at 1440p are estimated to be marginal, and 4K gaming is not viable with this GPU.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU's average benchmark score is 106,413, placing it in the 97th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all server-class Xeon or EPYC processors: the Intel Xeon w7-3555 (0.2% slower), Intel Xeon 6521P (0.5% slower), and AMD EPYC 8324P (3% faster) — while the Intel Xeon w7-2595X is 2.1% faster. This places the Ryzen 9 9850HX firmly in workstation-tier CPU performance.

In contrast, the GPU's average benchmark score is 1,285, placing it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (0.3% slower), NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 (1.4% slower), and NVIDIA NVS 4200M (1.4% slower), with the AMD Radeon R9 380 being 0.6% faster. This is entry-level GPU territory. The combined percentile for the build is 52, which reflects the averaging effect of the two extreme scores. The CPU-specific benchmarks show a multi-thread score of 51,722, a single-thread score of 4,461, and a physics score of 3,054. The floating-point and integer math scores of 115,062 and 172,943, respectively, indicate strong compute throughput, but the GPU's FP32 of 5.299 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards. The data suggests that for CPU-bound tasks, this build performs at the level of a high-end workstation, while for GPU-bound tasks, it performs at the level of a budget laptop.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 106,413 is 0.2% higher than the Intel Xeon w7-3555 (106,192), 0.5% higher than the Intel Xeon 6521P (105,845), and 3% higher than the AMD EPYC 8324P (103,329), but 2.1% lower than the Intel Xeon w7-2595X (108,663).

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking?

A: The GPU is in the 7th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1,285, which is 0.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (1,281) and 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon R9 380 (1,293).

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and tensor operations?

A: Yes, the GPU has 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC support.

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination, so all gaming frame-rate figures are estimated from benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a Turing-architecture GPU built on TSMC's 12 nm process, with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. It features 1,920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The base clock is 945 MHz with a boost clock of 1,380 MHz, and the memory operates at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus, yielding 336.0 GB/s bandwidth. The GPU's 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM is sufficient for 1080p gaming and entry-level professional workloads, but it is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures or large datasets.

The FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.60 TFLOPS (2:1). The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,285, placing it in the 7th percentile. This score is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (1,281, 0.3% slower) and slightly below the AMD Radeon R9 380 (1,293, 0.6% faster). These comparisons highlight that the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a low-tier part in the current benchmark landscape, despite its RT and tensor core features.

For rendering workloads, the tensor cores (240) and RT cores (30) provide hardware acceleration for AI-based denoising and ray-traced effects, but the overall compute throughput is limited by the modest 5.299 TFLOPS FP32. The 80 W TDP and MXM Module slot width indicate a mobile workstation design. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, which covers modern API requirements. The 12 nm process node is older compared to the CPU's 4 nm node, contributing to the performance disparity. In practical terms, the GPU is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings and light 3D rendering, but it will bottleneck any CPU-intensive workload that requires GPU acceleration beyond basic tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is constrained by the GPU. The CPU's 97th percentile performance can drive high frame rates, but the GPU's 7th percentile score and 1,285 3DMark result cap output. At 1080p, esports titles may approach 60+ FPS, but high-refresh monitors (144 Hz+) will not be fully utilized in demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads and 51,722 multi-thread score handle encoding and game capture simultaneously without strain. The GPU's NVENC (via tensor cores) can assist, but the 6 GB VRAM may limit game settings while streaming, and the overall GPU performance is a bottleneck for games being streamed.

Video editing: The CPU excels here, with a multi-thread score of 51,722 and single-thread of 4,461, enabling fast timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth provide hardware acceleration for effects, but 6 GB VRAM may choke on 4K timelines or complex color grades.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is strong due to the 12 cores and 172,943 integer math score. GPU rendering (e.g., CUDA-based) is limited by the 7th percentile GPU, making it slow for final-frame renders. RT cores help with interactive previews, but the low FP32 throughput is a clear bottleneck.

Software development: Compilation and parallel builds benefit from the 24 threads and 106,413 average CPU score. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong productivity machine, though the 55 W TDP and mobile form factor may limit sustained all-core loads.

Student and office work: This is overkill. The CPU's 97th percentile ensures snappy responsiveness for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, but the GPU's modest performance is more than sufficient for office apps. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC support add reliability for data-heavy tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The Ryzen 9 9850HX's 97th percentile CPU score and 24 threads make it ideal for developers compiling large codebases, researchers running data analysis, or engineers using CPU-based simulations. The 64 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support these workloads effectively. The GPU's 7th percentile ranking means gamers should look elsewhere unless they play only undemanding titles at 1080p. Content creators working primarily in CPU-bound software, such as video encoding or batch photo processing, will see strong performance. Students in STEM fields needing a portable workstation for MATLAB or similar CPU-heavy applications may benefit, though the GPU is not suited for machine learning training. Small business workstations running database or server tasks would leverage the CPU's multi-thread power and ECC memory support, but the GPU adds little for such roles. The 7th percentile GPU is best suited for 2D design, basic CAD, or legacy professional apps rather than modern 3D workflows.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX, a 12-core Zen 5 mobile processor from the 9000 series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, a Turing-architecture GPU from the GeForce 30-series family. The CPU is an active production part released on 2025-01-05, while the GPU is end-of-life with a release date of 2019-05-26. The combined percentile is 52, which places this build in the middle of the database, but this figure obscures the extreme divergence: the CPU is in the 97th percentile while the GPU is in the 7th percentile. The build's overall tier is therefore defined by the CPU's workstation-class performance, with the GPU acting as a weak adjunct. The CPU's average benchmark score of 106,413 is comparable to server Xeon processors, while the GPU's 1,285 average score is comparable to decade-old entry-level cards. This is a CPU-centric workstation disguised as a laptop, not a balanced gaming or general-purpose machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU limits every GPU-accelerated workload. The CPU's 97th percentile score (106,413 average) versus the GPU's 7th percentile score (1,285 average) shows a massive 90-percentage-point gap. The CPU can execute 51,722 multi-thread operations and 4,461 single-thread operations, while the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score is 1,285. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, capping FPS regardless of the CPU's headroom. The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock is irrelevant when the GPU cannot render frames fast enough. In CPU-bound tasks like compilation or data compression (score 662,381), the GPU plays no role, so the CPU's full power is utilized. For rendering, the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 GB VRAM will saturate quickly, forcing reliance on the CPU's 24 threads for compute. The FPS scaling, estimated from the benchmark scores, shows that raising resolution or graphical settings will immediately expose the GPU bottleneck. The combined percentile of 52 reflects this imbalance, as the average of 97 and 7 is 52. The data indicates that any workload requiring both CPU and GPU will be GPU-limited, while pure CPU workloads will see exceptional performance. Users should pair this CPU with a higher-tier GPU to achieve balance, or accept that the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a placeholder for basic display output rather than a performance component.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 9850HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds