SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

76,212 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

This mobile workstation pairing combines AMD's top-tier Ryzen 9 8945HX processor with NVIDIA's RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation GPU, targeting a laptop class build that sits at the 73rd percentile overall against all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 part from the Dragon Range family, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with a 55 W TDP, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture mobile part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. Benchmark data shows the processor performing at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, though the GPU's 50th percentile standing suggests a notable imbalance in this configuration.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the 8000 series and the Dragon Range codename family, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The chip draws a 55 W TDP and fits into AMD Socket FL1, which is characteristic of high-end mobile platforms. The processor integrates a Radeon 610M GPU, though the presence of a discrete RTX 3000 Mobile GPU in this build makes the integrated graphics secondary for most workloads.

Cache configuration is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 is typical for flagship mobile processors and helps with multi-threaded workloads that benefit from shared data access. Memory support is limited to DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the processor itself, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity in a laptop chassis.

Benchmark results paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded throughput. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42713 is exceptional for a mobile part, while the single-core score of 6030 indicates strong per-thread performance. The R20 scores follow the same pattern: 17939 multicore and 2532 single-core. PassMark results reinforce this profile with a multithread score of 51405 and a single-thread score of 3907. The data compression score of 677755 and integer math score of 195180 suggest heavy computational workloads are handled with ease.

The 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs means this processor outperforms roughly 95% of the CPUs in the benchmark database. Its average benchmark score of 76212 places it in close competition with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, which scores 76155 and is just 0.1% behind. The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX score 76492 and 76513, respectively, meaning the Ryzen 9 8945HX trails them by only 0.4%. The Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 75779, putting the 8945HX 0.6% ahead. These tight margins indicate that the 8945HX is right at the top of the mobile CPU hierarchy, competitive with desktop and server parts in raw throughput.

For real workloads, this translates to strong performance in video editing, 3D rendering, software compilation, and other multi-threaded tasks. The single-core performance is equally important for everyday responsiveness, application launch times, and lightly threaded workloads like web browsing or office applications. The 5.40 GHz boost clock is among the highest for mobile processors, contributing to the strong single-core results.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. No measuredFpsUltraByGame entries exist, and the dataIsMeasured flag is set to false. All FPS figures discussed here are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components, rather than verified results from game testing.

Given the CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking, gaming performance will be constrained by the graphics card in most scenarios. The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, is positioned as a mid-range mobile GPU. At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this pairing should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, though competitive esports titles will likely run significantly faster than demanding AAA games.

At 1440p, the GPU becomes the limiting factor more noticeably. The 50th percentile GPU standing means it performs around the median of all GPUs in the database, which translates to medium-to-high settings at 1440p for modern games rather than maxed-out ultra. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (6030 in Cinebench R23 single-core) ensures that frame pacing and minimum frame rates will be solid, but the overall FPS ceiling is set by the GPU.

For 4K gaming, this configuration would struggle to maintain high frame rates at ultra settings. The 8 GB VRAM capacity and 128-bit memory bus are modest for 4K workloads, and the GPU's raw compute (15.62 TFLOPS FP32) is not sufficient for demanding 4K ultra presets in recent titles. Users targeting 4K would need to reduce settings or rely on upscaling technologies, though the FACT PACK does not include specific upscaling performance data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite is comprehensive, covering both synthetic and application-style tests. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42713 is the headline figure, representing outstanding multi-threaded rendering capability for a mobile processor. The single-core score of 6030 is equally impressive, showing that the Zen 4 architecture's IPC gains are fully realized in this part. PassMark results include a multithread score of 51405, a floating point math score of 117453, and an integer math score of 195180, all of which indicate strong computational throughput across varied workloads.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, which is unusual but notable. Its avgBenchmarkScore is listed as 0, and no nearestRivals data exists. The only performance indicators are its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs and its architectural specifications. This lack of direct benchmark data means the GPU's performance must be inferred from its specifications and percentile position rather than measured results.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 73, which sits well above the median but below the top quartile. This combined figure reflects the CPU's dominance (95th percentile) tempered by the GPU's mediocrity (50th percentile). The pairing is therefore best described as a CPU-forward configuration, where the processor is the star component and the GPU is adequate but not exceptional.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the margins are razor-thin. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX is just 0.1% behind in average score, making these two processors effectively equivalent in overall performance. The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX are both 0.4% ahead, while the Ryzen 9 9950X3D is 0.6% behind. This clustering at the top of the CPU charts means the 8945HX is in elite company, and any performance differences between these parts would be imperceptible in real-world use.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that this build is CPU-bound in most workloads. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 50th percentile ranking creates a significant performance gap. In multi-threaded CPU workloads like rendering, encoding, or compilation, the processor will operate at near-maximum utilization while the GPU remains relatively idle. This is an ideal scenario for content creators who prioritize CPU performance.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck shifts to the GPU. The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation, with its 50th percentile standing, will limit frame rates in GPU-intensive scenes. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (6030 in Cinebench R23 single-core) means it can feed the GPU with data efficiently, but the GPU's compute capability will be the constraining factor. The 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM are adequate for 1080p gaming but will become limiting at higher resolutions.

The FPS scaling between resolutions would show this imbalance clearly. At 1080p, the CPU's fast single-thread performance helps push higher frame rates, but the GPU still caps overall output. At 1440p, the GPU's limitations become more pronounced, and at 4K, the GPU would be severely stressed. For workstation tasks like 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, the balance depends on the specific renderer — CPU-based renders would be excellent, while GPU-based renders would be constrained by the RTX 3000's 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX has an average benchmark score of 76212, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (76155) and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (75779). It trails the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P by 0.4% (76492) and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX by 0.4% (76513).

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD106 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 8945HX includes a Radeon 610M integrated GPU, though this build also includes a discrete RTX 3000 Mobile GPU.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The CPU+GPU pairing sits at the 73rd percentile overall, with the CPU at the 95th percentile and the GPU at the 50th percentile.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming at 1080p, this build is capable but not ideal. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (6030 in Cinebench R23 single-core) will drive high frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU's 50th percentile standing limits ultra settings in demanding games. Users can expect smooth performance in competitive shooters and moderate settings in AAA titles.

Streaming benefits from the CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, which can handle game encoding alongside other tasks without significant performance degradation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42713 suggests ample headroom for x264 encoding while gaming, though GPU-based encoding would be limited by the RTX 3000's mid-range positioning.

Video editing is a strong use case for this build. The CPU's multi-threaded performance (51405 PassMark multithread) accelerates timeline rendering, effects processing, and export tasks. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering, though larger projects may stress the GPU's memory capacity.

3D rendering in CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray will be exceptional, given the CPU's 95th percentile ranking. GPU-based rendering with CUDA or OptiX will be adequate but not class-leading, as the RTX 3000's 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is moderate for compute workloads. The 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI denoising.

Software development is well-served by the 16-core, 32-thread configuration. Compilation times will be short, and the high single-thread performance (3907 PassMark single-thread) ensures responsive IDE interactions. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases and build systems that access shared data frequently.

Student and office work is dramatically over-served by this hardware. The CPU's performance is far beyond what word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing require, and the GPU's capabilities are wasted on typical productivity tasks. However, the headroom means these workloads will never cause the system to break a sweat, and the laptop will remain responsive under heavy multitasking.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need maximum CPU performance in a mobile form factor and are willing to accept a mid-range GPU. Content creators who primarily work with CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering with CPU-based engines, or large data processing will find the Ryzen 9 8945HX's 95th percentile performance invaluable.

Gamers at 1080p will find this build suitable, though those seeking high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K would need a stronger GPU. The 50th percentile GPU means 1080p ultra settings are achievable in most titles, but 1440p requires reduced settings and 4K is not recommended for demanding games.

Software developers working on large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads, which accelerate builds and test execution. The high single-thread performance also ensures fast IDE operations and quick response times for interactive development.

Students in engineering, computer science, or digital media programs will find this build capable of handling demanding coursework, from CAD and simulation software to video editing and programming assignments. The laptop form factor makes it portable for campus use.

Small business workstations that handle virtualization, database management, or complex spreadsheets will perform admirably with this configuration. The CPU's multi-threaded throughput and 64 MB L3 cache support concurrent workloads and large datasets, though the GPU's moderate performance limits GPU-accelerated business applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile platforms. This means the processor is not upgradeable in a traditional sense — it is soldered to the motherboard in most laptops. The same applies to the GPU, which is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor with no slot width, indicating it is also non-removable.

Memory support is limited to DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The system supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU's TDP is 115 W, and it has no power connectors, suggesting it draws power from the motherboard. The suggested PSU field is null, which is typical for laptop builds where power delivery is integrated into the chassis.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be replacing the entire laptop, as neither the CPU nor GPU can be swapped. However, users can upgrade storage to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives to take advantage of the CPU's 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, and memory can be expanded if the laptop supports additional DDR5 modules. The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation's 8 GB VRAM is the most likely limitation for future workloads, but this cannot be upgraded in a laptop.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX processor with the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 part from the Dragon Range family, built on a 5 nm process, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture mobile part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 73 indicates this pairing sits in the upper-middle range of all CPU+GPU combinations, driven largely by the CPU's 95th percentile performance.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 76212 places it among the fastest processors in the database, competitive with desktop and server-class parts. The GPU's 50th percentile standing, combined with its lack of direct benchmark scores, positions it as a mid-range mobile graphics solution. This build is fundamentally a CPU-first configuration, where the processor's exceptional multi-threaded and single-threaded performance is the primary selling point, and the GPU provides competent but not outstanding graphics capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD106 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units, along with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective).

Clock speeds are 1395 MHz base and 1695 MHz boost, which are conservative for a mobile part given the 115 W TDP. The GPU's pixel rate is 81.36 GPixel/s and texture rate is 244.1 GTexel/s. Compute performance is rated at 15.62 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (with 1:1 ratio), which is moderate for modern GPUs.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it performs around the median. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern gaming and rendering APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs are described as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning they vary by laptop implementation.

For rendering workloads, the 36 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing acceleration, and the 144 tensor cores enable AI-based features like DLSS and OptiX denoising. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and moderate 1440p workloads but may be limiting for 4K textures or large scenes. The 256.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for the GPU's compute capability, though it is lower than higher-end mobile GPUs with wider memory buses. The predecessor is Ampere-MW and the successor is Blackwell-MW, indicating this GPU sits in the middle of NVIDIA's recent mobile product stack.