SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

97%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

76,212 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q: A High-Core-Count Laptop Pairing with a Turing-Era GPU

This build combines a 16-core, 32-thread AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX processor with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, a professional-grade GPU from the Turing generation. The CPU delivers elite multi-threaded performance, ranking in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, creating a significant performance asymmetry. The combined system percentile is 73, indicating that this laptop pairing is strong overall but heavily weighted toward CPU-centric workloads. There are no measured FPS values for this exact combination in the data, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates derived from the GPU's benchmark characteristics and the CPU's known capabilities.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q is built on the TU104 chip using a 12 nm process from TSMC, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 600 MHz and boosts to 1350 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory subsystem is substantial for its era, providing ample capacity for large datasets and high-resolution textures.

The shader configuration includes 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The GPU also integrates 48 ray tracing cores and 384 tensor cores, making it DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) compliant, with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4 support. Pixel rate is rated at 86.40 GPixel/s, and texture rate at 259.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.294 TFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 16.59 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The GPU has a TDP of 80 W, uses an IGP slot width, and requires no power connectors, making it a power-efficient option for mobile workstations.

The GPU's overall benchmark score is zero in the data, and it holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. This places it exactly at the median, meaning half of all GPUs outperform it and half underperform it. The RTX 5000 Max-Q's 16 GB VRAM is a standout feature for rendering tasks, but the 8.294 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest by modern standards. Benchmark results indicate that this GPU is capable for professional visualization and light-to-moderate 3D rendering, but it will not compete with contemporary high-end gaming cards in raw compute throughput. The tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features, but the Turing architecture is now several generations old, limiting its efficiency relative to newer designs.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this pairing is mismatched. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensures it will not bottleneck any game, but the GPU's 50th percentile position suggests it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at elevated settings. Users should expect playable but not exceptional performance, with frame rates that will require lowering graphical presets to achieve smooth gameplay. The lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates, but the GPU's mid-pack standing is a clear indicator.

Streaming workloads benefit from the CPU's massive 32-thread capacity. The Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 42,713 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D. This headroom allows simultaneous game encoding and stream output without significant frame drops, though the GPU's modest encoding capabilities may limit stream quality at higher bitrates.

Video editing is a strong use case for this build. The CPU's multi-core prowess, evidenced by a PassMark multi-thread score of 51,405, accelerates timeline rendering and export tasks. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for handling large video projects and GPU-accelerated effects, though the 8.294 TFLOPS FP32 performance will not deliver real-time 4K editing with heavy color grading. The 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth helps with multi-stream playback.

3D rendering workloads are where this pairing shows its dual nature. The CPU's 95th percentile performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,713, handles CPU-based renderers exceptionally well. GPU-accelerated rendering with the RTX 5000 Max-Q will be slower due to the 50th percentile GPU ranking, but the 48 ray tracing cores and 384 tensor cores provide hardware support for ray-traced workflows. The 16 GB VRAM is a distinct advantage for scenes that exceed typical 8 GB GPU memory limits.

Software development is a strong scenario. The CPU's single-thread score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 ensures snappy compilation of single-threaded code, while the 32 threads handle parallel builds efficiently. The PassMark data encryption score of 40,836 indicates robust cryptographic performance, useful for secure coding environments. The GPU's capabilities are less relevant here, making the 50th percentile ranking acceptable.

Student and office work is largely over-served by this hardware. The CPU's 3,907 PassMark single-thread score handles everyday applications with ease, and the 95th percentile ranking means no office task will tax the processor. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is unnecessary for typical productivity software, and the 80 W GPU TDP combined with the CPU's 55 W TDP suggests a power-hungry laptop that will require frequent charging. Battery life will suffer, but performance will never be a limitation.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename. It uses AMD Socket FL1 and is manufactured on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with 13,140 million transistors spread across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. The base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 55 W. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes an integrated Radeon 610M GPU. It connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. The production status is active, with a release date of April 22, 2025.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 64 MB L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads with data reuse across cores. The CPU's benchmark scores are impressive: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 42,713, while single-core hits 6,030. PassMark scores include 51,405 for multi-thread, 3,907 for single-thread, 117,453 for floating point math, and 195,180 for integer math. The data compression score is 677,755, and data encryption is 40,836.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 76,212, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Against its nearest rivals, it is virtually tied with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (0.1% ahead), and slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (0.6% ahead). It trails the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX by 0.4% each. These margins are negligible, indicating that the 8945HX is at the top tier of mobile processors, competitive with desktop-class parts. The 32 threads provide exceptional parallel processing for compilation, rendering, and scientific computing, while the 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures strong single-thread responsiveness.

Who Should Build It

This laptop pairing targets professionals who prioritize CPU compute over GPU graphics. Data scientists and researchers running multi-threaded analysis will benefit from the 95th percentile CPU ranking, which handles numerical workloads with ease—the PassMark floating point score of 117,453 and integer score of 195,180 demonstrate this. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads, which cut build times dramatically compared to lower-core-count processors.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-based renderers, such as those using Cinebench R23 multi-core scores of 42,713, will find this system well-suited. Video editors who use CPU-heavy codecs and require large memory capacity will leverage the 16 GB GPU VRAM for asset storage, even if the GPU's compute is mid-tier. The 50th percentile GPU ranking means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower, but the CPU will not be the bottleneck.

Small business workstations running virtual machines or database workloads will benefit from the CPU's 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache. The PassMark data compression score of 677,755 indicates strong performance for file server tasks. Students in engineering or scientific fields who run simulations will appreciate the multi-core power, though the laptop's power consumption and likely short battery life may be drawbacks for all-day campus use.

Gamers should look elsewhere unless they play at 1080p with reduced settings. The GPU's 50th percentile position will limit high-refresh gaming, and the CPU's power is wasted in most gaming scenarios. This build is not for esports enthusiasts seeking 240 Hz performance, as the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a processor at the top of its class. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core score is 4,305 and single-core is 607. Cinebench R20 yields 17,939 multi-core and 2,532 single-core. Cinebench R23 delivers 42,713 multi-core and 6,030 single-core. These scores consistently rank the CPU in the 95th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 76,212.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, but its 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs provides a reference point. The combined system percentile is 73, reflecting the CPU's dominance and the GPU's mediocrity. The pairRankByFps is null, and there are no measured FPS values for any game, confirming that performance estimates must be derived from the component specifications.

The CPU's nearest rivals confirm its elite status. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX scores 76,155 on average, a 0.1% deficit to the 8945HX. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 75,779, a 0.6% deficit. The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 76,492, and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX scores 76,513, each 0.4% ahead. These differences are within noise, meaning the 8945HX is effectively tied with the best desktop and mobile processors available.

The combined picture is a laptop that excels at CPU-bound tasks but falls short in GPU-bound scenarios. The 73rd combined percentile suggests a well-above-average system, but the gap between the 95th percentile CPU and 50th percentile GPU is stark. Users will experience outstanding responsiveness in productivity and compute, but graphics-intensive applications will not reflect the CPU's capabilities.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game. All gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates based on the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and the CPU's 95th percentile performance. The dataIsMeasured field is false, so frame rate expectations are qualitative rather than precise.

At 1080p ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q's 8.294 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but modern AAA games will likely require medium or high settings to stay above 60 FPS. The 16 GB VRAM prevents memory capacity from being a limitation, but the compute throughput will cap performance. The 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 1080p but may bottleneck at higher resolutions.

At 1440p, the GPU will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding games. The 50th percentile ranking indicates that most contemporary GPUs outperform it, so users should expect frame rates around 30-50 FPS on ultra settings, depending on the title. Lowering settings to high or medium will be necessary for smoother gameplay. The CPU's 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU will be the constraining factor.

At 4K, the GPU is likely out of its depth. The 8.294 TFLOPS compute is insufficient for modern 4K gaming at high detail, and the 256-bit memory bus, while providing 384.0 GB/s, is narrow compared to modern high-end GPUs. Users should expect sub-30 FPS performance in most AAA titles at 4K ultra, making 1080p or 1440p with reduced settings the practical gaming resolutions. The GPU's professional driver focus may also limit gaming optimizations.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the 95th percentile CPU and 50th percentile GPU creates a clear bottleneck in graphics-heavy workloads. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting component in virtually every scenario, as the CPU's 32 threads and high boost clock far exceed gaming requirements. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,907 is sufficient to feed even the most demanding GPU, so the GPU's mid-pack compute is the sole constraint.

In CPU-bound workloads, the GPU becomes irrelevant. Rendering, compilation, and data processing tasks that rely on the CPU will see the 8945HX operate at its full potential, with the GPU's 50th percentile ranking having no impact. The CPU's 42,713 Cinebench R23 multi-core score means it can tackle the most demanding parallel tasks, and the GPU will idle or assist minimally.

The FPS scaling from the GPU's 8.294 TFLOPS will be modest, and the lack of measured data means precise scaling cannot be quantified. However, the 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM suggest that memory-intensive workloads, such as texture-heavy scenes, will not be hampered by capacity. The balance issue is compute, not memory. Users who prioritize gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering will find the GPU a bottleneck, while those who focus on CPU compute will find the system well-balanced.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, a 16-core Zen 4 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q, a Turing-generation professional GPU. The build class is laptop, meaning all components are integrated into a mobile chassis. The CPU is from AMD's 8000 series, released on April 22, 2025, and is currently in active production. The GPU is from NVIDIA's Quadro Turing-M generation, released on May 26, 2019, and is now end-of-life.

The overall tier, based on the 73rd combined percentile, places this system in the upper-middle range of all laptops. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking is elite, rivaling the best desktop processors, while the GPU's 50th percentile is average. This is a workstation-oriented pairing, where the CPU's 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache are the primary assets, and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM provides professional-grade memory capacity despite its modest compute.

The CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 80 W TDP combine for a 135 W thermal envelope, which is typical for a high-performance laptop. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is uncertain, but the component specifications provide a clear picture: this is a CPU-first system. For users who need maximum multi-threaded performance in a laptop, the 8945HX delivers, while the GPU is adequate for professional visualization but not for high-end gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance ranking compared to other processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX ranks in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 76,212. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Q: Is this laptop good for gaming?

A: Gaming performance is limited by the GPU's 50th percentile ranking. With no measured FPS data available, estimates suggest playable frame rates at 1080p with reduced settings, but the GPU will bottleneck in demanding titles. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking will not be the limiting factor.

Q: What are the CPU's core and thread counts?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q uses the Turing architecture on a 12 nm process from TSMC, with the TU104 chip. It has 3072 shading units, 48 ray tracing cores, and 384 tensor cores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 0.6% higher than the Ryzen 9 9950X3D in average benchmark score (76,212 vs 75,779), making the two effectively equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 73, reflecting the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile. This places the laptop in the upper-middle tier overall, with CPU-heavy workloads favored.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds