SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

87 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
76%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

76,212 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score
Top 24% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

This mobile workstation pairing combines a 16-core Zen 4 flagship processor with a Turing-based professional GPU, but the benchmark data reveals a profound imbalance. The Ryzen 9 8945HX sits in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, delivering desktop-class multi-threaded performance, while the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile languishes in the 7th percentile among all GPUs, a score that places it near entry-level GeForce GT 610 class performance. The combined system percentile is 51, meaning this configuration lands squarely in the middle of all tested laptop builds, despite the CPU's elite standing. This is a processor searching for a far more capable graphics partner.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FL1, a socket designed for the Dragon Range mobile processor family. The Ryzen 9 8945HX uses the Zen 4 architecture on TSMC's 5 nm process, featuring 16 cores and 32 threads with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and the memory controller does not support ECC. The processor provides Gen 5 PCIe with 28 lanes from the CPU, which is ample bandwidth for modern storage and expansion, though the GPU in this configuration is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16.

The CPU's TDP is rated at 55 W, which is remarkably low for a 16-core part, indicating that the platform is designed for power-constrained mobile environments. The GPU has a separate 80 W TDP, and because the GPU uses an MXM Module slot width with no power connectors listed, the total system power draw is modest by desktop standards. The suggested PSU field is null, which means no specific power supply recommendation exists in the data; however, the combined 55 W CPU and 80 W GPU TDPs suggest that a capable laptop power brick is sufficient, and there is no indication that a high-wattage desktop PSU is required.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to replace the GPU with a more modern part, as the CPU has substantial headroom. The Ryzen 9 8945HX's benchmark scores are within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and 0.1% of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, meaning the processor is not the limiting factor in any workload. The 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU are more than adequate for any current or near-future GPU, and the dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is sufficient for the CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache. The socket FL1 platform is a mobile-only design, so upgrades are limited to what the laptop chassis allows, but the data clearly indicates that the GPU is the component that needs replacing first.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data paints an unambiguous picture of a CPU-bound system in compute workloads and a GPU-bound system in graphics workloads. The Ryzen 9 8945HX achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,713, a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,939, and a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4,305. On the single-core side, the CPU scores 6,030 in Cinebench R23, 2,532 in R20, and 607 in R15. These numbers place the CPU in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 76,212.

The GPU, by contrast, scores only 1,285 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. This score is within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610, 0.6% below the AMD Radeon R9 380, and 1.4% above the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 and NVIDIA NVS 4200M. The delta between the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 7th percentile is extreme, and in any workload that requires both components — such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering — the GPU will be the sole bottleneck. For CPU-only tasks like data compression, encryption, and integer math, the system performs at elite levels, but for anything involving graphics, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile will hold the entire platform back.

The PassMark data for the CPU reinforces this split. The multi-thread score is 51,405, the single-thread score is 3,907, and the floating-point math score is 117,453. The integer math score is 195,180, and the extended instructions score is 49,823. Data compression scores 677,755, while data encryption scores 40,836. These are strong numbers that show no CPU-side weakness, which means that any perceived slowness in real-world use will be directly attributable to the GPU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system is not suitable for high-refresh gaming at any resolution. The GPU's 7th percentile ranking and its proximity to GT 610-class performance mean that frame rates will be extremely low, even at 1080p with low settings. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking is irrelevant when the GPU cannot feed frames at a playable rate.

Streaming: The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, which can handle software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's lack of performance means that gaming and streaming simultaneously will result in very poor game frame rates. The data shows no measured FPS for any game, and the GPU's benchmark score suggests that even streaming non-gaming content is fine, but the gaming experience will suffer.

Video editing: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 677,755 and integer math score of 195,180 indicate strong performance for video encoding and decoding tasks that rely on the CPU. The GPU's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle some GPU-accelerated effects, but the 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is low, so timeline rendering will be primarily CPU-bound.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,713 is exceptional for a mobile processor, rivaling desktop parts. CPU-based rendering will be very fast. GPU-based rendering, however, will be limited by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 30 RT cores, which are far below modern standards. The data indicates that the CPU will finish render tasks in a fraction of the time the GPU would take.

Software development: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a PassMark multi-thread score of 51,405, make compilation and testing fast. The single-thread score of 3,907 is also solid for interactive development. The GPU is not a factor in most development workflows, so this is a strong scenario for this system.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread Cinebench R23 score of 6,030 and the system's 51st combined percentile indicate that everyday productivity tasks will be responsive. The GPU's low performance is irrelevant for document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The 55 W CPU TDP means the laptop will run efficiently on battery, but the 80 W GPU TDP adds heat and power draw when active.

Who Should Build It

This system is for users who prioritize CPU compute above all else and have minimal graphics requirements. The target audience is professionals who run CPU-intensive workloads on the go — software developers compiling large codebases, researchers running scientific simulations, and analysts processing large datasets. The Ryzen 9 8945HX's 95th percentile CPU ranking and its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 17,939 make it a legitimate desktop replacement for compute tasks.

Content creators who work primarily in CPU-bound workflows, such as audio production or CPU-based video encoding, will find the 16 cores and 32 threads more than adequate. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU's compile times, and the 6 GB of GPU memory is enough for basic CAD or visualization tasks, though not for serious 3D work. Small business workstations that run data processing or financial modeling software will see strong performance, as the PassMark integer math score of 195,180 indicates rapid number crunching.

However, gamers should avoid this build entirely. The GPU's 7th percentile ranking means that even esports titles at low settings will struggle. Users who need GPU acceleration for rendering, machine learning, or video effects should look elsewhere, as the 240 tensor cores and 30 RT cores in the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile are not sufficient for modern workloads in those fields.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 76,212, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX at 76,155 (0.1% slower), the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P at 76,492 (0.4% faster), the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX at 76,513 (0.4% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D at 75,779 (0.6% slower). This clustering shows that the Ryzen 9 8945HX is at the absolute top of the mobile CPU hierarchy, trading blows with desktop and server parts.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 1,285, placing it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 at 1,281 (0.3% slower), the AMD Radeon R9 380 at 1,293 (0.6% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 at 1,267 (1.4% slower), and the NVIDIA NVS 4200M at 1,267 (1.4% slower). The GPU is effectively in a class with decade-old entry-level cards, which is a stark contrast to the CPU's position.

The combined system percentile is 51, which is the average of the CPU's 95th and the GPU's 7th percentiles. This means that while the CPU is elite, the overall system performance is dragged down to the middle of the pack by the GPU. The data shows that the CPU is 0.1% to 0.6% away from the top four rival CPUs, while the GPU is within 1.4% of its nearest rival — but those rivals are GT 520-class parts.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is based on the Turing architecture, specifically the TU106 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It has 1,920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. The GPU includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which provide hardware support for ray tracing and AI acceleration, respectively. The base clock is 945 MHz with a boost clock of 1380 MHz.

Memory is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s. The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.60 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The benchmark score of 1,285 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 is the only GPU benchmark available in the data, and it places the GPU in the 7th percentile. This score indicates that the GPU is not suitable for modern 3D rendering, despite having RT and tensor cores. The 30 RT cores can technically perform ray tracing, but at 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32, the rasterization performance is too low to make ray tracing usable in practice. The 240 tensor cores support DLSS and other AI features, but the underlying rendering speed is so low that these features cannot compensate.

The GPU's 6 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures in older games, but the 336.0 GB/s bandwidth and 192-bit bus are modest by modern standards. The 80 W TDP is low, which is typical for a mobile workstation GPU of this era, but it also limits performance. The production status is end-of-life, meaning this GPU is discontinued and no longer being developed.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, and these estimates should be treated as approximations. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,285, which is comparable to the GeForce GT 610 and GT 520, strongly indicates that this system cannot achieve playable frame rates in any modern game at any resolution.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 and 88.32 GPixel/s pixel rate are far below what is required for 60 FPS in AAA titles. The 6 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, but the raw compute power is the limiting factor. At 1440p and 4K, the situation is worse, as the GPU's 192-bit memory bus and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause severe bandwidth bottlenecks. Even at 720p with low settings, the GPU's 7th percentile ranking suggests that frame rates would be inconsistent and often below 30 FPS.

Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant might be playable at the lowest settings at 1080p, but the GPU's score relative to the GT 610 and GT 520 suggests that even these light titles would struggle to maintain high refresh rates. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking provides a strong gaming CPU, but the GPU is so weak that it nullifies the CPU's advantage.

FAQ

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 8945HX a good CPU for this system?

A: Yes, the CPU is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 76,212, and it is within 0.6% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and 0.1% of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX.

Q: How does the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile compare to its rivals?

A: The GPU scores 1,285 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 0.3% faster than the GeForce GT 610, 0.6% slower than the Radeon R9 380, and 1.4% faster than the GeForce GT 520 and NVS 4200M.

Q: What memory does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, but its 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance means ray tracing will be very slow.

Q: What is the CPU's power consumption?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 80 W.

Q: What is the system's overall performance percentile?

A: The combined system percentile is 51, which places it in the middle of all tested laptop builds.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.40 GHz. The CPU has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. It supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and it provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Radeon 610M, and the socket is AMD Socket FL1.

The benchmark data shows the CPU's dominance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42,713 multi-core and 6,030 single-core. In R20, it scores 17,939 multi-core and 2,532 single-core. In R15, it scores 4,305 multi-core and 607 single-core. The PassMark scores include 51,405 multi-thread, 3,907 single-thread, 195,180 integer math, 117,453 floating-point math, 49,823 extended instructions, 677,755 data compression, 40,836 data encryption, and 78781 random string sorting. The find prime numbers score is 262, and the physics score is 2,168.

The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and its average benchmark score of 76,212 places it in the same league as the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (76,155), the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P (76,492), the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (76,513), and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (75,779). The largest delta between the CPU and any rival is 0.6%, which is within the margin of error for most benchmarks.

For real workloads, the 16 cores and 32 threads provide exceptional multi-threaded performance for rendering, compilation, and data processing. The 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures strong single-threaded performance for interactive tasks. The 55 W TDP is surprisingly low for this level of performance, making it an efficient choice for mobile workstations. The CPU's only weakness is its pairing with a GPU that is in the 7th percentile, which limits the system's overall capabilities in graphics-intensive tasks. The CPU is a top-tier part that deserves a much faster GPU to match its potential.