SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

76,212 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile

22,729 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop platform pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. The data shows a processor that sits near the top of the CPU hierarchy and a GPU that is solidly mid-pack, creating a system with distinct strengths and clear limitations. This analysis is based strictly on the measured benchmark results and specifications provided.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to high-performance mobile platforms. Memory support is limited to DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform also provides PCIe Gen 5 connectivity with 28 lanes coming directly from the CPU, which is a notable feature for a laptop, as it allows for extremely fast NVMe storage and future expansion options that can saturate the available bandwidth. The CPU's 55 W TDP is a baseline figure; the actual power draw and thermal headroom will vary by laptop chassis design, but it frames the processor as a high-power part that requires a robust cooling solution.

The GPU is connected via a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. This is a standard configuration for a mobile GPU of this class and should not be a limiting factor for the RTX 4060 Mobile's performance. The system lacks ECC memory support, which is not a concern for consumer or gaming workloads but is worth noting for professional use cases that demand error correction.

Because this is a laptop, the upgrade path is largely closed. The CPU and GPU are soldered to the motherboard in most implementations, leaving the user with little to no ability to swap these components. The sensible "upgrade" for this platform is not a component swap, but rather a shift in usage. The data indicates the CPU is the dominant component, with a 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs. In contrast, the GPU sits at the 67th percentile. This means the platform is prepared for a future where it is paired with a more powerful GPU. If a user were to move this CPU to a desktop-class motherboard with a stronger graphics card, the CPU's headroom would be unlocked. For the laptop itself, the only practical upgrades are memory and storage, which can alleviate system bottlenecks but will not change the fundamental balance between the 8945HX and the RTX 4060 Mobile.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD107 chip and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, which yields a total bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The GPU is equipped with 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. Clock speeds are listed with a base of 1545 MHz and a boost of 1890 MHz, with the memory running at an effective 16 Gbps.

For ray tracing and AI workloads, the GPU has 24 dedicated RT cores and 96 tensor cores. The FP32 performance is rated at 11.61 TFLOPS, which is the same as its FP16 performance due to a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 181.4 GTexel/s. These specifications point to a GPU that is capable of handling modern games, but the 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus will be a limiting factor at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs.

The benchmark results confirm this position. The GPU's PassMark G3D score is 17469, placing it at the 67th percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 22729, which puts it in a tight race with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, which scores 22895, a delta of -0.7%. This means the RTX 4060 Mobile is essentially on par with the RTX 2080 in raw performance. It is also just 1.3% ahead of the newer RTX 5060 Mobile and 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT. The data shows that this is a mid-range performer, capable of solid 1080p gameplay but not designed for pushing high frame rates at 4K without significant compromises.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture shows a system with a high-performing CPU and a mid-range GPU. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 42713, which is exceptional for a mobile part. Its single-core score of 6030 is equally impressive. This performance places the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX at the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 76212. Its closest rival is the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, which scores 76155, a delta of only 0.1%, making them effectively tied in performance. The CPU is also just 0.4% behind the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D.

The GPU's performance is less dominant. Its PassMark G3D score of 17469 is solid, but its average benchmark score of 22729 places it at the 67th percentile. The combined percentile for this system is 81, reflecting the strong CPU pulling up the overall score. The measured FPS data across games reinforces this. The system achieves an average of 106.4 FPS across all tested games at all resolutions. This places the pair at rank 2497 out of 3861 pairs, meaning there are many laptop configurations that deliver higher average frame rates, primarily those with more powerful GPUs.

The combined picture is clear: this is a CPU-bound system. The 8945HX is a top-tier part, while the RTX 4060 Mobile is a competent but not exceptional GPU. In workloads that are heavily multithreaded, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU will deliver outstanding results. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, particularly at higher resolutions.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the system is capable of high frame rates in many titles. Measured data shows 164 FPS in Counter-Strike 2, 152 FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone, and 362 FPS in CS:GO. These results support a high-refresh 1080p monitor for esports and competitive shooters. However, for more demanding titles like Ark: Survival Ascended, the frame rate drops to 24 FPS at 1080p, indicating that max settings are not always playable.

Streaming: The combination of a powerful 16-core CPU and an RTX 4060 GPU with dedicated tensor and RT cores is well-suited for streaming. The CPU can handle the encoding workload with x264, or the GPU's NVENC encoder can offload the task entirely, leaving the CPU free for the game. The high single-thread score of 6030 in Cinebench R23 ensures that game logic and streaming software will not cause stuttering in most cases.

Video Editing: The CPU's Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4305 and PassMark multi-thread score of 51405 indicate that this system can handle video editing timelines with ease. Export times will be short, and effects processing will be responsive. The GPU's 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p editing, but 4K projects with heavy color grading may require more memory.

3D Rendering: This is a strong workload for this system. The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads are ideal for CPU-based rendering engines. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 is a top-tier result for a laptop. The GPU can assist with real-time viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated renders, with its 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 performance providing a decent boost, but the CPU will be the primary workhorse.

Software Development: The high core count and 32 threads make compiling large codebases faster than on most laptops. The PassMark data encryption score of 40836 and integer math score of 195180 further indicate strong performance in computational tasks. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking means it will tear through compilation jobs and other developer workloads.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for basic office tasks, but the performance is there to handle any academic workload, from large spreadsheets to complex simulations. The CPU's single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The laptop's battery life is not in the data, but the 55 W TDP CPU suggests it is not designed for all-day portability.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this system is someone who needs extreme CPU performance for work but also wants a capable gaming GPU. This is not a pure gaming laptop; it is a mobile workstation that can game well. Content creators who work with video, code, or 3D models will benefit the most from the 8945HX's performance. The GPU is sufficient for 1080p gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks, but it is not the primary draw.

For gamers, this system is a good fit for those who play at 1080p and prioritize high frame rates in competitive titles. The measured FPS in games like Valorant (376 FPS at 1080p) and CS:GO (362 FPS at 1080p) shows that the system can drive fast refresh rate panels. It is less ideal for gamers who want to play at 1440p or 4K with max settings, as the GPU will be the bottleneck.

Small business workstations that need to handle heavy multitasking, data analysis, and virtualization will find the 32 threads and high memory bandwidth useful. The lack of ECC memory is a consideration, but for many business workloads this is not a requirement. Students in engineering or computer science programs will also find this a powerful tool, though it is a premium configuration for their needs.

Gaming Performance

The data provided is measured FPS at Ultra settings, and it paints a clear picture of the system's gaming capabilities.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers a strong experience for many games. Esports titles run at very high frame rates: Valorant hits 376 FPS, CS:GO reaches 362 FPS, and Counter-Strike 2 runs at 164 FPS. More demanding titles are still playable, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 152 FPS and Roblox at 212 FPS. However, the heaviest games struggle. Ark: Survival Ascended runs at just 24 FPS, and The Medium drops to 34 FPS. Most other titles sit in the 60-120 FPS range, such as Control at 68 FPS and Fortnite at 79 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. Valorant still manages 321 FPS, but the frame rates for most other games drop significantly. Call of Duty: Warzone runs at 135 FPS, which is still good, but Counter-Strike 2 drops to 109 FPS. Heavier titles like Ark: Survival Ascended fall to 15 FPS, which is unplayable. Many other games, such as Control and Fortnite, hover in the 50 FPS range, which is a playable but not ideal experience for a high-refresh monitor.

At 3840x2160, the system is not suitable for modern gaming at Ultra settings. Most games fall below 40 FPS. Call of Duty: Warzone is the exception at 114 FPS, and Valorant remains playable at 256 FPS. However, the vast majority of titles, including Counter-Strike 2 at 61 FPS and Control at 35 FPS, will require significant settings reductions to be playable. The 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are simply not enough for 4K with high-quality textures.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data clearly shows that the GPU is the bottleneck for gaming workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 76212 places it at the 95th percentile, while the GPU's 22729 score is at the 67th percentile. This disparity means that in almost any gaming scenario, the RTX 4060 Mobile will be the first component to reach its limit.

This is evident in the FPS scaling. At 1080p, the system achieves an average of 106.4 FPS across all games. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would see frame rates stay constant regardless of resolution. Instead, as resolution increases to 1440p and 2160p, frame rates drop dramatically across the board. For example, in Control, the FPS drops from 68 at 1080p to 52 at 1440p and then to 35 at 4K. This pattern is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck, where the GPU's rendering capacity is being saturated.

However, the CPU is not entirely without limits. In esports titles at 1080p, where the GPU can render frames very quickly, the CPU's single-thread performance (6030 in Cinebench R23) becomes more important. The fact that Valorant can hit 376 FPS and CS:GO can hit 362 FPS shows that the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU in these scenarios. For productivity workloads, the CPU is the clear star, and its 95th percentile ranking means it will not be the bottleneck in any CPU-intensive task. The system is well-balanced in that the CPU has enough power to handle any task, while the GPU is adequate for 1080p gaming but will hold back the system at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Is this laptop good for gaming at 1440p?

A: The data shows it is playable, but not ideal. Measured Ultra settings FPS at 2560x1440 shows Call of Duty: Warzone at 135 FPS and Valorant at 321 FPS, but many other games drop to the 50-60 FPS range, such as Control at 52 FPS and Fortnite at 50 FPS. Heavier titles like Ark: Survival Ascended are unplayable at 15 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX has an average benchmark score of 76212, which is just 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX's score of 76155. This puts the two processors in a statistical tie.

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to desktop cards?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile's average benchmark score of 22729 is 0.7% lower than the desktop NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080's score of 22895, indicating they offer very similar performance levels.

Q: Can this system handle 4K video editing?

A: The CPU is more than capable, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713. However, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM may be a limiting factor for complex 4K projects with heavy effects, as it is a capacity constraint for holding texture and preview data.

Q: What is the best resolution for gaming on this system?

A: The measured data supports 1920x1080 as the best resolution for gaming. The system achieves an average of 106.4 FPS across all games at this resolution, and many esports titles run at well over 150 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU bottleneck the system in gaming?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck in gaming. The CPU is at the 95th percentile, while the GPU is at the 67th percentile. FPS drops significantly as resolution increases, which is a clear indication the GPU is the limiting component.

Q: What are the memory and storage support options?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU for storage and other devices.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is part of the 8000 series and is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with a transistor count of 13,140 million. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, and it can boost up to 5.40 GHz. It features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a large 64 MB of L3 cache. The TDP is rated at 55 W.

This CPU is a performance monster. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 places it at the 95th percentile of all CPUs. This is a score that rivals desktop processors and indicates that the 8945HX can handle the most demanding multithreaded workloads, such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, with ease. The PassMark multi-thread score of 51405 and the integer math score of 195180 further confirm its raw compute capability.

Single-thread performance is equally strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6030 is excellent, and the PassMark single-thread score of 3907 shows that the CPU is responsive in everyday tasks and games that do not utilize many cores. The data encryption score of 40836 and the floating-point math score of 117453 indicate that the CPU is not just fast in a general sense but also efficient at specific, complex operations. This performance is backed by the fact that its average benchmark score of 76212 puts it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, showing it is a top-tier part in any context. The high core count, fast clocks, and large cache make it an exceptional CPU for a laptop, capable of handling virtually any task a user can throw at it, though its power requirements mean it is best suited for larger, thicker laptops with robust cooling.