SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + AMD Radeon 880M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
85%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

76,212 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 880M

8,436 Benchmark Score
Top 15% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a laptop pairing built around a flagship-class 16-core CPU and a modest integrated GPU. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 processor based on the Dragon Range architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with 64 MB of L3 cache. The AMD Radeon 880M is an integrated graphics solution based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm process, with 768 shading units and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The pairing ranks in the 69th combined percentile across all CPU+GPU combinations in the database, with a measured average FPS of 48.6 across 51 games at 1920x1080 ultra settings. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with an entry-level IGP, creating a significant performance imbalance that defines its use cases.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU performance tier of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX?

A: The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 76212. It is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, which scores 76155, a delta of just 0.1%. It also edges out the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D by 0.6%, which scores 75779.

Q: How does the Radeon 880M integrated GPU compare to dedicated graphics cards?

A: The GPU is in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 8436. Its closest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (8427 score, 0.1% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458 score, -0.3% delta), meaning its performance is comparable to older entry-level dedicated mobile GPUs.

Q: Can this system play modern AAA games at playable frame rates?

A: At 1920x1080 ultra settings, it is borderline. Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 21 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 19 FPS, and The Medium at 15 FPS. However, it can handle less demanding titles: Call of Duty: Warzone hits 152 FPS, Valorant hits 166 FPS, and CS:GO hits 160 FPS at the same settings.

Q: What is the combined performance ranking of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The pair ranks 3652 out of 3732 total pairs in the database, which places it in the bottom few percent of all combinations. Its average FPS across all tested games is 48.6, which reflects the GPU's limiting role in gaming.

Q: What memory and PCIe specifications does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU itself. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop component set?

A: The build class is designated as "laptop." The CPU is a mobile part on the AMD Socket FL1, and the GPU is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 15 W TDP and no power connectors, confirming it is not a desktop solution.

Q: What is the production status of these components?

A: Both the CPU and GPU are marked as "Active" in production. The CPU's release date is April 22, 2025, while the GPU's release date is July 14, 2024.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench scores. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42713 points in multi-core and 6030 points in single-core. For perspective, this multi-core score is about 7 times higher than its single-core score, which is typical for a high-core-count processor. In Cinebench R20, it achieves 17939 multi-core and 2532 single-core. PassMark multi-thread performance is 51405, while single-thread is 3907. The CPU's 95th percentile rank against all CPUs confirms it is a top-tier performer for compute-heavy workloads. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, is virtually tied at 0.1% difference in average score, indicating that the 8945HX is at the very top of the mobile CPU hierarchy.

The GPU, in contrast, is a modest performer. Its best benchmark result is 40006 in Geekbench Vulkan, followed by 31285 in Geekbench OpenCL. In PassMark, it scores 7615 in G3D and 3719 in GPU Compute. The 43rd percentile rank shows it is below average for all GPUs, though its closest rivals are older dedicated parts like the GTX 675MX, suggesting it is not entirely without merit for basic tasks. The GPU's raw compute is rated at 4.454 TFLOPS for FP32, with a pixel rate of 46.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU is a 95th percentile processor, but the GPU is a 43rd percentile part. The combined percentile for the pair is 69, which is dragged down by the GPU. The pair's rank of 3652 out of 3732 pairs (bottom 2%) for FPS performance shows that for gaming, this system is not competitive on a frame-rate basis. However, for non-gaming workloads that rely heavily on CPU compute, the system would perform like a high-end workstation.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows that the GPU is the bottleneck for gaming workloads. The CPU's raw compute capability is far beyond what the Radeon 880M can feed. For example, at 1920x1080 ultra, the system achieves 21 FPS in Cyberpunk 2077, a heavily GPU-bound title. In contrast, Call of Duty: Warzone achieves 152 FPS, which is a lighter load for the GPU. The CPU is not the limiting factor here; if it were, we would see consistently low frame rates across all games, regardless of graphical intensity. Instead, the FPS scaling across resolutions confirms the GPU bottleneck: in Warzone, FPS drops from 152 at 1080p to 135 at 1440p to 114 at 4K. In Cyberpunk, it drops from 21 at 1080p to 16 at 1440p to 11 at 4K. This resolution-dependent scaling is the signature of a GPU-limited system.

The CPU's percentile of 95 versus the GPU's 43 means that in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the system will perform exceptionally well. The PassMark data compression score of 677755 and floating-point math score of 117453 indicate massive processing throughput. However, in gaming, the GPU's low percentile means it will struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles at high settings. The bottleneck is not a "bad" thing per se; it just means the system is designed for a specific workload profile—CPU-heavy tasks with light graphical requirements. If you try to run a game like Red Dead Redemption 2 at ultra settings, the GPU will cap performance at 19 FPS at 1080p, regardless of the CPU's capability.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need extreme CPU compute power in a laptop but have minimal GPU demands. The primary audience is software developers who compile large codebases, as the 16 cores and 32 threads will dramatically reduce build times. Data scientists and researchers running simulations or batch processing will benefit from the PassMark integer math score of 195180 and extended instructions score of 49823. Content creators who work in applications that leverage CPU rendering, such as certain 3D modeling or video encoding workflows, will find the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 useful, though GPU-accelerated rendering would be limited.

Students in engineering or computer science fields who need a portable workstation for heavy computation but do not game will find the CPU performance compelling. Small business workstations that handle database operations, virtualization, or complex spreadsheets will see excellent responsiveness. Gamers are not the target audience, as the GPU's 43rd percentile rank and sub-30 FPS in most AAA titles at 1080p ultra makes it unsuitable for modern gaming. However, it can handle esports titles well: CS:GO runs at 160 FPS, Valorant at 166 FPS, and Rainbow Six Siege at 86 FPS, all at 1080p ultra. This makes it viable for competitive gamers who play these specific titles and do not require high settings in graphically intensive games.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This system can drive high refresh rates in esports titles. Valorant hits 166 FPS and CS:GO hits 160 FPS at 1920x1080 ultra, which is sufficient for 144Hz displays. However, modern AAA games will not reach high refresh rates; Cyberpunk 2077 manages only 21 FPS at 1080p ultra, so a high-refresh monitor would only be useful for the lighter esports titles listed.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. In a game like Warzone at 152 FPS, the CPU could handle the encoding overhead without impacting game performance. However, the GPU's limitations mean you would be streaming at lower graphical settings. The PassMark multithread score of 51405 suggests the CPU can handle simultaneous gaming and encoding tasks without becoming the bottleneck.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 will handle 4K video editing and rendering in CPU-based codecs efficiently. However, the GPU's 4.454 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is minimal for GPU-accelerated effects or rendering in software like DaVinci Resolve, which would be slower than a dedicated GPU.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender's Cycles (CPU mode) or V-Ray will be fast, leveraging the 32 threads. The CPU's 95th percentile rank means it is among the fastest mobile processors for this task. However, GPU-based rendering is not viable, as the Radeon 880M's low compute throughput would result in long render times.

Software development: This is a strong use case. The CPU's high single-thread score of 6030 in R23 and multi-thread score will reduce compilation times. The PassMark data encryption score of 40836 and data compression score of 677755 indicate strong performance for I/O-bound development tasks. The 64 MB of L3 cache helps with large codebases.

Student and office work: For typical office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, this system is overkill. The CPU's power is wasted on such light workloads, but it will handle any task you throw at it. The integrated GPU is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration, as indicated by its PassMark G2D score of 969.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 880M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process. It has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, along with 12 ray tracing cores. The boost clock is 2900 MHz, with a base clock of 400 MHz. It uses system shared memory, so its bandwidth is dependent on the system's DDR5 memory configuration, which is rated at 83.2 GB/s for the CPU. The GPU's FP32 performance is rated at 4.454 TFLOPS, with a pixel rate of 46.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s.

The benchmark scores show it is a capable entry-level part. Its best result is 40006 in Geekbench Vulkan, which is a compute-oriented test. In PassMark, its G3D score of 7615 puts it in the 43rd percentile, comparable to the GTX 675MX. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 535 is low, reflecting its limitations in modern DirectX 12 titles. The ray tracing cores are present (12), but their performance is not sufficient for playable ray-traced gaming; Cyberpunk 2077 with ray tracing would likely be unplayable given its 21 FPS at 1080p ultra without RT.

For rendering, the GPU's compute score of 3719 in PassMark is low, indicating it is not suitable for GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or similar software. The 16 ROPs limit fill-rate, which is why pixel-heavy workloads at high resolutions perform poorly. The GPU is best suited for light photo editing, video playback, and esports gaming at lower resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with 13,140 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with a total die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 2.50 GHz, boosting to 5.40 GHz. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The TDP is 55 W, which is high for a mobile part, indicating it is designed for performance laptops with adequate cooling.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, which is a potential bottleneck for the integrated GPU, as it shares this memory. The 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU allow for fast NVMe storage and potentially discrete GPUs, though this build uses the integrated GPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking in systems that support it.

The benchmark results are outstanding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713 is exceptional for a mobile processor, rivaling many desktop parts. The single-core score of 6030 is also strong, ensuring snappy performance in single-threaded applications. The PassMark multithread score of 51405 and floating-point math score of 117453 confirm its compute prowess. The CPU's 95th percentile rank places it among the top 5% of all CPUs, with its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, being statistically tied. This is a processor for heavy multi-threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system featuring the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX CPU paired with the AMD Radeon 880M integrated GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread flagship mobile processor from the 8000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture. The GPU is an integrated solution based on RDNA 3.5, sharing system memory. The combined percentile of 69 indicates that while the CPU is top-tier (95th percentile), the GPU drags the overall gaming performance down (43rd percentile). The pair's rank of 3652 out of 3732 pairs for FPS performance places it in the bottom 2% of all pairs, meaning it is not a gaming-first system.

In terms of overall tier, this is a high-performance workstation CPU paired with an entry-level IGP. It is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a compute-focused laptop that can handle light gaming. The CPU's performance is comparable to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, while the GPU's performance is comparable to the NVIDIA GTX 675MX. This pairing is best understood as a "CPU monster with a GPU afterthought," ideal for developers and creators who need raw processing power but do not prioritize gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is on the AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile socket, so upgrading the CPU in a laptop is generally not possible. The platform uses DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, which is the current standard. The CPU supports 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is future-proof for fast storage and external GPU enclosures, though the laptop form factor limits expansion.

The GPU is integrated, so there is no discrete upgrade path within the same system. The only way to improve GPU performance would be to use an external GPU (eGPU) via the PCIe lanes, but this is not a standard laptop configuration. The GPU's TDP is 15 W, and the CPU's TDP is 55 W, so the total system power draw is manageable, but there is no suggested PSU rating for the GPU, as it is an IGP.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that if gaming performance is a priority, you would need to move to a different laptop with a discrete GPU. However, if you are satisfied with the CPU performance and only need occasional esports gaming, this system is adequate. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is a limiting factor for the IGP, so a system with faster DDR5 memory could slightly improve GPU performance, but the upgrade path within this specific laptop is non-existent for the CPU and GPU. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means that any future external devices would not be bottlenecked by the interface.