SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

76,212 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with the AMD Radeon 8050S represents a high-end laptop configuration that sits at the 92nd percentile overall among all tested pairings. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 part running on the Dragon Range architecture, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated graphics solution based on the Strix Halo chip. Benchmark results show the processor achieving an average score of 76,212, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with the graphics solution posting an average score of 62,108, good for the 89th percentile among GPUs. This is a system built for demanding workloads, though the data reveals interesting nuances in how it handles gaming versus productivity tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system delivers competitive frame rates in competitive shooters, with Counter-Strike 2 hitting 152 FPS and Valorant reaching 349 FPS. The 1440p results remain strong for esports, with Valorant still at 298 FPS and Rainbow Six Siege at 119 FPS. However, 4K gaming is more limited, with most AAA titles falling below 60 FPS, indicating this pairing is best suited for high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming rather than 4K.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming workloads. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics in the CPU handles display output, while the Radeon 8050S manages the game rendering. PassMark multithread score of 51,405 and integer math score of 195,180 indicate strong parallel processing capability for simultaneous game capture and encoding.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,713 reflects robust rendering performance for video export. The floating-point math score of 117,453 in PassMark supports smooth effects processing and color grading. The 64 MB of L3 cache helps with large media files, while the dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s provides sufficient data throughput for 4K video timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's 32 threads deliver strong performance in CPU-bound rendering tasks, with Cinebench R20 multicore score of 17,939. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute adds GPU-accelerated rendering capability. The 32 RT cores and 2,048 shading units provide hardware support for ray-traced workflows, though the system-shared memory means texture-heavy scenes will depend on available system RAM.

Software development: The high single-thread score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,907 accelerate compilation and code analysis. The data encryption score of 40,836 in PassMark indicates strong cryptographic performance for secure development environments. The 16 physical cores allow multiple virtual machines or containers to run concurrently without significant contention.

Student and office work: The CPU's 95th percentile ranking ensures snappy responsiveness for document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 610M handles basic display tasks, while the 8050S remains idle, conserving power. The 55W TDP for both components suggests reasonable battery life for a high-performance laptop, though the system's overall performance class targets demanding professional use rather than basic productivity.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The pairing sits at the 92nd percentile among all tested CPU+GPU combinations, with an average FPS across games of 98.9 at 1080p.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 76,212 on average, which is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (76,155) and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (75,779).

Q: What is the GPU's performance relative to comparable mobile GPUs?

A: The Radeon 8050S averages 62,108, which puts it 0.3% ahead of the Radeon Pro W6600M (61,896) and 2.6% behind the Radeon RX 7600M (63,775).

Q: Does this system support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 8050S includes 32 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), providing hardware-accelerated ray tracing capabilities.

Q: What memory type does this platform use?

A: The system uses DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The GPU shares system memory rather than having dedicated VRAM.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and upgrade potential?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1 and supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the processor. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking if the laptop BIOS permits.

Q: How does the system perform in 4K gaming?

A: At 3840x2160, most AAA titles struggle, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 22 FPS and Red Dead Redemption 2 at 20 FPS. Less demanding games like Valorant hit 238 FPS and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reaches 137 FPS.

Gaming Performance

Measured FPS data at ultra settings reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels in esports and older titles: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive hits 336 FPS, Valorant reaches 349 FPS, and Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege manages 181 FPS. Modern competitive shooters also perform well, with Call of Duty: Warzone at 152 FPS and Counter-Strike 2 at 152 FPS. For demanding AAA games at 1080p, results are mixed: Cyberpunk 2077 runs at 45 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 at 41 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended at 22 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly but remain playable for many titles. Valorant stays at 298 FPS, Warzone at 135 FPS, and CS2 at 101 FPS. However, AAA games show strain: Cyberpunk 2077 drops to 34 FPS, Red Dead Redemption 2 to 30 FPS, and Ark: Survival Ascended to 14 FPS. The 1440p results suggest this is the practical limit for smooth gaming in demanding titles.

At 3840x2160, the system is only suitable for less demanding games. Valorant manages 238 FPS, CS:GO hits 137 FPS, and Warzone achieves 114 FPS. Most AAA titles fall below 40 FPS, with Cyberpunk 2077 at 22 FPS, Control at 32 FPS, and Microsoft Flight Simulator at 33 FPS. The pairRankByFps of 2,808 out of 3,732 pairs indicates that while this system outperforms many older configurations, it is not positioned among the top performers for pure gaming FPS.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data reveals a system where the GPU is the primary limiting factor in gaming workloads. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 89th percentile shows a meaningful gap in relative capability. This manifests in the FPS scaling across resolutions: from 1080p to 1440p, average frame rates drop by roughly 35-40%, and from 1440p to 4K, they drop another 40-50%. This pattern is characteristic of a GPU-bound system, where increased pixel count directly impacts performance.

In CPU-intensive workloads like video encoding and 3D rendering, the Ryzen 9 8945HX's 32 threads keep the system well ahead of the GPU's contribution. The PassMark multithread score of 51,405 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 42,713 demonstrate that the processor can handle sustained heavy loads without bottlenecking. The GPU's system-shared memory architecture means that at higher resolutions, memory bandwidth contention may further limit performance.

The 55W TDP for both CPU and GPU suggests a balanced power envelope, but the actual bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. In games with high CPU requirements like Microsoft Flight Simulator (55 FPS at 1080p), the processor's single-thread performance matters more. In GPU-heavy titles like Cyberpunk 2077, the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the limiting factor. The data indicates that for gaming, the Radeon 8050S is the constraining component, while for productivity, the CPU is more than sufficient.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 76,212, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs tested. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX scores 76,155 (0.1% behind), the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P scores 76,492 (0.4% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX scores 76,513 (0.4% ahead). The Ryzen 9 9950X3D is 0.6% behind at 75,779. This clustering indicates that the 8945HX is positioned at the top tier of mobile processors, effectively matching desktop-class performance.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 42,713 demonstrates strong multi-threaded capability, while the single-core score of 6,030 shows excellent per-thread performance. The PassMark suite reveals specialized strengths: data compression at 677,755, floating-point math at 117,453, and integer math at 195,180. The extended instructions score of 49,823 indicates robust SIMD processing for scientific and engineering workloads.

The GPU averages 62,108, placing it in the 89th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Radeon Pro W6600M at 61,896 (0.3% behind) and the Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 63,693 (2.5% ahead). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 and Vulkan score of 58,398 show consistent performance across different compute APIs. Combined, the CPU and GPU produce a system that ranks in the 92nd percentile overall, indicating a high but not elite performance tier.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who need strong CPU performance for professional workloads while maintaining decent gaming capability. Video editors and 3D artists will benefit from the CPU's 32 threads and the GPU's 2,048 shading units, though they should plan for the system-shared memory limitations. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the high single-thread score of 6,030 in Cinebench R23 and the 95th percentile CPU ranking.

Gamers at 1080p will find the system capable of high-refresh esports play, with Valorant at 349 FPS and CS:GO at 336 FPS. Those willing to drop settings in AAA titles can achieve playable frame rates, as seen in Control at 63 FPS and Cyberpunk 2077 at 45 FPS. The 1440p gaming experience is acceptable for competitive titles but requires lowered settings for demanding single-player games.

Students and professionals seeking a high-performance laptop for engineering simulations, financial modeling, or scientific computing will find the CPU's 16-core, 32-thread design well-suited. The 64 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support large datasets. Small business workstations requiring reliable multitasking and occasional GPU acceleration for rendering or analysis tasks will find this pairing adequate, though the GPU is not designed for heavy compute workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 8945HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which supports the Dragon Range platform. It features PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, providing substantial bandwidth for future NVMe storage and external GPU connectivity. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support means that upgrading to higher-capacity or faster DDR5 modules is possible, though the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is fixed by the memory bus design.

The GPU is an integrated part of the Strix Halo chip, meaning it cannot be upgraded separately. This is a significant limitation for future GPU improvements. The system's 55W TDP for both components suggests that the laptop power delivery is designed for this specific configuration, and there is no suggested PSU upgrade path since this is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) design.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system RAM, since the GPU uses system-shared memory. This would directly benefit gaming performance, as more available memory reduces texture swapping. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking if the laptop's thermal solution permits, potentially improving single-thread performance. For external expansion, the PCIe Gen 5 x16 interface on the GPU could theoretically support an eGPU enclosure, but the integrated nature of the 8050S makes this impractical.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with the AMD Radeon 8050S in a laptop class configuration. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 processor from the 8000 series, built on TSMC's 5nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die. The GPU is an RDNA 3.5 architecture part on TSMC's 4nm process, featuring 2,048 shading units and 32 RT cores on a 308 mm² die.

The combined system ranks in the 92nd percentile overall, with the CPU at 95th and GPU at 89th percentile respectively. The average FPS across all tested games at 1080p is 98.9, placing this pairing at rank 2,808 out of 3,732. This is a high-end mobile configuration that excels in CPU-intensive tasks and provides solid 1080p gaming, but it is not a top-tier gaming machine. The system's tier is best described as "high-performance laptop" with a focus on productivity and content creation over pure gaming FPS.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX features 16 cores and 32 threads, running at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It uses the Zen 4 architecture on the Dragon Range codename, manufactured on TSMC's 5nm process. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. This is a mobile processor with a TDP of 55W and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance, with Cinebench R23 multicore scoring 42,713 and R20 multicore at 17,939. The single-thread scores are equally impressive: R23 single-core at 6,030 and R15 single-core at 607. PassMark results reveal specialized strengths: floating-point math at 117,453, integer math at 195,180, and data compression at 677,755. The data encryption score of 40,836 indicates strong AES performance for security applications.

The 95th percentile ranking places this CPU among the fastest mobile processors available, rivaling desktop parts. The 0.1% delta from the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX shows these are essentially equivalent in overall performance. For real workloads, this means smooth 4K video editing, fast code compilation, and efficient multi-tasking with many concurrent applications. The 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures snappy single-thread response in everyday tasks.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S uses the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4nm process. It has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz and boost clock of 2800 MHz, delivering 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 11.47 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio). It includes 32 RT cores for ray tracing but has no dedicated tensor cores.

Memory is system-shared, meaning the GPU uses the same DDR5 memory as the CPU with bandwidth dependent on the system configuration. This is a significant limitation for gaming at high resolutions, as the 83.2 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth is shared. The pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s indicate solid fill rates for a mobile IGP.

Benchmark performance shows a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 and Vulkan score of 58,398, placing it in the 89th percentile. The 0.3% lead over the Radeon Pro W6600M and 2.5% deficit to the Radeon Pro Vega 56 demonstrate it is a competent mid-range performer. For rendering workloads, the 2,048 shading units provide adequate compute for GPU-accelerated effects, but the system-shared memory limits texture-heavy scenes. The 32 RT cores enable ray tracing in supported titles, but performance will be modest compared to dedicated GPUs.