SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
88%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

76,212 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score
Top 12% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX paired with the AMD Radeon 740M represents a striking imbalance in mobile computing. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread powerhouse that sits at the 95th percentile of all processors, while the GPU is an integrated graphics solution that hovers near the 53rd percentile of all discrete and integrated GPUs. This pairing creates a system where the processor can handle the most demanding multi-threaded workloads with ease, but the graphics subsystem will constrain any task that relies on visual output. The data indicates a clear bottleneck: the Radeon 740M is the limiting factor for gaming, 3D rendering, and GPU-accelerated workloads, while the CPU will rarely be the constraining component in any scenario. Benchmark results show a combined percentile of 74, reflecting the drag that the modest GPU places on an otherwise exceptional CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data paints a stark picture of component imbalance. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 76,212 places it in the 95th percentile, just 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D. This is elite-level processing performance. In contrast, the GPU’s average benchmark score of 12,870 places it in the 53rd percentile, with rivals like the AMD FirePro W5100 trailing by only 0.2% and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 trailing by 0.3%. The GPU is a mid-pack performer, not a bottom-tier part, but it is nowhere near the class of the CPU.

This asymmetry defines the system’s behavior. In CPU-bound workloads—software compilation, data compression, encryption, physics calculations—the Ryzen 9 8945HX will deliver top-tier results. The PassMark multi-thread score of 51,405 and the integer math score of 195,180 demonstrate massive parallel throughput. However, in any GPU-bound task, the Radeon 740M becomes the ceiling. Its FP32 throughput of 2.867 TFLOPS is modest, and its 8 ROPs limit pixel output to 22.40 GPixel/s. The data suggests that even a mid-range discrete GPU would outperform this iGPU by a wide margin, but no such rival data is present in the pack for direct comparison.

The bottleneck analysis is straightforward. For gaming at 1080p, the GPU will limit frame rates, regardless of the CPU’s capability. For video editing, the CPU can handle encoding and decoding, but GPU-accelerated effects and rendering will stall. For 3D rendering in applications that rely on the GPU, the 740M’s 256 shading units and 4 RT cores will be the constraining factor. The only workloads where this pairing shines are purely CPU-bound tasks, where the 8945HX can operate without interference from the graphics subsystem.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark suite shows consistent strength across single-threaded and multi-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 42,713, while the single-core score is 6,030. The Cinebench R20 results follow the same pattern: multi-core at 17,939 and single-core at 2,532. Cinebench R15 shows 4,305 multi-core and 607 single-core. PassMark tests reinforce this: single-thread at 3,907, multi-thread at 51,405, floating-point math at 117,453, and data compression at 677,755. These numbers place the CPU in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 76,212.

The GPU’s benchmark results are far more modest. Geekbench OpenCL scores 10,172, and Geekbench Vulkan scores 15,568. The average benchmark score is 12,870, placing it in the 53rd percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro 455 (0.3% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 580 (0.4% behind). These are older discrete GPUs, and the 740M trades blows with them, which is noteworthy for an integrated solution but underwhelming compared to the CPU’s standing.

The combined picture is one of a system that excels at computation but struggles with graphics. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this tension. A user running CPU-heavy applications will experience flagship-level performance, but any GPU workload will pull the system down to mid-range territory. The data shows no measured FPS values for this exact combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data—so all frame rate discussions must be considered estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC, with a transistor count of 13,140 million across a die size of 2x 71 mm². Base clock is 2.50 GHz, boost clock is 5.40 GHz, and the TDP is 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, and it has a Radeon 610M integrated GPU as a backup, though the primary GPU in this pairing is the discrete Radeon 740M.

The benchmark scores indicate strong real-world performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,713 is exceptional for a mobile processor, rivaling desktop parts. The single-core score of 6,030 shows that the architecture is efficient at lower thread counts, which benefits everyday responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. PassMark data compression at 677,755 and encryption at 40,836 highlight the CPU’s suitability for file archiving and security tasks. The floating-point math score of 117,453 and integer math score of 195,180 demonstrate balanced arithmetic capability, useful for scientific computing and financial modeling.

The nearest rivals confirm the CPU’s position. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX scores 76,155, a 0.1% difference, meaning the two are effectively tied. The AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX both score slightly higher at 76,492 and 76,513 respectively, but the deltas are within 0.4%, making this a statistical dead heat. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D scores 75,779, which is 0.6% lower. This places the 8945HX in the top echelon of available processors, suitable for heavy multi-threaded workloads like rendering, compilation, and scientific simulation.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else and are willing to accept integrated graphics. The target audience is professionals who run CPU-bound applications and do not require high-end gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. Software developers will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads, which speed up compilation and testing. The PassMark data encryption score of 40,836 and extended instructions score of 49,823 indicate strong performance for cryptography and vectorized code, useful for security researchers and data scientists.

Content creators who work primarily with audio or CPU-based video encoding will find the 8945HX capable, but those relying on GPU acceleration for effects will be disappointed. Students and small business workstations that run office suites, web development tools, and database management will experience responsive performance, though the GPU will limit any graphical tasks. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking means it can handle the most demanding computational workloads, but the GPU’s 53rd percentile means gaming should be limited to esports titles at lower settings, and even then, frame rates will be modest.

The system is not suited for high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K, nor for 3D rendering in Blender or CAD applications that leverage the GPU. It is, however, an excellent choice for a headless server, a build server, or a workstation where the GPU is only needed for basic display output. The 55 W TDP of the CPU and 45 W TDP of the GPU suggest a laptop that can sustain heavy CPU loads without excessive heat, making it a candidate for long-running compute tasks.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU-GPU combination—the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data—so all frame rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The Radeon 740M’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 15,568 and OpenCL score of 10,172 suggest a GPU that can handle 1080p gaming at low to medium settings in older or less demanding titles. The 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 44.80 GTexel/s texture rate indicate that modern AAA games will struggle to maintain 60 FPS at 1080p, even with reduced settings.

At 720p, the 740M might deliver playable frame rates in lighter games, but the CPU’s power will be largely wasted in gaming scenarios. The 8 ROPs and 256 shading units are the key limits, as they cap pixel fill and shader complexity. For esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, the 740M may achieve 60 FPS at 1080p with lower presets, but for games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield, expect sub-30 FPS performance. The data shows no measured FPS, so these are qualitative expectations based on the GPU’s benchmark position relative to rivals like the Radeon RX 580, which is 0.4% faster, and the GTX 590, which is 0.3% slower.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, reflecting the CPU’s strong 95th percentile ranking and the GPU’s weaker 53rd percentile ranking.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX has an average benchmark score of 76,212, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX’s 76,155, making them effectively tied in performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The AMD Radeon 740M uses system-shared memory, with the size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," meaning it relies on the CPU’s DDR5 memory.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the FACT PACK indicates that ECC memory support is false for the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 5.40 GHz, and the TDP is 55 W, which is low for a 16-core processor, suggesting efficient power management.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The Radeon 740M delivers 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is modest and places it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the CPU’s L3 cache size?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX has 64 MB of L3 cache, which is substantial and aids in multi-threaded workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 740M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, using the Phoenix2 chip on a 4 nm process node from TSMC. It has 256 shading units, 16 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 8 render output units (ROPs). The base clock is 800 MHz, and the boost clock is 2800 MHz. It features 4 RT cores, though no tensor cores are listed. The pixel rate is 22.40 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 44.80 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 2.867 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The GPU’s TDP is 45 W, and it uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. Memory is system-shared, meaning bandwidth is dependent on the CPU’s DDR5 memory, which is 83.2 GB/s for the 8945HX.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that is competitive with older discrete parts. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 10,172 and Vulkan score of 15,568 place it in the 53rd percentile, with an average score of 12,870. Its nearest rival, the AMD FirePro W5100, is 0.2% faster, while the Radeon RX 580 is 0.4% faster. This means the 740M can handle light 3D rendering, basic video editing, and older games, but it will struggle with modern AAA titles at high settings. The 4 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low shading unit count will limit ray-traced performance. For rendering workloads, the 2.867 TFLOPS is a fraction of what a dedicated workstation GPU offers, so this is not a system for GPU-accelerated production tasks.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX, a 16-core mobile processor from the 8000 series, with the AMD Radeon 740M, an integrated GPU. The build class is laptop, indicating this is a mobile system. The combined percentile is 74, which places the overall system in the upper-mid range of all possible configurations. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking pulls the combined score up, while the GPU’s 53rd percentile drags it down. The result is a laptop that is exceptional for CPU-intensive tasks but average for graphics.

The CPU is built on Zen 4 architecture with Dragon Range codename, released in April 2025, and is currently active in production. The GPU is based on RDNA 3.0, released in January 2024, and is also active. The system uses DDR5 memory with dual-channel support, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs. Overall, this is a workstation-class CPU in a laptop form factor, paired with an entry-level integrated GPU, creating a system that is best suited for computational work rather than gaming or GPU-accelerated graphics.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The Radeon 740M’s 53rd percentile ranking and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit frame rates to below 60 FPS at 1080p in most modern titles. The CPU’s power is irrelevant here, as the GPU is the bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU can handle encoding via software, given its 16 cores and strong Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,713. However, the GPU cannot handle game rendering at high quality simultaneously, so streaming will require lower game settings or a dedicated capture card.

Video editing: The CPU excels at encoding and decoding, with PassMark floating-point math at 117,453. But GPU-accelerated effects and timeline rendering will be slow due to the 740M’s 256 shading units. Editing is possible, but exports and previews will be sluggish.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender (Cycles CPU) will be fast, thanks to the 32 threads. GPU-based rendering will be severely limited by the 740M’s 2.867 TFLOPS, making it unsuitable for production work.

Software development: Excellent. The CPU’s 95th percentile ranking and high multi-thread scores (51,405 in PassMark) speed up compilation, testing, and running virtual machines. The GPU is sufficient for basic UI rendering.

Student and office work: More than adequate. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,907 in PassMark ensures snappy application response, and the GPU handles office suites, web browsing, and video playback without issue. The 55 W TDP suggests long battery life under light loads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile platforms. The socket supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, which is future-proof for high-speed NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures, though the GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The TDP of the CPU is 55 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 45 W, so the total system draw is modest, but there is no suggested PSU listed, as this is a laptop with no user-replaceable power supply.

A sensible next upgrade would be to add a discrete GPU, though this is limited by the laptop form factor. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes on the CPU suggest that an external GPU enclosure could theoretically be used, but the GPU’s PCIe 4.0 x8 interface indicates a bandwidth ceiling. More realistically, a future laptop with the same CPU but a higher-tier GPU, such as a discrete Radeon or GeForce part, would unlock the CPU’s full potential. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking in supported laptops, but this is constrained by thermal and power limits. The platform supports 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is ample for a discrete GPU and multiple NVMe drives, but the integrated nature of the 740M means no upgrade path for the GPU within the chassis. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is a potential bottleneck for the iGPU, but it is the maximum supported by the dual-channel DDR5 configuration.