SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

31,074 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Balance and Bottleneck

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile represents a fascinating study in mobile component balancing. The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 81st percentile among all graphics cards—a remarkably tight alignment that suggests neither component dramatically overshadows the other in synthetic workloads. This near-identical percentile positioning (82 vs. 81) implies a system designed for equilibrium rather than lopsided performance.

Looking at the CPU's threading characteristics, the data reveals a processor that scales well with multi-threaded workloads but maintains respectable single-thread performance. The 3DMark scores show a progression from 1013 in single-thread to 1985 in 2-thread, 3809 in 4-thread, 6385 in 8-thread, and 7774 in 16-thread tests. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads (6385 to 7774) represents only a 21.7% improvement, indicating that the processor's 8 cores and 16 threads reach diminishing returns beyond 8 threads. This suggests that workloads heavily reliant on 16-thread parallelism will see modest gains over 8-thread performance, potentially creating a bottleneck in heavily multi-threaded applications.

The GPU side shows a different bottleneck profile. With 7424 shading units, 232 tensor cores, and 58 RT cores, the RTX 4080 Mobile has substantial parallel processing capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 24926 against a G2D score of 929 reveals a stark contrast—3D workloads dominate, while 2D tasks are comparatively trivial. The GPU's compute score of 11191 on PassMark suggests that compute-heavy workloads (like rendering or physics simulation) perform at roughly 45% of the card's 3D graphics throughput, indicating potential bottlenecks when shifting from gaming to compute tasks.

The FPS scaling story must be framed carefully, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows, so all FPS discussion is estimated from benchmark scores. Based on the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16795 and the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24926, the system appears balanced for 1440p gaming, where both components contribute meaningfully. At lower resolutions, the CPU's single-thread score of 1013 on 3DMark could become the limiting factor in high-refresh scenarios, while at 4K, the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth would likely become the primary constraint.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers strong synthetic scores across multiple test suites. In Geekbench, it achieves 2116 single-core and 12276 multi-core. Cinebench R23 shows 1805 single-core and 16795 multi-core, while the older R15 test yields 281 single-core and 2640 multi-core. The 3DMark suite provides a more granular view: 1013 single-thread, 1985 dual-thread, 3809 quad-thread, 6385 8-thread, and 7774 max-thread. The CPU's average benchmark score is 31074, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700F, scores 31081, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core i7-13700TE scores 31028 (0.1% slower), while the Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 31143 (0.2% faster). The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS scores 30879, placing it 0.6% behind.

The GPU presents equally compelling numbers. Geekbench OpenCL scores 159575, while Vulkan scores 145807. PassMark DirectX tests show 157 for DX10, 244 for DX11, 96 for DX12, and 286 for DX9. The PassMark G3D score of 24926 and GPU compute score of 11191 round out the picture. The GPU's average benchmark score is 38135, at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, scores 38299 (0.4% faster), while the RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38349 (0.6% faster). The desktop RTX 4070 scores 37648 (1.3% slower), and the NVIDIA Tesla P4 scores 37628 (1.3% slower).

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 82, reinforcing the balanced nature of the build. The CPU's PassMark multi-thread score of 29780 and single-thread score of 3850 indicate a processor that excels in both parallel and sequential tasks. The GPU's FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS and texture rate of 386.3 GTexel/s suggest strong raw throughput. Together, these components create a system that performs at the top tier of mobile computing, with both halves contributing roughly equally to the overall experience.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-specific socket that limits traditional desktop upgrades. The processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is a significant consideration for upgrade planning—users are locked into DDR5, which offers solid bandwidth but may limit options if faster memory becomes available. The CPU also provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), enabling high-speed NVMe storage and GPU connectivity.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is current-generation and should not bottleneck the RTX 4080 Mobile's performance. The GPU's TDP is 110 W, while the CPU's TDP is 45 W, giving a combined thermal envelope of 155 W before considering other components. The GPU has no power connectors (listed as "None") and uses an IGP slot width, indicating it is soldered or integrated into the laptop's design. The suggested PSU field is null, meaning no specific power supply recommendation exists—this is expected for a laptop where power delivery is handled by the chassis design.

Upgrade paths are constrained by the laptop form factor. The CPU is not socket-upgradeable in most designs, and the GPU is likewise fixed. The practical upgrade path involves memory (up to the DDR5 capacity the laptop supports) and storage (via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives). Given the 12 GB VRAM on the GPU, users may find this sufficient for current games, but future titles with higher VRAM demands could push the system to its limits. The CPU's 16 MB shared L3 cache and 8 cores are well-matched to the GPU, so upgrading one without the other would create imbalance. A sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to maximize the dual-channel bandwidth, or adding high-speed PCIe Gen 4 storage to reduce load times.

# Who Should Build It

This system targets users who demand high performance in a mobile form factor. Gamers at 1440p resolution will find the RTX 4080 Mobile's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth sufficient for ultra settings in most titles, while the CPU's 8 cores and 5.20 GHz boost clock handle game logic and physics. The 82nd CPU percentile and 81st GPU percentile indicate a top-tier mobile experience, though not the absolute best available.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16795 and the GPU's compute capabilities. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11191 suggests capable rendering performance, while the CPU's floating-point math score of 61821 and integer math score of 101226 indicate strong number-crunching ability. Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 16 threads and the data encryption score of 21323, which reflects efficient cryptographic operations.

Students and small business users seeking a powerful workstation will find the system overqualified for typical office tasks but well-suited for demanding academic or professional software. The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 356508 indicates excellent archival and database performance, while the single-thread score of 3850 ensures responsive everyday use. The 82nd combined percentile places this firmly in high-end territory, appropriate for users who need top-tier performance without the bulk of a desktop workstation.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point. It belongs to the 8000 series and is built on a 4 nm TSMC process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.00 GHz, boosting to 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. Cache is structured as 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and includes Radeon 780M integrated graphics.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Geekbench multi-core score of 12276 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 16795 indicate strong parallel performance, competitive with desktop processors from a previous generation. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7774 nearly matches the max-thread score of 7775, confirming that the processor is fully utilized at 16 threads. The 8-thread score of 6385 suggests that 8 threads deliver 82% of the maximum throughput, highlighting the benefit of SMT.

Single-thread performance is respectable but not class-leading. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1013 and Geekbench single-core of 2116 place it below the fastest desktop CPUs but well above typical mobile processors. The Cinebench R23 single-core of 1805 suggests solid per-core performance for gaming and lightly-threaded applications. The PassMark single-thread score of 3850 corroborates this, indicating that the processor can handle single-threaded tasks without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The PassMark suite reveals specialized strengths. Data compression scores 356508, encryption 21323, extended instructions 26964, floating-point math 61821, integer math 101226, and random string sorting 43202. These numbers suggest a processor well-suited for scientific computing, financial modeling, and data processing. The find prime numbers score of 92 is relatively low, indicating that pure integer math benchmarks may not fully reflect real-world performance. The physics score of 1434 on PassMark suggests adequate performance for physics simulations in games.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. It features 7424 shading units, 232 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 58 RT cores, and 232 tensor cores. The base clock is 1290 MHz with a boost of 1665 MHz, and memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The GPU's benchmark performance is characterized by strong 3D rendering and compute capabilities. The PassMark G3D score of 24926 places it in the upper tier of mobile GPUs, while the GPU compute score of 11191 indicates solid compute throughput. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 and Vulkan score of 145807 confirm strong cross-API performance. DirectX scores are mixed: DX9 at 286, DX10 at 157, DX11 at 244, and DX12 at 96. The low DX12 score relative to DX11 is notable, potentially indicating driver overhead or architectural trade-offs in certain workloads.

The 12 GB VRAM is a significant asset for modern gaming and content creation. The 432.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that the memory subsystem can keep pace with the GPU's compute capabilities. The 58 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, while 232 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS and other neural network workloads. The FP32 performance of 24.72 TFLOPS and FP16 of 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) indicate balanced compute, though the lack of FP16 acceleration may limit certain AI workloads.

Texture and pixel rates are strong: 386.3 GTexel/s and 133.2 GPixel/s respectively. These figures suggest excellent performance in texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution rendering. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with current and upcoming titles. The TDP of 110 W is reasonable for a mobile GPU of this class, and the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides ample bandwidth for data transfer.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 1013 on 3DMark may limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles, while the GPU's 24926 G3D score can push high FPS. At 1440p, the balance shifts toward the GPU, and the 12 GB VRAM provides headroom for texture-heavy games. Estimated FPS figures are not available, as no measured data exists for this combination.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and 45 W TDP handle encoding workloads, while the GPU's NVENC (via tensor cores) can offload streaming. The PassMark encryption score of 21323 suggests efficient processing for stream encryption. The 82nd combined percentile indicates a system capable of simultaneous gaming and streaming, though exact FPS impacts cannot be quantified without measured data.

Video Editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16795 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU's compute score of 11191 supports effects and color grading. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces data transfer bottlenecks. The 12 GB VRAM handles 4K previews and multi-layer timelines effectively.

3D Rendering: The GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 58 RT cores provide strong rendering performance, while the CPU's floating-point math score of 61821 supports physics and simulation. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in complex scenes. The combined 82nd percentile suggests capable performance for architectural visualization and product design.

Software Development: The CPU's 16 threads and 5.20 GHz boost clock accelerate compilation, while the PassMark integer math score of 101226 indicates strong data processing. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large codebases in memory. The single-thread score of 3850 ensures responsive IDE performance.

Student and Office Work: The system is overqualified for document editing and web browsing, but the PassMark data compression score of 356508 accelerates file archiving. The 45 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for a high-performance laptop. The 82nd combined percentile places it well above typical office machines.

# FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU combination?

A: The combined percentile is 82, indicating that this system performs better than 82% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HS has an average benchmark score of 31074, matching the Intel Core i7-12700F at 31081 (0% delta). It is 0.1% faster than the Intel Core i7-13700TE and 0.6% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop alternatives?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile scores 38135 on average, which is 1.3% faster than the desktop NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (37648) and 1.3% faster than the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (37628).

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this system support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU uses 12 GB of GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is unlocked (false). The CPU runs at fixed clocks of 4.00 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost.

Q: What PCIe version and lane configuration does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What is the process node and architecture of each component?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC's 4 nm process using Zen 4 architecture (Hawk Point), while the GPU uses TSMC's 5 nm process with Ada Lovelace architecture (AD104 chip).

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile pairing. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

Based on the CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 81st percentile, this system should deliver high frame rates in most modern games at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. The GPU's 24926 PassMark G3D score and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest strong rasterization performance, while the 58 RT cores enable ray-traced effects at playable frame rates. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide sufficient processing power for game logic and AI, with the 5.20 GHz boost clock handling single-threaded game engines.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1013) may become a limiting factor in CPU-bound titles, potentially capping frame rates below what the GPU can deliver. At 1440p, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck, and the 12 GB VRAM accommodates high-resolution textures. At 4K, the GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance suggests playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but the 12 GB VRAM may limit ultra settings in VRAM-hungry games.

The lack of measured FPS data means these estimates carry uncertainty. The benchmark scores indicate a high-performance system, but real-world frame rates depend on many factors, including thermal management, driver optimization, and game-specific engine characteristics. Users should expect performance in the top tier of mobile gaming laptops, but exact FPS figures require validation through hands-on testing.

# Build Overview

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile pairing is a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") that combines a high-end mobile processor with an upper-tier mobile GPU. The CPU is part of AMD's 8000 series, featuring 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 4 architecture (Hawk Point), built on a 4 nm process. The GPU is NVIDIA's GeForce 40-series mobile offering, featuring the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process.

This system occupies the 82nd combined percentile, placing it in the top 18% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 81st percentile are nearly identical, indicating a well-balanced pairing where neither component significantly outperforms the other. This balance is unusual in mobile systems, where one component typically dominates due to thermal or power constraints.

The CPU's 45 W TDP and GPU's 110 W TDP combine for a 155 W thermal envelope, which is manageable for a high-performance laptop. The CPU supports DDR5 memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the GPU uses 12 GB of GDDR6 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16.

The system's nearest CPU rival, the Intel Core i7-12700F, matches its average benchmark score within 0%, while the nearest GPU rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, is 0.4% faster. This indicates that the system sits at a performance plateau where small variations in benchmarks can shift rankings. The overall tier is high-end mobile computing, suitable for gaming, content creation, and professional workloads that demand significant processing power in a portable form factor.