SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

91 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
93%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

31,074 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score
Top 7% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a laptop configuration that lands in the 78th percentile of all combined CPU+GPU pairs. The CPU alone sits at the 82nd percentile, the GPU at the 73rd, and the data set contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination—so all gaming projections in this analysis are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not measured results.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming — The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,013 in 3DMark and 1,805 in Cinebench R23, combined with the GPU’s 73rd percentile standing, indicate that this pair can push high frame rates at 1080p in esports titles and maintain strong performance in demanding AAA games. The GPU’s G3D score of 19,587 and its parity with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (delta 0%) suggest a 1080p‑class performer, though exact FPS numbers are not available.

Streaming — The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, a PassMark multithread score of 29,780, and a 3DMark max-thread score of 7,775 provide ample headroom for simultaneous game capture, encoding, and scene rendering. The GPU’s NVENC-class tensor cores (144 total) further offload streaming work, but the CPU’s strong multi-core results are the primary anchor.

Video editing — In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU delivers 12,276 in Geekbench multi-core and 16,795 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The GPU’s OpenCL score of 109,197 and its 15.62 TFLOPS FP32 throughput support real-time previews and effect processing. The combination is well suited for timeline scrubbing and export tasks that scale across cores and CUDA hardware.

3D rendering — The GPU’s 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores, alongside a PassMark GPU compute score of 8,399, point to capable ray tracing and compute rendering. The CPU’s 16 threads and 16 MB L3 cache complement the GPU’s workload. The pair’s combined percentile of 78 reflects a balanced rendering package for a laptop.

Software development — The CPU’s integer math PassMark score of 101,226 and data compression score of 356,508 indicate strong compiler and build performance. The 16 threads and 4 nm process enable quick parallel compilation. The GPU’s compute capabilities can accelerate parallel workloads such as machine learning inference, though the CPU remains the primary driver for typical development tasks.

Student and office work — The CPU’s single-thread score of 2,116 in Geekbench and 3,850 in PassMark single-thread ensure snappy responsiveness in everyday applications. The GPU’s G2D score of 763 is modest but adequate for office productivity. The 45 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop that can balance battery life and performance for light tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 31,074, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its closest rival is the Intel Core i7-12700F with an identical score of 31,081 (delta 0%), meaning the 8945HS matches a desktop mid-range processor in raw compute. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 16,795 in Cinebench R23 and its 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,774 underline its strong parallel capability. The single-thread scores (1,805 Cinebench, 2,116 Geekbench) are equally competitive, with a single-thread 3DMark score of 1,013.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 27,435, placing it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT with an average score of 27,425 (delta 0%). The RTX 4070 Mobile also sits within 0.5% of the desktop RTX 3090 (score 27,565), which is remarkable for a laptop GPU. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19,587 and Geekbench OpenCL of 109,197 confirm its desktop-class rendering capability.

The combined percentile of 78 indicates that the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU; the CPU outperforms 82% of all CPUs, while the GPU outperforms 73% of all GPUs. This imbalance matters for certain workloads, as discussed in the balance section.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for the Ryzen 9 8945HS + RTX 4070 Mobile combination in the fact pack. The dataIsMeasured flag is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty. Consequently, all gaming frame-rate figures in this section are qualitative estimates based on the benchmark scores, not observed results.

The GPU’s 73rd percentile and its G3D score of 19,587 suggest that it can handle modern AAA games at 1080p with high to ultra settings, and at 1440p with high settings. The CPU’s single-thread performance (1,013 in 3DMark) is sufficient to feed the GPU at high frame rates, but the exact FPS will depend on the specific title and resolution. For esports games like Counter-Strike or Overwatch, the CPU’s strong single-thread and the GPU’s high shader count (4,608) likely support 144 Hz monitors, but those numbers are not in the fact pack. For heavier titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Microsoft Flight Simulator, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256 GB/s bandwidth will be a limiting factor at 4K, but 1080p and 1440p remain viable. The data cannot confirm any specific FPS; these are estimates only.

Who Should Build It

Gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1080p or 1440p gaming will find this pair sufficient, given the CPU’s 82nd percentile and the GPU’s 73rd percentile. The GPU’s proximity to the RX 6700 XT (delta 0%) and RTX 3090 (delta -0.5%) indicates desktop-tier frame rates in a mobile form factor.

Content creators working on video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s multi-core scores (16,795 in Cinebench R23, 12,276 in Geekbench multi) and the GPU’s compute performance (OpenCL 109,197, Vulkan 108,367). The 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is adequate for 1080p and 1440p render passes, and the 36 RTX cores support hardware ray tracing.

Software developers who compile large codebases will appreciate the CPU’s integer math score of 101,226 and its 16 threads. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with repeated access patterns. The GPU’s 144 tensor cores can accelerate machine learning inference, but the CPU remains the workhorse.

Students and office users in demanding STEM fields (CAD, scientific computing) will find the CPU’s single-thread score of 2,116 and multi-core score of 12,276 sufficient for typical tools. The integrated Radeon 780M GPU provides a fallback for display output, though the discrete RTX 4070 Mobile is the primary.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines or database workloads will benefit from the CPU’s high integer math (101,226) and data encryption (21,323) scores. The 16 threads and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth are ample for multitasking.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with Zen 4 architecture. It clocks from a base of 4.00 GHz to a boost of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W. The cache hierarchy is generous: 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Benchmark results are strong across the board. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,795 and Geekbench multi-core of 12,276 place it in the same performance class as a desktop Intel Core i7-12700F (delta 0%). The single-thread scores (1,805 Cinebench, 2,116 Geekbench, 1,013 3DMark) show a top-tier mobile CPU for responsiveness. The PassMark multithread score of 29,780 and integer math of 101,226 further demonstrate its capability in integer-heavy tasks such as video encoding and software compilation.

The CPU’s integrated Radeon 780M GPU adds a secondary display output and can handle light graphics workloads, but it does not affect the performance of the discrete RTX 4070 Mobile. The 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die are typical for a mobile processor of this class.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD106 chip, produced on a 5 nm TSMC process. It has 4,608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs, along with 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1395 MHz and a boost of 1695 MHz, with a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). Its 8 GB GDDR6 VRAM runs on a 128‑bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s TDP is 115 W, and it interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark scores are impressive for a mobile part. The PassMark G3D score of 19,587 and Geekbench OpenCL of 109,197 indicate desktop‑class rasterization. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, has an average score of 27,425—a delta of 0%—meaning the RTX 4070 Mobile matches a desktop mid‑range GPU. The GPU also sits within 0.5% of the RTX 3090 (27,565), which is a desktop high‑end card. The FP32 compute throughput of 15.62 TFLOPS supports real‑time ray tracing and DLSS (via the tensor cores), and the DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern titles.

The GPU’s percentile of 73 is lower than the CPU’s 82, indicating that in many workloads the CPU is the stronger component. For gaming, this is typical—the GPU is the primary driver, and the CPU is sufficient to avoid bottlenecks at 1080p and 1440p.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 73rd percentile reveal a clear asymmetry. The CPU is more capable relative to its class than the GPU is relative to its class. In gaming, the GPU is likely the limiting factor at higher resolutions (1440p and above), because the GPU’s absolute score (27,435) is lower than the CPU’s absolute score (30,074) relative to their respective pools. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single‑thread (1,013 in 3DMark) can feed the GPU adequately, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 256 GB/s bandwidth may cap performance in memory‑intensive titles.

In compute‑heavy workloads such as 3D rendering or machine learning, the CPU’s 16 threads and 16 MB L3 cache can handle parallel tasks, but the GPU’s 8.4 TFLOPS FP32 (actually 15.62 TFLOPS) and 36 RT cores are the primary accelerators. Here the CPU is rarely a bottleneck because the GPU’s compute throughput (15.62 TFLOPS) is higher than the CPU’s integer math (101,226) in absolute terms.

The combined percentile of 78 suggests that the pair is balanced enough to avoid severe bottlenecking in most applications. The CPU is faster relative to its class, so in single‑thread‑bound tasks the CPU is clearly the stronger component; in GPU‑bound tasks the GPU is the weaker link, but it still performs at a level that matches a desktop RX 6700 XT.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, a mobile‑specific socket. The memory support is DDR5 dual‑channel with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen4 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x8. The platform does not support ECC memory.

The GPU has no external power connectors—it is an IGP with a TDP of 115 W—and the CPU has a TDP of 45 W, yielding a combined power envelope of 160 W. No suggested PSU is listed, but a laptop is not upgradable in the traditional sense. The PCIe interface is x8, so a future GPU upgrade would require a motherboard change, not just a GPU swap. The socket FP8 is unlikely to support future processors beyond the current generation.

For a meaningful upgrade, the next logical step would be to increase the memory bandwidth or move to a higher‑tier mobile GPU (e.g., RTX 4080 Mobile), but such a change would require a new motherboard and possibly a new laptop chassis. Within the current platform, the only upgradeable component is the storage (via PCIe Gen4) and possibly the RAM, but the fact pack does not specify the number of slots or maximum capacity. Therefore, the best long‑term upgrade path is a new laptop with a newer socket and GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s socket?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS uses the AMD Socket FP8.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: It has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual‑channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 Mobile has 36 RT cores, and its DirectX 12 Ultimate support includes hardware ray tracing.

Q: What is the GPU’s VRAM size and bus width?

A: The GPU has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128‑bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i7-12700F in average score?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 30,074, while the i7-12700F scores 31,081—a delta of 0%, meaning they are effectively identical.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No. The fact pack explicitly states that no measured FPS rows exist, and the dataIsMeasured flag is false. All FPS estimates are based on benchmark scores, not observed frame rates.