SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

31,074 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

71,768 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

This mobile pairing combines an 8-core Zen 4 Hawk Point processor with a RDNA 2 discrete GPU, placing the system in the 87th percentile overall among all tested CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU sits in the 82nd percentile against all processors, while the GPU reaches the 91st percentile against all graphics cards, indicating a well-matched duo where neither component dramatically overshadows the other. The data presented here derives exclusively from synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, containing 25,000 million transistors within a 178 mm² die. This Hawk Point chip belongs to the Zen 4 architecture family, clocking from a 4.00 GHz base frequency up to 5.20 GHz boost. The 45-watt TDP classifies it as a high-performance mobile part suitable for thin-and-light gaming laptops and portable workstations.

Cache hierarchy comprises 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 pool. This configuration supports DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, yielding 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The CPU exposes 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, adequate for a discrete GPU and fast NVMe storage. Integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide fallback display output, though the discrete RX 6650M handles demanding workloads.

Benchmark results reveal strong scaling from 2 to 16 threads. The 3DMark suite shows 1,985 points with 2 threads, 3,809 with 4 threads, 6,385 with 8 threads, and 7,774 with 16 threads — nearly identical to the 7,775 maximum-thread score. This near-plateau beyond 8 threads indicates that the 8 physical cores deliver most of the performance, with simultaneous multithreading adding modest gains. Single-thread performance reaches 1,013 points in 3DMark, while Cinebench R23 yields 1,805 single-core and 16,795 multi-core points.

Geekbench scores of 2,116 single-core and 12,276 multi-core place this chip firmly in upper-midrange mobile territory. PassMark results show strong integer math (101,226) and floating-point math (61,821) scores, with data compression hitting 356,508 and encryption reaching 21,323. The 92-point prime number finding score appears low relative to other tests, suggesting this workload may not align well with Zen 4's strengths or the mobile power envelope.

Against nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 8945HS averages 31,074 points across all benchmarks. The Intel Core i7-12700F scores 31,081 (0% delta), making them effectively identical. Intel Core 9 273PTE leads slightly at 31,143 (-0.2% delta from the Ryzen), while the Intel Core i7-13700TE trails at 31,028 (+0.1% delta). The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS sits 0.6% behind. This clustering demonstrates that the 8945HS delivers desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a 45-watt mobile package.

Balance and Bottleneck

The 82nd CPU percentile versus 91st GPU percentile suggests the graphics card slightly outpaces the processor in relative standing. However, the small gap — 9 percentile points — indicates a balanced pairing where either component can become the limiting factor depending on workload characteristics.

For CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation, the PassMark physics score of 1,434 and 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,774 show ample headroom for most gaming titles. The GPU's 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 throughput can saturate lower thread counts in many games, meaning the CPU will often wait on the GPU at higher resolutions. Conversely, highly threaded workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering will fully utilize all 16 threads, making the CPU the bottleneck.

The memory subsystem deserves attention. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s bandwidth pairs with the GPU's 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, creating a system where the discrete GPU has nearly 2.5 times the memory throughput of the CPU. This disparity matters in mixed workloads where data must transfer between CPU and GPU memory spaces. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer at 128-bit bus width suffices for 1080p gaming but may constrain texture-heavy scenes at higher resolutions.

FPS scaling cannot be measured directly due to absent frame data. However, benchmark percentiles imply that at 1080p with high refresh rates, the GPU will likely become the limiting factor in graphically intense titles, while CPU-bound esports titles could see the processor limiting maximum frame rates. At 1440p and above, the GPU's workload increases, further shifting the balance toward the graphics card.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 31,074, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all processors. This means it outperforms roughly 82% of CPUs in the database. Key scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 16,795 and single-core at 1,805, plus Geekbench multi-core at 12,276 and single-core at 2,116.

The GPU's average benchmark score reaches 71,768, placing it in the 91st percentile of all graphics cards. Geekbench OpenCL yields 65,800 points, while Vulkan reaches 77,735 points. The Vulkan advantage over OpenCL suggests strong driver optimization for modern graphics APIs.

Combined system percentile sits at 87, reflecting that this pairing outperforms 87% of tested CPU+GPU combinations. The GPU's nearest rival, NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal, scores 72,098 (-0.5% delta), while AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 72,379 (-0.8% delta). The RX 6650M leads the AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE (70,829, +1.3% delta) and trails the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition (73,370, -2.2% delta). These comparisons place the mobile GPU within striking distance of older desktop flagship cards.

The 3DMark thread scaling data provides insight into real-world responsiveness. The jump from 1,985 (2 threads) to 3,809 (4 threads) shows near-perfect 2x scaling, while 8 threads reach 6,385 (1.68x over 4 threads) and 16 threads hit 7,774 (1.22x over 8 threads). This diminishing returns curve is typical for modern processors, indicating that most consumer workloads benefit from 8 cores, with 16 threads handling professional multitasking.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 8945HS uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-only socket with no desktop equivalent. This limits upgradeability to replacing the entire laptop motherboard or system. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with the CPU's memory controller rated for 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Users seeking more memory throughput would need a different platform entirely.

PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes provides connectivity for the GPU (typically x8) and storage devices. The GPU itself uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which offers sufficient bandwidth for the RX 6650M's 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. NVMe SSDs can utilize remaining lanes for fast boot and load times.

The CPU's 45 W TDP and GPU's 120 W TDP combine for a 165 W thermal budget before considering other components. No suggested PSU is listed, and the GPU's IGP slot width with no power connectors indicates it draws power through the motherboard, typical for mobile discrete GPUs. The system's overall power draw will depend heavily on laptop cooling design and power delivery.

For a sensible next upgrade, users should consider whether the 8-core CPU or the 8 GB GPU limits their workloads first. The GPU's end-of-life production status and 8 GB VRAM suggest it will age faster than the CPU. However, the mobile form factor makes component swaps impractical; a full laptop replacement offers the only meaningful upgrade path. Users satisfied with 1080p gaming and moderate productivity should find this platform serviceable for several years.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 8945HS compare to the Intel Core i7-12700F?

A: The two processors are effectively tied in average benchmark scores, with the Ryzen 9 8945HS scoring 31,074 and the Core i7-12700F scoring 31,081, a 0% delta. This means users should not expect meaningful performance differences between them in most workloads.

Q: Is the Radeon RX 6650M faster than the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal?

A: The RX 6650M average score of 71,768 trails the TITAN X Pascal's 72,098 by 0.5%. The difference is negligible, meaning the mobile GPU performs comparably to this older desktop flagship in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth and does it support ECC?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HS supports dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, so users requiring error-correcting memory must look elsewhere.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, leaving additional lanes for storage and other peripherals.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and type?

A: The Radeon RX 6650M features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This capacity suits 1080p gaming but may limit high-resolution texture workloads.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 8945HS includes Radeon 780M integrated graphics. This provides display output and basic graphics acceleration when the discrete GPU is idle or unavailable.

Q: What is the production status of the GPU?

A: The Radeon RX 6650M is listed as end-of-life, while the CPU remains active in production. This suggests the GPU may become harder to source over time, though existing systems remain supported.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650M employs the Navi 23 chip built on TSMC's 7 nm process, containing 11,060 million transistors across a 237 mm² die. The RDNA 2.0 architecture provides 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. Clock speeds range from a 2,068 MHz base to 2,416 MHz boost, with a game clock of 2,222 MHz. Memory operates at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), feeding 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit interface for 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Ray tracing hardware includes 28 RT cores, while no tensor cores are present — this is expected for RDNA 2, which handles AI workloads through shader-based compute. The GPU delivers 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 17.32 TFLOPS FP16 via 2:1 ratio. Pixel fill rate reaches 154.6 GPixel/s, and texture fill rate hits 270.6 GTexel/s. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Geekbench scores of 65,800 (OpenCL) and 77,735 (Vulkan) demonstrate strong compute performance for a mobile GPU. The Vulkan advantage suggests good low-level API optimization, benefiting modern games and compute workloads. The 91st percentile ranking places this GPU above 91% of all tested graphics cards, an impressive feat for a mobile part.

The nearest rival comparison shows the RX 6650M within 2.2% of the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition (73,370) and 1.3% ahead of the RX 6600 LE (70,829). These desktop cards, while older, represent the performance tier this mobile GPU occupies. For rendering workloads, the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth handle 1080p and moderate 1440p textures, while FP32 compute supports GPU-accelerated rendering in supported applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 91st percentile ranking and CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,805 in Cinebench R23 suggest capable 1080p high-refresh gaming. The 8 GB VRAM may limit texture quality in newer titles, but the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth keeps frame pacing smooth.

Streaming: The 8-core CPU with 16 threads provides ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29,780 indicates the CPU can handle game plus encoder workloads, though dedicated encoder hardware is absent on both components.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 16,795 and Geekbench multi-core of 12,276 support smooth 1080p and light 4K editing. The GPU's OpenCL score of 65,800 accelerates effects and exports, while 8 GB VRAM handles moderate timelines.

3D rendering: The CPU's 16 threads deliver solid CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates GPU renderers. Combined performance should handle small-to-medium scenes efficiently.

Software development: The 16-thread CPU and 16 MB L3 cache compile code efficiently, while the GPU supports API testing for DirectX 12 and Vulkan applications. The 82nd CPU percentile ensures responsive builds for most projects.

Student and office work: This pairing is overkill for document processing and web browsing. However, the integrated Radeon 780M allows low-power operation for battery savings, while the discrete GPU activates only when needed.

Build Overview

This laptop-class build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS with the AMD Radeon RX 6650M, creating a mobile system in the 87th combined percentile. The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 91st percentile indicate a slightly GPU-favored balance, but the gap is small enough that neither component consistently bottlenecks the other.

The system targets high-performance mobile computing, suitable for gaming, content creation, and professional workloads that benefit from 16 threads and strong GPU compute. The 45 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP suggest a laptop with adequate cooling, likely in a larger chassis or with advanced thermal solutions.

As a laptop build, upgradeability is limited to external peripherals and storage. The end-of-life GPU status and active CPU production create an interesting dynamic: the processor may outlast the graphics card in terms of driver support and availability, but the entire system will age as a unit.

Who Should Build It

Gamers seeking 1080p performance with high settings will find this pairing sufficient, given the GPU's 91st percentile standing and 8 GB VRAM. Esports titles will run at high frame rates, while AAA games require settings tuning for consistent 60+ FPS.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering benefit from the 16-thread CPU and GPU compute capabilities. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,795 handles export tasks, while the OpenCL score of 65,800 accelerates effects.

Software developers targeting modern graphics APIs (DirectX 12, Vulkan) can test on capable hardware. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes support fast storage, and the 16 threads compile code quickly.

Students and office workers will find the system overpowered for basic tasks, but the integrated graphics enable efficient battery operation. Small business workstations requiring occasional GPU acceleration for design or data visualization would benefit.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measured frame rates, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from synthetic benchmark scores.

Based on the GPU's 91st percentile and 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 1080p gaming at high settings should deliver playable frame rates in most titles. The 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth support modern game textures at this resolution. Esports and older titles may reach high refresh rates given the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1,805 in Cinebench R23.

At 1440p, the GPU will become the limiting factor. The 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB capacity constrain texture-heavy scenes, and frame rates will likely drop below 60 FPS in demanding AAA titles. Users seeking consistent 1440p high-refresh gaming should consider a more powerful GPU.

The CPU's thread scaling suggests consistent frame pacing in multi-threaded game engines, with 8 cores handling background tasks while the GPU renders. The 16 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency, benefiting CPU-bound scenarios. However, the absence of measured data means these estimates carry uncertainty; actual performance depends heavily on specific game optimization and laptop thermal design.