SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

31,074 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS paired with the AMD Radeon 8050S represents a high-performance mobile platform that sits near the top of the laptop hierarchy. Benchmark data shows this combination achieving an 86th percentile ranking among all tested system pairings, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of competing laptop configurations. The processor ranks in the 82nd percentile for CPUs, while the integrated graphics solution ranks in the 89th percentile for GPUs, making this a balanced and potent duo for demanding mobile workloads. This analysis relies strictly on the available benchmark scores, with no measured FPS data existing for this specific combination; all gaming frame rate expectations are derived from the synthetic benchmark results.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 8050S is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node, and is part of the Navi Mobile generation. It operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz, which contributes to a calculated pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s. The GPU contains 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, alongside 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. Its FP32 performance is rated at 11.47 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance matching at an 11.47 TFLOPS ratio of 1:1, indicating no loss of throughput when using half-precision operations.

Memory configuration for the Radeon 8050S is entirely system-shared, meaning it draws from the host's DDR5 memory pool rather than having dedicated VRAM. The memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," with bandwidth described as "System Dependent," which could be a limiting factor in texture-heavy scenarios but allows for flexible allocation based on workload demands. The GPU interfaces with the system via a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus, which provides ample bandwidth for data transfer between the CPU and GPU, though the actual memory throughput will be constrained by the CPU's dual-channel memory bus rated at 89.6 GB/s.

In terms of benchmark performance, the Radeon 8050S achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65818 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 58398. These results place it in the 89th percentile among all GPUs, a strong showing for an integrated graphics processor. Comparing against its nearest rivals, the GPU sits within a narrow performance band: it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which scores 61896, and 2.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, which scores 63693. The gap is similarly tight against the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, which scores 63775 and is 2.6% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, which scores 63830 and is 2.7% faster. This positioning suggests the Radeon 8050S competes with discrete mobile GPUs, despite being integrated.

For rendering workloads, the 32 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for real-time ray-traced effects, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means AI-accelerated features like DLSS-style upscaling are not available in the same capacity. The OpenCL score of 65818 suggests robust compute performance for tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering, while the Vulkan score of 58398 indicates solid performance in modern graphics APIs. The 4 nm process node and 308 mm² die size allow for a high density of processing units, and the GPU's TDP is rated at 55 W, which is reasonable for a mobile solution.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The benchmark data reveals a CPU that performs strongly across synthetic tests, with an average benchmark score of 31074 and an 82nd percentile ranking against all CPUs. In 3DMark tests, the Ryzen 9 8945HS scores 7774 in the 16-thread test and 7775 in the max-thread test, showing excellent scaling when all 16 threads are utilized. The single-thread score of 1013 and the 2-thread score of 1985 indicate solid per-core performance, while the 4-thread score of 3809 and 8-thread score of 6385 demonstrate consistent scaling up to the full core count.

Cinebench results reinforce this picture, with a multicore score of 16795 in R23 and 2640 in R15, alongside single-core scores of 1805 in R23 and 281 in R15. Geekbench tests show a multicore score of 12276 and a single-core score of 2116. PassMark tests further detail the CPU's capabilities: multithread score of 29780, single-thread score of 3850, integer math at 101226, floating-point math at 61821, and extended instructions at 26964. Data compression scores reach 356508, data encryption hits 21323, and random string sorting achieves 43202, with find prime numbers at 92 and physics at 1434.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 8945HS is effectively tied with the Intel Core i7-12700F, which has an average score of 31081 and a deltaPct of 0. It is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700TE, which scores 31028, and 0.2% behind the Intel Core 9 273PTE, which scores 31143. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS trails by 0.6% with a score of 30879. This places the CPU in a competitive position against both Intel and AMD alternatives at similar performance levels.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 62108, derived from the two Geekbench tests, placing it in the 89th percentile. Combined, the CPU and GPU achieve an 86th percentile system ranking, which reflects a well-matched pairing where neither component dramatically outperforms the other in a way that creates a glaring imbalance. The data indicates that this system is capable of handling both processor-intensive and graphics-intensive tasks at a high level, though the lack of measured FPS data means real-world gaming performance must be inferred from these synthetic scores.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Hawk Point, and belongs to the 8000 series. It has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 45 W, making it suitable for high-performance laptops. The CPU is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm², which contributes to its efficiency and performance density.

Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache. This configuration supports the high single-thread performance indicated by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1013 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1805. For real workloads, the 16 threads enable strong multi-threaded performance, as seen in the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16795, which is competitive with desktop CPUs from previous generations. The PassMark multithread score of 29780 confirms that the CPU handles parallel tasks efficiently, while the integer and floating-point math scores of 101226 and 61821, respectively, show solid arithmetic throughput.

The memory support includes DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported, which may be a consideration for certain professional applications. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, and it includes integrated Radeon 780M graphics, though the system also pairs with the discrete-class Radeon 8050S. The CPU is not multiplier unlocked, so overclocking is not an option, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz offers strong out-of-the-box performance.

In comparison to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 8945HS matches the Intel Core i7-12700F in average score, indicating comparable multi-threaded performance despite being a mobile processor. The data compression score of 356508 and data encryption score of 21323 suggest strong performance in data-centric workloads, while the extended instructions score of 26964 indicates good SIMD performance for scientific and engineering applications. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking across all CPUs means it outperforms 82% of tested processors, making it a high-end choice for mobile workstations.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There are no measured FPS rows available for this exact CPU and GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Consequently, all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores, and they should not be treated as verified frame rates. The data clearly indicates that no real-world gaming tests have been recorded for this specific pairing, so expectations must be built on the synthetic performance of the Radeon 8050S and the Ryzen 9 8945HS.

Given the GPU's 89th percentile ranking and its proximity to discrete mobile GPUs like the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, the Radeon 8050S is likely capable of delivering playable frame rates at 1080p in many modern titles, especially at medium to high settings. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS and the pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s suggest adequate raw processing power for most games. However, the system-shared memory architecture means that performance will depend heavily on the system's DDR5 memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which could become a bottleneck in memory-intensive scenes or at higher resolutions.

For esports titles and less demanding games, the high boost clock of 2800 MHz and the 64 ROPs should allow for high refresh rate gaming at 1080p, potentially exceeding 100 FPS in lighter workloads. For AAA titles, the 32 ray tracing cores enable some level of ray-traced effects, but performance may be modest due to the lack of dedicated tensor hardware for upscaling. The Vulkan score of 58398 indicates good performance in modern API-based games, while the OpenCL score of 65818 suggests that compute-heavy features like physics or particle effects will be handled competently. At 1440p, frame rates are likely to be lower, and users may need to reduce settings to maintain smooth gameplay, while 4K gaming would be challenging for this integrated solution.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The system pairing shows a combined percentile of 86, with the CPU at 82 and the GPU at 89, indicating that the GPU is relatively stronger than the CPU in this configuration. This suggests that in graphics-intensive workloads, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, while in compute-heavy tasks, the GPU may be the constraint. The CPU's single-thread score of 1013 in 3DMark and 1805 in Cinebench R23 are solid but not exceptional, which could limit frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios like physics simulation or AI-driven game logic.

The GPU's lead over the CPU in percentile terms (89 vs 82) implies that at high resolutions with demanding graphics settings, the GPU will be the primary driver of performance, and the CPU should be able to keep up without major bottlenecks. However, at lower resolutions or with less demanding graphics settings, the CPU's performance may become the limiting factor, preventing the GPU from reaching its full potential. The FPS scaling, though not measured, can be expected to follow this pattern: at 1080p, the CPU may constrain frame rates in some titles, while at 1440p or higher, the GPU will dominate the workload.

The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is shared between the CPU and GPU, which could create a bottleneck in mixed workloads where both components are under heavy load simultaneously. For example, in a game with high draw distances and complex AI, the CPU might struggle to feed the GPU quickly enough, while the GPU's system-shared memory access could also introduce latency. The CPU's 16 MB L3 cache helps mitigate some of this, but the dual-channel memory bus may be insufficient for the most demanding scenarios. Overall, the balance favors the GPU, but the CPU is capable enough to avoid severely hampering graphics performance in most applications.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This platform is best suited for users who need a high-performance laptop with strong integrated graphics, as indicated by the 86th percentile system ranking. Gamers targeting 1080p resolution with medium to high settings will find the Radeon 8050S's 89th percentile GPU performance sufficient for many titles, based on its proximity to discrete mobile GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, which scores 63775 and is only 2.6% faster. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking ensures that gaming at this resolution will not be severely CPU-bound, with single-thread scores like the 3DMark score of 1013 supporting responsive gameplay.

Content creators, particularly those working with video editing or 3D rendering, will benefit from the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16795 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 65818, which indicate strong performance in rendering and compute-heavy applications. The 16 threads and 16 MB L3 cache provide solid multi-tasking capabilities, while the GPU's 32 ray tracing cores can accelerate previews in 3D software. Software developers will appreciate the PassMark data compression score of 356508 and integer math score of 101226, which support fast compilation and data processing tasks.

Students and small business users who require a portable workstation without a dedicated GPU will find this platform capable of handling productivity tasks, office applications, and light creative work. The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 12276 ensures smooth multitasking, while the integrated GPU can handle casual gaming or video playback without issue. The 45 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP indicate that this is a power-hungry configuration, so it is not intended for users seeking maximum battery life, but rather for those prioritizing performance in a mobile form factor.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the Radeon 8050S's 89th percentile ranking and FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS suggest the ability to drive high frame rates in competitive titles, though the lack of measured FPS data means these are estimates. The GPU's boost clock of 2800 MHz and 64 ROPs should support frame rates above 60 FPS in many games, but the system-shared memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s may limit performance in the most demanding scenes.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16795 provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming, as the encoding workload can be handled by the CPU without severely impacting game performance. The GPU's OpenCL score of 65818 also indicates it could assist with encoding tasks, though the lack of dedicated tensor cores means no AI-based encoding acceleration.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 101226 and the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 performance supports smooth timeline scrubbing and effects rendering in 1080p or 1440p projects. The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is adequate for editing workflows, and the 16 MB L3 cache helps with repeated data access during export.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16795 provides strong CPU-based rendering performance, while the GPU's 32 ray tracing cores and OpenCL score of 65818 offer hardware acceleration for GPU-based renderers. This dual capability makes the platform suitable for architectural visualization or product design, though the system-shared memory may limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's PassMark data compression score of 356508 and extended instructions score of 26964 support fast code compilation and data processing, making this a capable development machine. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the 82nd percentile CPU ranking ensures responsiveness during debugging and testing.

Student and office work: The CPU's Geekbench single-core score of 2116 ensures snappy application launch and web browsing, while the 16 threads handle multitasking across office suites, browsers, and communication apps. The integrated GPU can drive an external display for productivity, and the 86th percentile system ranking indicates this is overkill for basic tasks but future-proof for more demanding coursework.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, so CPU upgrades are not practical in the traditional sense; the processor is soldered to the motherboard in most laptop designs. The platform supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and users can potentially upgrade the system memory to increase this bandwidth, which would benefit the GPU's system-shared memory architecture. ECC memory is not supported, so users must stick to non-ECC DDR5 modules.

PCIe connectivity includes Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which can be used for NVMe SSDs or other peripherals. The GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, though it is an integrated part, so there is no physical upgrade path for the GPU itself. The CPU's TDP is 45 W, and the GPU's TDP is 55 W, meaning the total power draw for the compute components is around 100 W, which is typical for a high-performance laptop. The suggested PSU is not listed, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified, but the low TDPs suggest that a standard laptop power adapter is sufficient.

Given these constraints, a sensible next upgrade would be increasing system memory to maximize the shared memory bandwidth available to the GPU, as this directly impacts graphics performance. Adding a fast NVMe drive via the PCIe Gen 4 lanes would improve load times and data access, but the CPU and GPU are otherwise locked into their current configuration. The platform is designed as a complete mobile solution, so users should consider it a fixed configuration with limited upgradeability beyond memory and storage.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS and AMD Radeon 8050S combination?

A: The combination achieves an 86th percentile ranking among all tested system pairings, with the CPU ranking in the 82nd percentile and the GPU ranking in the 89th percentile.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8050S compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 62108, making it 0.3% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (61896), but 2.5% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63693) and 2.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (63775).

Q: What is the memory configuration for the AMD Radeon 8050S?

A: The GPU uses system-shared memory, meaning it draws from the host system's DDR5 memory pool, with memory size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared" and bandwidth described as "System Dependent."

Q: What are the key specifications of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS processor?

A: It is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, a TDP of 45 W, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Are there any measured FPS results for this CPU and GPU combination?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's performance in Cinebench R23 tests?

A: The CPU scores 16795 in the multicore test and 1805 in the single-core test, indicating strong multi-threaded performance relative to its 82nd percentile ranking.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported, and the platform uses DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds