SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

97%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

81,103 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, and manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process node. The chip operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts up to 5.30 GHz, placing it firmly in the high-end mobile computing segment. The processor contains 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design with each die measuring 71 mm². Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache shared across all cores.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the 8940HX scores 32,521 points in multi-core rendering, while the single-core score reaches 1,917 points. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a similar pattern with 5,355 multi-core and 292 single-core points. These results indicate that the processor maintains strong single-thread performance while delivering exceptional multi-threaded throughput for a mobile part.

PassMark results reinforce this assessment. The multi-thread score of 49,731 and single-thread score of 3,874 place the CPU in the 95th percentile of all processors tracked in the database. Integer math performance reaches 189,221 points, while floating-point math scores 113,921 points. Data compression scores 650,984 points, and encryption performance reaches 39,318 points. Extended instruction tests produce 47,802 points, and random string sorting achieves 75,381 points. Prime number finding scores 251 points, and physics calculations reach 2,104 points.

The nearest rival comparisons show remarkable parity at the top end of the CPU hierarchy. The Intel Xeon w5-3535X scores 81,115 on average, essentially identical to the 8940HX's average benchmark score of 81,103. The Intel Core i9-14900KS also sits at 81,127, representing a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 trails slightly at 80,762, a 0.4% difference, while the Intel Xeon 638 scores 80,723, a 0.5% gap. These figures demonstrate that the 8940HX performs within a narrow band of some of the most powerful desktop and workstation processors available, despite being a mobile part.

For real-world workloads, the 16-core configuration with SMT provides 32 threads that handle heavily parallel tasks such as video rendering, code compilation, and scientific computing with ease. The 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures responsive performance in lightly threaded applications like web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software that scales poorly across cores. The 64 MB L3 cache helps maintain high memory throughput in cache-sensitive workloads.

The processor supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, delivering 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This bandwidth figure is modest compared to desktop high-end parts, but adequate for the laptop form factor. The CPU also integrates a Radeon 610M GPU for basic display output when the discrete graphics card is not required. PCIe Gen 5 support with 28 lanes from the CPU provides ample bandwidth for storage and expansion. The socket is AMD Socket FL1, confirming this is a BGA-mounted mobile processor rather than a socketed desktop part. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking in systems where thermal headroom permits, though the 55 W TDP suggests limited overclocking potential in most laptop chassis.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh represents a professional-grade mobile GPU built on the Turing architecture, using the TU106 chip manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process. The GPU contains 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die, with a transistor density of 24.3 million per mm². This is an end-of-life product released in May 2019, positioned as a successor to Quadro Pascal-M and predecessor to Ampere-MW.

Memory configuration consists of 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The GPU operates with a base clock of 945 MHz and a boost clock of 1380 MHz. Compute resources include 1,920 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The GPU features 30 RT cores for ray tracing acceleration and 240 tensor cores for AI and deep learning workloads.

Performance metrics show a pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute throughput reaches 5.299 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance doubles to 10.60 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. These figures place the GPU at the 50th percentile of all GPUs in the database, indicating mid-pack performance relative to the full range of graphics hardware tracked.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which provides sufficient bandwidth for most workloads, though it is one generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support. The power consumption is rated at 80 W TDP, and the card uses an MXM module form factor with no power connectors, suggesting it draws power directly from the motherboard. Display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they vary by laptop implementation.

The absence of benchmark data for this GPU in the fact pack means the analytical picture relies on architectural specifications and the percentile ranking. The Turing architecture introduced hardware ray tracing and tensor cores, making this GPU capable of accelerated ray-traced rendering and AI-assisted workflows. The 30 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing calculations, while the 240 tensor cores accelerate matrix operations used in deep learning inference and training.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS handles traditional rasterization and compute shaders. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for 1080p gaming and moderate 3D rendering scenes, but may prove limiting for large texture sets or high-resolution professional work. The 336.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports the 192-bit bus width, providing sufficient data throughput for the GPU's compute capabilities.

The professional Quadro branding indicates this GPU targets workstation applications such as CAD, 3D modeling, and scientific visualization, where certified drivers and reliability take precedence over raw gaming performance. The Turing architecture's features, including mesh shading and variable rate shading, provide modern rendering capabilities despite the GPU's age.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of a 95th percentile CPU with a 50th percentile GPU creates a significant performance imbalance in this laptop build. The combined percentile of 73 reflects this disparity, indicating that the GPU is the primary limiting factor in most graphics-intensive workloads. The CPU's average benchmark score of 81,103 places it alongside desktop flagship processors, while the GPU sits at the median of all graphics cards.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as software compilation, data processing, and multi-threaded productivity applications, the 8940HX provides ample headroom. The 32 threads and 5.30 GHz boost clock ensure that the processor rarely becomes a bottleneck in these workloads. The 95th percentile ranking confirms that only a small fraction of CPUs outperform this chip.

Conversely, GPU-bound workloads such as gaming at high resolutions and 3D rendering will see the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh reach its limits well before the CPU. The 50th percentile GPU ranking means half of all GPUs perform better, creating a situation where the CPU frequently waits on the GPU to complete frame rendering or compute tasks. This imbalance is acceptable for professional workloads that alternate between CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive phases, but it limits pure gaming performance.

The 80 W GPU TDP combined with the 55 W CPU TDP suggests a total thermal budget of approximately 135 W for the compute components, excluding memory, storage, and display. This thermal envelope is typical for a performance laptop and allows sustained operation under load, though the GPU may experience thermal throttling in extended gaming sessions depending on the laptop's cooling solution.

Memory bandwidth presents another potential bottleneck. The CPU's 83.2 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 bandwidth is modest for a 16-core processor, and the GPU's 336.0 GB/s is adequate but not exceptional for its class. In workloads that stream large datasets between CPU and GPU, the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface on the GPU side limits data transfer rates to approximately 16 GB/s in each direction, which may constrain performance in some professional applications.

The data suggests that users should expect CPU-bound performance to exceed GPU-bound performance significantly. Applications that leverage both components in parallel, such as video editing with GPU acceleration, will see the GPU determine overall throughput in render phases while the CPU dominates timeline manipulation and encoding tasks.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU combination targets mobile workstation users who require exceptional CPU performance for professional workloads but do not prioritize modern GPU performance. The 95th percentile CPU ranking makes this build suitable for developers, engineers, and content creators who spend most of their time in CPU-bound applications.

Software developers will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads for parallel compilation, testing, and virtualization workloads. The 5.30 GHz boost clock ensures fast single-threaded performance for build tools that do not scale across cores. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces latency in data-intensive development tasks such as database queries and large-scale code analysis.

Content creators working with video editing, motion graphics, and 3D modeling will find the CPU capable of handling complex timelines and simulations, while the Quadro RTX 3000 provides professional-grade GPU acceleration with certified drivers for applications like Autodesk and Dassault Systèmes products. The 6 GB VRAM supports 1080p editing workflows and moderate 3D scenes.

Students in engineering, computer science, and data science programs will appreciate the portability of a laptop with this performance level. The 16-core CPU handles simulation software, statistical analysis, and machine learning model training that would otherwise require a desktop workstation. The GPU's tensor cores accelerate certain AI workloads, though the 50th percentile ranking means it is not a primary deep learning platform.

Small business workstations serving roles in CAD design, financial modeling, and data analysis will benefit from the Quadro's professional driver support and reliability certifications. The combination of a high-end CPU with a mid-range professional GPU provides balanced performance for office productivity suites, spreadsheet calculations, and presentation software, where the CPU dominates and the GPU provides smooth display output.

Gamers seeking high-refresh 1080p performance will find the Quadro RTX 3000 adequate for many titles, though the 50th percentile ranking indicates that dedicated gaming GPUs in the same price class may offer higher frame rates. The CPU's exceptional performance ensures that frame rates are GPU-limited, which is preferable to CPU-limited scenarios in terms of consistency.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming at 1080p will produce frame rates determined by the Quadro RTX 3000's 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The 80 W TDP and 6 GB VRAM support medium to high settings in most titles, with the 30 RT cores enabling ray tracing at reduced resolutions or with DLSS assistance from the 240 tensor cores. The CPU's 95th percentile performance ensures minimum frame rates remain stable, avoiding stutter in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming gameplay while gaming simultaneously will leverage the CPU's 16 cores for encoding, with the 32 threads handling both game logic and video encoding without significant performance degradation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 indicates substantial headroom for concurrent workloads, while the GPU's 50th percentile performance may require reduced in-game settings to maintain streaming quality.

Video editing in applications like Adobe Premiere Pro will see the CPU dominate timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 49,731 supports smooth real-time preview of multi-layer timelines, while the GPU accelerates effects and transitions through its 1,920 shading units. The 6 GB VRAM stores textures and preview buffers for 1080p projects without exhausting memory.

3D rendering in Blender or Maya will utilize the CPU for scene preparation and simulation while the GPU handles viewport rendering and final frame rendering. The CUDA cores in the Quadro RTX 3000 accelerate Cycles and other GPU render engines, with the 30 RT cores providing hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects. The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests render times will be moderate compared to higher-end workstation GPUs.

Software development involving large codebases will benefit from the CPU's compilation speed, with the 16 cores reducing build times significantly compared to lower-core-count processors. The 64 MB L3 cache accelerates incremental builds, while the 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large in-memory data structures. The GPU provides adequate acceleration for UI rendering and integrated development environments.

Student and office work involving document creation, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing will see the CPU operate at a fraction of its capacity, with the 5.30 GHz boost clock ensuring instant responsiveness. The integrated Radeon 610M handles basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, extending battery life. The Quadro RTX 3000 activates only when needed for graphics-accelerated applications.

# FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX compare to the Intel Core i9-14900KS?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores, with the Core i9-14900KS scoring 81,127 and the Ryzen 9 8940HX scoring 81,103, representing a 0% delta. This places them at performance parity despite the Ryzen being a mobile processor.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX does not support ECC memory. The processor supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the GPU's ray tracing and tensor core configuration?

A: The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh includes 30 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and 240 tensor cores for AI and deep learning workloads. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What socket does the Ryzen 9 8940HX use?

A: The processor uses AMD Socket FL1, which is a BGA socket designed for mobile processors. The CPU is not socketed and is permanently attached to the motherboard.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1,917, while the multi-core score is 32,521, representing a 17x scaling factor across the 16 cores. PassMark shows a single-thread score of 3,874 and a multi-thread score of 49,731.

Q: What is the GPU's process node and transistor count?

A: The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process and contains 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.3 million per mm².

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific BGA socket. This means the CPU is not upgradeable without replacing the entire motherboard. The 8940HX is part of the 8000 series and represents one of the highest-performing mobile processors in the Dragon Range family, so a CPU upgrade would require moving to a newer platform generation.

Memory support includes DDR5 through a dual-channel interface, delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The system supports up to 64 MB of L3 cache on the CPU, and memory capacity is determined by the laptop's motherboard design. Users seeking additional memory bandwidth would need to consider a platform with quad-channel support, which is not available in this mobile form factor.

PCIe connectivity includes Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures. The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is one generation behind the CPU's native support. This creates a potential upgrade path to a newer GPU with PCIe 4.0 or 5.0 support, though the MXM module form factor limits replacement options to compatible modules.

The CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 80 W TDP combine for a total compute power draw of approximately 135 W. The suggested PSU field is null, indicating that the laptop's power adapter is determined by the manufacturer. Users should ensure the power adapter provides sufficient wattage for sustained operation under full load, though the 80 W GPU TDP is modest by gaming laptop standards.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be replacing the GPU with a newer MXM module that offers higher performance. The 50th percentile GPU ranking indicates significant headroom for improvement, while the 95th percentile CPU ranking suggests the processor will remain competitive for years. Users might also upgrade storage to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives to take advantage of the CPU's 28 PCIe lanes, though the actual benefit depends on workload.

The end-of-life status of the GPU means NVIDIA has ceased production, and availability will decline over time. Users seeking warranty support should verify the laptop manufacturer's policy on GPU replacement. The predecessor and successor designations (Quadro Pascal-M and Ampere-MW) indicate the product's position in NVIDIA's professional mobile lineup, with the Ampere generation offering significant performance improvements.

# Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh in a laptop form factor. The combination represents a mobile workstation with exceptional CPU performance and mid-range professional GPU capabilities. The combined performance percentile of 73 reflects the disparity between the CPU's 95th percentile ranking and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking.

The build class is laptop, meaning all components are integrated into a portable chassis. The CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 80 W TDP contribute to a thermal envelope suitable for a performance laptop, though the 5 nm CPU process and 12 nm GPU process create different thermal characteristics. The CPU's Dragon Range architecture targets high-performance mobile computing, while the Quadro Turing-M generation focuses on professional graphics workloads.

The overall tier of this build is high-end for CPU-bound tasks and mid-range for GPU-bound tasks. The 95th percentile CPU places it among the fastest mobile processors available, while the 50th percentile GPU positions it at the median of all graphics cards. Users prioritizing CPU performance will find this build exceptional, while those requiring top-tier GPU performance should consider alternative configurations.

The 8000 series CPU generation and the GeForce 30-series GPU generation indicate different product cycles, with the CPU being significantly newer. The CPU's release date of April 2025 contrasts with the GPU's 2019 release, creating a generational gap that explains the performance disparity. This build suits users who understand the CPU-centric performance profile and require professional GPU features rather than raw gaming performance.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 81,103 places it in the 95th percentile of all processors. The nearest rivals demonstrate the competitive landscape: the Intel Xeon w5-3535X scores 81,115 (0% delta), the Intel Core i9-14900KS scores 81,127 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scores 80,762 (0.4% delta), and the Intel Xeon 638 scores 80,723 (0.5% delta). These tight margins indicate that the 8940HX performs within 0.5% of some of the most powerful desktop processors.

Specific CPU benchmark scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 and single-core score of 1,917. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score reaches 5,355 with a single-core score of 292. PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 49,731 and single-thread score of 3,874. The avgBenchmarkScore of 81,103 aggregates these results into a single performance metric.

The GPU has no benchmark scores listed in the fact pack, with an avgBenchmarkScore of 0 and no nearest rivals. The percentileVsAllGpus value of 50 places it at the median of all GPUs, but without specific benchmark data, the analytical comparison relies on the GPU's architectural specifications. The absence of measured FPS data for this combination means all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the GPU's compute capabilities and the CPU's performance headroom.

The combined percentile of 73 reflects the overall performance tier of this CPU+GPU pairing. This figure weights the CPU and GPU contributions, with the CPU's exceptional performance partially offsetting the GPU's mid-range position. The combined picture shows a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks while providing adequate GPU performance for professional and moderate gaming workloads.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for any game or resolution, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and architectural specifications, not from direct testing.

At 1080p resolution with ultra settings, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh's 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth will determine frame rates in most games. The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests performance comparable to the median of all GPUs, which translates to playable frame rates in most titles at medium to high settings. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, though some modern games may exceed this capacity with ultra texture packs.

The CPU's exceptional performance ensures that frame rates are GPU-limited in virtually all scenarios. The 95th percentile ranking means the 8940HX will not bottleneck the GPU, even in CPU-intensive games that benefit from high single-thread performance. The 5.30 GHz boost clock and 64 MB L3 cache provide the responsiveness needed for consistent frame pacing.

The 30 RT cores enable ray tracing effects, though the 50th percentile GPU performance means enabling ray tracing will significantly impact frame rates. The 240 tensor cores support DLSS, which can offset the performance cost of ray tracing by rendering at lower resolutions and upscaling. Users seeking high-refresh gaming should expect to adjust settings to achieve 60+ FPS in demanding titles.

The 80 W GPU TDP limits sustained performance in laptops with inadequate cooling. The 12 nm process generates more heat than newer GPUs, potentially leading to thermal throttling in extended gaming sessions. The MXM module form factor allows for potential GPU upgrades, though availability of compatible modules may be limited given the end-of-life status.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds