SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
97%
VS
GPU
90%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

81,103 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

18,159 Benchmark Score
Top 10% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile: A Desktop-Class CPU Paired with a Mainstream GPU in a Laptop Enclosure

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile combination represents a laptop build where the CPU substantially outclasses the GPU in raw compute capability. The Ryzen 9 8940HX sits in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 3060 Mobile lands in the 62nd percentile among all GPUs, a 33-point gap that defines this pairing's character. The combined percentile of 79 reflects a system that excels in multi-threaded productivity but delivers only mid-range gaming performance. The data shows a processor that rivals workstation-class silicon from Intel, while the graphics solution competes with desktop GPUs from several generations ago. This is a laptop designed for compute-heavy tasks where the GPU is a supporting actor rather than the star.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, code-named Dragon Range, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It packs 13,140 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design measuring 2x 71 mm². The base clock runs at 2.40 GHz with a boost clock reaching 5.30 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing enthusiasts to push beyond stock frequencies. The CPU's 55 W TDP is notably low for a 16-core part, indicating aggressive power management in mobile form factors.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 64 MB L3 pool shared across the chip. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, though ECC is not supported. The processor connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes, providing ample bandwidth for storage and expansion. Integrated graphics come in the form of a Radeon 610M, which serves as a basic display output but is not intended for gaming.

Benchmark results place this CPU in elite territory. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 32,521 points demonstrates exceptional parallel throughput, while the single-core score of 1,917 points shows strong per-thread performance. The Cinebench R15 results reinforce this: 5,355 multi-core and 292 single-core. PassMark scores paint a detailed picture of workload-specific strengths: integer math reaches 189,221, floating-point math hits 113,921, and data compression scores 650,984. Data encryption at 39,318 and extended instructions at 47,802 show robust cryptographic and SIMD capabilities. The multithread score of 49,731 and physics score of 2,104 indicate strong general-purpose compute.

The average benchmark score of 81,103 places this CPU in the 95th percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are telling: the Intel Xeon w5-3535X scores 81,115 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core i9-14900KS scores 81,127 with a 0% delta, and the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scores 80,762 with a 0.4% delta. This means the Ryzen 9 8940HX trades blows with Intel's flagship desktop silicon and workstation Xeons, an extraordinary feat for a mobile processor. For real workloads, this translates to near-desktop-class rendering in Cinebench, rapid code compilation, and fluid multitasking across dozens of threads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 62nd percentile creates a situation where the processor will frequently wait on the graphics card in gaming scenarios. In light workloads like web browsing or office productivity, the CPU's massive thread count is largely idle, but in multi-threaded rendering or simulation tasks, the GPU becomes the secondary consideration.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact combination, can be inferred from the benchmark deltas. The RTX 3060 Mobile's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 with a -0.2% delta and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER with a 0.4% delta. These comparisons suggest the GPU performs at a level comparable to mid-range desktop parts from 2020-2021. Meanwhile, the CPU outperforms the Intel Core i9-14900KS by 0% and the Xeon w5-3535X by 0%, indicating the processor is not the limiting factor in any workload that engages more than a few cores.

In gaming, the GPU will be the bottleneck at all resolutions, meaning the CPU's headroom will not translate to higher frame rates beyond what the RTX 3060 Mobile can deliver. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or data analysis, the GPU's modest compute (10.94 TFLOPS FP32) may be underutilized while the CPU runs at full tilt. The PassMark physics score of 2,104 and multithread score of 49,731 suggest the CPU handles complex simulations without breaking a sweat, but the GPU's PassMark G3D score of 13,230 indicates it will struggle with graphically intensive real-time workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a processor that dominates its mobile class. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 is within 0% of the Intel Core i9-14900KS, a desktop part with significantly higher power limits. The single-core score of 1,917 aligns with the Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395's performance class. PassMark single-thread score of 3,874 and multithread score of 49,731 confirm the CPU's position in the 95th percentile.

The GPU's benchmark results tell a more modest story. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score of 1,821 places it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs. Geekbench OpenCL scores 79,483 and Vulkan scores 80,344, showing balanced compute performance across APIs. PassMark results are mixed: DirectX 10 scores 90, DirectX 11 scores 110, DirectX 12 scores 58, and DirectX 9 scores 146. The G2D score of 588 and G3D score of 13,230 indicate the GPU handles 2D tasks easily but is mid-pack for 3D rendering. GPU compute scores 5,718, which is modest compared to the CPU's compute capabilities.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU contributes the vast majority of overall compute power. The average benchmark score of 81,103 for the CPU dwarfs the GPU's 18,159 average, a ratio of roughly 4.5:1 in favor of the processor. The combined percentile of 79 reflects this skew: the system is well above average overall, but the GPU pulls the combined score down from what the CPU alone would achieve.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 8940HX compare to Intel's flagship desktop CPU?

A: The Ryzen 9 8940HX scores 32,521 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is within 0% of the Intel Core i9-14900KS's average benchmark score of 81,127. The data shows these processors perform at parity despite the Ryzen being a mobile part.

Q: What is the GPU's performance class relative to desktop GPUs?

A: The RTX 3060 Mobile's average benchmark score of 18,159 is within 0.4% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER and -0.2% of the AMD Radeon Pro 5700. This places it in the 62nd percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Can this laptop handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: Yes, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 and PassMark floating-point math score of 113,921 indicate excellent rendering performance. The GPU's FP32 compute of 10.94 TFLOPS adds hardware acceleration but is not the primary driver.

Q: What memory type does this system support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported.

Q: Is the CPU's integrated graphics usable for gaming?

A: The Radeon 610M integrated GPU is present, but benchmark data indicates it is not intended for gaming. The discrete RTX 3060 Mobile is required for any meaningful frame rates.

Q: How does the CPU's encryption performance compare to its rivals?

A: The PassMark data encryption score of 39,318 and extended instructions score of 47,802 are strong, but the nearest rival comparisons do not break down per-test scores, so a direct comparison is not available from the data.

Q: What is the release timeline for these components?

A: The CPU was released on 2025-04-22, while the GPU was released on 2021-01-11. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, while the CPU is still in active production.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is built on the Ampere architecture, using the GA106 chip fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. The chip contains 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die, with a transistor density of 43.5 million per mm². The GPU has 3,840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units, and 48 raster output units. It includes 30 RT cores for ray tracing and 120 tensor cores for AI acceleration, making it capable of DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Memory configuration is 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1,750 MHz, translating to 14 Gbps effective. The base clock is 900 MHz with a boost clock of 1,425 MHz. Pixel rate reaches 68.40 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 171.0 GTexel/s. The GPU's FP32 performance is 10.94 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 10.94 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration. The TDP is rated at 80 W, with no external power connectors required. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and display outputs are listed as portable device dependent.

Benchmark scores position this GPU in the 62nd percentile. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,821 is modest for modern titles. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 79,483 and 80,344, respectively, show balanced compute. PassMark DirectX scores are low, with DX12 at 58, DX11 at 110, and DX10 at 90, suggesting the GPU is not optimized for newer APIs in synthetic tests. The G3D score of 13,230 and GPU compute score of 5,718 indicate mid-range capabilities. The average benchmark score of 18,159 is within 1.2% of the AMD Radeon RX 460 and Intel Arc A770M, showing this GPU competes with entry-level to mid-range parts from various generations.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 336 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p textures but may limit higher-resolution assets. The 30 RT cores provide ray tracing support, but performance in RT-heavy scenes will be constrained by the GPU's overall compute throughput. The 120 tensor cores enable DLSS, which can improve frame rates in supported titles, but the GPU's modest FP32 output of 10.94 TFLOPS means raw rasterization performance is the limiting factor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 13,230 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1,821 suggest 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings in most titles. The GPU's performance class, within 0.4% of the RTX 2060 SUPER, indicates it can handle esports titles at high frame rates.

At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread score of 1,917 in Cinebench R23 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,874 ensure that CPU-bound scenarios are rare. The GPU will be the primary limiter. At 1440p, the 6 GB VRAM capacity may become a constraint in texture-heavy titles, potentially requiring reduced settings. At 4K, the GPU's 10.94 TFLOPS FP32 and 336 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for playable frame rates in most modern games, and the 6 GB VRAM will likely cause stuttering due to memory overflow.

The direct comparison to the RTX 2060 SUPER, which has a 0.4% higher average score, suggests the RTX 3060 Mobile performs similarly to that desktop card. Ray tracing performance, while supported via 30 RT cores, will be limited; the PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58 indicates suboptimal DX12 path utilization. DLSS via the 120 tensor cores can provide a performance boost in supported titles, potentially recovering some frame rates, but the fundamental GPU compute is the bottleneck.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. The socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the 55 W TDP in a laptop chassis will limit thermal headroom. The GPU is a mobile part with an 80 W TDP and no external power connectors, meaning it is soldered or MXM-based and not user-upgradeable in most laptops.

The suggested PSU is not listed in the data, but the combined TDP of 55 W for the CPU and 80 W for the GPU totals 135 W, which is modest for a laptop. The GPU's end-of-life status means replacements are not available for this specific model, and the CPU's active production status suggests it will remain available for some time. A sensible next upgrade would involve a newer GPU, but the mobile form factor limits options to what the laptop manufacturer supports. The PCIe Gen 5 CPU lanes provide future-proofing for storage, but the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is already at its maximum bandwidth for this class.

Memory is dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, which is adequate for the CPU but may bottleneck the GPU's 336 GB/s bandwidth in mixed workloads. The lack of ECC support limits use in mission-critical workstations. The integrated Radeon 610M provides a fallback display output but does not contribute to gaming performance.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining a 16-core Zen 4 processor with a mid-range Ampere GPU. The build class is explicitly laptop, and the combined percentile of 79 reflects a system that is above average but not top-tier. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking is exceptional, but the GPU's 62nd percentile pulls the overall position down. This is a compute-first system where the CPU dominates.

The Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor with a 5.30 GHz boost clock and 64 MB L3 cache, capable of matching desktop-class Intel parts. The RTX 3060 Mobile is a 6 GB GDDR6 GPU with 3,840 shading units and 30 RT cores, performing at the level of a desktop RTX 2060 SUPER. The pairing is unusual: the CPU is overqualified for gaming, while the GPU is underqualified for the CPU's compute potential.

In terms of tier, this system sits in the upper-midrange for laptops. The CPU places it in the top 5% of processors, but the GPU places it in the 62nd percentile of graphics cards. Users who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads will find this pairing suitable, while gamers should expect mid-range performance.

Who Should Build It

The target user for this combination is a professional or power user whose primary workloads are CPU-intensive. Data compression scores of 650,984 and integer math of 189,221 indicate strong performance for database operations, code compilation, and scientific computing. The encryption score of 39,318 and extended instructions score of 47,802 suggest suitability for security-related tasks and cryptographic workloads.

Content creators working with video encoding or 3D rendering will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521, which rivals desktop workstations. The PassMark multithread score of 49,731 and physics score of 2,104 make this suitable for simulation and modeling. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU handles compilation and analysis tasks efficiently.

Gamers at 1080p resolution with medium settings will find the GPU adequate, but those seeking high-refresh-rate or 1440p gaming should look elsewhere. Small business users running productivity suites will see excellent responsiveness, but the CPU's power is largely untapped in such workloads. The system is best suited for users who need desktop-class multi-core performance in a laptop form factor, with gaming as a secondary consideration.