SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

81,103 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + AMD Radeon 860M

This pairing combines a 16-core Dragon Range mobile CPU with a RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU, targeting the upper-middle tier of laptop performance. The processor sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the integrated graphics land at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, yielding a combined build percentile of 84. The CPU is a high-end mobile part with 32 threads and a 55 W TDP, whereas the GPU is a low-power integrated solution drawing just 15 W, creating an asymmetric configuration where compute throughput vastly exceeds graphics capability. Notably, there are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct testing.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boosts up to 5.30 GHz, giving it substantial single-thread headroom despite its multi-core focus. The chip integrates 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 cache, which is generous for a mobile part and helps with latency-sensitive workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and it does not support ECC memory. The processor uses AMD Socket FL1 and is part of the 8000 series, with a production status of Active and a release date of April 2025.

The benchmark data reveals a processor that excels in sustained multi-threaded work. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 32,521 points, which places it in the top tier of mobile processors. The single-core score of 1,917 in the same test indicates strong per-thread performance, consistent with the 5.30 GHz boost clock. PassMark results reinforce this picture: the multi-thread score of 49,731 and integer math score of 189,221 are robust numbers for compile workloads and scientific computing. The floating-point math score of 113,921 suggests solid capability in numerical simulation and data analysis. Data compression and encryption scores of 650,984 and 39,318 respectively indicate strong throughput for archive handling and security-related tasks.

The CPU's average benchmark score of 81,103 puts it at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, and its nearest rivals show near-identical performance. The Intel Xeon w5-3535X scores 81,115 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core i9-14900KS scores 81,127 (also 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scores 80,762 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Xeon 638 scores 80,723 (0.5% behind). This means the 8940HX is statistically tied with some of the strongest desktop and workstation processors ever made, which is remarkable for a laptop chip. The 55 W TDP is modest relative to the performance on offer, indicating excellent efficiency from the 5 nm process and Zen 4 architecture.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 is the headline number, representing a 16-core result that rivals desktop HEDT parts. The single-core score of 1,917 in the same test is equally important, as it shows the 5.30 GHz boost clock delivers class-leading per-thread responsiveness for everyday applications and lightly-threaded games. PassMark data shows a single-thread score of 3,874, which aligns with the Cinebench single-core result. The physics score of 2,104 and the prime number finding score of 251 are lower relative to other PassMark metrics, reflecting that these specific workloads may not fully utilize the architecture's strengths.

The GPU benchmarks are more modest. The AMD Radeon 860M scores 22,759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30,043 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 26,401. This places it at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 at 26,421 (0.1% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 at 26,331 (0.3% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26,553 (0.6% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 at 26,683 (1.1% ahead). The comparison to the RTX 5060 is notable because that is a discrete gaming GPU, yet the integrated 860M essentially matches its average benchmark score. However, the RTX 5060 likely achieves that score with different workload characteristics, and the 860M's system-shared memory and 15 W TDP will constrain sustained performance in ways raw scores do not fully capture.

The combined picture is a platform that delivers top-tier CPU throughput for productivity and development tasks, while GPU performance is sufficient for light gaming and accelerated rendering but far below what a discrete graphics card would offer. The 84th combined percentile reflects this imbalance — the CPU pulls the overall position up significantly, while the GPU limits the platform's gaming and graphics potential.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Krackan Point chip and belonging to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point mobile platforms. It is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, which is a newer node than the CPU's 5 nm process. The GPU operates with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, which is a wide range that allows it to scale from idle to demanding loads. The memory configuration is entirely system-shared, meaning there is no dedicated VRAM; instead, it draws from the same DDR5 pool as the CPU, with bandwidth described as system-dependent. This is a critical limitation for gaming, as the 83.2 GB/s CPU memory bandwidth is shared between the processor and the GPU.

The compute resources are modest but modern: 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation pipelines. The GPU includes 8 ray tracing cores, which is notable for an integrated part and enables hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the overall throughput is limited. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, which are figures consistent with a low-power integrated GPU. The FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 is also 3.072 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, indicating no dedicated half-precision acceleration. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it has full feature support for modern graphics APIs.

In terms of real workloads, the Geekbench Vulkan score of 30,043 indicates the GPU can handle DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles at low to medium settings in 1080p, but the system-shared memory will cause stuttering in games that require more than the available bandwidth. The OpenCL score of 22,759 shows reasonable compute capability for tasks like video encoding acceleration or light GPU-accelerated filters in photo editing, but it is not a substitute for a discrete GPU in 3D rendering. The 15 W TDP means the GPU will not generate significant heat, which is advantageous for thin-and-light laptops, but it also caps sustained performance. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, which is adequate for an integrated part.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's average benchmark score of 26,401 places it roughly on par with the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, which is an entry-level discrete GPU. Estimated frame rates at 1080p in esports titles would likely reach 60-100 FPS on low settings, but high-refresh 144 Hz gaming in modern AAA titles would fall short. The CPU's strong single-core performance of 1,917 in Cinebench R23 helps with frame pacing, but the GPU becomes the bottleneck in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multi-thread score of 49,731 indicates x264 encoding at high presets would have minimal impact on game performance. However, the GPU's modest 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput limits the quality of hardware-accelerated encoding or rendering overlays, so software encoding on the CPU is the preferred approach.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 suggests the CPU can handle 4K video editing timelines with multiple streams, especially with proxies. The GPU's OpenCL score of 22,759 provides some acceleration for effects and color grading, but it is not sufficient for demanding GPU-accelerated effects. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for dual-channel DDR5, but large projects may benefit from more capacity.

3D rendering: The CPU excels at this task; a score of 32,521 in Cinebench R23 multi-core means CPU-based rendering in Blender or similar software would be fast, rivaling desktop workstation chips. The GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 is far too low for GPU rendering, which requires 10+ TFLOPS for practical use. The 8 ray tracing cores in the 860M are a token feature rather than a functional rendering solution.

Software development: The 16-core, 32-thread configuration, combined with a PassMark integer math score of 189,221, makes this an excellent platform for compilation of large codebases. The data compression score of 650,984 indicates fast archive and build artifact handling. The single-thread score of 3,874 ensures fast IDE responsiveness and quick startup times for development tools.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-core performance and the GPU's 72nd percentile position ensure smooth everyday computing, including web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work. The 55 W CPU TDP and 15 W GPU TDP mean the laptop would have excellent battery life for a high-performance machine, though the DDR5 memory requirement may increase power draw compared to LPDDR5 systems.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need workstation-class CPU performance in a laptop but accept integrated graphics as a compromise. Developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 32 threads and the 189,221 PassMark integer math score. Video editors working with high-resolution footage but using proxy workflows will appreciate the 32,521 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Students in engineering or computer science programs will find the CPU performance sufficient for simulation software and compilation tasks, while the GPU handles basic visualization needs.

Small business workstations that require heavy spreadsheet processing, database queries, or data analysis will see strong performance from the 650,984 data compression score and the 113,921 floating-point math score. Gamers at 1080p with low graphics settings and esports titles will find the GPU adequate, but the system is not suited for 1440p or 4K gaming. Content creators who offload rendering to CPU-based pipelines will find this platform faster than most desktop systems. The 95th CPU percentile means this is effectively a desktop replacement for compute workloads, while the 72nd GPU percentile limits it to light gaming and 2D acceleration.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to the Intel Core i9-14900KS?

A: The Ryzen 9 8940HX has an average benchmark score of 81,103, while the Core i9-14900KS scores 81,127, a 0% delta. The two are statistically identical in overall performance despite the 8940HX being a 55 W laptop chip and the i9-14900KS being a desktop part.

Q: Is the Radeon 860M comparable to a discrete GPU?

A: The 860M's average benchmark score of 26,401 is within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060's score of 26,331 and 0.1% of the MX550's score of 26,421. However, the 860M uses system-shared memory and draws only 15 W, so sustained gaming performance will be lower than discrete GPUs with dedicated VRAM.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen 9 8940HX supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This is shared between the CPU and the integrated GPU, which can create a bottleneck in graphics-intensive tasks.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 860M includes 8 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes DXR ray tracing. However, with only 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ray tracing will be limited to very low resolutions and settings.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 84, which reflects the strong CPU (95th percentile) balanced against the weaker GPU (72nd percentile). The overall position is pulled down by the graphics component.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The Ryzen 9 8940HX uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile platforms. It is not compatible with desktop AM4 or AM5 sockets.

Q: When was the GPU released?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M was released on February 28, 2025, approximately two months before the CPU's release date of April 22, 2025.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry in this build is stark. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all processors, while the GPU rests at the 72nd percentile. This means the GPU will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive workload, including gaming, 3D rendering, and GPU-accelerated video effects. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 could support frame rates well above 100 FPS in most games, but the GPU's 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will cap frame rates at roughly 30-60 FPS in modern titles at 1080p. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, data analysis, and CPU rendering, the system performs at the level of a high-end desktop, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 49,731 confirming this. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is shared between the CPU and GPU, so heavy gaming will reduce CPU memory throughput, potentially impacting physics and AI calculations in games. Conversely, in pure compute tasks, the GPU's 15 W TDP and system-shared memory will not interfere with CPU performance. The result is a platform that is exceptionally well-balanced for productivity but poorly balanced for gaming; the user gets flagship CPU performance but entry-level GPU performance.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, a 16-core Zen 4 mobile processor, with the AMD Radeon 860M, an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU. The system is classified as a laptop build, meaning both components are soldered and not upgradeable. The CPU is a Dragon Range part with a 55 W TDP, designed for high-performance gaming and workstation laptops, while the GPU is a 15 W integrated solution from the Krackan Point chip. The combined percentile of 84 places this system in the upper tier of laptop configurations, but the gap between the CPU's 95th percentile and the GPU's 72nd percentile is substantial. This is not a balanced gaming laptop; it is a compute-focused laptop with the graphics capability of an entry-level discrete GPU. The 5 nm CPU and 4 nm GPU are both manufactured by TSMC, indicating a modern, efficient platform. The CPU's 13,140 million transistors and dual 71 mm² die size show a complex design, while the GPU's transistor count is unknown. The overall tier is high for productivity and low for gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so the following frame-rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's average benchmark score of 26,401 places it near the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (26,421) and RTX 5060 (26,331), suggesting 1080p gaming at low to medium settings. In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, estimated frame rates could reach 80-120 FPS at 1080p low settings, given the CPU's strong single-core score of 1,917 in Cinebench R23. In older AAA titles from 2018-2020, expect 40-60 FPS at 1080p medium settings. In modern AAA games with demanding graphics, the estimate drops to 20-35 FPS at 1080p low, as the 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and shared memory bandwidth become limiting. The 8 ray tracing cores are present, but ray tracing will reduce frame rates to unplayable levels in most titles. The CPU will not be the bottleneck in any gaming scenario; even at 720p, the GPU's 48.00 GPixel/s pixel rate will limit fill-rate-bound scenes. These estimates should be treated cautiously, as the system-shared memory and laptop cooling solutions can cause significant variance from the benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform uses AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-only socket with no upgrade options — the CPU is soldered to the motherboard. The system supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and since the GPU relies on system-shared memory, adding more RAM or faster RAM would directly improve graphics performance. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, which is future-proof for NVMe storage expansion, but the GPU is limited to PCIe 4.0 x8 because it is an integrated part. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 15 W, bringing the combined silicon power draw to approximately 70 W; a laptop with a 100 W+ cooling solution would be sufficient. No suggested PSU is listed, and there are no power connectors for the GPU since it is an IGP. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, but overclocking on a laptop is constrained by thermal limits. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase DDR5 memory capacity and speed, as this would benefit both the CPU's memory bandwidth and the GPU's shared memory performance. Beyond that, the only meaningful upgrade would be to a different laptop with a discrete GPU, as the CPU's performance is already at the 95th percentile and does not need replacement. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support means an external GPU enclosure could theoretically be used, but the 28 CPU lanes would need to be shared between storage and the eGPU, and the laptop form factor may not support such a configuration.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds