SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

81,103 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX and AMD Radeon 780M represent a high-end mobile processor paired with a capable integrated graphics solution, targeting a niche in the laptop market. This combination prioritizes heavy multi-threaded CPU performance while relying on an iGPU for graphical tasks, a configuration that yields a distinct performance profile. The following analysis breaks down the components, their measured capabilities, and the realistic use cases for such a system, based strictly on the provided data.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically the Dragon Range codename. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, which is relatively high for a mobile part, indicating sustained performance potential. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 64 MB of L3 cache, which is beneficial for workloads that rely on data locality.

Benchmark results show this CPU is a multi-threaded powerhouse. In Cinebench R23, it scores 32521 points in the multicore test, while its single-core score is 1917 points. The multicore result places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market. The single-core score, while strong, is less dominant, indicating that its primary strength lies in parallel workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 49731 reinforces this, and the integer math score of 189221 and floating-point math score of 113921 show robust performance in both types of calculations. Data compression and encryption scores of 650984 and 39318, respectively, further highlight its capability in productivity and security-related tasks.

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the Intel Xeon w5-3535X and Intel Core i9-14900KS, both with an average score of 81115 and 81127, respectively, showing a deltaPct of 0. This places the 8940HX in the same performance tier as these desktop-class processors. It is also 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Xeon 638. For real-world workloads, this means the 8940HX can handle demanding tasks like video rendering, software compilation, and scientific simulations with ease, rivaling top-tier desktop hardware in multi-threaded scenarios, while its single-thread performance is sufficient for responsive everyday use and gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to this mobile processor line. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It does not support ECC memory. For expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, ensuring high-bandwidth connectivity for modern NVMe SSDs and other peripherals, though the GPU itself uses a separate interface.

The integrated graphics is a Radeon 610M, which is a basic iGPU, meaning the system relies on the discrete or additional Radeon 780M for graphical output. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and while the data does not include a suggested PSU for the system, the power headroom is dictated by the laptop's design, not a desktop PSU. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would involve pairing the CPU with a more powerful discrete GPU, as the 55 W TDP and PCIe Gen 5 support suggest the CPU can drive high-end graphics cards in a laptop chassis, though the specifics are limited by the mobile form factor.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the chip codename Phoenix. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. Its memory is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's DDR5 memory rather than dedicated VRAM, making its bandwidth "System Dependent." The GPU features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 render output units (ROPs). It includes 12 ray tracing (RT) cores, but no tensor cores, as it relies on standard shader hardware for compute tasks.

In terms of raw compute, the 780M delivers 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same for FP16 (1:1). Its pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 139.2 GTexel/s. The GPU's TDP is listed as 15 W, which is low, but this is the power draw of the IGP alone within the CPU package. Benchmark results show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480, which is modest. In Geekbench, it scores 18602 in OpenCL and 33683 in Vulkan. These scores place the GPU in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, indicating it is a mid-tier performer for integrated graphics.

The nearest rivals for the 780M are interesting. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 460, both older mobile workstation GPUs. It is 0.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and 0.4% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7790. This suggests that while the 780M is an iGPU, its performance is comparable to some entry-level discrete GPUs, though the RTX 4060 comparison is likely based on a specific test metric and not indicative of overall gaming performance. For rendering, the 780M can handle light tasks, but its lack of dedicated VRAM and modest compute power make it unsuitable for heavy 3D rendering or high-end gaming at high settings.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 780M's benchmark scores, such as a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480, indicate it can handle esports titles at lower settings and resolutions, but it is not suited for high-refresh gaming at high detail in demanding games. The CPU's strong single-core performance would help in frame pacing, but the GPU is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32521, provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming while maintaining game performance. The high PassMark multithread score of 49731 supports this, making the CPU well-suited for software encoding.

Video editing: The 8940HX excels here, with a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 5355 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32521. The CPU can handle 4K video timelines and effects, though the 780M's limited GPU acceleration means rendering will be slower than with a discrete GPU.

3D rendering: The CPU's performance is a major asset, with PassMark floating-point math score of 113921, which is crucial for 3D rendering tasks. However, the 780M's lack of dedicated VRAM and lower compute power (8.909 TFLOPS) means GPU-accelerated rendering will be a bottleneck, making CPU rendering the preferred method.

Software development: With 32 threads and a high single-thread score of 3874 in PassMark, this CPU can compile code quickly. The data compression score of 650984 also aids in build and source control operations. The GPU is sufficient for UI rendering and basic graphical needs.

Student and office work: This combination is overkill for basic tasks. The CPU's performance ensures smooth multitasking and fast spreadsheet calculations, while the 780M provides adequate support for office suites and web browsing. The low GPU TDP of 15 W also suggests efficient battery life for light workloads.

Benchmark Performance

The exact CPU scores are as follows: Cinebench R15 multicore at 5355 and single-core at 292; Cinebench R23 multicore at 32521 and single-core at 1917. PassMark scores include multithread at 49731, single-thread at 3874, integer math at 189221, floating-point math at 113921, data compression at 650984, data encryption at 39318, extended instructions at 47802, physics at 2104, and random string sorting at 75381. The CPU's average benchmark score is 81103, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

The GPU scores are: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 480, Geekbench OpenCL at 18602, and Geekbench Vulkan at 33683. Its average benchmark score is 17588, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 78. It is important to note that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS discussion is estimated from the benchmark scores, which show a stark contrast: the CPU is in the top 5% of all processors, while the GPU is in the lower half of the top two-thirds of all GPUs. This combined picture is of a system that is heavily skewed toward CPU performance, with the GPU serving as a secondary component.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count of the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock of the AMD Radeon 780M?

A: The GPU has a boost clock of 2900 MHz.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The CPU is in the 95th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU's average benchmark score?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 17588.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for the AMD Radeon 780M?

A: The GPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 78.

Who Should Build It

This build is for users who prioritize CPU-intensive tasks over GPU performance. It targets professionals in software development, data analysis, and video editing, who will benefit from the 8940HX's 95th percentile CPU ranking and high PassMark multithread score of 49731. Gamers who play esports titles at lower resolutions and settings may find the 780M sufficient, as it sits in the 61st percentile of GPUs, but those seeking high-refresh gaming at high detail will be disappointed. Content creators focusing on CPU-based rendering will appreciate the 32521 Cinebench R23 multicore score, while students and office workers will find the system vastly over-specified for their needs, though it will handle all tasks with ease. The build is also suitable for small business workstations that run complex simulations or manage large datasets, leveraging the CPU's data encryption score of 39318 and integer math score of 189221.

Build Overview

This pairing consists of the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX CPU and the AMD Radeon 780M GPU, classified as a laptop build. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor with a 95th percentile ranking, while the GPU is a mid-tier integrated solution with a 61st percentile ranking. The overall tier, based on the combined percentile of 78, places this system in the upper-mid range of all possible configurations. It is a high-performance CPU platform with a modestly capable GPU, making it a specialized tool rather than a balanced gaming machine.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in this system. The CPU's average benchmark score of 81103 is in the 95th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 17588 is in the 61st percentile. This discrepancy means that in graphics-intensive workloads, the 780M will limit performance, even though the CPU has significant headroom. For instance, in a gaming scenario, the CPU's high single-thread score (3874 in PassMark) can process game logic efficiently, but the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 will cap the frame rate and graphical fidelity.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or software compilation, the CPU is the limiting factor only in the sense that it is the component doing the work, but it performs exceptionally well. The GPU's low TDP of 15 W and system-shared memory mean it cannot offload significant work from the CPU. The estimated FPS scaling, based on the benchmark scores, suggests that the GPU will underperform the CPU in almost every graphical task. Therefore, the balance is heavily skewed: the CPU is a flagship-level part, while the GPU is a competent but entry-level solution for gaming and rendering. This system is best suited for users who need maximum CPU throughput and are willing to accept the GPU's limitations.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

AMD Radeon 780M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds