SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

97%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

81,103 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + AMD Radeon 740M

This laptop-class pairing combines AMD’s 16-core Dragon Range flagship processor with a modest RDNA 3.0 integrated GPU, creating a system where CPU performance is exceptional but graphics capability remains entry-level. The Ryzen 9 8940HX sits in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the Radeon 740M lands at the 53rd percentile among all GPUs, producing a combined percentile of 74. The data shows a clear asymmetry: this platform is built for heavy compute tasks, not high-end gaming.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It belongs to the 8000 series and targets the mobile market with a 55 W TDP, base clock of 2.40 GHz, and boost clock of 5.30 GHz. The chip packs 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die layout of 2x 71 mm², with 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes. The multiplier is unlocked, though this is a mobile part.

Benchmark results confirm the processor's high-end positioning. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 32,521 in multi-core and 1,917 in single-core. The multi-core figure is particularly telling: it places the 8940HX within a hair of Intel’s Core i9-14900KS, which averages 81,127 in the aggregate benchmark suite, a 0% delta from the Ryzen’s 81,103 average. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 trails by 0.4%, and the Intel Xeon w5-3535X is essentially tied at 81,115. For a 55 W mobile chip to match desktop-class silicon in average benchmark score is a strong statement about Zen 4’s efficiency at this power envelope.

Single-thread performance is equally competitive. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,917 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,874 indicate strong per-core throughput, though the numbers suggest it is not the absolute fastest in lightly threaded workloads. The Intel Core i9-14900KS, one of the nearest rivals, typically leads in single-thread tests, but the delta in average score is negligible at 0%. In real workloads, this translates to snappy application launches, responsive code compilation, and fluid 60 FPS gaming in CPU-bound titles when paired with a discrete GPU.

The PassMark suite provides deeper insight. Integer math scores 189,221, floating-point math scores 113,921, and extended instructions hit 47,802. Data compression reaches 650,984, while encryption processes at 39,318. These numbers indicate strong throughput for compression tools, encryption workloads, and scientific computing. The multi-thread score of 49,731 and physics score of 2,104 reinforce the CPU’s capability in heavily parallel tasks. The average benchmark score of 81,103 across all tests places it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, meaning only about 5% of processors outperform it in aggregate.

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing presents an unusual bottleneck profile. The CPU operates at the 95th percentile, while the GPU sits at the 53rd percentile. In graphics-intensive workloads, the Radeon 740M will be the limiting factor by a wide margin. The integrated GPU’s FP32 throughput of 2.867 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s are modest figures that will cap frame rates far below what the CPU can feed.

The data supports this interpretation through the absence of measured FPS data for this combination. No measuredFps rows exist in the fact pack, which itself signals that this pairing is not intended for high-refresh gaming scenarios. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 (0.2% delta), AMD Radeon Pro 455 (0.3%), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (0.3%), while the AMD Radeon RX 580 is 0.4% ahead. These are all older or lower-tier parts, confirming the 740M’s entry-level status.

In CPU-bound tasks, the balance shifts entirely. Multi-threaded workloads like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation will leverage the 16 cores and 32 threads effectively, with the GPU playing little or no role. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 and PassMark multi-thread score of 49,731 indicate that the CPU can sustain heavy all-core loads. Memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s will not bottleneck the CPU in most compute tasks, though it may limit integrated graphics performance since the GPU shares system memory.

For gaming, the bottleneck is unambiguous: the GPU will limit frame rates in virtually every title, especially at higher resolutions and graphics settings. The CPU’s single-thread performance is sufficient for high-FPS gaming in esports titles, but the 740M cannot deliver those frame rates. The combined percentile of 74 reflects this imbalance—the system is stronger than most laptops overall, but the GPU drags down gaming potential.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon 740M with 256 shading units and 8 ROPs cannot realistically drive high-refresh displays in modern titles. The FP32 throughput of 2.867 TFLOPS is entry-level, and with no measured FPS data, expectations should be modest. Esports titles at low settings and 720p or 1080p may achieve playable frame rates, but 144 Hz or 240 Hz gaming is out of reach. The CPU’s single-thread score of 3,874 would support high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU cannot deliver them.

Streaming: The 16-core, 32-thread CPU provides ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 means encoding overhead will have minimal impact on other tasks. However, the integrated GPU limits the gaming experience being streamed. The PassMark data compression score of 650,984 and encryption score of 39,318 suggest efficient handling of stream encoding workloads.

Video editing: Multi-core performance shines here. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32,521 and PassMark floating-point score of 113,921 indicate strong performance for rendering timelines, applying effects, and exporting video. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with large media files. The GPU’s limited compute may slow GPU-accelerated effects, but CPU-based editing workflows will be responsive.

3D rendering: This is a strength area. The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with the multi-thread score of 49,731, deliver solid performance in CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5,355 and R23 multi-core of 32,521 confirm scalability across all cores. The GPU cannot contribute meaningfully to GPU-accelerated rendering given its 2.867 TFLOPS FP32, so users should rely on CPU rendering.

Software development: Compilation and testing benefit from the 32 threads and high single-thread speed. The PassMark integer math score of 189,221 and random string sorting score of 75,381 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing. The single-thread score of 3,874 ensures fast IDE responsiveness and quick incremental builds.

Student and office work: Overkill is the operative word. The CPU’s performance far exceeds office application needs, but the platform’s laptop class and 55 W TDP mean it may come with trade-offs in battery life and chassis size. For document editing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, the 53rd-percentile GPU is sufficient, and the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures smooth multitasking. The 95th CPU percentile is unnecessary but not harmful.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need massive CPU compute in a laptop form factor but do not require discrete graphics performance. Content creators working with CPU-based rendering, video encoding, or large data processing will find the 16-core configuration valuable. The 95th CPU percentile places it among the fastest mobile processors available.

Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 32 threads and high single-thread speed. The PassMark integer math score of 189,221 and multi-thread score of 49,731 indicate strong parallel compilation performance. Data scientists and engineers running simulations or processing large datasets will also find the CPU capability compelling.

Gamers should look elsewhere. The 53rd GPU percentile and entry-level specs—256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32—cannot deliver modern gaming experiences at acceptable frame rates. Small business workstations running productivity suites, databases, or financial modeling will be well served, though the CPU is far more powerful than such workloads require.

The combined percentile of 74 suggests this system is above average overall, but the skew toward CPU performance makes it a specialized tool rather than a general-purpose gaming or multimedia machine. Users who occasionally game at low settings may find it adequate, but enthusiasts should pair this CPU with a discrete GPU in a different chassis.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 81,103, placing it in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon w5-3535X at 81,115 (0% delta), Intel Core i9-14900KS at 81,127 (0%), AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 at 80,762 (0.4% behind), and Intel Xeon 638 at 80,723 (0.5% behind). This indicates the 8940HX performs essentially identically to elite desktop processors in aggregate benchmarks.

Key CPU scores include Cinebench R23 multi-core at 32,521 and single-core at 1,917, Cinebench R15 multi-core at 5,355 and single-core at 292, PassMark multi-thread at 49,731, PassMark single-thread at 3,874, integer math at 189,221, floating-point math at 113,921, extended instructions at 47,802, data compression at 650,984, data encryption at 39,318, physics at 2,104, and random string sorting at 75,381.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 12,870, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro W5100 at 12,847 (0.2% behind), AMD Radeon Pro 455 at 12,831 (0.3% behind), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 at 12,830 (0.3% behind), and AMD Radeon RX 580 at 12,928 (0.4% ahead). Geekbench scores are 10,172 in OpenCL and 15,568 in Vulkan.

The combined picture shows a system that is exceptional on the CPU side and middling on the GPU side. The 74th combined percentile reflects this asymmetry. Users should expect flagship-level compute performance with entry-level graphics.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX have?

A: The CPU has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on Zen 4 architecture on a 5 nm process.

Q: What is the CPU’s performance percentile?

A: The Ryzen 9 8940HX ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 81,103.

Q: How does the Radeon 740M compare to other GPUs?

A: The GPU sits in the 53rd percentile with an average score of 12,870. It performs within 0.4% of the AMD Radeon RX 580 and within 0.3% of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, indicating the system outperforms most laptops overall but is held back by the integrated GPU.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this combination?

A: No. The fact pack contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What memory and PCIe support does the CPU offer?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes.

Q: What is the TDP of each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 45 W.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX and AMD Radeon 740M. The fact pack contains no measuredFps entries, and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative guidance rather than precise figures.

The Radeon 740M’s specifications—256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, 4 RT cores, and 2.867 TFLOPS FP32—indicate entry-level integrated graphics performance. The GPU’s 53rd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 12,870, which is within 0.4% of the Radeon RX 580, suggest it can handle older or less demanding titles at low to medium settings. At 1080p, esports games like League of Legends or Counter-Strike 2 may achieve playable frame rates at low settings, but modern AAA titles will likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS at minimum settings.

The CPU’s single-thread performance of 3,874 in PassMark and 1,917 in Cinebench R23 will not bottleneck the GPU in gaming, meaning the GPU is the sole limiter. At 720p, frame rates may improve, but the 8 ROPs and 22.40 GPixel/s pixel rate cap output. The system memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is shared with the GPU, which may further limit performance in memory-intensive scenes. Users should not expect high-refresh or high-detail gaming from this pairing.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This means the processor is not upgradeable in the traditional sense—it is soldered or embedded in the laptop chassis. Users should plan for the entire system to be replaced rather than upgraded component-by-component.

Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The memory bus is system shared with the integrated GPU, meaning faster RAM could improve both CPU and GPU performance. However, the fact pack does not specify maximum memory capacity or speed, so users should consult their laptop’s documentation.

PCIe support is Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU. This allows for high-bandwidth connections to NVMe storage or external GPU enclosures, though the laptop form factor may limit expansion options. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is sufficient for its bandwidth needs.

The CPU’s TDP of 55 W and the GPU’s TDP of 45 W combine to 100 W of component power draw. The fact pack lists no suggested PSU for this integrated GPU, and the GPU has no power connectors since it is an IGP. The system’s power supply is determined by the laptop design, and users should ensure adequate cooling and power delivery for sustained CPU loads. A sensible next upgrade would be a laptop with a discrete GPU if gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads are priorities, as the CPU’s performance is already near the top of the mobile market.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, a 16-core, 32-thread mobile flagship, with the AMD Radeon 740M, an integrated RDNA 3.0 GPU. The CPU ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 81,103, matching desktop processors like the Intel Core i9-14900KS and Intel Xeon w5-3535X. The GPU ranks in the 53rd percentile with an average score of 12,870, comparable to older discrete GPUs like the Radeon RX 580.

The combined percentile of 74 places this system above most laptops overall, but the performance profile is heavily skewed toward CPU compute. The 55 W CPU TDP and 45 W GPU TDP indicate a balanced thermal envelope for a laptop, though the GPU’s entry-level specifications mean gaming performance is minimal. This platform is best suited for users who need flagship multi-core performance in portable form and do not require discrete graphics. The absence of measured FPS data reinforces that this is not a gaming-focused configuration.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX + AMD Radeon 740M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds