SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

65,914 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

This desktop pairing combines AMD's flagship 16-core Zen 4 processor with NVIDIA's entry-level Ampere-based GPU, creating a stark performance asymmetry. The CPU sits in the 93rd percentile among all processors, while the GPU languishes in the 18th percentile — a 75-point gap that defines every workload discussion. The combined percentile of 56 reflects this imbalance, with the processor capable of far more than the graphics card can feed or display.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data presents an unusual bottleneck profile. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D, with its 16 cores and 32 threads, produces a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,291 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 22,363. These numbers place it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly 93% of processors in the database. The RTX 4010, by contrast, scores 2,893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, landing in the 18th percentile — below 82% of all GPUs.

In gaming workloads, the GPU is unambiguously the limiting component. The RTX 4010's 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus delivers 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth, a figure that will constrain texture streaming and high-resolution rendering. The CPU's 3DMark scores — 13,180 at 16 threads and 14,252 at max threads — suggest ample headroom for frame generation, physics, and game logic. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

For CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and encryption, the bottleneck reverses. The GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput becomes irrelevant, and the processor's Passmark multi-thread score of 62,383 dominates. The Passmark data compression score of 784,993 and encryption score of 47,100 indicate workloads where the GPU sits idle while the CPU crunches data. In mixed workloads — streaming while gaming, for instance — the CPU handles encoding with headroom while the GPU struggles to maintain frame rates.

The 120W TDP of the CPU versus the 50W TDP of the GPU further illustrates the mismatch. The processor draws more than twice the power of the graphics card, yet the GPU's 250W suggested PSU recommendation indicates the system overall remains modest. The single-thread performance gap — CPU at 2,053 in Cinebench R23 single-core versus the GPU's lack of any single-thread metric — shows where the bottleneck shifts depending on workload type.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 65,914, which is 0.3% below the Intel Core 9 273PQE (66,099), 0.4% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (66,159), 1.2% above the AMD EPYC 9124 (65,104), and 1.4% below the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus (66,855).

Q: What is the RTX 4010's performance position relative to other GPUs?

A: The RTX 4010 scores 2,893 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. It trails the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB by 0.5%, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF by 0.6%, the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB by 0.7%, and the Quadro P600 by 1%.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have, and what is its architecture?

A: The Ryzen 9 7950X3D features 128 MB of shared L3 cache, including a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice. It is built on Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 17,840 million transistors across two 71 mm² dies.

Q: What memory does this build support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

Q: Is the GPU's memory capacity sufficient for modern gaming?

A: The RTX 4010 has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus. Given its 18th percentile GPU ranking and the CPU's 93rd percentile position, the memory capacity will likely limit texture quality and resolution in newer titles, though it may suffice for esports and older games.

Q: What are the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread benchmark scores?

A: The CPU scores 2,053 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 36,291 in multi-core. Geekbench single-core is 2,548 and multi-core is 22,363. Passmark single-thread is 4,146 and multi-thread is 62,383.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7950X3D includes Radeon Graphics as integrated graphics. This could provide a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed or fails.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores — the CPU's 93rd percentile and the GPU's 18th percentile. The RTX 4010's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,893, nearly identical to the RTX 4060 Ti's 2,907-2,913 range, suggests the GPU will perform at entry-level 1080p standards.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth will be the primary constraint. Esports titles with light graphics demands might achieve playable frame rates, but the 18th percentile GPU ranking indicates most modern AAA games will require medium or low settings to maintain smooth gameplay. The CPU's single-thread score of 2,053 in Cinebench R23 ensures no CPU-side frame pacing issues, but the GPU will bottleneck at roughly the same level as the RTX 4060 Ti class — which the nearest rival deltas of -0.5% to -1% confirm.

At 1440p, the memory bandwidth limitation becomes more pronounced. The 64-bit bus and 4 GB capacity will likely force texture quality reductions. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,641 and 16-thread score of 13,180 indicate it can handle game logic and physics at high thread counts, but the GPU cannot translate that into high-resolution frame rates.

At 4K, this pairing is not viable for modern gaming. The GPU's 18th percentile position and 4 GB VRAM will exceed capacity in most titles. The CPU's 128 MB L3 cache provides no benefit to GPU-bound rendering. Users seeking 4K should look at the GPU's nearest rivals with higher scores — though even those sit near the same performance tier.

The overall gaming picture: the CPU is overkill for the GPU, and the GPU is underpowered for the CPU's gaming potential. The bottleneck is severe and consistent across resolutions, with the GPU limiting frame rates at every setting level.

Who Should Build It

This pairing suits users whose workloads are heavily CPU-bound and who need only basic graphics acceleration. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the CPU's Passmark integer math score of 214,089 and multi-thread score of 62,383. The 16 cores and 32 threads accelerate parallel builds, while the GPU handles simple 2D and light 3D visualization.

Students in computer science or engineering fields get a workstation that excels at simulation, data analysis, and virtualization. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking means it outperforms most desktop processors in the database, while the GPU's 18th percentile is adequate for office productivity, web browsing, and document rendering.

Small business workstations handling databases, spreadsheets, and financial modeling benefit from the CPU's data compression score of 784,993 and encryption score of 47,100. The GPU provides display output without adding significant power draw — its 50W TDP keeps system thermals and electricity usage low.

Content creators working primarily with CPU-rendered output — such as audio production or code-based animation — will find the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,291 valuable. The GPU's 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles basic effects and compositing, though heavy GPU rendering is not recommended.

Gamers who target esports at 1080p with low settings may find acceptable performance, but the 18th percentile GPU ranking suggests this is not the primary use case. The CPU's gaming headroom is wasted with this GPU, making it a poor choice for gaming-focused builds.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on AMD Socket AM5 with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a 120W TDP. The 5 nm TSMC process packs 17,840 million transistors across two 71 mm² dies, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking.

The cache hierarchy is the defining feature: 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 128 MB shared L3 cache, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice. This large cache benefits gaming and data-heavy workloads by reducing memory latency. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support provides 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use.

Benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core scores 36,291, Geekbench multi-core scores 22,363, and Passmark multi-thread scores 62,383. Single-thread performance is equally strong: 2,053 in Cinebench R23, 2,548 in Geekbench, and 4,146 in Passmark. The 3DMark thread scaling — 1,062 single-thread, 2,102 at 2 threads, 4,123 at 4 threads, 7,641 at 8 threads, 13,180 at 16 threads, and 14,252 at max threads — shows near-linear scaling up to 16 threads, with diminishing returns beyond.

The CPU's 93rd percentile rank places it above the Intel Core 9 273PQE (66,099 avg score, -0.3% delta), Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus (66,159, -0.4%), AMD EPYC 9124 (65,104, +1.2%), and Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus (66,855, -1.4%). The average benchmark score of 65,914 confirms its position among high-end desktop processors.

For real workloads, the CPU excels at video encoding, 3D rendering (CPU-based), software compilation, scientific computing, and virtualization. The Passmark extended instructions score of 58,515 indicates strong SIMD performance for vectorized code. The find prime numbers score of 495 and physics score of 5,053 show moderate performance in specific workloads, while floating-point math at 130,403 and integer math at 214,089 demonstrate broad computational strength.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is an entry-level GPU based on the Ampere architecture, using the GA107 chip fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. It packs 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, with a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The card measures 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height, occupying a single slot with no power connectors required — drawing just 50W and suggesting a 250W PSU.

Memory specifications show 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, delivering 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1500 MHz with 12 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 768 shading units, 24 texture mapping units, and 16 raster operation units. It includes 6 ray tracing cores and 24 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display output comes via 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,893 places the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are strikingly close: the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB scores 2,907 (-0.5%), the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2,910 (-0.6%), the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB scores 2,913 (-0.7%), and the Quadro P600 scores 2,923 (-1%). This tight clustering indicates the RTX 4010 performs at a level nearly indistinguishable from these rivals, despite their different market positions.

The FP32 throughput of 2.706 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1 ratio), limits compute-heavy rendering tasks. Pixel rate of 28.19 GPixel/s and texture rate of 42.29 GTexel/s are modest figures. The 64-bit memory bus severely constrains bandwidth, making the GPU unsuitable for high-resolution textures or large datasets. Ray tracing cores exist but will struggle with modern RT workloads given the low compute throughput.

For rendering, the GPU is best suited to lightweight tasks: 2D compositing, basic video effects, and GPU-accelerated previews. The 24 tensor cores enable DLSS capabilities where supported, but the 4 GB VRAM limits the resolution and quality settings at which DLSS can operate effectively.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite shows a processor at the top of its class. The average benchmark score of 65,914 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 9 273PQE, scores 66,099 — just 0.3% higher. The AMD EPYC 9124 scores 65,104, which is 1.2% lower. This tight grouping around 65-67k indicates the 7950X3D sits in a competitive cluster of high-end processors.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2,893 places it in the 18th percentile — a dramatic contrast. Its nearest rivals all score within 1%: the RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB at 2,907 (-0.5%), RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF at 2,910 (-0.6%), RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB at 2,913 (-0.7%), and Quadro P600 at 2,923 (-1%). The GPU's average benchmark score equals its single 3DMark score of 2,893.

The combined picture is one of extreme asymmetry. The CPU outperforms 93% of processors while the GPU outperforms only 18% of GPUs. The combined percentile of 56 reflects a system that is, on average, mid-pack — but this average masks the true nature of the pairing. CPU-bound tasks will perform at the 93rd percentile level, while GPU-bound tasks will perform at the 18th percentile level. The system's effective performance depends entirely on which component is the bottleneck for a given workload.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X3D — a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 processor on Socket AM5 — with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4010, an entry-level Ampere GPU based on the GA107 chip. The CPU's 93rd percentile rank and the GPU's 18th percentile rank place this pairing in the 56th combined percentile, indicating a mid-tier overall system driven by an extremely strong processor.

The CPU's 128 MB L3 cache, 5.70 GHz boost clock, and 120W TDP make it a top-tier desktop processor. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR6 memory, 64-bit bus, and 50W TDP make it a low-power entry-level card. The launch MSRP for the CPU was $699; the GPU has no listed launch MSRP.

This pairing is classed as a desktop build, suitable for stationary workstations and gaming systems. The tier from the combined percentile (56) suggests an average system, but the distribution is heavily skewed: users will experience either exceptional CPU performance or limited GPU performance, rarely both simultaneously.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: Not recommended. The GPU's 18th percentile rank and 4 GB VRAM will cap frame rates well below what the CPU's 93rd percentile can support. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,641 ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU's 2.893 Steel Nomad score limits 1080p performance to low-to-medium settings in modern titles.

Streaming: Viable with CPU-based encoding. The 16-core processor handles game logic and encoding simultaneously, with Passmark multi-thread score of 62,383 providing ample headroom. The GPU's modest 50W TDP keeps total system power low, reducing heat and noise during long streaming sessions.

Video editing: Mixed results. CPU-heavy tasks like rendering timelines and encoding exports benefit from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 36,291. GPU-accelerated effects and preview rendering will be limited by the 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM, potentially causing slowdowns with complex projects.

3D rendering: CPU rendering is excellent — the Geekbench multi-core score of 22,363 handles complex scenes efficiently. GPU rendering with the RTX 4010 is not advisable; the 64-bit memory bus and 18th percentile rank will cause long render times. The 24 tensor cores provide some RT acceleration, but the 4 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: Strong choice. The CPU's Passmark integer math score of 214,089 accelerates compilation, and the 128 MB L3 cache speeds up repeated builds. The GPU handles IDE rendering and browser acceleration without issue. The 93rd percentile CPU rank means fast build times for most projects.

Student and office work: Overkill for basic tasks, but the system is efficient. The CPU's 120W TDP and GPU's 50W TDP keep power draw low during light use. The Passmark data compression score of 784,993 speeds up file archives, while the GPU's 4 GB VRAM handles multiple 4K displays via the 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The ECC memory support adds stability for long-running calculations.