SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D

65,914 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing of an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 presents a desktop configuration where the CPU is the dominant component in raw processing power, but the GPU will dictate the experience in graphics-bound scenarios. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 3080 rests at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. This 25-point gap in percentile ranking is the first clear indicator that the processor has substantially more compute headroom than the graphics card can fully utilize in most workloads.

The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is exceptional, with a PassMark multithread score of 62,383 and a Cinebench R23 multicore result of 36,291. These figures place it in the top tier of desktop processors, outpacing its nearest rivals by narrow margins: it trails the Intel Core 9 273PQE by just 0.3% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus by 0.4%, while leading the AMD EPYC 9124 by 1.2%. The 16-core, 32-thread configuration with a 5.70 GHz boost clock ensures that CPU-bound tasks such as compilation, rendering, and scientific computing will rarely encounter a bottleneck from the processor side.

The RTX 3080, by contrast, delivers a PassMark G3D score of 25,086 and an average benchmark score of 23,172. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA P106-100 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, both of which it edges out by 0.3%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M, which it leads by 0.4%. These deltaPct values are remarkably tight, suggesting that the RTX 3080 sits in a crowded performance band where small architectural differences translate into negligible real-world gains. For gaming, this means the GPU will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions where pixel throughput becomes the primary constraint.

The balance of this system leans heavily toward CPU-bound productivity. The 3DMark thread scaling scores tell a clear story: single-thread score of 1,062, 2-thread score of 2,102, 4-thread score of 4,123, 8-thread score of 7,641, 16-thread score of 13,180, and max-thread score of 14,252. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads is nearly linear (from 7,641 to 13,180, a 72% increase), and from 16 to max threads the gain is 8.1%. This indicates the Zen 4 architecture scales efficiently across all 32 threads, making the CPU exceptionally well-suited for parallel workloads. The GPU, however, with 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth, will cap performance in memory-intensive graphics tasks where VRAM capacity becomes the decisive factor.

Benchmark Performance

The combined benchmark picture for this desktop build places it at the 81st percentile overall, a strong showing that reflects the CPU’s dominance in the pairing. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D achieves an average benchmark score of 65,914, while the RTX 3080 averages 23,172. The CPU’s score is 2.8 times higher than the GPU’s, quantifying the imbalance: this is a processor-first build where the graphics card is a capable but secondary component.

The CPU’s benchmark suite is comprehensive. In Cinebench R23, it scores 36,291 multicore and 2,053 single-core. The multicore result is particularly telling when compared to the single-core figure: the ratio of 17.7:1 demonstrates that the 16-core configuration delivers near-optimal scaling for threaded workloads. The Geekbench results reinforce this, with 22,363 multicore and 2,548 single-core. PassMark scores further detail the CPU’s strengths: integer math at 214,089, floating-point math at 130,403, data compression at 784,993, and data encryption at 47,100. The extended instructions score of 58,515 indicates strong AVX-512-class performance, which benefits scientific and engineering applications.

The GPU’s benchmark results are more modest. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 reflects modern rasterization performance, while Geekbench OpenCL at 152,423 and Vulkan at 33,620 show compute capability. PassMark DirectX 12 scores 100, DirectX 11 scores 207, and DirectX 10 scores 170, with DirectX 9 at 258 — these legacy API scores are less relevant for modern workloads but show the card’s backward compatibility. The GPU compute score of 14,397 in PassMark indicates that while the RTX 3080 is competent for compute tasks, it is not in the same league as the CPU for general-purpose parallel processing.

The nearest rival comparisons for the CPU show a tightly clustered field. The Intel Core 9 273PQE averages 66,099 (0.3% ahead), the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus averages 66,159 (0.4% ahead), and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus averages 66,855 (1.4% ahead). Only the AMD EPYC 9124 trails, at 65,104 (1.2% behind). For the GPU, the rival field is even tighter: the NVIDIA P106-100 averages 23,249 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 averages 23,250 (0.3% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M averages 23,273 (0.4% ahead). These sub-1% deltas for the GPU mean that in a head-to-head comparison, the RTX 3080 is effectively indistinguishable from these rivals in aggregate benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process node with 17,840 million transistors across a dual-die design measuring 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 4.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 120 W. The 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice, is a defining feature that gives this chip a significant advantage in cache-sensitive workloads.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of shared L3. The 3D V-Cache technology stacks an additional 64 MB slice on top of the standard cache, bringing total L3 to 128 MB. This large cache footprint directly benefits gaming and database workloads where working sets exceed typical cache sizes. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, along with ECC support for error-correcting applications.

The benchmark scores reflect the architecture’s strengths. The 3DMark max-thread score of 14,252 versus the 16-thread score of 13,180 shows that all 32 threads are being utilized effectively. The PassMark physics score of 5,053 and find prime numbers score of 495 are representative of the integer-heavy workloads that the Zen 4 cores handle efficiently. The single-thread performance, measured at 1,062 in 3DMark, 326 in Cinebench R15, 2,053 in Cinebench R23, and 2,548 in Geekbench, is competitive with the best desktop processors, ensuring that lightly-threaded applications still perform well.

For real-world workloads, this CPU excels in scenarios that demand parallel execution. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,291 places it at the top of the desktop hierarchy, and the Geekbench multicore score of 22,363 confirms this position. The PassMark multithread score of 62,383 is particularly strong for content creation tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The data compression score of 784,993 indicates excellent performance for archival and database operations, while the random string sorting score of 92,784 supports text-processing and data-manipulation tasks.

The CPU’s closest rivals in the benchmark database all sit within a 2% performance band. The Intel Core 9 273PQE and Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus are marginally faster, while the AMD EPYC 9124 is slightly slower. This indicates that the 7950X3D is not the absolute fastest CPU in the database, but it is firmly in the top tier, and the 3D V-Cache provides unique advantages that the rivals do not offer.

Who Should Build It

This desktop build targets users who prioritize CPU throughput over GPU performance. The 93rd percentile CPU ranking versus the 68th percentile GPU ranking makes this clear: the processor is the star of this configuration. Gamers playing at 1080p or 1440p will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread scores and large cache, which can improve frame pacing and minimum frame rates in CPU-bound titles. However, at 4K resolution, the RTX 3080’s 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth will become the limiting factor, and the CPU advantage will be less apparent.

Content creators and software developers are the primary beneficiaries of this pairing. The 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with the 128 MB L3 cache, handle video editing, 3D rendering, code compilation, and scientific simulations with ease. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,291 and PassMark multithread score of 62,383 indicate that rendering tasks will complete quickly, and the data encryption score of 47,100 shows strong performance for security-focused workloads.

Students and researchers in engineering, data science, or computational fields will find the CPU’s floating-point math score of 130,403 and extended instructions score of 58,515 valuable for numerical simulations and machine learning training on CPU. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations where data integrity is critical. Small business workstations that handle database management, virtualization, or financial modeling will benefit from the data compression score of 784,993 and the integer math score of 214,089.

The GPU, while not the primary focus, still provides solid graphics performance. The RTX 3080’s 68th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 25,086 mean it can handle modern games at high settings and support GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender or Premiere Pro. The 10 GB of GDDR6X memory is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, and the 272 tensor cores and 68 RT cores enable DLSS and ray tracing features, albeit with the VRAM constraints at higher resolutions.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative expectations rather than verified results.

Based on the RTX 3080’s benchmark performance, which includes a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and a PassMark G3D score of 25,086, this system is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,062 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,548, ensures that frame generation is not CPU-limited in most games. The large 128 MB L3 cache is particularly beneficial for open-world games and simulations that frequently access large datasets.

At 1080p, the combination of the CPU’s high boost clock and the GPU’s 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should deliver high frame rates in competitive shooters and esports titles. The 10 GB VRAM is adequate for this resolution, and the 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth prevents texture streaming bottlenecks. At 1440p, the GPU becomes more stressed, but the 68th percentile ranking suggests it can still achieve playable frame rates at high settings in most games, with the CPU providing consistent frame pacing.

At 4K, the RTX 3080’s 10 GB VRAM becomes a limiting factor, especially in texture-heavy titles. The 320-bit memory bus and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth help mitigate this, but the capacity is a hard constraint. The CPU’s performance advantage becomes largely irrelevant at this resolution, as the GPU is fully saturated. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 indicates that the card is better suited to 1440p than 4K for demanding titles.

Ray tracing performance, supported by 68 RT cores, will be acceptable at 1080p and 1440p, but the VRAM capacity may force lower texture settings when ray tracing is enabled. DLSS, leveraging the 272 tensor cores, can offset some of the performance cost, but the 10 GB VRAM limits the effective resolution at which this feature can be used comfortably.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA102 chip, manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process node. It contains 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die, with a transistor density of 45.1M per mm². The card features 8,704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. The base clock is 1,440 MHz with a boost clock of 1,710 MHz, and the memory operates at 1,188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective on GDDR6X.

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus, providing 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration delivers a pixel rate of 164.2 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 465.1 GTexel/s, with FP32 compute at 29.77 TFLOPS and FP16 at 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The card includes 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS.

The benchmark scores for the RTX 3080 place it at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average score of 23,172. The PassMark G3D score of 25,086 is the primary gaming indicator, while the GPU compute score of 14,397 shows its capability for non-graphics compute tasks. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423 and Vulkan score of 33,620 provide additional context for compute performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 is a modern rasterization benchmark that reflects current game demands.

The card’s nearest rivals — the NVIDIA P106-100, AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16, and AMD Radeon RX 6600M — all score within 0.4% of the RTX 3080 in aggregate benchmarks. This tight clustering indicates that the RTX 3080 is not a performance outlier in its class, but rather a solid mid-to-high-tier GPU that holds its own against contemporary alternatives. For rendering workloads, the 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is sufficient for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications like Blender, though the 10 GB VRAM may limit scene complexity.

The TDP is rated at 320 W with a suggested PSU of 700 W. The card is dual-slot with a length of 285 mm (11.2 inches), height of 112 mm (4.4 inches), and width of 40 mm (1.6 inches). It uses a single 12-pin power connector and offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The production status is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, but the card remains relevant for 1080p and 1440p gaming.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop build is 81, indicating it outperforms 81% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the benchmark database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The CPU scores 65,914 on average, trailing the Intel Core 9 273PQE by 0.3% and the Intel Core Ultra 5 250KF Plus by 0.4%, while leading the AMD EPYC 9124 by 1.2% and trailing the Intel Core Ultra 5 250K Plus by 1.4%.

Q: What are the RTX 3080’s closest GPU rivals and how close are they?

A: The GPU’s nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100 (0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (0.3% ahead), AMD Radeon RX 6600M (0.4% ahead), and AMD Radeon R9 M290X (0.4% ahead), all within a sub-1% performance band.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have and what is the 3D V-Cache configuration?

A: The CPU has 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice that stacks additional cache on the Zen 4 die.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3080 features 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus with 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 1,188 MHz (19 Gbps effective).

Q: Is measured FPS data available for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, along with ECC memory support.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 processor with a 5.70 GHz boost clock and 128 MB of L3 cache, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with 10 GB of GDDR6X memory and 8,704 shading units. The combined percentile ranking is 81, placing this system in the upper quintile of all builds in the database.

The overall tier of this pairing is defined by the CPU’s 93rd percentile ranking, which is the dominant factor. The GPU’s 68th percentile ranking is respectable but clearly secondary. This is a build where the processor outshines the graphics card, making it ideal for CPU-intensive workloads rather than pure gaming at maximum settings. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 65,914 is nearly three times the GPU’s 23,172, underscoring the performance disparity.

The build class is desktop, meaning it is intended for stationary use with standard form-factor components. The CPU is from the 7000 series with the Raphael codename, while the GPU is from the GeForce 30-series with the GA102 chip. Both components are from their respective manufacturers’ mainstream desktop lineups, with the CPU still in active production and the GPU marked as end-of-life.

The pairRankByFps is null, indicating that no measured FPS data exists for this combination. This means performance expectations must be derived from the individual component benchmarks and their percentiles. The CPU’s strength in multi-threaded workloads and the GPU’s solid but not exceptional graphics performance combine to create a system that excels in productivity and content creation, with good but not class-leading gaming capability.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7950X3D uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports the current generation of Ryzen processors. The CPU has PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes available from the CPU, providing high-bandwidth connectivity for modern GPUs and NVMe storage. The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC capability for error-sensitive workloads. The CPU’s TDP is 120 W, which is modest for a 16-core processor and allows for a range of air and liquid coolers.

The RTX 3080 uses PCIe 4.0 x16 for its bus interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU has a TDP of 320 W, and the suggested PSU is 700 W. This leaves headroom for additional components, though the 12-pin power connector requires an adapter for standard PSUs. The GPU’s dimensions — 285 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width — mean it will fit in most mid-tower cases, but clearance should be verified.

A sensible next upgrade for this system would be to replace the GPU with a newer model that offers higher VRAM capacity and better ray tracing performance. The CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support ensures that any modern GPU will be fully utilized. The 120 W CPU TDP and 320 W GPU TDP together suggest that the 700 W PSU is adequate, but a higher-wattage unit would provide more headroom for overclocking or additional drives.

The CPU’s unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the 3D V-Cache design may have specific thermal considerations. The DDR5 memory support means that faster memory kits can improve performance in memory-sensitive workloads. The ECC memory support is a unique feature that appeals to users running long-duration computations where data integrity is paramount. The platform’s longevity is supported by the AM5 socket, which is expected to support future Ryzen generations, making the motherboard a long-term investment.