SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

69,515 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

41,187 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti form a high-end desktop pairing that combines a 16-core Zen 4 flagship with an Ampere-based enthusiast GPU. The benchmark data indicates this is a formidable combination for both productivity and high-resolution gaming, though the absence of measured FPS data requires careful inference from synthetic scores to understand its gaming capabilities.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture using an 8 nm process at Samsung, with a GA102 chip containing 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1365 MHz and a boost clock of 1665 MHz, while its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory runs at an effective 19 Gbps across a 384-bit bus interface, yielding a substantial memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s. This memory configuration provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures and complex scenes in modern rendering workloads.

The GPU’s compute configuration is substantial: 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It also includes 80 dedicated RT cores and 320 tensor cores, which are essential for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS-based upscaling respectively. The pixel rate is rated at 186.5 GPixel/s, and the texture rate reaches 532.8 GTexel/s. Raw FP32 compute is listed at 34.10 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance matching at 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) — a figure that indicates the card handles both single-precision and half-precision workloads at identical throughput, benefiting certain compute tasks.

In benchmark results, the RTX 3080 Ti scores 5077 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which represents a modern DirectX 12 rasterization test. Its Geekbench scores are 170,037 in OpenCL and 192,697 in Vulkan, showing strong cross-API compute performance. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 26896, a G2D score of 1091, and a GPU compute score of 15282. The DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 PassMark scores are 274, 184, 223, and 110 respectively. The GPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 41187. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, scores 40870 (0.8% lower), while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 40377 (2% lower), placing the RTX 3080 Ti ahead of both. The NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB scores 41707 (1.2% higher) and the Tesla M40 scores 41897 (1.7% higher), though those are compute-oriented data center parts rather than direct gaming competitors.

For rendering workloads, the 12 GB VRAM combined with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth ensures that complex 3D scenes with high-resolution textures remain resident in GPU memory without spilling to system RAM. The 80 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, and the 320 tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising and DLSS, which can significantly improve frame rates in ray-traced titles. The 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is well-suited for GPU-accelerated rendering in applications that leverage CUDA or OpenCL, and the 1:1 FP16 ratio further aids in mixed-precision workloads.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 89, indicating that this system outperforms 89% of all tracked desktop configurations. The CPU, the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, holds a 94th percentile position among all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 69515. The GPU, the RTX 3080 Ti, holds an 83rd percentile position among all GPUs with an average score of 41187. Together, these components place the system in the upper echelon of desktop performance, with the CPU being notably stronger relative to its peers than the GPU.

The CPU’s multi-threaded scores are particularly impressive. In Cinebench R23, the 7950X achieves a multicore score of 36523 and a singlecore score of 2000. Geekbench results show 22415 for multicore and 2613 for singlecore. The 3DMark thread tests reveal scaling: 1099 for single-thread, 2161 for 2-threads, 4218 for 4-threads, 7920 for 8-threads, 14110 for 16-threads, and 15579 for max threads. This scaling pattern indicates near-linear performance growth up to 16 threads, with a modest gain beyond that, reflecting the 16-core/32-thread configuration.

The GPU’s synthetic scores are more modest relative to the CPU’s dominance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 places it in the upper-mid range of modern GPUs, while its PassMark G3D score of 26896 is solid but not class-leading. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 192697 is strong, suggesting good driver overhead characteristics. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-6% performer, while the GPU is a top-17% performer — the CPU has more headroom than the GPU in this pairing, which matters for games and applications that scale with core count.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, containing 13,140 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with a die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 4.50 GHz, boosting up to 5.70 GHz, and the CPU has a TDP of 170 W. It supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a theoretical memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), and it includes integrated Radeon Graphics, making it a versatile desktop platform.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool is particularly beneficial for workloads that exhibit data locality across multiple cores, such as game physics, database queries, and compilation tasks. The CPU is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and it was released on September 26, 2022, with a launch MSRP of $699.

Benchmark results confirm its multi-threaded prowess. In Cinebench R15, it scores 5947.5 multicore and 315.5 singlecore. PassMark results show a multithread score of 62478, with single-thread at 4266. Specific workload tests in PassMark highlight its strengths: data compression scores 835923, data encryption scores 49336, extended instructions score 62131, floating point math scores 138004, integer math scores 225603, physics scores 3102, and random string sorting scores 98501. The find prime numbers test scores 337, which is a lower score reflecting the nature of that specific test.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the 7950X is extremely competitive. The Intel Core i7-14700K has an average score of 69355, which is 0.2% lower. The AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69288 (0.3% lower), while the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 (0.5% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996 (0.7% higher). These small deltas indicate that the 7950X is right at the top of the desktop CPU performance tier, with only marginal differences separating it from its closest competitors.

For real workloads, the 16 cores and 32 threads handle heavily parallel tasks with ease. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 suggests strong performance in 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation. The high single-thread score of 2000 in Cinebench R23 and 2613 in Geekbench indicates that it also excels in lightly threaded tasks like gaming and general desktop responsiveness. The PassMark data encryption and compression scores are indicative of strong performance in archival and security-related workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The percentile gap between the CPU (94th) and GPU (83rd) is 11 points, which indicates a system where the CPU has more relative headroom than the GPU. In gaming scenarios, this typically means the RTX 3080 Ti will be the limiting factor at higher resolutions and graphical settings, while the Ryzen 9 7950X will be able to feed frames quickly enough at lower resolutions and competitive settings. The 3DMark thread scaling shows the CPU reaches 14110 at 16 threads and 15579 at max threads, indicating that it can handle up to 16 threads with near-perfect scaling and gains an additional 10% beyond that. This suggests that in games that utilize 8 or fewer threads, the CPU has significant reserve capacity.

The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 is a modern rasterization benchmark, and its PassMark G3D score of 26896 places it in the 83rd percentile. In GPU-bound scenarios, such as 4K gaming with ultra settings, the RTX 3080 Ti will be the primary constraint. Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios, such as 1080p gaming with a high refresh rate monitor or in simulation games with heavy physics, the Ryzen 9 7950X is unlikely to be the bottleneck given its 94th percentile ranking and strong single-thread performance.

The memory bandwidth of the CPU (83.2 GB/s for dual-channel DDR5) is significantly lower than the GPU’s 912.4 GB/s, but this is expected since they serve different roles. For gaming, the GPU’s memory bandwidth is the critical figure, and 912.4 GB/s is ample for high-resolution textures. For productivity, the CPU’s memory bandwidth is adequate for most workloads, though it may be a limiting factor in memory-bandwidth-sensitive tasks like certain scientific simulations.

The combined percentile of 89 suggests that the system is well-balanced overall, with the CPU being the stronger component relative to its peers. In practical terms, this means that for most gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor at 1440p and 4K with high settings, while the CPU will have headroom for background tasks, streaming, and multitasking without impacting frame rates. For productivity workloads that are heavily multi-threaded, the CPU will be the dominant contributor, and the GPU will provide acceleration for GPU-compute tasks.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 3080 Ti’s 83rd percentile ranking and 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 compute provide sufficient raw power for high-refresh 1440p gaming. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1099 and Geekbench singlecore score of 2613 ensure that frame times remain consistent in CPU-light scenarios. However, without measured FPS data, expect the GPU to be the primary limiter at 1440p with ultra settings, potentially falling short of 240 Hz in demanding titles.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 7950X’s 16 cores and 32 threads, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523, provide ample headroom for software encoding via x264 while gaming simultaneously. The GPU’s NVENC encoder (not benchmarked here, but implied by the tensor cores) can offload encoding tasks, and the 320 tensor cores can assist with AI-based enhancements. The high PassMark multithread score of 62478 indicates the CPU can handle the encoding workload without starving game threads.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU’s PassMark floating point math score of 138004 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 170037 indicates strong performance in video encoding and effects rendering. The 12 GB VRAM on the GPU is sufficient for 4K timelines with multiple effects layers, and the 912.4 GB/s bandwidth allows for fast GPU-side processing. Export times will be heavily accelerated by the CPU’s 32 threads.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36523 is a strong indicator of CPU-based rendering performance in applications like Blender (Cycles) or V-Ray. The GPU’s 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 80 RT cores accelerate GPU-based renderers and ray tracing workloads. The system is well-suited for both CPU and GPU rendering pipelines, with the CPU being the stronger component.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 835923 and integer math score of 225603 indicate fast compilation and archiving. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with large codebases and frequent rebuilds. The 94th percentile CPU ranking means developers will see minimal wait times for builds, and the 32 threads allow for parallel compilation across multiple projects.

Student and office work: This configuration is excessively powerful for typical office tasks, but the high single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 4266) ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsers and document editors. The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU provide a fallback for basic display output, though the discrete GPU is always available. This is a workstation-class setup that will handle any office workload without breaking a sweat.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets enthusiasts and professionals who need top-tier CPU performance without sacrificing GPU capability. Gamers at 1440p or 4K who prioritize high settings and ray tracing will find the RTX 3080 Ti’s 83rd percentile ranking and 80 RT cores beneficial, while the CPU’s 94th percentile ensures no frame pacing issues. Content creators working with video, 3D rendering, or large data sets will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores (Cinebench R23 multicore 36523) and the GPU’s compute capabilities (Geekbench OpenCL 170037).

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 225603 and data compression score of 835923. Students in engineering or computer science fields who run simulations or compile frequently will find the 32 threads useful. Small business workstations handling data analysis, virtualization, or CAD will benefit from the ECC memory support and 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for expansion.

The build is less suited for budget-conscious buyers or those who only game at 1080p, as the CPU’s power and cost are better utilized in productivity tasks. However, for a high-end desktop that excels at both gaming and professional workloads, this pairing is well-justified by the benchmark scores.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this desktop configuration is 89, meaning it outperforms 89% of all tracked desktop builds.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7950X compare to the Intel Core i7-14700K in average benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 9 7950X has an average benchmark score of 69515, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700K’s score of 69355.

Q: Does the RTX 3080 Ti support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 80 dedicated RT cores based on the Ampere architecture, which accelerate ray tracing workloads in supported games and applications.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the RTX 3080 Ti?

A: The GPU has a memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, provided by 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus.

Q: What is the boost clock of the Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The boost clock is 5.70 GHz, with a base clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: How does the GPU’s PassMark G3D score compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti scores 26896 in PassMark G3D, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870 on average (0.8% lower than the RTX 3080 Ti’s overall average, though this is a different metric).

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data available for this specific pairing in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built on AMD Socket AM5, which supports the Ryzen 9 7950X. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the motherboard should provide PCIe Gen 5 lanes (24 lanes from the CPU) for expansion cards and storage. The CPU’s TDP is 170 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 350 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 750 W. This suggests that a quality 750 W power supply is the minimum for this configuration, with some headroom for overclocking or additional components.

The GPU uses a 1x 12-pin power connector and is a dual-slot design measuring 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. It has a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is backward compatible with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 support. The GPU is marked as end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, so a sensible future upgrade would be to a newer-generation GPU that maintains or exceeds the current performance level.

For the CPU, the AM5 socket is the current platform, and future upgrades would involve newer Ryzen processors on the same socket, provided BIOS support is available. The 94th percentile CPU performance means that an upgrade would only yield marginal gains, so users should prioritize GPU upgrades first. The 12 GB VRAM on the current GPU may become a limitation for very high-resolution textures, so a future GPU with more VRAM would be a logical path.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build featuring the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. The CPU is a 16-core/32-thread Zen 4 processor with a 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card with an 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs. The combined percentile is 89, placing this system in the upper tier of desktop performance. The CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers, making this a productivity-first build that also delivers strong gaming performance.

The Ryzen 9 7950X is a flagship desktop processor with a 170 W TDP, while the RTX 3080 Ti is an enthusiast-tier GPU with a 350 W TDP. The pairing is well-suited for high-end gaming at 1440p and 4K, as well as demanding professional workloads like 3D rendering, video editing, and software development. The system represents a balanced high-end configuration, with the CPU offering more headroom than the GPU in terms of relative performance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

There is no measured FPS data available for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The RTX 3080 Ti’s PassMark G3D score of 26896 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5077 indicate strong rasterization performance for 1440p and 4K gaming. Its 12 GB VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-resolution textures, and the 80 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the Ryzen 9 7950X’s strong single-thread performance (Geekbench singlecore 2613) will likely prevent CPU bottlenecks, and the GPU should deliver high frame rates in most titles. At 1440p, the GPU will be the limiting factor, but its 83rd percentile ranking suggests solid performance in demanding games. At 4K, expect the GPU to be the clear bottleneck, with frame rates depending heavily on the game’s optimization and whether ray tracing is enabled. These are estimates and should be treated as such, as no empirical FPS data exists for this pairing.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds