SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7950X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X

69,515 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

23,172 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X is a 16-core, 32-thread desktop processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, with the die consisting of 13,140 million transistors across two 71 mm² chiplets. The processor carries a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, with a TDP of 170 W. Cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

Benchmark data places this CPU in the 94th percentile among all tested CPUs, which indicates a top-tier position in overall processing capability. The average benchmark score across all tests is 69,515. This positions it in direct competition with the Intel Core i7-14700K, which has an average score of 69,355 — a difference of only 0.2 percent in favor of the AMD part. The nearest rivals also include the AMD EPYC 9115 (69,288, 0.3 percent behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69,875, 0.5 percent ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69,996, 0.7 percent ahead). The data suggests that the 7950X is effectively at parity with the best current desktop and mobile offerings, with performance differences that fall within measurement noise for most applications.

Single-thread performance is strong, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,099 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,000. The Geekbench single-core score is 2,613, and PassMark single-thread is 4,266. These numbers indicate that the 7950X handles lightly threaded workloads such as everyday desktop responsiveness, web browsing, and legacy applications with a high level of competence. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,161 and 4-thread score of 4,218 show good scaling for moderately threaded tasks.

Multi-threaded performance is where this processor excels. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,523 and the 3DMark max-threads score of 15,579 reflect strong scaling across all 32 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 62,478 confirms this. The Geekbench multicore result of 22,415 is similarly robust. In productivity-oriented workloads, the PassMark integer math score of 225,603, floating-point math score of 138,004, and extended instructions score of 62,131 indicate that the processor is well suited for scientific computing, financial modeling, and code compilation, where many threads are available and heavily utilized.

The memory subsystem is equally important. The 7950X supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is supported, which is an advantage for workstation builds where data integrity is important. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, which means that current and future high-bandwidth storage and GPU options will not be constrained by the bus. The integrated Radeon Graphics engine is present, but it is not a performance GPU; it provides basic display output for systems without a discrete graphics card.

The 3DMark 16-thread score of 14,110, 8-thread score of 7,920, and 4-thread score of 4,218 indicate a linear scaling pattern: each doubling of threads from 2 to 16 nearly doubles the score. This is an indicator of a well-balanced architecture that does not suffer from heavy inter-core contention. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 5,947.5 reinforces the multi-thread capability, as does the PassMark physics score of 3,102. Data compression and encryption workloads also show strong results: PassMark data compression of 835,923 and data encryption of 49,336 are high numbers, and random string sorting at 98,501 is also notable.

The processor has been on the market since September 2022 and remains active in production. The launch MSRP is $699. The multiplier is unlocked, which allows for manual overclocking if the user has adequate cooling. The part number is 100-000000514.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 69,515 places it at the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The closest rival, the Intel Core i7-14700K, scores 69,355, which is 0.2 percent lower. The AMD EPYC 9115 scores 69,288, 0.3 percent lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69,875, 0.5 percent higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69,996, 0.7 percent higher. The differences are minimal, meaning the 7950X is effectively in the same performance class as these rivals, with the exact ranking depending on the specific workload.

The GPU, an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, has an average benchmark score of 23,172 and sits at the 68th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100 at 23,249 (0.3 percent higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at 23,250 (0.3 percent higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at 23,273 (0.4 percent higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X at 23,276 (0.4 percent higher). The GPU's performance is mid-pack relative to the broader GPU population, but it is far behind the top-tier cards.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 81. This places the build above the majority of all desktops, but the CPU is clearly the stronger component in the pairing. The CPU is in the top 6 percent of all processors, while the GPU is in the top 32 percent. The combined percentile is not simply an average of the two; it reflects the overall performance of the system across a broad set of benchmarks.

The GPU benchmark scores show that the RTX 3080 is strongest in compute tasks: Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423, Geekbench Vulkan of 33,620, and PassMark GPU compute of 14,397. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4,407, which indicates good DirectX 12 rendering performance. The PassMark G3D score is 25,086, and the G2D score is 1,054. The DirectX 10, 11, 12, and 9 scores are 170, 207, 100, and 258 respectively.

The overall picture is of a desktop build where the CPU is a top-tier part and the GPU is a solid mid-range to upper-mid-range part. For CPU-bound workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, code compilation, or scientific simulation, the system will perform at the level of the top 6 percent of all CPUs. For GPU-bound workloads, the performance is more modest, but still within the top 32 percent of all GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The 3DMark single-thread score is 1,099, the Cinebench R23 single-core score is 2,000, the Geekbench single-core score is 2,613, and the PassMark single-thread score is 4,266.

Q: How does the 7950X compare to the Intel Core i7-14700K?

A: The 7950X has an average benchmark score of 69,515, while the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69,355. The difference is 0.2 percent in favor of the 7950X.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: Does the RTX 3080 have ray tracing and tensor cores?

A: Yes, it has 68 RT cores and 272 tensor cores.

Q: What is the GPU's memory capacity and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 3080 has 10 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 320-bit bus, delivering 760.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 170 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 W. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 700 W.

Q: What is the production status of the RTX 3080?

A: The RTX 3080 is end-of-life, having been released on 2020-08-31. Its predecessor is GeForce 20 and its successor is GeForce 40.

Who Should Build It

The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop build that targets users who need strong CPU throughput for content creation, software development, and scientific workloads, while still having enough GPU power for modern gaming at high resolutions. The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,523 and a PassMark multithread score of 62,478, make it ideal for video editing, 3D rendering, code compilation, and data analysis. The GPU's 10 GB of VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p and 4K gaming in many titles, though not at the highest settings in every case.

For content creators, the CPU's multi-thread performance is the headline. The 3DMark max-threads score of 15,579 and the PassMark integer math score of 225,603 indicate that the processor can handle complex rendering and encoding tasks without becoming a bottleneck. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 152,423 and GPU compute score of 14,397 provide additional acceleration for tasks that are offloaded to the GPU.

Software developers will find the CPU's single-thread and multi-thread performance useful for build times and running virtual machines. The PassMark data encryption score of 49,336 and data compression score of 835,923 are strong indicators for tasks involving large datasets. The 32 threads allow for heavy parallelization, and the 64 MB of L3 cache helps with working sets.

Students and small business workstations can also benefit, particularly if they run simulation, statistical analysis, or machine learning workloads. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking means it is at the top of the desktop CPU market, and the GPU, while not top-tier, is still above 68 percent of all GPUs. The combined percentile of 81 shows that this build is above the vast majority of desktop systems.

The build is less suitable for gamers who prioritize maximum frame rates at 1080p with a high refresh rate, as the GPU will likely be the limiting factor in those scenarios. It is more appropriate for users who play at 1440p or 4K, where the GPU's performance is more balanced against the CPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicate an imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU sits at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 68th percentile. This means that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU is capable of feeding data to the GPU at a rate that the GPU cannot fully utilize, especially in games where the frame rate is limited by the GPU's rendering speed.

For CPU-bound tasks, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or code compilation, the CPU will be the primary driver. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,523 and the PassMark multithread score of 62,478 indicate that these tasks will be completed quickly, and the GPU will not be a major factor. For GPU-bound tasks, such as gaming at high resolutions or GPU-based rendering, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and the PassMark G3D score of 25,086 are solid, but they are not in the top tier of GPU performance.

The FPS scaling in games will be primarily determined by the GPU. The CPU's single-thread performance is high, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,099 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,000. This means that the CPU will not be a bottleneck in most games, even at high frame rates. The GPU will be the limiting factor, especially at 4K resolution, where the GPU's 10 GB of VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for many games, but not all.

The 81st percentile of the combined build is lower than the CPU percentile of 94, which confirms that the GPU pulls the overall performance down. A more powerful GPU would raise the combined percentile, but the current GPU is still a capable part for the majority of users. The power supply headroom is also a consideration: the GPU has a TDP of 320 W and a suggested PSU of 700 W, while the CPU has a TDP of 170 W. This leaves headroom for additional components, but not for a much more power-hungry GPU without a larger PSU.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1,099, Cinebench R23 single-core 2,000) ensures that it will not bottleneck high-refresh gaming at 1080p or 1440p. The GPU, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and a PassMark G3D score of 25,086, will be the limiting factor. At 1440p, the system should achieve high frame rates in most games, but at 4K, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 760.3 GB/s bandwidth may be a constraint for the highest settings.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU with 32 threads can handle encoding and game capture simultaneously. The PassMark data compression score of 835,923 and the 3DMark max-threads score of 15,579 indicate that the CPU has enough headroom to encode video while gaming. The GPU can also assist with NVENC, but the CPU is the primary strength for this workload.

Video editing: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 36,523 and the PassMark integer math score of 225,603 will make short work of timeline scrubbing, color correction, and exporting. The GPU's OpenCL score of 152,423 can accelerate effects and transitions. The 64 MB of L3 cache is a benefit for large project files.

3D rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the 7950X's 32 threads will render scenes at a high speed, as evidenced by the 3DMark max-threads score of 15,579. In GPU-based rendering, the RTX 3080's 29.77 TFLOPS of FP32 and 68 RT cores will accelerate ray tracing, but the GPU is not as strong as the CPU, so CPU rendering may be the preferred path for final frames.

Software development: The CPU's 32 threads and high single-thread performance make it ideal for compiling large codebases. The PassMark data encryption score of 49,336 and the PassMark floating-point math score of 138,004 are useful for encryption or numerical computing. The system can run multiple VMs or containers, with 64 MB of L3 cache helping to keep working sets hot.

Student and office work: This build is overkill for basic office tasks, but the CPU's 94th percentile and the GPU's 68th percentile make it a fast machine for any workload. The integrated Radeon Graphics can be used for basic display output, but the discrete GPU will be used for any graphics acceleration. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is sufficient for multitasking.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current desktop socket for AMD. The memory support is DDR5, dual-channel, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, which means that the platform is ready for the latest storage and GPU cards.

The CPU has a TDP of 170 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 320 W with a suggested PSU of 700 W. This suggests that the power supply has enough headroom for the current components. A sensible next upgrade would be to install a more powerful GPU, such as one from the GeForce 40 series (the successor to the 30-series), which would raise the system's overall performance. The GPU is also an end-of-life product, so a newer GPU would be a natural upgrade.

The CPU is also an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible if the user has a capable cooling solution. The socket AM5 is expected to be used for several more generations of AMD processors, so a future CPU upgrade is possible without changing the motherboard.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080. The CPU is the dominant component, with a 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 69,515. The GPU has a 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 23,172. The combined percentile for the system is 81.

The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread processor with a boost clock of 5.70 GHz, a TDP of 170 W, and support for DDR5 memory. The GPU is a 10 GB GDDR6X card with a boost clock of 1710 MHz, a TDP of 320 W, and 8704 shading units. The CPU is the dominant component in this pairing, and the GPU is a solid mid-tier to upper-mid-tier card.

The launch MSRP of the CPU is $699. The GPU's launch MSRP is $699 USD. This is a high-end build, but the GPU is not the top tier, which means the system is more of a "balanced high-end" than an "extreme enthusiast" system.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 is built on the Ampere architecture, using the GA102 chip. It is manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung, with 28,300 million transistors on a 628 mm² die. The GPU has 8704 shading units, 272 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It has 68 RT cores for ray tracing and 272 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads.

The memory subsystem consists of 10 GB of GDDR6X on a 320-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) and a bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s. The base clock is 1440 MHz and the boost clock is 1710 MHz. The pixel rate is 164.2 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 465.1 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 29.77 TFLOPS, and the FP16 performance is also 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1).

The GPU sits at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23,172. The closest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100 (23,249, 0.3 percent higher), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 (23,250, 0.3 percent higher), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M (23,273, 0.4 percent higher), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X (23,276, 0.4 percent higher). The differences are minimal, meaning that the RTX 3080 is within a small margin of these cards.

In compute workloads, the GPU is strong. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 152,423, the Geekbench Vulkan score is 33,620, and the PassMark GPU compute score is 14,397. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4,407, which is a measure of DirectX 12 gaming performance. The PassMark G3D score is 25,086, and the G2D score is 1,054.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The power connectors are 1x 12-pin, and the suggested PSU is 700 W. The card is dual-slot and measures 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

The RTX 3080 is an end-of-life product, having been released on 2020-08-31. Its predecessor is the GeForce 20 series, and its successor is the GeForce 40 series. This means that it is still a capable GPU, but it is not the latest generation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 pairing. Therefore, all FPS figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as such.

The CPU's single-thread performance is high, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,099 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,000. This suggests that the CPU will not be a bottleneck in games, even at high frame rates. The GPU's performance, as measured by the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,407 and the PassMark G3D score of 25,086, indicates that it can handle games at 1440p with high settings, but may struggle at 4K with the highest settings in the most demanding titles.

At 1080p, the CPU is likely to be the bottleneck in some games, but the GPU will still deliver high frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU will be more of a limiting factor, and at 4K, the GPU will be the primary constraint. The 10 GB of VRAM is sufficient for most games at 1440p, but may be a limitation for 4K textures or games with very large texture packs. The bandwidth of 760.3 GB/s is high, which helps at higher resolutions.

The combined percentile of 81 indicates that the system is above average for gaming, but it is not a top-tier gaming rig. The CPU is strong enough for any game, and the GPU is strong enough for most games, but the GPU is the component that will determine the maximum settings and resolution.