SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

59,641 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (Dragon Range codename) and fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It pairs with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, a Turing-architecture professional laptop GPU with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. This combination targets high-end laptops where CPU multi-threading and GPU compute matter equally. The CPU carries 128 MB of shared L3 cache, including a 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice, which is a key differentiator for latency-sensitive workloads. The GPU, while older in architecture, provides professional-grade features and a wide memory bus. This analysis uses only the FACT PACK data; no measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates are estimates derived from benchmark scores and percentile positions.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor with a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its TDP is 55 W, which is modest for a chip with this core count, but the 5 nm process from TSMC helps keep power in check. The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory support is present, which is unusual for a mobile part and benefits data-integrity workloads. The PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, enabling fast connectivity for storage and GPU expansion.

The cache hierarchy is where this chip stands out. Each core gets 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2, but the shared L3 is 128 MB, with a 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice. This massive L3 pool reduces memory latency and improves hit rates for data-heavy applications. In benchmark terms, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32782 and a single-core score of 1935. The Geekbench multi-core score is 16758, with a single-core score of 2769. For context on threading, the 3DMark 16-thread score is 12459, while the max-thread score is 12936, indicating that scaling beyond 16 threads yields diminishing returns—likely due to the 16-core limit. The single-thread 3DMark score is 1071, which is lower than some desktop rivals but acceptable for a mobile chip.

PassMark results show a multi-thread score of 57476 and a single-thread score of 4050. Integer math scores 201217, floating-point math scores 121619, and data compression hits 699988. These numbers indicate strong performance in scientific computing, encryption (data encryption score of 42367), and compression tasks. The extended instructions score of 52310 suggests robust AVX-512 or similar vector processing capabilities. The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 92, meaning it outperforms 92% of all processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 59641.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-14900F (average score 60008), 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099), and 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104). It is 1.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 (58916). These deltas are small, meaning the 7945HX3D trades blows with top-tier desktop and mobile chips from the same generation. The real advantage is the 128 MB L3 cache, which the benchmarks alone may not fully capture in latency-sensitive games or database workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` object is empty, and `dataIsMeasured` is false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The CPU’s high single-thread score (1935 in Cinebench R23) and massive L3 cache suggest strong gaming performance, especially in titles that benefit from large caches. The GPU, however, is the limiting factor for gaming, as the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a professional card with a 50th percentile vs all GPUs.

At 1080p ultra settings, the GPU’s 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth would likely deliver playable frame rates in esports titles, but modern AAA games may see 30-60 FPS depending on optimization. At 1440p, expect lower frame rates, possibly 20-40 FPS in demanding titles. At 4K, the 16 GB VRAM helps with texture loading, but the raw compute power is insufficient for high refresh rates. The CPU would not bottleneck in most games, as its single-thread performance is strong, but the GPU’s age (Turing architecture from 2019) limits modern features like ray tracing efficiency.

For high-refresh gaming (144Hz or higher), this pairing is not ideal. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it is average among all GPUs, and its 3072 shading units are modest for 2023-era games. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking ensures that frame rates are not CPU-limited, but the GPU will cap performance. In less demanding games like CS:GO or League of Legends, the CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost and large cache could push frame rates well above 100 FPS, but the GPU’s pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s are the binding constraints. Overall, treat the FPS figures as estimates: expect smooth 60 FPS in older titles at 1080p, but drop settings for newer releases.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a Turing-architecture GPU (chip TU104) built on a 12 nm process at TSMC, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The transistor density is 25.0M per mm². It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU’s base clock is 1035 MHz, with a boost clock of 1530 MHz. It features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. For ray tracing, it has 48 RT cores, and for AI acceleration, it has 384 tensor cores.

The compute performance is rated at 9.400 TFLOPS for FP32 and 18.80 TFLOPS for FP16 (with a 2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs. The TDP is 110 W, and it uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface. The display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning laptop manufacturers choose the ports. The production status is end-of-life, with a release date of 2019-05-26.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile vs all GPUs is 50, meaning it sits exactly in the middle of all GPUs in the database. This is a professional workstation card, not a gaming card, so its strengths lie in compute tasks like rendering and simulation rather than raw gaming frame rates. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for large 3D models or high-resolution textures, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth supports heavy data movement. The tensor cores enable AI denoising and machine learning inference, while the RT cores provide hardware ray tracing, though Turing’s ray tracing performance is slower than newer architectures.

For rendering workloads, the 3072 shading units and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance are adequate for mid-range 3D modeling, but not for high-end animation or complex visual effects. The texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s helps with texture-heavy scenes. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking indicates it is neither a top-tier nor a low-end part—it is a balanced option for professional tasks that require certified drivers and stable compute, but it will not compete with modern gaming GPUs in frame rates.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This pairing is not suited for 144Hz gaming. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 are below what modern titles need for high frame rates at high settings. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU caps performance. Expect estimates of 60 FPS at 1080p in less demanding games, with drops below 30 FPS in AAA titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads handle encoding and gaming simultaneously. The Geekbench multi-core score of 16758 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32782 provide ample headroom for OBS encoding while gaming. The GPU’s tensor cores can also assist with AI-enhanced streaming features, but the GPU’s gaming performance limits the quality of the game feed itself.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. The PassMark multi-thread score of 57476 and integer math score of 201217 accelerate video encoding, color grading, and effects rendering. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM is useful for previewing 4K timelines, but its 50th percentile means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than modern cards. Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32782 suggests smooth 4K editing in software like Premiere Pro, but hardware-accelerated exports will be moderate.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 5600 and R23 score of 32782 are strong for CPU-based rendering in Blender or V-Ray. The GPU’s 3072 shading units and 9.400 TFLOPS support GPU rendering, but the 50th percentile means render times are average. The 16 GB VRAM helps with complex scenes that exceed 8 GB, and the tensor cores can accelerate AI denoising.

Software development: The CPU’s 32 threads handle compilation and virtualization. The PassMark data compression score of 699988 and extended instructions score of 52310 speed up code compilation and cryptographic operations. ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long builds. The GPU’s 12_2 DirectX support is irrelevant for most dev tasks, but the 16 GB VRAM aids in GPU compute for machine learning training.

Student and office work: This is overkill. The CPU’s single-thread score of 4050 in PassMark makes everyday tasks fast, but the 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP mean the laptop will need active cooling. Office suites, web browsing, and spreadsheet work will be instantaneous, but the system’s power draw and noise are unnecessary for such tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is unused in this scenario.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 59641, placing it in the 92nd percentile vs all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Core i9-14900F (60008, -0.6% delta), AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099, -0.8%), AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104, -0.8%), and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 (58916, +1.2%). The CPU’s scores across tests are consistently high: Cinebench R23 multi-core 32782, single-core 1935; Geekbench multi-core 16758, single-core 2769; PassMark multi-thread 57476, single-thread 4050. The 3DMark tests show a 16-thread score of 12459 and a max-thread score of 12936, indicating that the chip scales efficiently up to 16 cores but gains little beyond that.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile vs all GPUs is 50, meaning it is exactly average. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 71, indicating that as a system, it outperforms 71% of all configurations in the database. The CPU is clearly the dominant component, pulling the combined score upward. The GPU’s lack of benchmark data and 50th percentile ranking suggests it is a mid-tier component that does not add significant performance above the average.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is top-tier (92nd percentile) and the GPU is mid-tier (50th percentile). This imbalance means the CPU will not bottleneck any workload, but the GPU will limit gaming and some GPU-accelerated tasks. For CPU-bound workloads like compiling, rendering, or multitasking, the system is excellent. For GPU-bound workloads like gaming or machine learning training, the system is average.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals who need massive CPU throughput and adequate GPU compute. Content creators working with 4K video editing, 3D modeling, or software development will benefit from the CPU’s 92nd percentile performance. The 16-core, 32-thread configuration with 128 MB L3 cache excels in multi-threaded applications like Cinebench R23 (32782) and PassMark multi-thread (57476). The 16 GB GPU VRAM is useful for large datasets in scientific computing or high-resolution textures in rendering.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with mid-range settings will find the GPU adequate, but those seeking high-refresh or 4K gaming should look elsewhere. The CPU’s single-thread performance (1935 in Cinebench R23) supports fast frame times, but the GPU’s 50th percentile caps FPS. Students and office workers will find this system excessive, as the power draw and cost exceed what basic tasks require. Small business workstations running virtual machines, databases, or CAD software will benefit from the ECC memory support and 32 threads.

The target user is a mobile workstation buyer who prioritizes CPU performance over gaming. The CPU’s 92nd percentile vs all CPUs and the GPU’s 50th percentile vs all GPUs create a system that is 71st percentile overall. This is a machine for heavy multi-threaded workloads, not for frame-rate chasing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D has 16 cores and 32 threads.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 128 MB of shared L3 cache, including a 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory capacity and type?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 48 RT cores, but its Turing architecture is from 2019, so ray tracing performance is average.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pair?

A: The combined percentile is 71, meaning it outperforms 71% of all configurations in the database.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data, so all frame rates are estimates.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP?

A: The CPU TDP is 55 W, while the GPU TDP is 110 W.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series (Zen 4, Dragon Range), with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, a Turing-architecture professional GPU. The build class is laptop, indicating this is a mobile workstation configuration. The CPU is in the 92nd percentile vs all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile vs all GPUs. The combined percentile is 71.

The CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock and 128 MB L3 cache make it a top-tier mobile processor, outperforming 92% of all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 59641 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i9-14900F (60008, -0.6%) and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (60099, -0.8%). The GPU, however, is an end-of-life professional card with no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK and a 50th percentile ranking. This is a CPU-first build where the processor drives performance, and the GPU provides adequate compute for professional tasks but not gaming excellence.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU is the dominant component in this pairing. With a 92nd percentile vs all CPUs, it will not bottleneck any workload. The GPU, at the 50th percentile, is the limiting factor for GPU-bound tasks. In gaming, the GPU’s 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth cap frame rates, while the CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost and large cache ensure frame times are low. The FPS scaling from the CPU to GPU is uneven: the CPU can push high frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, but the GPU limits overall output. For example, in a game that is CPU-heavy, the 7945HX3D’s 92nd percentile would allow high FPS, but the GPU’s 50th percentile would cap it. In rendering, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32782 handles CPU-based rendering, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 3072 shading units provide moderate GPU rendering. The bottleneck is the GPU for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks; the CPU is only a bottleneck if a workload is single-threaded, but its single-thread score of 1935 in Cinebench R23 is still high. Overall, the system is balanced for CPU-centric workloads but unbalanced for gaming, where the GPU holds the system back.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds