SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

76%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

59,641 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

1,285 Benchmark Score

Top 24% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

This laptop pairing combines a flagship 16-core Zen 4 processor with a professional Turing-era GPU, creating an unusual split: the CPU sits in the 92nd percentile of all processors while the GPU lands in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. The data shows a system where compute-heavy workloads will thrive, but gaming and graphics tasks will be severely constrained by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile. This is not a balanced build; it is a CPU-centric workstation with a legacy professional GPU bolted on.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 5 nm process, with the Zen 4 architecture under the Dragon Range codename. It packs 17,840 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration, and its 128 MB of shared L3 cache includes a 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice. The base clock is 2.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the chip carries a 55 W TDP. This is a mobile flagship, but the numbers show it performs like a desktop-class part.

Benchmark results confirm this. In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 32,782 points in multi-core and 1,935 points in single-core. The multi-core result places it among the top-tier productivity chips, while the single-core score of 1,935 is competitive for daily responsiveness and lightly threaded applications. Geekbench results reinforce the picture: 16,758 multi-core and 2,769 single-core. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a clear pattern — 2,095 for 2 threads, 3,937 for 4 threads, 7,330 for 8 threads, 12,459 for 16 threads, and 12,936 at max threads. The jump from 8 to 16 threads nearly doubles the score, indicating strong scaling across the 16 physical cores.

PassMark results further detail the CPU's strengths. Integer math scores 201,217, floating-point math scores 121,619, and extended instructions score 52,310. Data compression hits 699,988, while data encryption reaches 42,367. The multithread score is 57,476, and the single-thread score is 4,050. The physics score is 4,321, and random string sorting scores 83,919. These numbers indicate a processor that handles parallel workloads with ease — video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific computation, and database work will all benefit. The 83.2 GB/s dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth and 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU further support high-throughput tasks.

The average benchmark score of 59,641 places this CPU in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster. The Intel Core i9-14900F averages 60,008 (0.6% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX averages 60,099 (0.8% higher), the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX averages 60,104 (0.8% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 averages 58,916 (1.2% lower). In practical terms, the 7945HX3D is statistically indistinguishable from these rivals in average score, though the 3D V-Cache may provide advantages in cache-sensitive workloads that these aggregate scores do not fully capture. The 1.2% lead over the Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 and the sub-1% gaps to the Intel and AMD competitors mean real-world differences will be minimal for most applications.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance here is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor sits at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 7th percentile — a 85-point gap that defines this system's behavior. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, rendering, and data processing, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D will perform at an elite level, with multi-threaded scores that rival desktop parts. But in GPU-bound tasks — gaming, GPU-accelerated rendering, machine learning inference — the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile will be the limiting factor.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,285 is the only graphics benchmark available for this pairing, and it places the GPU at the 7th percentile overall. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 (1,281, 0.3% lower), the AMD Radeon R9 380 (1,293, 0.6% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 (1,267, 1.4% lower), and the NVIDIA NVS 4200M (1,267, 1.4% lower). These are low-end desktop parts from a decade ago, which tells you exactly where the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile stands. It is not a gaming GPU by any modern standard.

The CPU can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them. Even in lightly threaded gaming scenarios, the single-thread score of 1,935 in Cinebench R23 and 4,050 in PassMark ensures the CPU will never be the bottleneck at typical gaming resolutions. The GPU, with its 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth, will saturate long before the CPU breaks a sweat. For professional 3D applications that leverage the GPU's 1,920 shading units, 30 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores, the 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 10.60 TFLOPS FP16 performance are modest by modern standards, but they may still be useful for legacy professional workflows.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for this pairing, so all gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. Treat these as directional guidance rather than verified results.

Given the GPU's 7th percentile standing and its 1,285 Steel Nomad score, gaming performance will be poor by contemporary standards. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, despite its Turing architecture with DirectX 12 Ultimate support, is not designed for gaming workloads. Its nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the GeForce GT 610 and GT 520, which are entry-level parts from 2012 era. At 1080p with low settings, the GPU might manage playable frame rates in older or less demanding titles, but modern AAA games will likely struggle. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is also a limitation for current games that increasingly require 8 GB or more at higher settings.

The CPU's gaming potential is entirely wasted in this configuration. The 128 MB L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost clock would normally make this an exceptional gaming processor, but the GPU cannot translate that potential into frame rates. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be even more constrained. If gaming is a priority, this pairing is not the right choice — the data clearly shows a professional workstation GPU rather than a gaming part.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need extreme CPU performance in a laptop form factor and have professional GPU requirements that align with the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's capabilities. Content creators working with CPU-heavy workloads — video encoding, 3D scene preparation, software compilation — will benefit from the 16-core, 32-thread configuration and the 32,782 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. Developers compiling large codebases will see strong performance from the integer math score of 201,217 and the multithread score of 57,476.

Students and researchers running simulation software, data analysis, or scientific computing will find the CPU's 92nd percentile standing and 59,641 average benchmark score well-suited to their needs. Small business workstations that require professional GPU features like the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores for CAD or legacy professional applications may find this acceptable, though the GPU's 7th percentile ranking suggests it is a low-end professional part. The ECC memory support and dual-channel DDR5 configuration further position this as a workstation-oriented platform.

Gamers should avoid this build. The GPU cannot deliver modern gaming performance, and the CPU's capabilities will go unused in gaming scenarios. Similarly, anyone needing high-end GPU compute for machine learning or modern rendering will find the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile insufficient.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite paints a clear picture of an elite mobile processor. The average benchmark score of 59,641 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900F, scores 60,008, just 0.6% higher — a negligible difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX both score 0.8% higher, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 scores 1.2% lower. These margins are within noise for most workloads.

The GPU's benchmark picture is far less impressive. Its single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,285 places it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals — GeForce GT 610, Radeon R9 380, GeForce GT 520, and NVS 4200M — are all within 1.4% of its score, confirming its position among legacy low-end parts. The GPU's average benchmark score is 1,285, which is the only data point available.

The combined picture is a system at the 50th percentile overall. The CPU's elite performance is dragged down by the GPU's bottom-tier standing, resulting in a laptop that excels at CPU-bound tasks but fails at GPU-accelerated workloads. The 50th combined percentile reflects this split: it is neither a high-end gaming laptop nor a balanced workstation, but a CPU powerhouse with a professional GPU afterthought.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 32,782 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, placing it among top-tier mobile processors.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 59,641. The Intel Core i9-14900F scores 0.6% higher, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and Ryzen 7 8745HX score 0.8% higher, and the Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 scores 1.2% lower.

Q: What is the GPU's benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile scores 1,285 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 7th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: Is this system good for gaming?

A: No. No measured FPS data exists for this pairing, but the GPU's 7th percentile ranking and low benchmark score indicate gaming performance will be poor by modern standards.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and memory support?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and features 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation and reliability-focused workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Turing architecture (TU106 chip) on TSMC's 12 nm process, with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is not supported by the data. The GPU's 7th percentile ranking and 1,285 Steel Nomad score indicate frame rates will be too low for high-refresh displays. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1,935 Cinebench R23 single-core) cannot compensate for the GPU bottleneck.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a 32,782 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, can handle software encoding while gaming, but the GPU's weak performance limits the gaming side. Hardware encoding via the GPU's Turing architecture may help, but the overall gaming experience remains constrained.

Video editing: CPU-based editing and encoding will perform excellently. The 201,217 PassMark integer math score and 57,476 multithread score support fast timeline operations and export times. GPU-accelerated effects will be limited by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile's 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

3D rendering: CPU rendering will be outstanding with a 32,782 Cinebench R23 multi-core score. GPU rendering will be limited by the 7th percentile GPU, making this a CPU-first rendering workstation.

Software development: Compilation and build tasks benefit from the 16-core configuration and 699,988 data compression score. The 4,050 PassMark single-thread score ensures responsive IDE interactions and fast single-threaded tooling.

Student and office work: The CPU's 92nd percentile standing and 59,641 average benchmark score make this overkill for typical office tasks, but the ECC memory support and professional GPU could suit specialized academic workloads. Daily productivity will be exceptionally responsive.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket, so the upgrade path is limited to replacing the entire laptop rather than swapping components. The platform supports DDR5 dual-channel memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and the CPU provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU is an MXM Module with no power connectors, running on PCIe 3.0 x16, and has a TDP of 80 W. The suggested PSU is not specified, but the GPU's 80 W TDP and the CPU's 55 W TDP suggest a modest total system power draw for a laptop.

A sensible next upgrade would involve moving to a newer GPU generation, as the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is end-of-life. The successor to this GPU is the Ampere-MW generation, which would offer better performance. However, given the laptop form factor, the realistic upgrade path is a new laptop with a more balanced CPU-GPU pairing. The CPU itself remains competitive at the 92nd percentile, but the GPU's 7th percentile standing means any meaningful graphics upgrade requires a new system.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, a 16-core Zen 4 mobile flagship, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, a Turing-era professional GPU. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 59,641, while the GPU sits at the 7th percentile with a 1,285 Steel Nomad score. The combined percentile is 50th, reflecting the extreme imbalance between the two components.

The system is best understood as a CPU-first workstation. It excels at multi-threaded compute, software development, and CPU-based rendering, but the GPU's performance places it among legacy low-end parts. For users who need elite mobile CPU performance and have modest professional GPU requirements, this pairing can work. For gamers or those needing modern GPU compute, the data clearly indicates this is the wrong configuration.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds