SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

93 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

59,641 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile pairing represents a laptop configuration where an extreme high-end 16-core processor is combined with a mainstream 60th-percentile GPU. The CPU sits in the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, and the combined build lands in the 78th percentile. This is a machine designed for CPU-heavy productivity workflows rather than maximum gaming frame rates, and the data supports that split identity clearly.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 4050 Mobile’s 63rd percentile standing and its nearest rival comparisons suggest it can handle competitive esports titles well, but it will not push maximum frame rates at high detail in demanding AAA games. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14423 places it just 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 and 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro K6000, indicating a solid 1080p-class performer. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1071 in 3DMark single-thread and 4050 in Passmark single-thread ensures no processor bottleneck in most gaming scenarios, but the GPU will be the limiting factor for frame generation.

Streaming benefits enormously from this CPU. The 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32782, provide abundant headroom for encoding, overlays, and chat applications while the game runs simultaneously. The 92nd percentile CPU ranking means software encoding at high quality settings will have minimal impact on game performance, something lower-core-count systems cannot offer.

Video editing is a primary strength for this build. The Geekbench multicore score of 16758 and Passmark multithread score of 57476 indicate fast timeline scrubbing, preview rendering, and export times. The 128 MB of shared L3 cache, including the 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice, helps with large media files and complex effects stacks. The GPU’s 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth assist with GPU-accelerated effects, though the 63rd percentile GPU score means it will not be the fastest for heavy GPU-accelerated color grading.

3D rendering workloads are heavily CPU-bound, and this CPU excels. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32782 places it just 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-14900F and 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, making it competitive with desktop-class processors. The Passmark floating point math score of 121619 and integer math score of 201217 indicate strong number-crunching for ray tracing and physics simulations. The GPU can assist with CUDA-accelerated rendering, but its 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest compared to the CPU’s raw throughput.

Software development workflows benefit from the CPU’s massive multi-threading. Compilation tasks use the Passmark data compression score of 699988 and random string sorting score of 83919, both indicating fast file operations and code parsing. The 16 cores handle parallel builds efficiently, while the 92nd percentile CPU ranking means even the largest codebases compile quickly. The GPU is less relevant here, but its DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern graphics APIs for testing.

Student and office work is overkill for this hardware, but the data shows it handles such tasks effortlessly. The single-thread score of 2769 in Geekbench and 4050 in Passmark single-thread guarantee snappy application launches and smooth multitasking. The 55W TDP CPU and 50W TDP GPU mean the laptop can run cool and quiet for basic tasks, though the performance headroom is far beyond what spreadsheet or document work requires.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 59641, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900F, scores 60008, only 0.6% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX scores 60099, 0.8% higher. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX is also 0.8% higher at 60104, and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 scores 58916, 1.2% lower. This tight cluster indicates the 7945HX3D is essentially at parity with the best desktop and mobile processors available.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 19049, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6600, scores 19036, just 0.1% lower, while the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 scores 19030, also 0.1% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla K20m scores 19089, 0.2% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation scores 18954, 0.5% lower. This places the RTX 4050 Mobile in the upper-midrange of GPU performance, comparable to desktop GPUs from several generations ago.

The combined build percentile is 78, reflecting the large gap between the CPU’s 92nd percentile and the GPU’s 63rd percentile. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32782 and single-core score of 1935 show exceptional balance between multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The 3DMark thread scaling from 2 threads (2095) to max threads (12936) shows near-linear scaling, confirming the 16-core design is efficiently utilized. The Passmark physics score of 4321 and extended instructions score of 52310 further confirm the CPU’s strength in both legacy and modern workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This socket is not shared with desktop platforms, so upgrades would require a new laptop or motherboard rather than a simple CPU swap. The memory support is DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, which is standard for high-end mobile platforms. ECC memory support is included, which is rare for consumer mobile CPUs and beneficial for workstation tasks.

The PCIe implementation offers Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the fastest NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which provides sufficient bandwidth for its 6 GB GDDR6 memory and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 610M graphics can serve as a fallback display output or for power-saving modes, though the discrete GPU handles all demanding tasks.

The TDP figures are notable: the CPU is rated at 55W and the GPU at 50W, totaling 105W for the core components. The GPU has no power connectors (it draws power through the motherboard), and no suggested PSU is listed because this is a laptop component. The power delivery system in the laptop must handle both components simultaneously, and the 105W combined TDP is modest for a 16-core processor, thanks to the efficient 5nm process node from TSMC. A sensible next upgrade path within this platform would be replacing the GPU with a higher-tier RTX 40-series mobile part, though the CPU would remain the dominant component in any configuration.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p resolution with high refresh rates will find this build sufficient for competitive titles, where the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1071 in 3DMark single-thread) ensures high minimum frame rates. The GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking means it can handle most games at medium to high settings, but it will not sustain high frame rates at 1440p or 4K in demanding titles. The data suggests this is a 1080p gaming machine with excellent CPU headroom.

Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or large data sets will benefit most from this build. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32782 and Geekbench multicore score of 16758 indicate the CPU can handle multi-hour exports and complex simulations. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 140.4 GTexel/s texture rate support GPU-accelerated effects, though the 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits heavy compute tasks.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Passmark data compression score of 699988 and the 16-core/32-thread configuration. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking ensures parallel builds scale well, and the 128 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code. The GPU is secondary here, but its DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with graphics debugging tools.

Students and office workers are over-served by this hardware, but the low 55W CPU TDP means the laptop can run efficiently for extended periods. The single-thread performance of 4050 in Passmark guarantees snappy application responses, and the 63rd percentile GPU handles video playback and basic graphics tasks without strain. Small business workstations running databases or financial models will use the CPU’s multithread score of 57476 and encryption score of 42367 effectively.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It operates at a base clock of 2.30 GHz and boosts up to 5.40 GHz, built on TSMC’s 5nm process with 17,840 million transistors across two 71 mm² dies. The L1 cache is 64 KB per core, L2 is 1 MB per core, and L3 is 128 MB shared, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice. This large L3 cache is the defining feature, providing significant performance boosts for cache-sensitive workloads like gaming and database operations.

The benchmark scores reflect the impact of the 3D V-Cache. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32782 is only 0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-14900F and 0.8% behind the non-X3D Ryzen 9 7945HX, showing that the cache does not harm multi-threaded performance. The single-core score of 1935 in Cinebench R23 and 2769 in Geekbench confirm strong single-thread performance, which is critical for gaming and legacy applications. The 3DMark thread scaling shows excellent efficiency: 2 threads score 2095, 4 threads score 3937, 8 threads score 7330, and 16 threads score 12459, scaling nearly linearly with core count.

The Passmark scores reveal specialized strengths. The data compression score of 699988 and random string sorting score of 83919 indicate excellent memory subsystem performance, aided by the large L3 cache. The encryption score of 42367 and extended instructions score of 52310 show strong cryptographic and SIMD performance. The find prime numbers score of 446 is relatively low, indicating that integer-heavy algorithms may not benefit as much from the cache, but the overall multithread score of 57476 places the CPU firmly in the top 8% of all processors.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is based on the AD107 chip using Ada Lovelace architecture, built on TSMC’s 5nm process with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. It has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1455 MHz and boosts to 1755 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 48 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s.

The RT and tensor cores are present: 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores. These enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the modest 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance limits the complexity of ray tracing workloads. The FP16 performance is identical at 8.986 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, which is unusual and indicates the GPU does not have dedicated FP16 acceleration beyond what the shader cores provide.

The benchmark results show a 63rd percentile GPU. The Passmark G3D score of 14423 places it just 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6600 and 0.1% behind the NVIDIA Tesla K20m. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 show balanced compute performance across APIs. The Passmark DirectX scores are revealing: DirectX 9 scores 184, DirectX 10 scores 79, DirectX 11 scores 130, and DirectX 12 scores 61. This pattern indicates the GPU is optimized for modern APIs, with weaker legacy DirectX performance. The G2D score of 633 shows basic 2D graphics performance is adequate but not exceptional.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the CPU is the dominant component, with a 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 63rd percentile. This creates a significant imbalance for gaming workloads, where the GPU will almost always be the limiting factor. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1071 ensures it can feed the GPU at 1080p, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14423 will cap frame rates at levels well below what the CPU could support with a faster GPU.

For CPU-bound workloads like rendering, video editing, and compilation, the GPU is rarely the bottleneck. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32782 and Passmark multithread score of 57476 provide ample headroom for these tasks, and the GPU’s 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for most GPU-accelerated effects. The combined percentile of 78 reflects this split: the build excels at CPU-intensive tasks but is only average at GPU-intensive gaming.

The FPS scaling evidence supports this analysis. Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, the estimated gaming performance is derived from the GPU’s 63rd percentile and its near-parity with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (0.1% difference). This suggests 1080p gaming at medium-to-high settings is achievable, but the CPU’s massive performance headroom means upgrading the GPU would yield substantial frame rate gains without needing a CPU upgrade.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s performance ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D ranks in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 59641.

Q: How does the RTX 4050 Mobile compare to desktop GPUs?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score of 19049 places it in the 63rd percentile, with performance nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (0.1% difference) and the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (0.1% difference).

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined CPU and GPU pairing achieves a 78th percentile ranking, indicating above-average overall performance but with a significant gap between CPU and GPU capabilities.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D supports ECC memory in its dual-channel DDR5 configuration, which is beneficial for workstation and server-like workloads.

Q: What is the maximum boost clock of the CPU?

A: The CPU boosts up to 5.40 GHz from a base clock of 2.30 GHz, with a TDP of 55W.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s L3 cache size, and how does the 3D V-Cache work?

A: The CPU has 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice. This additional cache sits on top of the standard L3 and helps with latency-sensitive workloads.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D combined with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps entries. All frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile rankings.

The GPU’s 63rd percentile and its 0.1% deltaPct from the AMD Radeon RX 6600 suggest 1080p gaming is the primary target. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU should achieve playable frame rates in most titles, though demanding AAA games may require lowering settings to high or medium. The GPU’s DirectX 12 score of 61 in Passmark indicates modern games using DX12 will perform better than older DX11 titles, which score 130. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures but may struggle with high-resolution texture packs.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 192.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance will limit frame rates significantly. The 63rd percentile ranking means it is below the 78th percentile combined build, indicating the GPU is the weaker component. Competitive esports titles at 1080p with low-to-medium settings should achieve high refresh rates, but the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 14423 caps the ceiling. The CPU’s single-thread performance of 4050 in Passmark ensures no CPU bottleneck in gaming, so any frame rate limitations come directly from the GPU.

The GPU’s 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores enable DLSS and ray tracing, but the 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance means ray tracing will be limited to lower resolutions and settings. DLSS can help recover frame rates by rendering at lower internal resolutions, but the 6 GB VRAM may limit the quality of DLSS presets in some titles.

Build Overview

This is a laptop build (buildClass: laptop) combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, a 16-core Zen 4 processor with 3D V-Cache, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, an Ada Lovelace GPU with 6 GB GDDR6 memory. The CPU holds the 92nd percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, resulting in a combined 78th percentile ranking.

The overall tier of this build is defined by the CPU’s exceptional multi-threaded performance and the GPU’s solid midrange capability. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 59641 places it alongside desktop-class processors like the Intel Core i9-14900F, while the GPU’s average score of 19049 places it in the upper-midrange of mobile GPUs. This is a workstation-class CPU paired with a mainstream gaming GPU, making it ideal for productivity-first users who occasionally game or use GPU-accelerated applications. The 55W CPU TDP and 50W GPU TDP keep power consumption moderate for the performance offered, and the 5nm process nodes for both components ensure thermal efficiency. This pairing is not designed for maximum gaming frame rates; it is designed for CPU-intensive workloads where the GPU is sufficient but not the primary focus.