SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + AMD Radeon 890M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

86%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

59,641 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 890M

9,210 Benchmark Score

Top 14% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D and AMD Radeon 890M form a laptop pairing that is defined by a stark contrast: a 16-core, 32-thread CPU with a 92nd-percentile ranking against all CPUs, paired with an integrated GPU that sits at the 45th percentile among all GPUs. This is not a balanced duo in raw terms, but the data suggests a deliberate design for specific workloads where processor muscle matters more than graphics fidelity. The following analysis relies exclusively on the supplied benchmark results and platform specifications to interpret what this combination offers.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FL1, which is exclusive to the mobile Dragon Range series. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, and the memory bus provides a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This is the single most important upgrade consideration for the Radeon 890M, because the iGPU uses system memory for both its framebuffer and its bandwidth — the "System Shared" memory type and "System Dependent" bandwidth mean that faster or dual-channel DDR5 directly improves GPU performance. A sensible next upgrade would therefore be populating both memory channels with high-frequency DDR5 modules, as the data shows the CPU’s memory bandwidth is a shared resource between the 16 cores and the integrated graphics.

The CPU itself offers PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), which is ample for a high-end mobile SSD or external GPU enclosure, though the iGPU’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8. The 55 W TDP for the CPU and 15 W TDP for the GPU indicate a combined thermal envelope that is modest for a 16-core part, suggesting the system is designed for thick laptops or mobile workstations with adequate cooling rather than ultra-thin chassis. There is no suggested PSU listed, which is typical for an integrated graphics design — the power delivery is handled by the laptop’s internal regulators, and the lack of external power connectors on the GPU confirms this. A practical upgrade path would be adding more DDR5 memory (up to the dual-channel limit) or using the PCIe Gen 5 lanes for a high-speed NVMe drive; the CPU’s unlocked multiplier also allows tuning, though the mobile platform may restrict this.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 890M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 16 ray tracing cores. The boost clock reaches 2900 MHz, while the base clock sits at 400 MHz. Pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s and texture rate is 185.6 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance at 5.939 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same 5.939 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The memory is entirely system-shared, meaning the GPU has no dedicated VRAM — its bandwidth is whatever the system’s DDR5 provides, which the fact pack lists as "System Dependent." This is the critical constraint: the GPU’s raw compute is decent for an iGPU, but its lack of dedicated memory means performance scales with memory speed and channel count.

Benchmark results show a mixed picture. The GPU scores 590 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 37254 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 40808 in Geekbench Vulkan. Passmark results are more granular: 8076 in G3D, 4157 in GPU compute, but notably low in DirectX tests — 33 in DX10, 73 in DX11, 37 in DX12, and 97 in DX9. The G2D score is 979. This pattern suggests the GPU is strong at compute-style workloads (OpenCL, Vulkan) but weaker at legacy DirectX rasterization tasks. The 45th percentile ranking against all GPUs places it near the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (deltaPct -0.1) and slightly below the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 (deltaPct -0.7) and GTX 465 (deltaPct -0.9). For rendering tasks, the 5.939 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is respectable for an iGPU, but the 16 ray tracing cores are a token presence rather than a serious RT solution — expect RT to be a feature that exists but delivers limited frame rates.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are the headline. In Cinebench R23, it achieves 32782 multi-core and 1935 single-core. Geekbench shows 16758 multi-core and 2769 single-core. 3DMark thread tests scale from 1071 (single-thread) to 2095 (2 threads), 3937 (4 threads), 7330 (8 threads), 12459 (16 threads), and 12936 (max threads). Passmark multi-thread is 57476, with single-thread at 4050. The average benchmark score is 59641, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Against nearest rivals, it trails the Intel Core i9-14900F by 0.6%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX by 0.8%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX by 0.8%, while leading the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 by 1.2%. These deltas are all within 1.2%, meaning the 7945HX3D is statistically tied with its closest competitors — the 3D V-Cache (1x 64MB slice) does not create a decisive multi-core advantage in these synthetic tests, though it may help specific cache-sensitive workloads.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 9210, which is 45th percentile. Its nearest rivals are all within 1% — the Radeon Vega 8 (deltaPct -0.1), GTX 960 (deltaPct -0.7), GTX 465 (deltaPct -0.9), and GTX 850M (deltaPct -1). This means the 890M is essentially a mid-pack iGPU, comparable to a low-end discrete GPU from several generations ago. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 69, which is solidly above average but far from the 92nd percentile of the CPU alone — the GPU drags the overall system down. The picture is clear: this is a CPU-first build where the GPU is a secondary consideration, and any workload that leans on graphics will be limited by the iGPU’s 45th-percentile position.

Who Should Build It

The target user is someone who prioritizes CPU-heavy tasks over gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering. The 16-core, 32-thread configuration with a 92nd-percentile CPU rank makes this ideal for software developers compiling large codebases, data analysts running multi-threaded scripts, or students and researchers using computational tools that scale with cores. Content creators who work in video editing will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32782, which indicates strong encoding times, but they will hit a wall with GPU-accelerated effects or 3D rendering that relies on the GPU. Small business workstations for tasks like database management (Passmark data compression score of 699988, data encryption of 42367) or financial modeling would be well served.

For gamers, the story is more limited. The GPU’s 45th percentile means esports titles at low settings or older games at 1080p are feasible, but the lack of measured FPS data (the fact pack contains no measuredFps rows for this combination) means any gaming assessment is estimated. The Radeon 890M’s Passmark G3D score of 8076 is comparable to a GTX 960, so expect playable frame rates at 720p or 1080p with low-to-medium settings in non-demanding titles. This is not a build for high-refresh gaming or AAA titles at high settings. Instead, it suits users who need a portable workstation with occasional light gaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous: the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-related workloads, while the CPU is the limiting factor in purely computational tasks. The CPU’s 92nd percentile versus the GPU’s 45th percentile creates a 47-percentage-point gap, indicating that the iGPU will throttle any graphics-heavy application long before the CPU breaks a sweat. In gaming, the GPU’s low DirectX scores (33 in DX10, 73 in DX11, 37 in DX12) suggest that even at low resolutions, the iGPU will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could drive. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 12459 shows it can handle game logic and physics, but the GPU’s rendering throughput will be the ceiling.

Conversely, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or data processing, the GPU is idle and the CPU’s full 32782 Cinebench R23 multi-core score comes into play. The Passmark integer math score of 201217 and floating point math of 121619 indicate strong number-crunching. The bottleneck shifts based on workload: for gaming or GPU rendering, the 890M is the constraint; for multi-threaded CPU tasks, the 7945HX3D is the star. The combined percentile of 69 reflects this split — it is higher than the GPU alone but lower than the CPU alone, showing that the pairing is only as strong as its weakest link for any given task.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with a Dragon Range codename.

Q: What memory type does the platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and ECC capability, providing a theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: How does the GPU’s performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon 890M’s average benchmark score is 9210, placing it at the 45th percentile. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 by 0.7% and the GTX 465 by 0.9%, while being nearly identical to the AMD Radeon Vega 8 (deltaPct -0.1%).

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The CPU ranks in the 92nd percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 59641.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the Radeon 890M uses "System Shared" memory with a "System Dependent" bandwidth, meaning it relies on the system’s DDR5 memory for both capacity and speed.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combined CPU+GPU percentile is 69, which is between the CPU’s 92nd and the GPU’s 45th percentiles.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the fact pack contains no measuredFps rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing, so all FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

There is no measured FPS data for this combination — the fact pack explicitly lacks measuredFpsUltraByGame rows. Therefore, all gaming performance estimates are derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 590 and Passmark G3D of 8076 suggest that at 1080p with ultra settings, this pairing would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in modern AAA titles. The GPU’s low DirectX 11 score (73) and DirectX 12 score (37) in Passmark indicate that older API-based games may run better than newer ones, but still at modest settings. For esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, which are CPU-light and GPU-moderate, the CPU’s single-thread score of 4050 in Passmark could drive high frame rates at 1080p low settings, but the GPU may still cap them.

At 720p, the GPU’s FP32 compute of 5.939 TFLOPS could handle older games or indie titles at medium settings. The 16 RT cores are present but unlikely to enable meaningful ray tracing performance — expect RT to be a feature that is technically supported but not practically usable at playable frame rates. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7330 ensures that game logic and simulation are not bottlenecks, so any frame rate limitation is purely from the GPU. Users should target 720p or 1080p with low-to-medium settings for anything beyond basic 2D or older 3D games. The system is better suited for cloud gaming or streaming from a more powerful machine than for native AAA gaming.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D with the AMD Radeon 890M. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread part from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture with 128 MB of shared L3 cache (including a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice), manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The GPU is an integrated RDNA 3.5 part on a 4 nm process, with 1024 shading units and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The overall tier is defined by the combined percentile of 69, which places it above average but not in the top tier. The CPU’s 92nd percentile makes this an exceptional processor for compute-heavy tasks, while the GPU’s 45th percentile keeps it in mid-range territory for graphics. This is a workstation-first build with gaming as an afterthought — the data consistently shows the CPU outperforming the GPU by a wide margin across all benchmarks.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 Dragon Range architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 128 MB of shared L3, which includes a 1x 64MB 3D V-Cache slice. The transistor count is 17,840 million across a die size of 2x 71 mm². Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with ECC, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The CPU’s benchmark scores are uniformly strong: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 32782, single-core of 1935, Geekbench multi-core of 16758, and single-core of 2769. Passmark results show 57476 multi-thread and 4050 single-thread.

The 92nd percentile ranking reflects this performance, with an average benchmark score of 59641. The nearest rivals are all within 1.2% — the Intel Core i9-14900F at 60008 (-0.6%), AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX at 60099 (-0.8%), AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60104 (-0.8%), and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 at 58916 (+1.2%). The 3D V-Cache appears to provide no multi-core advantage in these synthetic tests, but it may improve performance in cache-sensitive workloads like gaming or certain scientific simulations. The CPU’s real-world value lies in its 16 cores and 32 threads, which excel in multi-threaded tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering (CPU-based), software compilation, and data analysis. The single-thread score of 4050 in Passmark indicates strong responsiveness for daily tasks and lightly-threaded applications.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is the weakest scenario. The GPU’s 45th percentile and low DirectX scores mean that even at 1080p low settings, frame rates would be modest — likely below 60 FPS in most modern titles. The CPU could drive high frame rates, but the iGPU caps it. Esports at 720p low might achieve playable numbers, but this is not a high-refresh gaming machine.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming or performing other tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32782 ensures that encoding won’t starve other workloads. However, the GPU’s lack of dedicated encoding hardware (not specified in the fact pack) means software encoding via the CPU is the primary path, which this CPU handles well.

Video editing: CPU-based editing and encoding will be fast, with the multi-core score of 32782 and Passmark integer math of 201217 supporting quick timeline operations. GPU-accelerated effects or color grading will be limited by the 890M’s 45th percentile, causing slowdowns in GPU-dependent tasks. Proxy workflows or CPU-only editing are recommended.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles on CPU) will be strong due to the 16 cores and 128 MB L3 cache. GPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles on GPU) will be poor — the 890M’s FP32 of 5.939 TFLOPS is far below any discrete GPU, and the 16 RT cores are insufficient for modern RT-heavy scenes.

Software development: Excellent. The 32 threads and high multi-core scores (Geekbench 16758, Passmark multi-thread 57476) make compilation and testing fast. The ECC memory support is a plus for long-running builds or server-like workloads.

Student and office work: Overkill but capable. The single-thread score of 4050 in Passmark and 2769 in Geekbench single-core handle spreadsheets, documents, and browsing with ease. The 890M handles 2D graphics and basic GPU acceleration for office applications, with a Passmark G2D score of 979. Battery life is not specified, but the 55 W CPU TDP suggests a large battery or constant power connection.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + AMD Radeon 890M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

AMD Radeon 890M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds