SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

59,641 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + AMD Radeon 780M: A Flagship CPU Paired with an Integrated GPU

This laptop build pairs AMD's flagship mobile processor, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, with the Radeon 780M integrated graphics. The combination is unusual: a 16-core, 32-thread CPU with 3D V-Cache designed for maximum compute performance, alongside an IGP that, while capable for integrated graphics, sits at the 61st percentile of all GPUs. The data reveals a system where the CPU is the dominant component by a wide margin, with the GPU acting as a functional but secondary partner. This pairing suggests a specific use case: maximum CPU throughput for demanding workloads where graphics acceleration is secondary or where an external GPU is anticipated.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance imbalance in this pairing is stark, and the benchmark data quantifies it clearly. The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 59,641, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The GPU, meanwhile, scores an average of 17,588, sitting in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. This creates a scenario where the CPU is, for most graphics-bound tasks, the component waiting on the GPU. In gaming, the Radeon 780M will be the primary bottleneck, as its compute and rendering capabilities are far below what the CPU can feed. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,071 in 3DMark and 1,935 in Cinebench R23 indicate it can handle any game logic or physics calculations with ease, but the GPU's 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will limit frame generation.

The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload. For purely CPU-bound tasks like data compression (699,988 in PassMark) or encryption (42,367 in PassMark), the CPU is the star, and the GPU is irrelevant. For 3D rendering or gaming, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 for the GPU highlights its modest DirectX 12 performance, which will struggle to maintain high frame rates at any resolution above 1080p. The FPS scaling is therefore dictated entirely by the GPU's capabilities, not the CPU's. The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with 128 MB of L3 cache, mean it will never be the cause of a frame rate drop; instead, the GPU will cap performance at a level far below what the CPU could theoretically support.

The system's memory configuration further compounds this. The GPU uses "System Shared" memory, meaning its bandwidth is "System Dependent." With the CPU supporting dual-channel DDR5 at 83.2 GB/s, the GPU will share this bandwidth, which is a fraction of what a discrete GPU would have. This shared memory architecture means that memory-intensive tasks on the GPU will contend with CPU memory access, potentially reducing overall system performance in mixed workloads. The data implies that this is a system for compute-heavy tasks first, with graphics as a convenience rather than a primary function.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional across the board. In 3DMark tests, it scores 12,459 with 16 threads and 12,936 with max threads, showing excellent scaling from 16 to 32 threads (a 3.8% increase). The single-thread score of 1,071 is strong, and the 2-thread score of 2,095 indicates efficient multi-threading at low thread counts. Cinebench R23 results are particularly telling: a multicore score of 32,782 and a single-core score of 1,935. The multicore score places this processor among desktop-class performers, despite its 55 W TDP. Geekbench scores of 16,758 (multi-core) and 2,769 (single-core) corroborate this, showing a balanced design that excels in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded workloads.

The CPU's nearest rivals highlight its competitive position. It trails the Intel Core i9-14900F by just 0.6% and the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX by 0.8%, while leading the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 by 1.2%. These are marginal differences, indicating that the 7945HX3D is at the very top of the mobile CPU hierarchy. The PassMark scores reinforce this: multi-thread at 57,476, integer math at 201,217, and floating-point math at 121,619 are all top-tier figures. The data compression score of 699,988 is particularly notable, suggesting exceptional performance in archiving and file management tasks.

The GPU's benchmarks are more modest but still respectable for an integrated solution. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 places it in a low-performance tier, but this is expected for an IGP. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 18,602 and 33,683, respectively, show that the GPU can handle compute tasks reasonably well for an integrated part. The GPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.2% faster) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.3% faster), which is surprising given the RTX 4060 is a discrete GPU. However, this is based on average benchmark scores across a limited set of tests, and the 780M's performance is likely more variable in real-world scenarios. The combined percentile for this build is 77, reflecting the strong CPU but weaker GPU.

FAQ

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900F?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D trails the Intel Core i9-14900F by 0.6% in average benchmark score, making them statistically equivalent in performance. The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59,641 on average, while the i9-14900F scores 60,008.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile, and what does that mean for gaming?

A: The Radeon 780M sits in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, which indicates it outperforms about 61% of GPUs in the database. For gaming, this means it can handle esports and older titles at 1080p with moderate settings, but it will struggle with modern AAA games at high settings.

Q: Is the CPU's 128 MB L3 cache beneficial for gaming?

A: Yes, the 128 MB shared L3 cache, which includes a 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice, is designed to reduce memory latency and improve gaming performance. This can provide a significant boost in games that are sensitive to cache size, though the GPU will still be the limiting factor in this pairing.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the Radeon 780M uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it draws from the system's DDR5 RAM. The bandwidth is "System Dependent," so performance will vary based on the system's memory configuration and speed.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP, and how does it affect cooling?

A: The CPU has a 55 W TDP, which is relatively low for a 16-core processor. This suggests that a capable cooling solution can manage it effectively, though sustained workloads may still generate significant heat.

Q: What generation is the GPU architecture?

A: The Radeon 780M is based on RDNA 3.0, which is AMD's third-generation RDNA architecture. It features 12 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, indicating modern feature support despite its integrated nature.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU's single-thread score in Cinebench R23 is 1,935, while its multicore score is 32,782, a ratio of about 17:1. This indicates excellent multi-thread scaling across its 16 cores, while single-thread performance remains strong for everyday tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: This is not a suitable pairing for high-refresh gaming. The Radeon 780M's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 indicates it will struggle to reach 60 FPS in most modern titles at 1080p, let alone high refresh rates like 144 Hz. The CPU is more than capable of processing game data, but the GPU will bottleneck frame rates severely. Esports titles with low graphical demands might achieve playable frame rates, but this is not a gaming-first build.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads are excellent for streaming, as they can handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously without breaking a sweat. The PassMark multi-thread score of 57,476 supports this. However, the GPU's limited performance means that streaming gameplay will be constrained by the game's frame rate, making this a poor choice for streaming modern games. For streaming non-gaming content or light games, it would work well.

Video Editing: The CPU's performance is outstanding for video editing. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,782 and Geekbench multicore of 16,758 indicate rapid rendering and encoding times. The 128 MB L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU's modest compute (8.909 TFLOPS) can assist with effects and previews, but it won't accelerate rendering as much as a discrete GPU would. For 1080p or light 4K editing, this is a capable system.

3D Rendering: In CPU-based rendering (e.g., Blender Cycles with CPU), this system excels. The 16-core, 32-thread CPU with a 3DMark max-thread score of 12,936 will render scenes quickly. The GPU's 12 RT cores provide some ray-tracing acceleration, but its performance is limited compared to discrete GPUs. For GPU-based rendering, the 780M will be slow, making this a CPU-rendering workstation.

Software Development: The CPU's high single-thread and multi-thread scores (1,935 and 32,782 in Cinebench R23) make it ideal for compiling code, running virtual machines, and executing test suites. The PassMark integer math score of 201,217 suggests strong performance in algorithm-heavy tasks. The GPU is sufficient for basic UI rendering and 2D graphics, making this a solid development machine.

Student and Office Work: For document editing, web browsing, and spreadsheet work, this system is overpowered. The CPU's single-thread score of 4,050 in PassMark ensures snappy responsiveness, while the GPU handles 2D graphics with ease. The 55 W TDP means it can run on battery efficiently, though the high-performance CPU may drain battery quickly under load. This is a premium, albeit overkill, office machine.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is built on TSMC's 5 nm process node, with a transistor count of 17,840 million across two 71 mm² dies. The base clock is 2.30 GHz, boosting up to 5.40 GHz, which is remarkable for a mobile chip. The 128 MB shared L3 cache, including a 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice, is the defining feature, designed to reduce memory latency and boost performance in cache-sensitive workloads.

The benchmark scores position this CPU at the top of the mobile market. Its 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms this. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 32,782 is 7.3% higher than the single-thread score of 1,935, demonstrating strong scaling. The 3DMark tests show a clear progression from 2 threads (2,095) to 16 threads (12,459) to max threads (12,936), indicating efficient thread management. The PassMark data compression score of 699,988 is particularly impressive, suggesting this CPU excels in compression and decompression tasks, likely due to the large cache.

The CPU's memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a consumer chip and indicates a workstation-oriented design. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 28 lanes provides ample bandwidth for high-speed storage and external GPUs. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics serve as a basic display output, but the system under analysis uses the more powerful Radeon 780M. The CPU's TDP of 55 W is low for its performance class, suggesting it can be cooled in thin-and-light laptops, though sustained boosts may push thermals.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process node. It has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, along with 12 RT cores for ray tracing. The boost clock is 2900 MHz, which is high for an IGP, contributing to its 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The memory is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's DDR5 RAM, with bandwidth dependent on the system configuration. This is a significant limitation for graphics performance, as shared memory bandwidth is far lower than discrete VRAM.

The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its integrated nature. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 is low, indicating limited DirectX 12 performance. Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 18,602 and 33,683 show that compute workloads are handled reasonably well, but these are not indicative of gaming performance. The GPU's 61st percentile ranking means it outperforms a majority of GPUs in the database, but this includes many older or entry-level parts. The pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s are modest, limiting fill-rate-bound scenarios.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is adequate for an IGP. The TDP of 15 W is minimal, and it requires no power connectors, making it a low-power solution. The 12 RT cores provide some ray-tracing capability, but performance will be limited due to the shared memory and overall low compute throughput. For rendering, this GPU can handle basic 2D and light 3D workloads, but it is not suitable for demanding graphics tasks.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers who play at 1080p with low graphical settings or focus on esports titles might find it acceptable, but the GPU's limitations make it unsuitable for high-resolution or high-fidelity gaming. Content creators who work primarily in CPU-intensive applications like video encoding, software compilation, or data analysis will benefit most. The 128 MB L3 cache and high multi-thread scores make it ideal for tasks that involve large datasets or complex algorithms.

Software developers who compile large codebases, run multiple virtual machines, or perform data processing will find the CPU's performance exceptional. The PassMark integer math score of 201,217 and floating-point score of 121,619 indicate strong computational throughput. Students in engineering or computer science fields who need a portable yet powerful machine for simulations or coding would also benefit, though the GPU's limitations may hinder graphics-intensive coursework.

Small business workstations that handle data analysis, financial modeling, or server-like tasks can leverage the CPU's power. The ECC memory support and 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allow for expansion with high-speed storage or external GPUs. The 55 W TDP makes it suitable for laptops that need to balance performance with portability. However, users who need gaming or 3D rendering performance should consider a discrete GPU, as the 780M will be a bottleneck in those scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is socketed in AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range platform. This limits CPU upgrades to other FL1 socket processors, potentially within the same generation. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel configuration, and the system can support ECC memory. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes provides ample bandwidth for modern NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures. The GPU, being integrated, cannot be upgraded independently; users must replace the entire motherboard or system to get a better GPU.

The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, but the CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 15 W TDP indicate a modest total power draw. This suggests that a laptop with this build will have efficient power delivery and potentially long battery life under light loads. For upgrading, the most sensible path would be to add an external GPU via the PCIe lanes, though this would require a compatible enclosure. Alternatively, users can upgrade storage to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives to take advantage of the CPU's high-speed interface. Memory upgrades to faster DDR5 modules would also benefit the GPU, as its performance is "System Dependent" on memory bandwidth.

The platform's production status is "Active," meaning it is currently supported and likely to receive driver and BIOS updates. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though this may be limited in a laptop form factor. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x8 interface is sufficient for an IGP, but it limits potential external GPU performance compared to a x16 slot. Overall, the upgrade path is limited by the integrated nature of the GPU, but the CPU's high performance ensures it will remain relevant for years.

Build Overview

This build classifies as a laptop, combining a flagship mobile CPU with an integrated GPU. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor with 3D V-Cache, designed for maximum CPU performance. The AMD Radeon 780M is an RDNA 3.0 integrated GPU with 12 RT cores, offering competent but not exceptional graphics performance. The combined percentile of 77 indicates that this build outperforms 77% of all CPU-GPU combinations in the database, though this is largely driven by the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking.

The pairing is unusual: it pairs a processor that rivals desktop-class chips in multi-threaded performance with a GPU that is merely average for integrated graphics. The data suggests this is a compute-first system, where the GPU serves as a functional display output and light graphics accelerator rather than a gaming or rendering powerhouse. The CPU's 128 MB L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost clock make it a top-tier mobile processor, while the GPU's 8.909 TFLOPS and 61st percentile ranking place it as a mid-tier integrated solution. This build is best suited for users who need maximum CPU throughput in a portable form factor, with graphics being a secondary consideration.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps rows for the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D with the Radeon 780M. All frame rate expectations are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores of both components.

Given the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480, which is in the low-performance tier, gaming performance will be modest. At 1080p with low to medium settings, the Radeon 780M can likely achieve playable frame rates (30-60 FPS) in less demanding titles like esports games or older releases. For modern AAA games at 1080p, frame rates will likely drop below 30 FPS, especially at high settings. The GPU's 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 12 RT cores suggest it can handle some ray-tracing at low resolutions, but the shared memory bandwidth will severely limit its effectiveness.

The CPU's performance will have no impact on gaming frame rates in this pairing, as the GPU will be the limiting factor in almost all scenarios. The 128 MB L3 cache may help in games that are cache-sensitive, but this benefit will be masked by the GPU's constraints. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be completely overwhelmed, and gaming will not be viable. For users who intend to game on this system, the expectation should be for casual or esports-level gaming at 1080p, with the understanding that the CPU is vastly more capable than the GPU. External GPU support via the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes would be the only way to unlock the CPU's full gaming potential.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D + AMD Radeon 780M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

AMD Radeon 780M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds