SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation pairing is a high-end laptop configuration that presents a stark performance dichotomy. The CPU is a top-tier mobile powerhouse, ranking in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU, despite its professional-class name and specifications, benchmarks in the 21st percentile, placing it far below typical gaming graphics cards. This combination results in a system with exceptional processing and compute capabilities, but its gaming potential is severely constrained by the GPU, making it a niche platform for specialized professional workloads rather than a balanced gaming machine.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX?

A: The Ryzen 9 7945HX sits in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 92% of processors in the database. Its average benchmark score is 60099, placing it statistically on par with the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, which scores 60104, and the Intel Core i9-14900F, which scores 60008. It is slightly ahead of the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D by 0.8%.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation compare to other GPUs?

A: The GPU's benchmark performance is in the 21st percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 3596. This puts it in the same performance class as the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (3594), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (3629), and the AMD Radeon HD 6770 (3649). It is essentially on par with these older, lower-tier cards, which is surprising for a professional mobile GPU.

Q: What kind of memory support does the CPU offer?

A: The Ryzen 9 7945HX supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature often valued in professional and workstation environments for data integrity.

Q: What is the architecture of the CPU and GPU in this build?

A: The CPU is based on AMD's Zen 4 architecture, codenamed "Dragon Range," and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The GPU is based on NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture, uses the AD103 chip, and is also built on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this specific build?

A: The combined CPU and GPU pairing achieves a 57th percentile ranking. This reflects a system that is dragged down by the relatively weak GPU performance, despite the CPU's top-tier 92nd percentile standing.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W, while the GPU has a TDP of 120 W. The system's power supply headroom can be inferred from these figures, as the suggested PSU is not specified.

Q: Is the measured FPS data available for this build?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data available for this exact CPU and GPU combination. All gaming performance figures discussed are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the components.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data reveals a profound imbalance. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX achieves an average benchmark score of 60099, placing it in the 92nd percentile. This is a flagship-level result, with the processor matching the average score of the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60104) and the Intel Core i9-14900F (60008). In contrast, the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation scores a mere 3596 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, placing it in the 21st percentile of all GPUs. This score places it directly in the same bracket as legacy cards like the GeForce GTX 1050 (3629) and the Radeon HD 6770 (3649), which are generations old. The combined percentile for this build is 57, which is a direct result of the high-performing CPU being paired with a GPU that performs like an entry-level part from a previous era.

This data paints a clear picture: the system's compute potential is immense, but its graphics rendering capabilities are not in the same league. The CPU is a champion, but the GPU is a significant bottleneck for any graphics-intensive task. The 21st percentile GPU ranking is a critical data point that defines this pairing as a workstation CPU matched with a GPU whose benchmark performance is far below what one would expect from a modern "RTX 5000" series part.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, specifically from the "Dragon Range" family. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, built on a 5 nm TSMC process. Its benchmark results are exceptional across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 33459 in multi-core and 1940 in single-core. The multi-core score indicates massive parallel processing power for rendering, compiling, and other heavily threaded tasks. For instance, the Passmark Multi-thread score of 54548 and the Passmark Integer Math score of 207524 confirm its dominance in compute-heavy workloads.

The single-thread performance is also strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2391 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1940. This suggests excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and solid performance in lightly threaded applications. The CPU also excels in specialized tasks, with a Passmark Data Compression score of 707249 and a Data Encryption score of 42703. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache and support for 83.2 GB/s of DDR5 memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput for the processor's 16 cores. In the context of its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7945HX is effectively tied with the Ryzen 7 8745HX and the Intel Core i9-14900F, but it holds a 0.8% advantage over the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, which is notable given the 3D variant's focus on gaming cache.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data shows a severe bottleneck scenario where the GPU is the limiting factor for all graphics-related workloads. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and high scores in multi-threaded tests like Cinebench R23 (33459) indicate it can feed data much faster than the GPU can process it for visual output. The GPU's 21st percentile rank, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, is comparable to the GeForce GTX 1050, which is a low-end card from several generations ago. This means in any game, the frame rate will be determined by the GPU.

The CPU will likely be underutilized in gaming scenarios, as it will be waiting for the GPU to complete its rendering tasks. However, in non-graphics workloads such as video encoding, software compilation, or 3D rendering, the CPU's immense power (e.g., Passmark Floating Point Math score of 123390) will be fully utilized, and the GPU's role may be less critical. The imbalance is stark: the CPU is a professional-grade, high-end part, while the GPU's benchmark performance places it in the entry-level segment. This dynamic means the system is balanced for compute tasks where the CPU is the primary engine, but wildly unbalanced for gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile "Dragon Range" processors. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, which offers high bandwidth for future NVMe storage and other peripherals, though the GPU itself connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC support being a key feature for workstation use. The CPU's TDP is a modest 55 W, which is low for a 16-core part, suggesting the system can be cooled with a capable laptop cooler.

The GPU has a TDP of 120 W and does not require additional power connectors, as it is an IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) type solution soldered onto the motherboard. Because this is a laptop (buildClass), the upgrade path is essentially non-existent for the GPU and CPU. The primary sensible upgrade for this platform would be increasing the amount of DDR5 memory, as the CPU's memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s would benefit from dual-channel operation. There is no suggested PSU data, but the combined 55W CPU and 120W GPU TDP suggests a standard high-end laptop power brick is sufficient.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is not for gamers. The GPU's 21st percentile rank makes it unsuitable for modern gaming at any resolution, as it will struggle to deliver playable frame rates. Instead, this build targets professionals who need immense CPU compute power on the go. This includes software developers who compile large codebases, data scientists running simulations, and students in engineering or scientific fields who require heavy multi-threaded processing. The CPU's high Passmark Multi-thread score of 54548 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 make it ideal for these tasks.

For small business workstations handling complex financial modeling, video transcoding, or 3D modeling in CPU-based renderers, this pairing offers high performance. However, for GPU-accelerated tasks like 3D rendering in Octane or Blender, or for machine learning training, the GPU's low benchmark score makes it a poor choice. The system is a specialized CPU-centric workstation, and its target user is someone who prioritizes processor performance over everything else and does not rely on the GPU for professional work.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features the AD103 chip. It has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, along with 76 RT cores and 304 Tensor cores. It is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. The clocks are set at a base of 1425 MHz and a boost of 2115 MHz, with memory running at an effective 18 Gbps. The theoretical compute figures are high, with an FP32 performance of 41.15 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 236.9 GPixel/s.

Despite these impressive specifications, its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596 is remarkably low, placing it in the 21st percentile. This score is virtually identical to the GeForce GT 545 (3594) and the GeForce GTX 1050 (3629). This suggests that, while the hardware is present on paper, the benchmark results indicate that the performance is severely limited, likely due to power constraints or driver issues in the mobile implementation. The 16 GB of VRAM and the high bandwidth are beneficial for large datasets in professional applications, but the raw rendering throughput, as measured by the benchmark, is not competitive with modern consumer GPUs. The RT and Tensor cores are present, but their real-world impact is not reflected in the single available benchmark score.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system (buildClass: "laptop") that pairs the top-tier AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation. The CPU is a monster, but the GPU's benchmark performance is a serious liability. The combined percentile of 57 is a mediocre result, dragged down entirely by the GPU's 21st percentile ranking. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking shows it is one of the best mobile processors available, but the GPU negates any potential for high-end graphics performance.

This is not a balanced gaming machine; it is a CPU-centric workstation with a GPU that happens to be included. The "RTX 5000" name suggests professional capability, but the 3DMark score of 3596 tells a different story, placing it in the same league as 10-year-old graphics cards. The overall tier is a mid-range system (57th percentile) that will excel in CPU-intensive tasks like code compilation and scientific computing, but will fail to deliver a modern gaming experience. It is a niche product for a specific professional who needs maximum CPU power and does not care about GPU-accelerated graphics performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the database. Therefore, all gaming performance figures here are estimates based on the individual component benchmark scores, and should be treated as such. The GPU's benchmark performance is the primary indicator for gaming capability.

Given the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, which places it in the 21st percentile and on par with the GeForce GTX 1050, the estimated gaming performance is expected to be very poor for modern titles. At 1080p with ultra settings, the system would likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS in most modern AAA games. At 1440p or 4K, the performance would be even worse, likely falling below playable frame rates in all but the oldest or least demanding games. The CPU's high single-thread score (Geekbench 2391) ensures that it will not be a limiting factor at these low frame rates, but the GPU will be the absolute bottleneck.

The 16 GB of VRAM is ample, but the rendering power is not there to use it effectively in gaming. The RT and Tensor cores are present, but with the GPU's low overall score, enabling ray tracing or DLSS would likely result in a significant performance hit that the GPU cannot handle. In summary, this is not a gaming laptop. The estimated frame rates are low across the board, and the system is unsuitable for any serious gaming use case.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds